ライフサイエンスコーパス: local community

1 d local extinction of species on the island (local community).

2 g with elected officials and engaging in the local community.

3 pecies, when tested on host species from the local community.

4 capacity personnel, who are engaged from the local community.

5 on of patients and their families from their local community.

6 mily members and healthy volunteers from the local community.

7 the service is tailored to the needs of the local community.

8 eories explaining the assembly mechanisms of local communities.

9 ween the health sector, rubber industry, and local communities.

10 hysical and/or competitive differences among local communities.

11 osure prophylaxis (PrEP) on HIV incidence in local communities.

12 fragmentation and habitat loss, that isolate local communities.

13 ction of different prey species in different local communities.

14 and the history of species colonization into local communities.

15 er niches were subsequently more dominant in local communities.

16 f the introduction and persistence of RSV in local communities.

17 ces that serve low-income populations across local communities.

18 entify contaminants which actually impact on local communities.

19 ial value at stake when conflict erupts with local communities.

20 the network structure are restricted to some local communities.

21 s is a high priority to federal agencies and local communities.

22 s engaging with, and providing benefits for, local communities.

23 s, which can affect the welfare of dependent local communities.

24 ollective environment-altering properties of local communities.

25 , but 82% gave approval for the study in the local community; 137 attendees completed the additional

26 lant diversity from 2000 to 2014 at both the local community (5 m(2)) and landscape (27 km(2)) scales

27 A billboard ban thus offers local communities a legal avenue to help curb the rising

28 RSA) abscesses may reflect the prevalence of local community-acquired MRSA (CAMRSA).

29 subjects were also recruited using targeted local community advertisements based on patients' county

30 ent can bring infusions of money and jobs to local communities, an array of risks to community-level

31 he landscape, with unknown repercussions for local communities and biodiversity conservation.

32 However, the phylogenetic clustering of local communities and deterministic processes that gover

33 of as public goods that can be exploited by local communities and drive diversification, for example

34 cts may facilitate coexistence in asymmetric local communities and generate unimodal species abundanc

35 s that dispersal among habitat patches links local communities and is a key "regional" process that m

36 varied in predator identity, dispersal among local communities and the history of species colonizatio

37 ortant consequences for the assembly of both local communities and the regional species pools from wh

38 ing analyses that are customary in their own local community and significantly different from those i

39 Patients who resided outside of our local community and who had medical admissions to the in

40 Asynchrony of species increased stability of local communities, and asynchrony among local communitie

41 and biogeography asserts that an island or a local community approaches an equilibrium species richne

42 Local communities are assembled from larger-scale specie

43 In general, we find that local communities are characterized by fewer higher taxa

44 Local communities are more robust to disturbance because

45 background of globally low endemism of AMF, local communities are shaped by regional processes inclu

46 the prevalence of TMP-SMX resistance in the local community are important steps in choosing an appro

47 polyphagous but that most plant species in a local community are resistant to any given pathogen.

48 These results highlight the need for local, community-based investigations about periodontal

49 how that even though no small mammals in the local community became extinct, species losses and gains

50 individuals to form coalitions transcending local community boundaries.

51 explain species diversity and composition in local communities but their relative importance remains

52 ion is not only how many species can inhabit local communities, but also which biological traits dete

53 , the variation in species composition among local communities, but empirical tests remain limited.

54 suggest that awarding formal land titles to local communities can advance forest conservation.

55 lung cancer and 56 controls identified from local community centers and frequency matched to the cas

56 f locations, including general hospitals and local community centers.

57 of the national context, project design, and local community characteristics affect these measures of

58 ership over larger forest commons patches to local communities, coupled with payments for improved ca

59 t communities, result not only in changes to local community diversity of floral-dependent species, b

60 ters on an asymmetric extension of Hubbell's local community dynamics, while an analogous extension o

61 y of local communities, and asynchrony among local communities enhanced metacommunity stability by a

62 It was showed that all local communities exhibit a highly diversified potential

63 ance by granting indigenous groups and other local communities formal legal title to land.

64 d HF to a single outpatient clinic serving a local community from January 1, 2001, through December 3

65 Future management of local community function and ecosystem services thus rel

66 nk community with a greedy optimization of a local community function conductance.

67 In the spring of 1990, local community health workers reported a measles outbre

68 ry academic center after receiving care in a local community hospital and 2) control patients who pre

69 rred that their family members remain at the local community hospital.

70 Patients arriving at local community hospitals (LOCs) benefit from stabilizat

71 uting role of native species dispersal among local communities in mediating these relationships remai

72 rs) and 166 controls recruited mainly from a local community in Maryland.

73 In addition, some characteristics of the local community in which projects are conducted, such as

74 We excluded local community initiatives and programs that received f

75 control at all levels from policy making to local community involvement.

76 not the answer, and that in fact support of local communities is far more important than some govern

77 be relatively few, species turnover in some local communities is predicted to be high (>40% of speci

78 Species assemblage in a local community is determined by the interplay of evolut

79 d-in patients are transitioned back to their local community is unknown.

80 ct design, particularly capacity-building in local communities, is associated with success across all

81 he impact of gender, and collaborations with local communities, labour organisations, and indigenous

82 led large scale patterns by including at the local community level information about species distribu

83 pansion, it is important to understand which local communities may face the greatest barriers to acce

84 tion of the relative abundance of species in local communities occurred despite decadal stability in

85 raphic phylogenetic structure, and show that local communities of Inga and regional communities of al

86 tive to microbial communities, considering a local community of co-occuring organisms as a sample fro

87 tions, such as small-scale turbines owned by local communities or organizations, turbine placement is

88 Local communities, particularly the poorest households,

89 child's only exposure was from swimming in a local community pool.

90 he likely host range of plant pathogens in a local community, providing an important tool for plant e

91 y threatened socio-ecological systems, where local communities rely heavily on aquatic animal protein

92 We argue that local communities restrict their consumption of forest p

93 that landscape management, which recognizes local community rights to customary community use areas,

94 matches in perceptions by the scientific and local communities risk undermining sensitive, but import

95 ng dissimilarly through time) of species and local communities stabilised metacommunity ecosystem fun

96 th species' habitat distributions, and hence local community structure and composition, even millions

97 ive rise to spatial and temporal patterns in local community structure.

98 f fragmentation studies that have focused on local community structure.

99 dary demarcation, and direct compensation to local communities, suggesting that even modest increases

100 bilize conservation efforts but also corrode local community support.

101 es turnover, fynbos is made up of dissimilar local communities that are species-rich but relatively p

102 etter colonizers of available space, whereas local communities that degrade their environment shrink

103 Local communities that improve their environmental condi

104 n opportunity to evaluate the involvement of local communities that still perform TMC in the national

105 lies and act as advocates for changes in the local community that support access to physical activity

106 changes in species abundance in established local communities to assess the full consequences of cli

107 hat adequate geographic access exists across local communities to serve new enrollees.

108 bly processes can be elucidated by comparing local communities to variously circumscribed species poo

109 patients in apparently good health from the local community to present four cases (two of presumed t

110 n of relative species abundance (RSA) in the local community under restricted immigration.

111 orking harmoniously in laboratories and with local communities was essential for rapid success in 197

112 Additionally, asynchronous responses among local communities were linked with species' populations

113 tacommunity (Fisher's log series) and in the local community, where there are fewer rare species.

114 the degrees of isolation and exchange among local communities within these ecological landscapes.

115 acterial metacommunity were observed (within local communities, within habitats and at the metacommun