ライフサイエンスコーパス: logarithm

1 ow the functional forms of these generalized logarithms are related to the asymptotic scaling behavio

2 he risk of developing psychiatric disorders [logarithm (base 10) of odds = 7.1].

3 ies of the five BFRs named above, given on a logarithm basis, were found to decrease linearly with th

4 In the multivariate logarithm-binomial regression model adjusted for baselin

5 letter studies on how the parameters in the logarithm conformal mapping control the cloaking effect.

6 d from the first kind and the second kind of logarithm conformal mappings are reduced to 9.779 and 12

7 oprotein cholesterol, each 1 unit of natural logarithm (Ln) triglycerides elevation was associated wi

8 tion of time; however, EBOV viremia was 0.94 logarithm (log) copies per ml (cp/ml) (P = 0.011) higher

9 With this foundation, the difference of logarithms, log A - log B = log A/B, provides a natural

10 years, and the mean visual acuity was 20/71 (logarithm minimum angle of resolution [logMAR], 0.55).

11 Linear behaviour was observed for logarithm NFX concentration against Hue+Lightness.

12 near dependence of emission intensity on the logarithm of analyte (K(+)) concentration was obtained f

13 The logarithm of BA partial pressures correlated significant

14 The sensor response increased linearly with logarithm of concentration of target DNA in the range 1x

15 ssed the relationship between VFQ-25 and the logarithm of contrast sensitivity (logCS), using Spearma

16 erive and validate the combined ITPD/logCAC (logarithm of coronary calcium) scores.

17 of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), logarithm of CS (log[CS]), and log(s) values were determ

18 nt variation is directly proportional to the logarithm of cTnI concentration between 5.0pgmL(-1) and

19 gnal demonstrated a linear relationship with logarithm of Dam concentration ranging from 0.075 to 30U

20 thm of relative transmission and the natural logarithm of dark-field scatter signal were plotted on a

21 y between the electrochemical signal and the logarithm of dsDNA-T concentration over the range from 1

22 H (hazard ratio [HR]/SD increment of natural logarithm of fasting hs-GH) was independently associated

23 PBA electrode has a linear dependence on the logarithm of Hb(A1c) concentration ranging from 0.975 to

24 ric (DPV) stripping signal of silver and the logarithm of HER2 concentrations was obtained in the ran

25 he sensor exhibited a linear response versus logarithm of IL-8 concentration from 900 fg/ml to 900 ng

26 r correlation between matrix effects and the logarithm of matrix concentration (or dilution factor) u

27 At 3 months, the mean logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) best-c

28 Mean visual acuity (VA) improved from 0.8 logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) preope

29 Significant improvement in VA in logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) was ac

30 corrected visual acuity (BCVA), expressed in logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (logMAR), and c

31 ity decreased from 1.3 preoperatively to 1.6 logarithm of minimal angle of resolution at last follow-

32 Logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) best-c

33 For all patients, the average pretreatment logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) was 0.

34 n measures (near, intermediate, and distance logarithm of minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] visual

35 cuity (VA; mean better-eye VA, 0.43 vs. 0.08 logarithm of minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]) and c

36 roportion of eyes that improved vision by 10 logarithm of minimum angle of resolution letters.

37 l acuity (BCVA) was between 0.3 and 1.0 on a logarithm of minimum angle of resolution visual chart.

38 In the CMO group, mean BCVA (in logarithm of minimum angle of resolution) improved modes

39 naesthesiologists, and obstetricians and the logarithm of MMR, and we explored the correlation for an

40 ding free energy increased linearly with the logarithm of monovalent cation concentration for several

41 andedness in the 22q13 region [heterogeneity logarithm of odds (HLOD) = 2.18].

42 n genomic regions with initial heterogeneity logarithm of odds (HLOD) scores of >/=2.0.

43 and stem volume mapped to 11 linkage groups (logarithm of odds (LOD) >/= 2.5), and explained 2.7-18.5

44 (chr15q11-13) and found support for linkage (logarithm of odds (LOD) 2), with a prominent parent-of-o

45 43 at 119 cM) and 9q21 (non-parametric pairs logarithm of odds (LOD) 3.4 for rs722642 at 78 cM) using

46 howed suggestive linkage in the same region [logarithm of odds (LOD) = 2.80].

47 esulting in 27 linkage groups with a minimum logarithm of odds (LOD) of 8 and maximum recombination f

48 gene locus on chromosome 5q35 with a maximum logarithm of odds (LOD) score of 6.79.

49 ied the strongest linkage evidence with CaD (logarithm of odds = 2.9) on chromosome 8p21.1 in AAs.

50 dentified a single quantitative trait locus (logarithm of odds = 31) on chromosome 6.

51 kers on 1p32.3 in the GLIS1 gene (rs6663966, logarithm of odds [LOD]=3.7), 1q32.1 near CHIT1 (rs75308

52 QTL on chromosome 9, named Bglu17 [26.4 cM, logarithm of odds ratio (LOD): 5.4], and 3 suggestive QT

53 chromosome 1q23.3 to 1q24.3 (non-parametric logarithm of odds score 2.9, model-based logarithm of od

54 ntified a single linkage signal with maximum logarithm of odds score 3.01 at 4p16.2-p16.1, correspond

55 se-associated locus on chromosome 4 (maximal logarithm of odds score 4.4 at D4S2971; theta = 0).

56 ric logarithm of odds score 2.9, model-based logarithm of odds score 4.99, theta=0 at D1S2768).

57 gle significant locus on chromosome 16p13.2 (logarithm of odds score 6.5).

58 14.1 was the most significant (heterogeneity logarithm of odds score = 3.38).

59 egion on chromosome 6q12-6q16 (heterogeneity logarithm of odds score = 3.9), under a recessive diseas

60 known DCM genes with a maximum heterogeneity logarithm of odds score of 1.74.

61 obtained a significant multipoint parametric logarithm of odds score of 3.3 on chromosome 6p, and who

62 -megabase recessive locus at 12q21.33 with a logarithm of odds score of 3.92.

63 F6 AIL confirms the rp2 QTL with an increase logarithm of odds score of 5.

64 n on chromosome 17 with a maximum multipoint logarithm of odds score of 6.01.

65 with the affected phenotype, and cumulative logarithm of odds score reached 6.03, establishing linka

66 t EEM was linked to the 6q24 region (maximum logarithm of odds score, 3.64).

67 n 5 (LRP5) gene segregated with the disease (logarithm of odds score, 4.62) but was not observed in m

68 ome-wide multipoint linkage peak, multipoint logarithm of odds, 1.59.

69 s affected with DCM in 7 of 17 DCM families (logarithm of odds, 2.99); 2 of these 7 families also had

70 m logarithm of odds=3.1) and to 14q (maximum logarithm of odds=2.3).

71 i (QTLs) for CIMT to chromosomes 7p (maximum logarithm of odds=3.1) and to 14q (maximum logarithm of

72 the strongest linkage support at 4q35 (LOD [logarithm of odds] score, 3.69), and the GWAS of age at

73 n, we compared the slopes of odds ratios for logarithm of pack-years in a model for men and women com

74 nergy change (DeltaDeltaG) is counted as the logarithm of relative probability of mutant amino acids

75 o evaluate the diagnostic value, the natural logarithm of relative transmission and the natural logar

76 ciations between specific pesticides and the logarithm of RTL, adjusting for age at buccal cell colle

77 ship between the stripping peak currents and logarithm of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) concentrations

78 The Logarithm of Slope (LOS) kinetic model was used to analy

79 CMRs and natural logarithm of SMRs were pooled by the method of the inver

80 , the explanatory variables also include the logarithm of solute vapor pressure, the solubility param

81 ls fit on 381 eligible subjects, the natural logarithm of SpG-adj maternal BPA concentration was inve

82 tionship between the current intensities and logarithm of ssDNA concentrations in the range from 0.1n

83 Logarithm of surface fluxes, on the other hand, was foun

84 llary flow distance scales with the negative logarithm of target concentration and have detected stre

85 at pHs above the indicator pKa (the negative logarithm of the acid dissociation constant).

86 age sensitivity, expressed as a slope of the logarithm of the blocker residence time as a function of

87 on constant (Ki) correlated with neither the logarithm of the catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km) nor cata

88 ivity relationship was uncovered between the logarithm of the chain transfer rate constants and the Z

89 The response obtained is proportional to the logarithm of the concentration of glucose, with a sensit

90 eterodyne signal increases linearly with the logarithm of the concentration of target oligonucleotide

91 near range (R(2) approximately 98%) with the logarithm of the concentration of the analyte comprising

92 the Nernst equation and proportional to the logarithm of the concentration ratios.

93 The logarithm of the equilibrium constant is plotted versus

94 17.7 and show a linear correlation with the logarithm of the exchange rates.

95 two linear regimes when plotted against the logarithm of the force-loading rate.

96 logy and the linear relationship between the logarithm of the fragment ion abundance ratio and the op

97 f Fe(CN)(6)(3-) by Hb is proportional to the logarithm of the Hb concentration.

98 For the viral enzyme the logarithm of the inhibition constant (Ki) correlated wit

99 The logarithm of the integrated correlation score showed the

100 hese potentials are found to change with the logarithm of the ion activity, in complete analogy to io

101 lish that Q(T) and C(peak) increase with the logarithm of the lateral wall area (A(LW)) and determine

102 The logarithm of the litter-air equilibrium partitioning coe

103 ECL intensity was linearly dependent on the logarithm of the mercury(II) concentration from 0.2 to 1

104 d with scleral lens wear, from 0.32 +/- 0.37 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) (m

105 r type 1 closure improved significantly from logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) 1.

106 ve complications, and pre- and postoperative logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) be

107 ty improved significantly from 1.18 +/- 0.42 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) un

108 eyes, mean visual acuity improved from 0.57 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) un

109 mean +/- standard deviation of 0.63 +/- 0.36 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) un

110 rected visual acuity at presentation was 1.0 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) un

111 We assessed the difference between logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) vi

112 A negative correlation was found between the logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) vi

113 ve corrected visual acuity was 0.48 +/- 0.23 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR), 0

114 Mean BCVA was 0.28 +/- 0.3 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR).

115 nths, 76% of patients achieved a UDVA of 0.1 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR; Sn

116 3 months, visual acuity improved a mean 0.31 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (range, -0.

117 rt) in the IFN beta group versus a mean 0.09 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (range, 0.1

118 Mean BCVA improved from 20/340 (logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution [logMAR] 1.

119 es included best-corrected visual acuity (in logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution [logMAR] un

120 spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA; in logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution [logMAR] un

121 an BCVA improved in both groups (0.41+/-0.39 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution [logMAR] vs

122 orrelation was found between this figure and logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution at any post

123 /- 0.65 in aphakic children to 0.55 +/- 0.51 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution in pseudoph

124 in the EndoGlide eyes as compared with 0.15 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution in the Busi

125 sual acuity was similar in both groups (0.13 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution in the Endo

126 est-corrected visual acuity improved by 0.10 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution units (P <

127 nitial and final examinations (0.37 +/- 0.48 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution units [Snel

128 ution units [Snellen 20/47] vs 0.28 +/- 0.34 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution units [Snel

129 ability of visual acuity improvement (>/=0.3 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution units impro

130 distance visual acuities were -0.09 +/- 0.12 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution units with

131 lution units with the V4b and -0.07 +/- 0.11 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution units with

132 Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) in logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution units, intr

133 d with a 2-line loss of visual acuity (+0.19 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution units; 95%

134 significantly at the end of follow-up (0.30 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution units; Snel

135 operative best-corrected visual acuity (0.82 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution units; Snel

136 Mean preinjection logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution visual acui

137 hin a gain or loss of 1 line, mean change in logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution visual acui

138 Mean logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution visual acui

139 Mean logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution visual acui

140 Mean logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution visual acui

141 Visual acuity of 20/30 or worse (0.2 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution) and macula

142 l best-corrected visual acuity of 20/40 (0.3 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution) or better

143 l best-corrected visual acuity of 20/40 (0.3 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution) or better,

144 uity compared with non-Nocardia ulcers (0.21 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution; 95% confid

145 ution; 95% confidence interval, 0.09 to 0.33 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution; P = .001).

146 Baseline VA was 0.44 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (2

147 The mean preoperative baseline logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (S

148 standard deviation improved from 0.45+/-0.19 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (S

149 BCVA in group A by a mean reduction of -0.11 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) af

150 e suture removal, BSCVA averaged 0.09+/-0.72 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) an

151 Mean BCVA was 0.33+/-0.23 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) an

152 Mean UCVA was 0.67 +/- 0.52 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) at

153 statistically significant difference in the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) BC

154 Median BCVA improved from 0.90 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) be

155 At 1 month, the mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) in

156 Visual acuity (VA) in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) le

157 The CDVA improved by an average of 5.0 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) le

158 , although mean differences were less than 1 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) li

159 Twelve eyes had a final VA of 0.4 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) or

160 Visual acuity was 0.18 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) or

161 not understand non-Snellen formats, such as logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR) or

162 ences were observed in VA measured using the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) sc

163 s, with a mean increase in VA of 0.26 on the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) sc

164 surgery, mean CDVA improved from 0.48+/-0.45 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) to

165 VA improved significantly from 0.47 +/- 0.05 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) un

166 or PK relative to no intervention was -0.613 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) un

167 Mean CDVA before CXL was 0.5 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) un

168 Mean preoperative BCVA was 0.68 +/- 0.29 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) un

169 The CDVA was 0.17 +/- 0.09 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) un

170 mean BSCVA after treatment was 1.295 +/- 0.5 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) un

171 pia was defined as IAD of 2 lines or more in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) un

172 The mean postoperative BCVA was 0.24+/-0.29 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) un

173 age-corrected visual acuity measurements in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) un

174 The CDVA improved by an average of 5.7 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) un

175 f are defined as change in MacDQoL score per logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) un

176 Mean baseline logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) VA

177 The logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) VA

178 er reading charts and was compared with near logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) VA

179 The median presenting logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) VA

180 Mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) VA

181 Most patients had VA decrease, with logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) va

182 umber; OR, 1.00-6.30; P < 0.001), and poorer logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) vi

183 The minimum data set included: age, logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) vi

184 Outcome measures were monocular logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) vi

185 significant negative correlation between the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) vi

186 calcification, central macular thickness, or logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) vi

187 tive error in diopters, and visual acuity in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) we

188 e CDVA in the tPRK-CXL group was 0.26+/-0.17 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), a

189 y and the precapsulotomy and postcapsulotomy logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), l

190 worse mean preoperative BCVA (0.55 vs. 0.36 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), P

191 nd at last presentations were 2.2 and 0.0625 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), r

192 rrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 1.39+/-0.64 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), w

193 he median extent of visual recovery was 0.18 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR).

194 ith treatment relative to baseline were 0.24 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR).

195 rrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 1.11+/-0.59 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR).

196 median visual acuity for the cohort was 0.39 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR; ra

197 ine in visual acuity from an average of 0.23 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR; Sn

198 eline, mean study eye visual acuity was 0.56 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR; st

199 ual outcomes (12-month median visual acuity, logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] 0.

200 nt improvement in visual acuity at 3 months (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] 0.

201 7% and visual acuity improved significantly (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] 0.

202 Median BCVA was 20/30 (mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] 0.

203 ffer between patients undergoing DSAEK (0.35 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] [9

204 hat UCDVA was better in the toric IOL group (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] me

205 not change significantly (BCVA, 0.77+/-0.62 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] pr

206 visual acuity (BCVA; mean BCVA, 1.22+/-0.81 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] un

207 uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA; measured in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] un

208 vision loss (P = .04) (hazard ratio, 1.7 per logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] un

209 Interval and final visual outcomes (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] vi

210 and the 234 eyes without SD (0.253 +/- 0.14 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] vs

211 ffected eye had worse mean CDVA (1.14+/-0.79 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] vs

212 rected distance visual acuity [CDVA] </=0.34 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]) a

213 acuity on average was better in CSNB1 (0.30 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]) t

214 ) for decade 1 eyes to be worse (2.05+/-1.29 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]) t

215 Working Group criteria), and visual acuity (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]) w

216 l visit was 20/60 (range, 20/400-20/25; 0.48 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]),

217 to 1 year postconversion for visual acuity (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]),

218 were corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA, logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]),

219 betic Retinopathy Study line (-0.17 +/- 0.11 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR], s

220 eyes required no regraft (BSCVA, 0.27+/-0.28 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]; C

221 Postoperative BCVA (mean, 0.378+/-0.487 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]; S

222 EAD Acuity Chart (Precision Vision) (0.4-1.3 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution at 40 cm),

223 Mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution baseline UC

224 of subjective refraction was measured with a logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution chart using

225 Visual Acuity system, and a subset using the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution chart.

226 Mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution initial vs.

227 A mean change in visual acuity of +5.5 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution letters (95

228 Mean VA increased by +5.3 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution letters fro

229 In group 1, logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution mean UDVA a

230 rvals, the mean improvement in CDVA was 0.07 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution or 3.5 lett

231 y, with a visual acuity decline rate of 0.03 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution per year.

232 ter 24 months, the median BCVA was 1.15 on a logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution scale (20/2

233 A) was measured at 4 and 1 m using a reduced logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution tumbling E

234 nimum angle of resolution units to 1.3+/-0.7 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution units (P =

235 solution units before surgery to 0.90+/-0.30 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution units 12 mo

236 Mean BSCVA improved from 1.27+/-0.44 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution units befor

237 Visual acuity was converted to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution units for a

238 ificantly improved the BCVAs {from 1.8+/-0.7 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution units to 1.

239 age was 48.2 +/- 12.6 years and mean BCVA in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution units was 0

240 confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.12 per 0.10 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution units), old

241 and 24 months was 0.16, 0.11, 0.08, and 0.04 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution units, resp

242 The mean distance BCVA was 0.81+/-0.29 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution units.

243 corrected visual acuity measured 0.14+/-0.26 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution units.

244 Change in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution VA (mean +/

245 Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution VA and log

246 The mean change in the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution VA at 3 yea

247 gnificant group differences in the change in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution VA before s

248 final VA measurement, the median presenting logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution VA improved

249 perative visual acuity (22% vs. 32% with 0.4 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution vision or w

250 ted for covariates, eyes with ERM had a mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acui

251 Mean preoperative logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acui

252 Statistically significant improvements in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acui

253 e was associated with poorer vision (rise in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acui

254 The mean (SD) logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acui

255 a mean best-corrected visual acuity of 1.13 (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) for surviv

256 diseases) and eyes with reduced vision (<0.1 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) or with lo

257 The mean logMAR (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) visual acu

258 The average preoperative VA was 1.9+/-0.5 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution.

259 nificant difference for aspheric IOLs (-0.01 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution; 95% confid

260 4 weeks, respectively, and the corresponding logarithm of the minimum angles of resolution (logMAR) V

261 in which each site contributes a term to the logarithm of the modeled IC50.

262 eter space and is strongly determined by the logarithm of the mutational bias parameter.

263 that for the abiotic reduction of NACs, the logarithm of the NACs' rate constants correlate with one

264 it achieves a query time that scales as the logarithm of the number of records in practice on genomi

265 Other suggestive NPL and logarithm of the odds (LOD) scores were attained from fa

266 t quantitative trait locus on chromosome 11 (logarithm of the odds = 7.4) to a missense mutation in c

267 out of six affected individuals; parametric logarithm of the odds score = 1.14).

268 y outcome, poor study design or quality, and logarithm of the odds score less than 3.

269 disease yielded a statistically significant logarithm of the odds score of 3.44 for chromosome 2p13

270 The combined logarithm of the odds score was 3.46.

271 se locus to chromosome 7q21.1-q31.1 (2-point logarithm of the odds score: 4.64; theta=0); in this reg

272 ith a dominant inheritance pattern (combined logarithm of the odds score: 9.5).

273 Signals of the logarithm of the odds to the base 10 (LOD >/= 3) were de

274 major loci on chromosomes 1 and 7 with LOD (logarithm of the odds) scores = 6.1 and 8.1, respectivel

275 The natural logarithm of the Olive tail moment (OTM) was plotted for

276 orm displayed a linear relationship with the logarithm of the paraoxon concentrations in the range of

277 s linearly proportional to the change of the logarithm of the primary ion activity is obtained.

278 ux-force relationship, which states that the logarithm of the ratio between the forward and reverse f

279 tive linear correlations between the natural logarithm of the reduction rate constants and DeltarG.

280 ensing that sensation is proportional to the logarithm of the stimulus intensity is observed between

281 t oligonucleotide was linear with respect to logarithm of the target oligonucleotide concentration in

282 The logarithm of the total probability of a MSA under a stoc

283 ar range, between peak current intensity and logarithm of TMP concentration between 1.0 x 10(-6) and

284 MI z score and in analyses that examined the logarithm of urinary BPA concentration and the prevalenc

285 by fitting a linear relationship between the logarithm of viscosity and the volume fractions of suspe

286 d in dependence of fluorescence intensity on logarithm of zinc ions concentration in extraordinary wi

287 proach would accumulate evidence in units of logarithms of likelihood ratios (logLR) to a desired lev

288 lope, 0.80 +/- 0.08) is observed between the logarithms of the inhibition (Ki) and Michaelis (Km) con

289 ong linear correlation was found between the logarithms of the stability constants of the Cu complexe

290 There was no association between logarithm periostin and age or sex, although levels were

291 such that 76% of results agreed within +/-1 logarithm (rS=0.85; P<.0001).

292 d aptamer-biosensor responded linearly, on a logarithm scale, over the concentration range 1 x 10(1)

293 derive a complete theory of the generalized logarithms that naturally arise from the violation of th

294 and total urine arsenic concentrations, LOD [logarithm (to the base of 10) of the odds] scores indica

295 ers, to estimate the associations of natural logarithm transformed creatinine-corrected urinary vanad

296 The distribution of periostin and logarithm-transformed periostin levels was derived, and

297 (adjusted OR per unit change in mean natural logarithm-transformed ratio of telomere repeat copy numb

298 eride level (RR per 1-SD decrease in natural logarithm-transformed triglyceride level, 1.17 [95% CI,

299 rcent reduction in the beta coefficient (the logarithm used to calculate the hazard ratio [HR]) was c

300 where the solute retention factors or their logarithms vary linearly with time.

301 umber that satisfies the law of the iterated logarithm yet exhibits pairwise bias toward repeated val