ライフサイエンスコーパス: loud

1 ent modalities (auditory and visual: "red," "loud").

2 slower than controls when forced to read out loud.

3 The effects of loud (105-dB) noise stress were examined on a spatial wo

4 Hamsters exposed to a loud 2- or 10-kHz tone in 1 ear often shifted their resp

5 In response to a series of loud acoustic stimuli, HR rats were faster to begin voca

6 orders of magnitude for a sample of 76 radio-loud active galaxies.

7 ' acceptance of the technique has been heard loud and clear.

8 We evaluated the impact of glaucoma on out-loud and silent reading.

9 A random sequence of equiprobable loud and soft speech sounds and bright and dim checkerbo

10 ated macular degeneration (AMD) on short out-loud and sustained silent reading speeds, and reading co

11 ut power enables thermoacoustic emissions at loud audible sound pressure levels of 90.1 dB, which are

12 Loud auditory stimuli were found to enhance reaction tim

13 such accelerated release can be elicited by loud auditory stimuli--a phenomenon known as 'StartReact

14 le-body musculature in response to a sudden, loud auditory stimulus, and PPI is the inhibition of aco

15 Loud bangs, bright flashes, and intense shocks capture a

16 petite-conditioning experiments in mice, the loud bell used to signal food presentation unexpectedly

17 inant left hemisphere were easily spoken out loud, but could not be written.

18 ght hemisphere, she could not speak them out loud, but could write them with her left hand.

19 also distinguish between soft-but-nearby and loud-but-distant sounds, indicating that distance proces

20 ural observations, gelada males responded to loud calls according to both their own and their opponen

21 Theropithecus gelada) males have conspicuous loud calls that may function as a signal of male quality

22 "Leader" males with harems putatively use loud calls to deter challenges from non-reproductive "ba

23 National Park, Nigeria, in which male alarm/loud calls were presented either alone, or following aco

24 ix healthy subjects were made in response to loud clicks presented to either ear.

25 ted (no conversational response, rousable by loud command).

26 hat the jet-launching regions of these radio-loud galaxies are threaded by dynamically important fiel

27 tic resonance imaging while awake) generated loud high frequency inspiratory sounds (HFIS, defined as

28 ional Reading Speed Text (IReST) passage out loud, maximum out-loud MNRead chart reading speed, susta

29 t that repeatedly switches between quiet and loud, midbrain neurons accrue experience to find an effi

30 d Text (IReST) passage out loud, maximum out-loud MNRead chart reading speed, sustained (30 minutes)

31 and participating in workouts accompanied by loud music (odds ratio = 2.84, 95% confidence interval:

32 .79, 95% CI: 1.11, 2.89), as did exposure to loud music (OR = 2.25, 95% CI: 1.20, 4.23).

33 sis that listeners with frequent exposure to loud music exhibit deficits in suprathreshold auditory p

34 The results demonstrated that a history of loud music exposure can lead to a profile of peripheral

35 30) have a history of frequent attendance at loud music venues where the typical sound levels could b

36 ed for seizure susceptibility by exposure to loud noise (an alarm bell) for 60 s.

37 aring their own vocalizations by exposure to loud noise after 35 d of age, before which they had been

38 imodal stress) with those of restraint or of loud noise alone.

39 association between occupational exposure to loud noise and acoustic neuroma.

40 ng stress was observed immediately after the loud noise but a similar increase in yawning 20 min afte

41 o the lateral amygdala blocked freezing to a loud noise but not to the male.

42 in the inner ear as a result of exposure to loud noise can lead to irreversible deafness.

43 The results from studies of loud noise exposure and acoustic neuroma are conflicting

44 y period of 13 or more years since the first loud noise exposure from any source was 2.12 (95% CI: 1.

45 The authors found that individuals reporting loud noise exposure from any source were at increased ri

46 duration of occupational and nonoccupational loud noise exposure of 146 acoustic neuroma cases and 56

47 f an increased risk of acoustic neuroma with loud noise exposure support previous research.

48 measured during an additional and drug-free loud noise exposure test.

49 he pathological events that follow intensely loud noise exposures and ischemia-reperfusion injury.

50 tual extinction procedure following repeated loud noise exposures failed to restore the habituated HP

51 drenal axis response habituation to repeated loud noise exposures is not derived from the auditory co

52 sibly by muscimol injections during repeated loud noise exposures to determine if brainstem or midbra

53 Importantly, habituation to repeated loud noise exposures was also prevented by reversible au

54 its putative role in habituation to repeated loud noise exposures, in rats.

55 t habituation-related plasticity to repeated loud noise exposures.

56 segment of a foreground sound is deleted and loud noise fills the missing portion, listeners incorrec

57 Exposure to loud noise from leisure activity without hearing protect

58 Exposure to loud noise from machines, power tools, and/or constructi

59 Exposure to occupational loud noise has been previously identified as a possible

60 ent study was to further examine the role of loud noise in acoustic neuroma etiology.

61 The effects of the lesions were specific to loud noise insofar as corticosterone release in response

62 at HPA axis response habituation to repeated loud noise lasted for at least 4 weeks in rats.

63 ynaptic functions, before acute and repeated loud noise or restraint exposures.

64 rats were exposed to inescapable tail shock, loud noise or restraint, and the effect on alpha(1d) ADR

65 to 3 weeks later, injected animals underwent loud noise stress, and their brains were processed for f

66 k in which the winner blasted the loser with loud noise through headphones.

67 Mice exposed to hours-long restraint or loud noise were modestly or minimally impaired in novel

68 sociations between leisure-time exposures to loud noise without hearing protection and acoustic neuro

69 These mice have a normal startle reflex to loud noise, a normal sense of balance, a normal auditory

70 dent memory of concurrent, hours-long light, loud noise, jostling and restraint (multimodal stress) w

71 est ("foreground" sound) is interrupted by a loud noise, subjects perceive the entire sound, even if

72 eground" sound) is interrupted (occluded) by loud noise, the auditory system restores the occluded in

73 reased freezing to the male rat but not to a loud noise, whereas infusion into the lateral amygdala b

74 the RPa and PaMP that were colocalized with loud noise-induced Fos expression.

75 ed by fear-potentiated startle response to a loud noise.

76 d un-conditioned reflex elicited by a sudden loud noise.

77 d corticosterone release normally induced by loud noise.

78 tion disrupts stress habituation to repeated loud noise.

79 exposures reduce acute HPA axis responses to loud noise.

80 upts acute HPA axis response specifically to loud noise.

81 erone in response to the perceived threat of loud noise.

82 its, including fetching tendency and fear of loud noises, while other traits revealed negligibly smal

83 ed epilepsy and have seizures in response to loud noises.

84 sing acronyms, such as lol for "laughing out loud," or clippings such as msg for "message." The prese

85 e many harmonic overtones of even moderately loud playing may become inaudible with earplugs to a lif

86 Every radio-loud quasar may have blazar activities, according to a u

87 both optical and radio observations of radio-loud quasars are the result of different viewing angles.

88 nd supports the unification scheme for radio-loud quasars.

89 Tests of out loud reading do not accurately reflect silent reading sp

90 trols and 64 glaucoma subjects had their out loud reading evaluated with the MNRead card and an Inter

91 the correlation of these two measures of out loud reading speed with each other (r = 0.72).

92 MNRead was used to assess short-duration out-loud reading speed.

93 10-87), and comparisons of sustained and out loud reading speeds demonstrated proportional error in B

94 owler monkeys (Alouatta spp.), which produce loud roars using a highly specialized and greatly enlarg

95 ry of sleep apnea or >/= 2 hallmarks of OSA: loud snoring, daytime sleepiness, witnessed apnea, and h

96 Exposure to loud sound (acoustic overexposure; AOE) induces hearing

97 ning of each trial and delivers increasingly loud sound blasts to the participants, successfully prov

98 Exposure to loud sound causes cochlear damage resulting in hearing l

99 ntral auditory pathway occurring weeks after loud sound exposure.

100 ensory conduction time, we estimate that the loud sound reduced the central visuomotor processing tim

101 Exposure to loud sound reduces presynaptic zinc levels in the DCN an

102 lear nucleus (DCN) shortly after exposure to loud sound that produces hearing loss.

103 e to the environmental challenge of a sudden loud sound, and that the response can be restored in Plg

104 e of rats to randomly presented, inescapable loud sound, referred to as sound stress, increases centr

105 CR to visual stimuli paired with an aversive loud sound, whereas amygdala patients failed to do so.

106 in auditory impairment following exposure to loud sound.

107 ifier and mediates protection on exposure to loud sound.

108 ed to various traumas, the most common being loud sound.

109 kin conductance, and pupil area responses to loud sounds (multivariate p = .007) compared with trauma

110 In contrast, some neurons respond to loud sounds by adjusting their response functions away f

111 nses in SWS compared with wakefulness, while loud sounds evoked similar responses in SWS and wakefuln

112 etics (which recover over 2 months) and that loud sounds reversibly modify excitatory synapses in the

113 Acoustic trauma (AT, loud sounds) slow AMPAR-EPSC decay times, increasing Glu

114 , (b) to avoid presentation of uncomfortably loud sounds, and (c) to ensure that subjects have contro

115 ore symptom of FXS is extreme sensitivity to loud sounds.

116 ption and emotional salience of tinnitus and loud sounds.

117 ement observed for soft and conversationally loud speech (all 52-dB and 62-dB conditions, P</=.001).

118 Larger heart rate responses to sudden, loud (startling) tones represent one of the best-replica

119 ct proximally and proximal reaction times to loud stimuli correlated with gait and postural disturban

120 stimulus is presented immediately before the loud stimulus.

121 ophysical loudness adaptation to comfortably-loud sustained tones; and (ii) physiological adaptation

122 subjects listened to a series of 15 sudden, loud tone presentations while heart rate, skin conductan

123 that larger heart rate responses to sudden, loud tones represent an acquired sign of PTSD rather tha

124 ents and 23 cognitively normal controls to a loud, unexpected acoustic startle stimulus (115-dB burst

125 of auditory feedback by chronic exposure to loud white noise (WN).

126 g juvenile zebra finches or exposing them to loud white noise throughout the sensitive period for son

127 ird groups following a nonspecific stressor (loud white noise) for a period of 1 hr, determining whet

128 rocedure in which one tone (CS+) predicted a loud white noise, whereas a second tone (CS-) was presen

129 dy in which one tone (CS+) was paired with a loud white-noise UCS and a second tone (CS-) was present