ライフサイエンスコーパス: low back

1 ptive field was in the intact muscles of the low back.

2 f acupuncture for conditions such as chronic low back and knee pain.

3 ered were: classic SMS (n = 5, involving the low back and lower extremities), variant SMS (n = 2, lim

4 utcome measures included lifetime history of low back and neck pain (using a range of increasingly st

5 llion (UI, $82.7 billion-$92.9 billion), and low back and neck pain accounted for the third-highest a

6 ing on diabetes, ischemic heart disease, and low back and neck pain accounting for the highest amount

7 Spending on low back and neck pain and on diabetes increased the mos

8 Low back and neck pain are critical public health proble

9 current US national prevalence estimates of low back and neck pain exist and few studies have invest

10 aemic heart disease, chronic kidney disease, low back and neck pain, and depressive disorders; the la

11 s have investigated the associations between low back and neck pain, psychological factors, and healt

12 disease, and the leading cause of DALYs was low back and neck pain.

13 of a multidimensional approach to examining low back and neck problems and suggests the need for fur

14 Generally, adults with low back and/or neck pain reported more comorbid conditi

15 se capacity (-2.0 +/- 2.1 ml/kg per minute), low-back and hamstring flexibility (-4.7 +/- 1.6 cm), an

16 approximately 15 years in the evaluation of low-back and lower extremity pain.

17 d between lift availability and work-related low-back and shoulder pain.

18 internal loads and perhaps increased risk of low back disorders.

19 the near infrared (NIR) region are ideal for low back-ground in vivo imaging.

20 The 250 patients had low back, hip, or knee pain for 3 months or longer and a

21 Implementing a selective approach to low back imaging, as suggested by the American College o

22 Low back injuries are common and costly, accounting for

23 Acute low back injuries are described in a cohort of about 31,

24 5.5 years of follow-up, 360 workers reported low back injuries, for a rate of 21.2 injuries per 1000

25 ucational program to prevent work-associated low back injury found no long-term benefits associated w

26 d an educational program designed to prevent low back injury in a randomized, controlled trial involv

27 the hopes of preventing costly and disabling low back injury in employees is becoming common in the w

28 The unadjusted low back injury rate per million work hours was 1.6 time

29 education program did not reduce the rate of low back injury, the median cost per injury, the time of

30 The survey collected data on low-back, neck, and shoulder pain, lift availability, li

31 past year was categorized as no pain in the low back or leg, LBP only, and LBP with leg pain.

32 For acute low back pain (<4 weeks' duration), the only nonpharmaco

33 am (SMP) on primary care patients with acute low back pain (ALBP) from low income, inner city neighbo

34 Main outcome measures were Aberdeen Low Back Pain (ALBP) score, Short Form 36 (SF-36) score

35 Patients with chronic low back pain (cLBP) or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (A

36 ga is effective for mild to moderate chronic low back pain (cLBP), but its comparative effectiveness

37 For many individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP), there is no identifiable cause.

38 the afternoon in 47 subjects without current low back pain (IVDs = 230; age range, 20-71 years) after

39 Low back pain (LBP) contributes to considerable disabili

40 Low back pain (LBP) in children and adolescents is a com

41 Low back pain (LBP) is a common debilitating condition w

42 Low back pain (LBP) is a widespread debilitating disorde

43 Low back pain (LBP) is common in children but the progno

44 Low back pain (LBP) is common in primary care.

45 Low back pain (LBP) is responsible for more than 2.5 mil

46 Low back pain (LBP) is the most frequently reported musc

47 ociated with a specific phenotype of chronic low back pain (LBP).

48 nal treatments for participants with chronic low back pain (Mint study) were conducted in 16 multidis

49 asone recipients demonstrated improvement in low back pain (P = .04, Fisher exact test), whereas 55%

50 betamethasone recipients had improvement in low back pain (P = .26), whereas 49% of triamcinolone re

51 betamethasone recipients had improvement in low back pain (P = .38), whereas 52% of triamcinolone re

52 lation, massage, and acupuncture for chronic low back pain (SOE, low to moderate).

53 acupuncture is modestly effective for acute low back pain (SOE, low).

54 iagnostic tests in patients with nonspecific low back pain (strong recommendation, moderate-quality e

55 the preceding therapies for acute or chronic low back pain (with or without leg pain) that reported p

56 manipulation, and yoga for acute or chronic low back pain (with or without leg pain).

57 Low back pain affects a minority of individuals over 65

58 Non-specific low back pain affects people of all ages and is a leadin

59 verity were divided according to symptoms of low back pain alone and symptoms of low back pain with o

60 s a major pathological process implicated in low back pain and is a prerequisite to disk herniation.

61 lly significant difference in improvement in low back pain and lower extremity pain between groups.

62 with betamethasone and triamcinolone reduced low back pain and lower extremity pain, although there w

63 The strongest associations were between low back pain and MRI change (odds ratio [OR] 3.6, 95% c

64 al conditions, such as fibromyalgia, chronic low back pain and myofascial pain.

65 anxiety, musculoskeletal disorders including low back pain and neck pain, diabetes, and cirrhosis--in

66 A 20-year-old man presented with 1 week of low back pain and progressive lower extremity weakness.

67 ic images, intracranial pressure processing, low back pain and real-time tumour tracking; (3) outcome

68 in intensity and disability in patients with low back pain and sciatica after lumbar disc herniation.

69 nce (MR) imaging in patients with persistent low back pain and sciatica effectively demonstrates spin

70 ans should evaluate patients with persistent low back pain and signs or symptoms of radiculopathy or

71 on (SOE, moderate) are effective for chronic low back pain and strengthens previous findings regardin

72 the most important factor leading to chronic low back pain and subsequent disability after discectomy

73 s important to remember about rare causes of low back pain and to perform detailed physical examinati

74 chological and health behavior correlates of low back pain and/or neck pain.

75 ale patients) undergoing lumbar spine CT for low back pain and/or radiculopathy.

76 Several systemic medications for low back pain are associated with small to moderate, pri

77 harmacologic therapies for primarily chronic low back pain are associated with small to moderate, usu

78 of moderate efficacy for chronic or subacute low back pain are cognitive-behavioral therapy, exercise

79 ood evidence of short-term effectiveness for low back pain are NSAIDs, acetaminophen, skeletal muscle

80 As many as 25% of individuals with low back pain are symptomatic at 12 months, in contradis

81 s for plain radiographs in the evaluation of low back pain are too sensitive and expose patients unne

82 pain-related conditions, but its effects on low back pain are uncertain.

83 ent state of managing chronic (and subacute) low back pain as reflected in recently published guideli

84 ffective for short-term pain relief in acute low back pain but caused sedation.

85 The weather affects low back pain but to a minor degree.

86 clinically important improvement in chronic low back pain compared with a standardized exercise prog

87 Low back pain continues to affect a significant proporti

88 Because non-specific low back pain does not have a known pathoanatomical caus

89 342 adults aged 20 to 70 years with chronic low back pain enrolled between September 2012 and April

90 s approximately 1.5), and a history of prior low back pain episodes and demographic variables were no

91 lated for prediction of persistent disabling low back pain for findings attainable during the clinica

92 thritis (OA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and low back pain from 12 community pharmacy sites responded

93 radiofrequency denervation to treat chronic low back pain from these sources.

94 udies of patients with fewer than 8 weeks of low back pain from which likelihood ratios (LRs) were ca

95 nd cost of diagnostic imaging for persistent low back pain have increased.

96 en that most patients with acute or subacute low back pain improve over time regardless of treatment,

97 use in 2,374 adult patients with persistent low back pain in 1987-1990 were analyzed.

98 al cost of diagnostic imaging for persistent low back pain in 1990 relative to 1987 was estimated at

99 al cost of diagnostic imaging for persistent low back pain in 1990 relative to 1987 was estimated.

100 We examined the prevalence of low back pain in adolescents and its association with BM

101 Height was associated with increased risk of low back pain in both genders.

102 Low back pain in children and adolescents is a common pr

103 , prognosis of metastatic spinal tumors, and low back pain in health care professionals.

104 Higher BMI was significantly associated with low back pain in males (for overweight, odds ratio = 1.0

105 Recommendations for the management of low back pain in primary care emphasise the importance o

106 Guidelines for the management of acute low back pain in primary care recommend early interventi

107 oach for management of non-specific subacute low back pain in primary care.

108 re is a significant genetic effect on severe low back pain in the community.

109 carpal tunnel syndrome, 59 million have had low back pain in the past 3 months, and 30.1 million hav

110 ith DZ twins, equating to a heritability for low back pain in the range of 52-68% and for neck pain i

111 Odds ratios for low back pain in the tallest group compared with the sho

112 The respective odds ratios for low back pain incidence were 0.97 (95% CI, 0.83-1.13) an

113 ical examination to help place patients with low back pain into 1 of 3 broad categories: nonspecific

114 Low back pain is a common medical problem but has decrea

115 Chronic low back pain is a common problem that has only modestly

116 Acute low back pain is common and spinal manipulative therapy

117 e acceptability of acupuncture treatment for low back pain is complex and multifaceted.

118 The most common cause of low back pain is degenerative disease of the interverteb

119 The incidence of low back pain is extremely high and is often linked to i

120 The clinical course of low back pain is often favourable, thus many patients re

121 Chronic low back pain is one of the most prevalent and costly me

122 Observations: Low back pain is rarely seen in youth before they reach

123 Low back pain is treated by many types of providers, wit

124 program to adults with chronic or recurrent low back pain led to greater improvements in back functi

125 Low back pain limits activity and is the second most fre

126 therapy (PT) for primary care patients with low back pain of <12 weeks' duration.

127 nts consulted primary care with non-specific low back pain of less than 12 weeks' duration.

128 ostic imaging is indicated for patients with low back pain only if they have severe progressive neuro

129 incidental but may be found in patients with low back pain or neuromuscular deficits.

130 es, women were 1.5 times more likely to have low back pain or symptoms of intervertebral disc herniat

131 clinical trials of participants with chronic low back pain originating in the facet joints, sacroilia

132 mptoms, and upper body, lower extremity, and low back pain over six months.

133 Patients with CLBP had low back pain persisting for at least 12 months that was

134 ated to a person's health status) indicating low back pain severity were divided according to symptom

135 ncome populations have a lower prevalence of low back pain than high-income populations.

136 atory drugs had smaller benefits for chronic low back pain than previously observed, duloxetine was e

137 endorse triage to identify the rare cases of low back pain that are caused by medically serious patho

138 ive inception cohorts of patients with acute low back pain that measured fear of pain (often describe

139 We randomly assigned 321 adults with low back pain that persisted for seven days after a prim

140 e preceding medications for acute or chronic low back pain that reported pain outcomes, back-specific

141 The proportion of visits to specialists for low back pain that were new consultations increased from

142 studies varied from a low of 31% (n = 8) for low back pain to a high of 68% (n = 23) for fibromyalgia

143 e authors randomly selected 62 patients with low back pain to undergo either rapid MR imaging or plai

144 idemiologic studies report the prevalence of low back pain to vary from 7.6% to 37% in different popu

145 ic reviews and RCTs, for RCTs of adults with low back pain treated in ambulatory settings with SMT co

146 ard deviation]; age range, 20-79 years) with low back pain underwent standard 1.5-T MR imaging, which

147 Prevalence of low back pain was 0.2% for both males and females with o

148 Seven RCTs involving 864 patients with low back pain were eligible for review.

149 raphy by a sports medicine clinic because of low back pain were evaluated for the presence of asympto

150 mponents for predicting persistent disabling low back pain were maladaptive pain coping behaviors, no

151 nostic imaging and testing for patients with low back pain when severe or progressive neurologic defi

152 atment selection in patients with persistent low back pain who are suspected of having herniated nucl

153 Recommendation 3: In patients with chronic low back pain who have had an inadequate response to non

154 y with SPECT can help identify patients with low back pain who would benefit from facet joint injecti

155 ptoms of low back pain alone and symptoms of low back pain with objective corroborating findings.

156 Low back pain with or without objective findings was ass

157 patients with evidence-based information on low back pain with regard to their expected course, advi

158 eporting (OP-8) reduced MR imaging rates for low back pain without conservative therapy in either Med

159 ion of MR imaging examinations performed for low back pain without history of conservative therapy.

160 ed by local DRG inflammation (a rat model of low back pain) and by a peripheral paw inflammation mode

161 h as imaging for patients with uncomplicated low back pain) and using the results for public reportin

162 , and tricyclic antidepressants (for chronic low back pain) are effective for pain relief.

163 nophen, skeletal muscle relaxants (for acute low back pain), and tricyclic antidepressants (for chron

164 nophen, skeletal muscle relaxants (for acute low back pain), and tricyclic antidepressants (for chron

165 , and tricyclic antidepressants (for chronic low back pain).

166 10 patients who sought chiropractic care for low back pain, 1088 (83%) had spinal manipulation.

167 131 consecutive patients with low back pain, 18 to 60 years of age, who were referred

168 2013, and October 24, 2014, and had chronic low back pain, a positive diagnostic block at the facet

169 that acupuncture may be useful for headache, low back pain, alcohol dependence, and paralysis resulti

170 pain and disability in patients with chronic low back pain, although this difference became nonsignif

171 eported by 71% of the patients, 55% reported low back pain, and 19% reported RA.

172 served, duloxetine was effective for chronic low back pain, and benzodiazepines were ineffective for

173 that acetaminophen is ineffective for acute low back pain, and duloxetine is associated with modest

174 for improving function and reducing chronic low back pain, and the benefits persisted for at least s

175 ack disorders, with a particular emphasis on low back pain, as this area has been most represented in

176 in into 1 of 3 broad categories: nonspecific low back pain, back pain potentially associated with rad

177 sis and assessment of disease progression in low back pain, brain tumours and primary epilepsy; (2) e

178 and height are linked to the pathogenesis of low back pain, but evidence-based confirmation is lackin

179 ion is a commonly used treatment for chronic low back pain, but high-quality evidence for its effecti

180 iscs has been linked with the development of low back pain, but little is known about factors affecti

181 Recommendation 2: For patients with chronic low back pain, clinicians and patients should initially

182 For patients with low back pain, clinicians should consider the use of med

183 For patients with acute low back pain, data are sparse and inconclusive.

184 in health centres respiratory insufficiency, low back pain, degree of physical function, presence of

185 arious musculoskeletal conditions, including low back pain, despite little scientific support for the

186 Secondary outcomes were self-reported low back pain, disability, global improvement, satisfact

187 aluated included reduction or elimination of low back pain, improvement in back-specific and overall

188 spinal manipulation; for chronic or subacute low back pain, intensive interdisciplinary rehabilitatio

189 niated disc (HD), one of the major causes of low back pain, is often resolved spontaneously without s

190 llitus, and chronic pain conditions (chronic low back pain, knee osteoarthritis, and fibromyalgia).

191 with the largest number of YLDs in 2010 were low back pain, major depressive disorder, other musculos

192 Among the patients with chronic low back pain, nerves extended into the inner third of t

193 that acetaminophen was ineffective for acute low back pain, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs had

194 heumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, chronic low back pain, or ischemic heart disease since 1995.

195 logic therapy with proven benefits-for acute low back pain, spinal manipulation; for chronic or subac

196 Among patients with acute low back pain, spinal manipulative therapy was associate

197 fferent rheumatic conditions (eg, neck pain, low back pain, systemic lupus erythematosus, fibromyalgi

198 For patients with low back pain, the McKenzie method of physical therapy a

199 For acute low back pain, the only therapy with good evidence of ef

200 Among adults with chronic low back pain, treatment with MBSR or CBT, compared with

201 include intense vulvar and vaginal itching, low back pain, uterine cramps, fetal distress, and prete

202 ty-seven patients (23 men and 24 women) with low back pain, who were scheduled for facet joint inject

203 ive-month period because of an acute, severe low back pain, with sphincter dysfunction, partially res

204 cians and American Pain Society guideline on low back pain, would provide better care to patients, im

205 r acute or chronic nonradicular or radicular low back pain.

206 sed the relationships of BMI and height with low back pain.

207 cceptability of acupuncture to patients with low back pain.

208 ity, and they can be responsible for chronic low back pain.

209 tool as they considered prognosis studies of low back pain.

210 spinal injections of methylprednisolone for low back pain.

211 uideline addressed pharmacologic options for low back pain.

212 int degeneration is a major cause of chronic low back pain.

213 effective treatment for chronic or recurrent low back pain.

214 ted the effectiveness of massage for chronic low back pain.

215 e lumbar facet joints has been implicated in low back pain.

216 osis, acute myocardial infarction, and acute low back pain.

217 s associated with modest effects for chronic low back pain.

218 ises following acute, experimentally induced low back pain.

219 Mr S, a 50-year-old man, has long-standing low back pain.

220 ach to using available treatment options for low back pain.

221 gic therapies are available for treatment of low back pain.

222 for chronic or subacute (>4 weeks' duration) low back pain.

223 l restoration are also effective for chronic low back pain.

224 fective primary care management strategy for low back pain.

225 e, examining the direct health care costs of low back pain.

226 e the most frequently prescribed therapy for low back pain.

227 en among older individuals with arthritis or low back pain.

228 to recovery in populations of patients with low back pain.

229 ollowing diskectomy for persistent radicular low back pain.

230 arch shows widespread use of acupuncture for low back pain.

231 Acupuncture effectively relieves chronic low back pain.

232 tients consulting primary care with subacute low back pain.

233 udes adults with acute, subacute, or chronic low back pain.

234 MRI changes are the strongest predictor of low back pain.

235 to improve decision making for patients with low back pain.

236 eplacement for radiographs for patients with low back pain.

237 ical outcomes for primary care patients with low back pain.

238 ing worse physical health than patients with low back pain.

239 ness and harms of SMT for acute (</=6 weeks) low back pain.

240 xercise programs in the treatment of chronic low back pain.

241 bark and magnets, have marginal benefit for low back pain.

242 h reduced incidence of back injury claims or low back pain.

243 on our small group of subjects with chronic low back pain.

244 role in the development and perpetuation of low back pain.

245 ination for the effective treatment of acute low back pain.

246 r clinical results in patients with subacute low back pain.

247 d spinal manipulation for some patients with low back pain.

248 damaged tissues in patients with nonspecific low back pain.

249 ve effectiveness and costs of treatments for low back pain.

250 rstand the role of MBSR in the management of low back pain.

251 ertebral disc in the pathogenesis of chronic low back pain.

252 ertebral disc in the pathogenesis of chronic low back pain.

253 recommendations on noninvasive treatment of low back pain.

254 follow published guidelines for treatment of low back pain.

255 g modalities in the evaluation of persistent low back pain.

256 ement for plain radiography in patients with low back pain.

257 acologic and nonpharmacologic treatments for low back pain.

258 tebral disc degeneration (IVDD) is linked to low back pain.

259 efficacy and safety of MBSR in patients with low back pain.

260 bility as a primary outcome in patients with low back pain.

261 essed nonpharmacologic treatment options for low back pain.

262 d exercise program for patients with chronic low back pain.

263 or young and middle-aged adults with chronic low back pain.

264 e treatment option for patients with chronic low back pain.

265 f glial activation, in patients with chronic low back pain.

266 r acute or chronic nonradicular or radicular low back pain.

267 ation of muscle fat content in patients with low back pain.

268 ion and to ameliorate IVD-associated chronic low back pain.

269 d degeneration are believed to contribute to low back pain.

270 prevalence of back and/or neck pain was 31% (low back pain: 34 million, neck pain: 9 million, both ba

271 rm trials showing modest effects for chronic low back pain; trials were not designed to assess seriou

272 nondrug treatments for patients with chronic low back pain?

273 ry of any allergy were more likely to report low-back pain (odds ratio = 1.51; 95% confidence interva

274 ore likely to have both major depression and low-back pain (odds ratio = 3.03; 95% confidence interva

275 ity were half as likely to have work-related low-back pain (OR=0.50, 95% CI 0.26-0.96) and nurses rep

276 e-sacral articulation of young patients with low-back pain and a lumbosacral transitional vertebra.

277 e; age range, 6-19 y; mean age, 15.7 y) with low-back pain and a lumbosacral transitional vertebra.

278 Although low-back pain and depression are common comorbidities, t

279 maging on clinical outcomes in patients with low-back pain and no indication of serious underlying co

280 r imaging in patients with acute or subacute low-back pain and without features suggesting a serious

281 lts are most applicable to acute or subacute low-back pain assessed in primary-care settings.

282 d effect on troublesome subacute and chronic low-back pain at a low cost to the health-care provider.

283 f different imaging methods, and duration of low-back pain did not affect the results, but analyses w

284 Chronic low-back pain has also become a diagnosis of convenience

285 ition to best practice advice in people with low-back pain in primary care.

286 Subjects responded to questions regarding low-back pain in the past 12 months and history of asthm

287 Low-back pain is a common and costly problem.

288 Low-back pain may result.

289 adults with troublesome subacute or chronic low-back pain were recruited from 56 general practices a

290 s is known about the epidemiology of chronic low-back pain with no associated work disability or comp

291 Lumbar imaging for low-back pain without indications of serious underlying

292 egenerative disc disease often causes severe low-back pain, a public health problem with huge economi

293 clinical care without immediate imaging for low-back pain.

294 transitional vertebra in young patients with low-back pain.

295 iations between allergies and depression and low-back pain.

296 aration of small molecules and proteins with low back pressure are demonstrated by high-performance l

297 ous properties of the monoliths lead to very low back pressures enabling the use of simple mechanical

298 Given their high efficiencies and relatively low back pressures, columns containing these particles w

299 EOPs into portable microfluidic devices with low back pressures.

300 l or clinical features suggestive of serious low-back problems.