ライフサイエンスコーパス: low sensitivity

1 s of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) have low sensitivity.

2 widespread use of CDT remains limited due to low sensitivity.

3 t agents, the main drawback deals with their low sensitivity.

4 ristics of exponential systems, suffers from low sensitivity.

5 r, these approaches have been criticized for low sensitivity.

6 e for estimating stroke incidence because of low sensitivity.

7 s from limited specificity and intrinsically low sensitivity.

8 ave large sample requirements and relatively low sensitivity.

9 stry, and life sciences, although limited by low sensitivity.

10 are not aligned with axes of either high or low sensitivity.

11 mportant limitation of NMR is its inherently low sensitivity.

12 recognizing a poxvirus peptide at relatively low sensitivity.

13 of chemical bonds, but is often hindered by low sensitivity.

14 the B. mori pheromone bombykol, albeit with low sensitivity.

15 unction with good specificity but relatively low sensitivity.

16 s the other two had moderate specificity and low sensitivity.

17 f extracapsular extension is tempered by its low sensitivity.

18 s displayed relatively high selectivity with low sensitivity.

19 s high specificity and predictive values but low sensitivity.

20 a result of limited sequence specificity or low sensitivity.

21 aninum infection by immunohistochemistry has low sensitivity.

22 g a rapid in-office result, had unacceptably low sensitivity.

23 urrence with high specificity, although with low sensitivity.

24 the aid of enhancement solution, albeit at a low sensitivity.

25 n of PI 3-kinase and is of high capacity and low sensitivity.

26 /dL were associated with mortality but had a low sensitivity.

27 unct to cystoscopy; however, it suffers from low sensitivity.

28 ed by their reliance on metals or relatively low sensitivity.

29 activity are indirect and laborious and have low sensitivity.

30 multiple samples but had poor stability and low sensitivity.

31 tensive, and are characterized by relatively low sensitivity.

32 ance between high detonation performance and low sensitivity.

33 Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) has a low sensitivity.

34 erting it to layer sliding, which results in low sensitivity.

35 to 10(3), thereby overcoming NMR's inherent low sensitivity.

36 ively small impact on mortality owing to its low sensitivity.

37 are often overshadowed by its intrinsically low sensitivity.

38 time of extubation had high specificity but low sensitivity.

39 ramers with high specificity, but unexpected low sensitivity.

40 scenarios for a given RNA sequence and have low sensitivities.

41 ents had high positive predictive values but low sensitivities.

42 rogram discrimination limit of 2.0 mg/dL had low sensitivity (0.05-0.28).

43 gh specificity (0.96; 95% CI, 0.90-0.98) but low sensitivity (0.32; 95% CI, 0.20-0.48) to predict met

44 Conventional clinical signs had low sensitivity (11%-42%) for detecting intracranial hyp

45 all three physical examination findings had low sensitivity (12% and 8%), high specificity (98% and

46 The gene-level methods had low sensitivity (20-63%), high specificity (89-100%), an

47 For both observers, VSB had low sensitivity (21% and 18%) and high specificity (88%

48 2 month conversion had low sensitivity (27.3% [95% confidence limit 16.6-41.4])

49 existing 2-tier serology-based assays yield low sensitivities (29%-40%) for early infection.

50 ort, canister weight, and pill count all had low sensitivity (29.2%, 65.0%, and 7.7%, respectively) f

51 d runny nose was most specific (90%) but had low sensitivity (32%) for LCI.

52 aditional cut point of 2 or more resulted in low sensitivities (38%-50%) in predominantly white femal

53 for optical correction of hypermetropia had low sensitivity (38.1%; 95% CI, 37.6%-38.6%), and the ar

54 Conventional cytology has a low sensitivity (4%-20%) but 100% specificity.

55 ogression to carcinoma, PTEN-null status had low sensitivity (44%; 95% CI, 45-54%) and specificity (5

56 ng volvulus and ischemia were diagnosed with low sensitivity (46% and 43%, respectively) but high spe

57 wed high positive predictive value (95%) but low sensitivity (51%) for a diagnosis of dementia made d

58 st conservative cut-off (nGFR </= 20) it had low sensitivity (55.3%), specificity (75%), PPV (67.6%)

59 offs had high specificities (91.6-97.9%) but low sensitivities (7.1-31.5%) for predicting adult outco

60 , a principal limitation of these methods is low sensitivity: a large number of fiber tracts that con

61 The test showed a low sensitivity against PCR and culture (<40%); however,

62 +)/alpha2(-) binding site on the heteromeric low sensitivity alpha2beta2 nAChR and validated the func

63 est that lynx1 shifts nAChR stoichiometry to low sensitivity (alpha4)3(beta2)2 pentamers primarily th

64 is report, we compare CMPI interactions with low-sensitivity (alpha4)3(beta2)2 and high-sensitivity (

65 harmacological differences between high- and low-sensitivity alpha4beta2 subforms.

66 135 nM) were not selective between high- and low-sensitivity alpha4beta2, chlorisondamine, mecamylami

67 A cutoff value of >40,000 copies/ml has a low sensitivity (Amplicor, 29.4%; HCS, 41.2%) but is spe

68 -appropriate, they suffered from drastically low sensitivities and high false negative rates.

69 Traditional echo indices showed overall low sensitivities and high specificities (among them myo

70 The low sensitivities and relatively low positive predictive

71 cytometry is commonly used, but suffers from low sensitivity and accuracy.

72 yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae suffered from low sensitivity and activity.

73 terized by limited substrate specificity and low sensitivity and are also cumbersome.

74 n change of absorbance generally suffer from low sensitivity and are difficult to adapt to high-throu

75 ific medium solution (i.e. Microtox((R))) or low sensitivity and diffusion limited protocols (i.e. am

76 ver, they continue to suffer from relatively low sensitivity and figures of merit (FOMs).

77 e expression in unique cell types have shown low sensitivity and high false positivity, thereby limit

78 B is predictive of death due to PE, but with low sensitivity and high interobserver variability.

79 cell population, is currently limited by the low sensitivity and high technical noise of single-cell

80 c tests; however, LFAs generally suffer from low sensitivity and lack of quantification.

81 colorimetric-based assays exhibit relatively low sensitivity and limited dynamic range that are unabl

82 However, low sensitivity and long acquisition times limit a broad

83 d-patient gold standard definitions produced low sensitivity and low specificity estimates, respectiv

84 sed approaches, all of which may suffer from low sensitivity and low throughput.

85 mass spectrometry (MS/MS) often suffer from low sensitivity and low-confidence protein identificatio

86 ed for such analysis, but this is limited by low sensitivity and low-throughput analysis.

87 termination of tryptamine in beer up to now: low sensitivity and matrix effects.

88 in non-TOP mRNA translation was obscured by low sensitivity and methodology biases.

89 oughput proteomic analysis, but to date, the low sensitivity and narrow dynamic range have limited th

90 sed indexes of airway evaluation suffer from low sensitivity and only modest specificity in identifyi

91 copy independently or combined is limited by low sensitivity and poor positive predictive value.

92 ctrical activity of neurons because of their low sensitivity and poor temporal resolution.

93 ectin in cervicovaginal secretions, also had low sensitivity and positive predictive value for preter

94 modalities were similar for staging, sharing low sensitivity and PPV but relatively high NPV and spec

95 ed diagnostic tests are available, they have low sensitivity and reproducibility.

96 st relaxation properties, which give rise to low sensitivity and resolution.

97 w bandwidth and long acquisition time, or by low sensitivity and resolution.

98 However, its relatively low sensitivity and reversible binding make it a tempora

99 ide based gas sensors associated with rather low sensitivity and selectivity, particularly under high

100 s of complex mixtures, NMR suffers from both low sensitivity and signal overlap.

101 oth bombykol receptor, BmorOR1, demonstrated low sensitivity and slow signal inactivation.

102 However, low sensitivity and specificity limit their clinical uti

103 e clinical settings is inadequate due to the low sensitivity and specificity of blood smears.

104 However, due to the low sensitivity and specificity of current imaging metho

105 use of inferior performance characteristics (low sensitivity and specificity)] these tests have not m

106 ents at risk for arrhythmia are, however, of low sensitivity and specificity, which results in a low

107 es between different species, owing to their low sensitivity and splice junction accuracy.

108 iagnosis because many are considered to have low sensitivity and the particular Leishmania species ca

109 the major disadvantage being its inherently low sensitivity and the subsequent inability to acquire

110 In subjects with renal dysfunction, the low sensitivity and the trend toward low specificity of

111 , had individually either low specificity or low sensitivity and, therefore, low efficiency scores (5

112 ging methods use ionizing radiation and have low sensitivity and/or low specificity for cancer cells.

113 linical coronary and myocardial disease have low sensitivity, and altered hemodynamics during the LT

114 igen detection tests for GAS have relatively low sensitivity, and backup testing is recommended in ch

115 ngliosides suffer from poor reproducibility, low sensitivity, and low-throughput capacity.

116 ble readout suffer from long reaction times, low sensitivity, and narrow dynamic range.

117 However, low specificity, low sensitivity, and the time consuming nature of curren

118 ssed diagnoses (for example, when tests with low sensitivity are used) and to false diagnoses (for ex

119 target amplification step that overcomes the low sensitivity associated with commonly used fluorescen

120 of BAMS mass signatures has been limited by low sensitivity at high masses.

121 except that naproxen was not detected due to low sensitivity at negative polarity and interference at

122 These studies have low sensitivity, because psoralen cross-linking suggeste

123 sts for serum tTG IgA and EMA IgA levels had low sensitivity (below 50%) in detection of persistent v

124 The speculum-based algorithm had a low sensitivity (between zero and 59%) but a higher spec

125 Urinary and PF LAM assays have low sensitivity but high specificity for diagnosis of TB

126 may be important in diagnostic trials where low sensitivity can translate into lack of clinical util

127 costly technique with high specificity, but low sensitivity), clinical use of these markers will imp

128 ysis in cancer since the 1970s, suffers from low sensitivity, complexity, and time-consuming and labo

129 had widespread use because of its relatively low sensitivity compounded by low natural abundance.

130 ions in negative control data or suffer from low sensitivity detecting known driving fusions in gold

131 ugh toxin-targeting assays which suffer from low sensitivity due to poor antibody avidity.

132 antage of the dye displacement assays is the low sensitivity due to the excess of the dye used.

133 s of genes simultaneously yet are limited by low sensitivity, dynamic range, accuracy and sample thro

134 to 2.5 microM (14-24% of the population) and low-sensitivity EC50 values of 110 to 180 microM (76-86%

135 (86)Rb efflux, and the proportion of high to low sensitivity efflux declined with age.

136 inct functional enrichment between high- and low-sensitivity estrogen responsive genes, supporting th

137 al studies are limited due to the relatively low sensitivity, excessive drift/noise, and inability to

138 s a VL of >/= 3.00 log(10) copies/ml, showed low sensitivities for A-266 (71.54%) and M-TFN (65.71%)

139 The electrodes showed very low sensitivities for different species, such as Na+, K+

140 etric substrates which traditionally present low sensitivity for assay-miniaturization.

141 The fixed 7.5% threshold had relatively low sensitivity for capturing 10-year events in younger

142 Routine intensive care unit surveillance has low sensitivity for detecting electrocardiogram evidence

143 erfusion, anuria was highly specific, but of low sensitivity for detection of DGF.

144 ceptably high false-positive rate (20%) or a low sensitivity for detection of MMD (40%).

145 coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp., had low sensitivity for detection of oxacillin resistance in

146 However, ECD had a low sensitivity for IHC-only 22% of patients with HER-2

147 ation in the LAS era, perhaps because of its low sensitivity for obesity.

148 G criteria were specific (many >95%) but had low sensitivity for RVH by cMRI.

149 chomatis, but leukocyte esterase testing had low sensitivity for selecting persons for screening with

150 d nodules 0.5 cm in diameter or larger, with low sensitivity for small non-FDG-avid nodules.

151 nal deletion mutant severely deregulated the low-sensitivity gene Tac-2.

152 d factor mutations preferentially deregulate low-sensitivity genes.

153 lities, excellent detonation properties, and low sensitivities, has been designed.

154 Given its high specificity but relatively low sensitivity, helical CT may not have the ideal attri

155 Stool examination had quite low sensitivities in making diagnosis in our study.

156 d intraoperative frozen section analysis had low sensitivities in the detection of cancer (16% and 23

157 st exists, and current serologic assays have low sensitivity in early HTBRF.

158 ost popular technology; however, this yields low sensitivity in low purity tumors.

159 ebrosides were not detected or detected with low sensitivity in MALDI MS because of other dominant ph

160 ause of the high rate of undertriage and the low sensitivity in predicting higher urgency levels.

161 f complex protein mixtures, but suffers from low sensitivity in protein identification.

162 ongenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) owing to low sensitivity in salt-wasting forms and a high rate of

163 They had low sensitivity in that they responded to tactile but no

164 puted tomography and serum tumor markers had low sensitivity in the detection of pancreatic dysplasia

165 CT has moderate specificity but relatively low sensitivity in the detection of preoperative Wilms t

166 fatal, and cell-based diagnostic tests have low sensitivity in this clinical setting.

167 tion of analytes which traditionally exhibit low-sensitivity in plasma-based ADI-MS analyses.

168 Criteria with low sensitivity included decreased height of the interve

169 ntly higher for high-sensitivity compared to low-sensitivity individuals.

170 Yet to overcome the low sensitivity inherent in inductive detection of weakl

171 Low sensitivity is characteristic of many proteomics met

172 The low sensitivity issue of capacitive biosensors was overc

173 nal one-beam absorption measurement exhibits low sensitivity, lack of three-dimensional sectioning ca

174 e sporadic CJD subtypes MM2C and MM2T, and a low sensitivity limited to variant CJD, Gerstmann-Straus

175 e PCR compared with saliva rapid culture had low sensitivity, limiting its value as a screening test.

176 Although the low sensitivity limits the number of patients for whom d

177 The finding of low sensitivity limits the use of the tool, which will r

178 s of conventional planar microarrays such as low sensitivity, long overnight hybridization time, lack

179 sting methods for SSR genotyping suffer from low sensitivity, low accuracy, low efficiency and high c

180 DNA damages, most of them are limited due to low sensitivity, low throughput, incompatibility for aut

181 are referred to as high-sensitivity (HS) and low-sensitivity (LS) nAChRs, respectively, based on a di

182 cificity of only 69%, and the Dako kit had a low sensitivity (<30% for 6 GII subgroups) but a high sp

183 y of (11)C-ER176 in humans is similar to the low sensitivity measured in vitro and, second, to measur

184 7; SD=0.74) and 15 'less sensitive mothers' (low sensitivity mothers - LSMs, mean=2.13; SD=0.52) unde

185 Leptospirosis is underdiagnosed due to low sensitivity, need of specialised equipment, and expe

186 , in particular those techniques that detect low-sensitivity nuclei, such as 15N and 13C.

187 hod to dramatically improve the MR signal of low-sensitivity nuclei.

188 by Taq polymerase is the likely cause of the low sensitivities of two shared-stem beacons when compar

189 % for parasitemia levels >0.5%, but a rather low sensitivity of 70% was achieved because of the small

190 rful tool for the study of ARF, although the low sensitivity of ARF codes is an important caveat.

191 This emergence and the low sensitivity of biological tests raise the question o

192 and reactions in microfluidic devices where low sensitivity of conventional magnetic resonance would

193 It can be hypothesized that the relatively low sensitivity of conventional neuroimaging techniques

194 ssis infection has been difficult due to the low sensitivity of culture.

195 did not indicate a potential relation of the low sensitivity of fish embryos to a limited uptake of t

196 The relatively low sensitivity of halothane quenching of Trp fluorescen

197 The low sensitivity of HCV RNA soon after birth and the find

198 NMR spectroscopy is often complicated by the low sensitivity of heavy nuclei.

199 onfers apoptosis resistance and results in a low sensitivity of human cancer cells to therapeutic age

200 e the overall binding energy as evidenced by low sensitivity of ionic distribution to the presence or

201 The low sensitivity of Mobile Health (mHealth) optical detec

202 ion of S-pigment might not contribute to the low sensitivity of mouse S-cones.

203 However, as a result of the intrinsically low sensitivity of MR imaging, high local concentrations

204 deep penetration to visualize soft tissues, low sensitivity of MRI frequently requires tumor imaging

205 Because of the low sensitivity of MRI however, designing new fluorochem

206 s remains a challenge because the inherently low sensitivity of NMR is aggravated by small fluid volu

207 zation techniques have boosted the otherwise low sensitivity of NMR spectroscopy, the efficiency of t

208 However, the low sensitivity of PCR (31%) compared to ELISA (81%) ind

209 The relatively low sensitivity of PCR of archival nasal samples in this

210 transport failure occurs under conditions of low sensitivity of photosynthesis and high sensitivity o

211 One factor is the low sensitivity of present-day aerosol to natural emissi

212 ients as "low risk," in combination with the low sensitivity of quick Sequential Organ Failure Assess

213 hanced Raman scattering (SERS), the previous low sensitivity of Raman measurements has also been alle

214 ission setting of Swaziland, we demonstrated low sensitivity of RDT for malaria diagnosis, owing to a

215 Collectively, results suggest that low sensitivity of reward circuitry increases risk for o

216 ave been possible previously, because of the low sensitivity of screening assays for mutations in end

217 Because of the low sensitivity of skin prick tests to meat, we studied

218 f the difficulty of collection of specimens, low sensitivity of smear microscopy, and poor access to

219 The generally low sensitivity of standard in vivo toxicity tests to im

220 in the course of Lyme disease because of the low sensitivity of tests in early disease.

221 ging is essential, about previous reports of low sensitivity of thallium in undifferentiated lymphoma

222 s of serine bound to an allosteric site, the low sensitivity of the archaeal protein to serine is con

223 The relatively low sensitivity of the Ca(V)1.3alpha(1) subunit to inhib

224 ls on the DFA assay slides suggests that the low sensitivity of the chromatographic immunoassay may r

225 rgely obtained in research settings, and the low sensitivity of the Confusion Assessment Method for t

226 by the often mild clinical presentation, the low sensitivity of the currently used diagnostic tools,

227 8, GII.10, and GII.16 were not detected, the low sensitivity of the EIA is primarily caused by low vi

228 ide, and is thus largely responsible for the low sensitivity of the human pathogen Mycobacterium tube

229 The major obstacle is the intrinsically low sensitivity of the low-field NMR experiment.

230 he more impressive because of the inherently low sensitivity of the method.

231 biological systems has been hampered by the low sensitivity of the optical techniques usually employ

232 The low sensitivity of the standard diagnostic test leads to

233 The low sensitivity of the SV40 Pr/E to silencing by in vitr

234 ampered by long acquisition times due to the low sensitivity of the technique.

235 estion of whether this phenomenon represents low sensitivity of the test or late development of fetal

236 One major limitation is the relatively low sensitivity of these methods, which recently has bee

237 However, the low sensitivity of these techniques can make it difficul

238 ings cannot rule out dengue fever due to the low sensitivity of this examination.

239 significant change in urinary L/R indicating low sensitivity of this methodology in studies on acute

240 The low sensitivity on short read homology search can lead t

241 ts are laborious and low-throughput and have low sensitivity or poor resolution.

242 reserve granule exocytosis, a high capacity, low sensitivity pathway, for massive salivary protein ex

243 timulated DNA synthesis via a high capacity, low sensitivity pathway.

244 the time of first clinical presentation by a low-sensitivity polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detec

245 However, its low sensitivity poses a problem.

246 cture of organic molecules, but its inherent low sensitivity prohibits the observation of diluted sam

247 ine ortholog Vmn2r1, is a calcium-dependent, low-sensitivity receptor specific for the hydrophobic am

248 dity which partially explains the relatively low sensitivity reported for LM as compared to other pat

249 s, but morphological prediction of MSI-H has low sensitivity, requiring molecular analysis for therap

250 ions for wheat flour and soy reached overall low sensitivities, sensitivities of other tested SPT sol

251 suffer from a lack of efficiency, relatively low sensitivity, slow electron transfer kinetics, high b

252 osis (Mtb) have many disadvantages including low sensitivity, slow turnaround times, or high cost.

253 ull cells revealed high-, intermediate-, and low-sensitivity targets.

254 ecificity and that of mycological culture by low sensitivity, the Aspergillus lateral-flow device see

255 Due to its relatively low sensitivity, the BioStar Chlamydia OIA should only b

256 ith long latencies have high spatial acuity, low sensitivities to contrast, temporal frequency, and s

257 with TASK-1, such as inhibition by hypoxia, low sensitivity to 4-aminopyridine and quinine and insen

258 est results may be unreliable in people with low sensitivity to a test odorant but an otherwise norma

259 d selective for the alpha4beta2 subform with low sensitivity to acetylcholine.

260 The low sensitivity to activation and desensitization of (al

261 idity recognition of peptide-MHC ligands had low sensitivity to activation and inefficient activation

262 Among young men, low sensitivity to alcohol intoxication predicts subsequ

263 with disinhibition; and those that confer a low sensitivity to alcohol.

264 neutral pH values, and they show relatively low sensitivity to ammonium chloride treatment in cells.

265 tive innate immune response characterized by low sensitivity to bacterial LPS, hypergammaglobulinemia

266 e channel conductance (approximately 50 fS), low sensitivity to block by external Ba2+ and Cs+, and n

267 dvantages of such techniques are potentially low sensitivity to contamination and lack of the require

268 asting openings, high affinity for GABA, and low sensitivity to diazepam, and the other with long-las

269 th, the astrocyte passive conductance showed low sensitivity to extracellular Ba(2+), and extracellul

270 id determinations (20 min on average), (iii) low sensitivity to impurities, (iv) wide lipophilicity r

271 oded in parallel by channels having high and low sensitivity to inhibition.

272 key role in learning, though they exhibit a low sensitivity to InsP(3) compared to peripheral tissue

273 neuronal cell line N1E115 (which exhibits a low sensitivity to InsP(3)).

274 Patient samples with p53 mutations showed low sensitivity to KPT-185.

275 values were never observed for AgNEs with a low sensitivity to NH(3).

276 minal isoforms, having fast inactivation and low sensitivity to nifedipine, mainly control the fast f

277 Catalyst activity has low sensitivity to oxygen.

278 E2(1-920)/AE1(613-929) without affecting its low sensitivity to pHo.

279 iated with progressive conduction disease, a low sensitivity to procainamide testing, and a relativel

280 -bound prothrombin and protein Z showed very low sensitivity to salt as long as calcium was at satura

281 Bronsted acid type receptors show relatively low sensitivity to solvent polarity and are equally or e

282 nts displayed only one component with a very low sensitivity to thapsigargin in both absence (IC50=33

283 These coatings have a low sensitivity to the angle of incidence and require mi

284 t cluster with eukaryotic IleRSs and exhibit low sensitivity to the antibiotic mupirocin.

285 l prostate epithelial cells exhibited a very low sensitivity to the apoptotic effects of doxazosin co

286 spond to touch, but have low spike rates and low sensitivity to the movement of whiskers.

287 which is based on their respective high and low sensitivity to the spider omega-agatoxin-IVA (omega-

288 0) peptide recruits low-avidity T cells with low sensitivity to Tregs and fails to modulate the suppr

289 ce of exogenous GABA exhibited both high and low sensitivity to Zn(2+) inhibition (IC(50) values, 1.8

290 ARs displayed an ATP-dependent rundown and a low sensitivity to Zn2+.

291 Its weakness is its low sensitivity towards contrast media.

292 The combination of a fast, low-sensitivity weighted keyword-based first pass algori

293 These low sensitivities were present across all 4 studies.

294 the evaluated molecular diagnostic tool had low sensitivity when applied to synovial fluid.

295 Abdominal radiography is mainly limited by low sensitivity when compared with low-dose CT in the sc

296 voltage transients, many indicators exhibit low sensitivity when imaged under two-photon illuminatio

297 r study suggests that the airleak test has a low sensitivity when used as a screening test to predict

298 mance of conventional culture was limited by low sensitivity, while that of the BDG test was limited

299 ever, current techniques can have relatively low sensitivity, with prior antimicrobial therapy and in

300 f at 1:160 serum dilution (high specificity, low sensitivity) would be useful to confirm the presence