ライフサイエンスコーパス: low-flow

1 from the surface upon a switch from high to low flow.

2 alteration in ion homeostasis as a result of low flow.

3 e observed with certain models in regions of low flow.

4 both injured and uninjured CCAs subjected to low flow.

5 n seems to be more intense during periods of low flow.

6 and timing of ecologically critical high and low flows.

7 eased TRX activity compared with exposure to low flow (0.4 dyn/cm2).

8 .1 microCi) to hypoxic (2.9 +/- 0.5 muCi) to low flow (10.9 +/- 1.3 microCi; P < .01).

9 A control group received 0% low flow (20 mins of global ischemia).

10 icantly less often in grafts with a TTF with low flow (259 of 363 [71.3%]) than in those with normal

11 5), high flow and placebo; Group 3 (n = 6), low flow (30 mL/kg/min) and epinephrine; and Group 4 (n

12 cruitment, n = 12) or 0.600 +/- 0.004 L/min (low flow, 33% full recruitment, n = 12) after lung injur

13 ft revision was more frequent in grafts with low flow (44 of 568 [7.7%]) than in those with normal fl

14 +/- SEM) to hypoxic (9.1 +/- 1.0 microCi) to low flow (44.0 +/- 2.6 microCi; P < .01).

15 In protocol 1 dogs with sustained low flow (50% +/- 4%) and absence of systolic thickening

16 The interval of low flow also coincides with anomalously high Gulf Strea

17 Prolonged low flow altered vascular function and may relate as muc

18 erved after 1 week only in CCA segments with low flow and injury.

19 Both low flow and low ejection fraction have emerged as impor

20 dial viability under conditions of sustained low flow and myocardial asynergy, such as appears to exi

21 g/min) and epinephrine; and Group 4 (n = 6), low flow and placebo.

22 Because low flow and shear stress have been related to the local

23 der mesenteric artery (MA1) is under chronic low flow and the adjacent first order mesenteric artery

24 rably to both Tee and multilaminar mixers at low flow and was successfully used to screen and optimiz

25 AP) improved outcomes compared with standard low-flow and high-flow oxygen therapies.

26 to that of the PAC; both approaches revealed low-flow and poor tissue perfusion that were worse in th

27 oconstriction or decreased limb blood flow ("low flow") and potentially with small blood volume.

28 ts of patients with low stroke volume index (low flow) and low-gradient with reduced (classical) or p

29 lavaged with saline (n = 8) at quasi-static (low flow at a peak pressure of 40 cm H(2)O) and dynamic

30 Low flow but not low LVEF or low gradient is an independ

31 cherichia coli and mediates weak adhesion at low flow but strong adhesion at high flow.

32 ximately 58% higher in high flow compared to low flow, but predation masked those differences.

33 titative response time of about a day during low flow, but this decreases to <12 h during high-flow e

34 ith higher dispersion and significantly more low-flow capillaries in the OZRs than in the LZRs.

35 Low-flow cardiopulmonary bypass (35 mL/kg/min) was insti

36 no significant difference was found between low-flow cardiopulmonary bypass and deep hypothermic cir

37 ither total circulatory arrest or continuous low-flow cardiopulmonary bypass.

38 ort method consisting predominantly of CA or low-flow cardiopulmonary bypass.

39 surgery was total circulatory arrest (CA) or low-flow cardiopulmonary bypass.

40 Intimal proliferation in low-flow carotid arteries was decreased in Bcr knockout

41 ntinuous assessment of cardiac output during low-flow circulatory shock states of diverse causes.

42 orea) alone can control recovery of high and low flow communities.

43 along mannosylated surfaces under relatively low flow conditions and to accumulate preferentially in

44 at drinking water intakes; however, similar low flow conditions in summer of 2012 did not, indicatin

45 of a real population during both natural and low flow conditions provided the simulation environment

46 sensitivity, thus keeping vessels open under low flow conditions that prevail in the primitive plexus

47 ygen, carbon dioxide, and temperature during low flow conditions, for a period of one week.

48 ct diel phosphorus signal was observed under low flow conditions, highlighting the ability of the sen

49 acity can reach full sorption capacity under low flow conditions, the macrorates are 10(-1) to 10(-3)

50 low toward mucosa (P < 0.003) under high and low flow conditions.

51 ains a significant concern, especially under low flow conditions.

52 zation, investigations which focus solely on low-flow conditions may yield misleading results.

53 e northern SCS, unusually weak winds created low-flow conditions that amplified the 2 degrees C basin

54 Using precision microfilters under low-flow conditions, we isolated circulating cancer-asso

55 The final low-flow/control activity ratio was 13.6:1.

56 The peak uptake low-flow/control ratio was 7:1.

57 ntly, the animals were exposed to 90 mins of low-flow CPB (35 mL/kg/min).

58 In response to low flow, CyPA plays a crucial role in VSMC migration an

59 Low flow during the dry summer of 2010 contributed to in

60 In our case it may be attributed to the low flow dynamics of PAVM, as well as to the local admin

61 in fewer and smaller occurrences of computed low-flow ecodeficits.

62 The potential benefits of ultra-low flow electrospray ionization (ESI) for the analysis

63 infusion analysis of the nanoLC fractions, a low-flow electrospray chip is used which consists of 400

64 detailed characterization of a conventional low-flow electrospray ionization (ESI) source for mass s

65 on determined maximum population size and in low flow environments, recruitment success is likely det

66 They lived in low-flow environments, fueled by uptake [1-3] of dissolv

67 to facilitate osmotrophic nutrient uptake in low-flow environments.

68 LC-MS, demonstrating the potential of ultra-low flow ESI for the analysis of phosphopeptides in liqu

69 entified and classified as "high-power" and "low-flow" events.

70 New therapies, including a novel low-flow extracorporeal CO2 removal technique and mesenc

71 SIN-1 and to cGMP was increased in the Day28 low flow first order mesenteric artery.

72 variance that drive fishery yield: prolonged low flows followed by a short flood pulse.

73 Before explantation, at low flow for 15 minutes, ejection fraction was 70 +/- 7,

74 ol), but after 2 hours they were perfused at low flow for 22 hours at 3.7 degrees C and again for 3 h

75 l rates of 78% and 70%, respectively, in the low-flow group vs 96% and 87%, respectively, in the norm

76 lyzer (EA) and introduces these gases into a low-flow helium carrier stream for isotopic analysis.

77 high gradient, normal flow low gradient, and low flow high gradient were 13%, 50%, 22%, and 15%, resp

78 Properties of the low-flow, high-viscosity circulatory state, combined wit

79 Tumors with a low-flow-high-metabolism phenotype demonstrated higher V

80 oxemic and normoxemic perfusion but not with low-flow hyperoxemic perfusion.

81 ared with baseline physiological values with low-flow hypoxemic and normoxemic perfusion but not with

82 Low flow (i.e., reduced stroke volume index [SVi]) can o

83 lar ejection fraction, including paradoxical low-flow (i.e., stroke volume index <35 ml/m(2)), low-gr

84 mia but before full reperfusion, a period of low flow improves postischemic myocardial function and e

85 g it difficult to differentiate a high and a low flow in a single experiment.

86 (n=10), NOET and 201Tl were injected during low flow in the left anterior descending coronary artery

87 sive forearm ischemia-reperfusion injury and low flow induced vascular dysfunction models provide met

88 uggest that HB-EGF signaling is required for low flow-induced hypertrophic remodeling and may partici

89 We thus tested whether HB-EGF contributes to low flow-induced negative hypertrophic remodeling (FINR)

90 ergetic recovery, only if a certain level of low flow is met.

91 Low flow is often associated with low gradient despite s

92 nditions, then subjected to 50 min of severe low flow ischemia followed by 60 min of reperfusion.

93 flow, 15 mins of global ischemia, 5 mins of low flow ischemia, and 30 mins of reperfusion.

94 -NMR isotopomer analysis after 30 minutes of low-flow ischemia (0.3 mL/min) and 60 minutes of reperfu

95 Hearts had 60 minutes of low-flow ischemia (10% of baseline coronary flow) and 30

96 MAPK activation was markedly reduced during low-flow ischemia (2.3- versus 7-fold in wild-type heart

97 In a canine model of regional low-flow ischemia (n = 9), serial IPPA SPECT images (2 m

98 respectively; P<.05) but not resulting from low-flow ischemia (recovery of developed pressure was 40

99 RSR13 given after the onset of low-flow ischemia also improved cardiac PCr/ATP ratios a

100 urine hearts were subjected to 60 minutes of low-flow ischemia and 120 minutes of reperfusion.

101 in left ventricle) rat and rabbit hearts to low-flow ischemia and increased extracellular calcium (f

102 Our goals were to (1) simulate the degree of low-flow ischemia and mixed anaerobic and aerobic metabo

103 red-cell perfused rabbit hearts by imposing low-flow ischemia and pacing tachycardia.

104 nstrumented canine myocardium after bouts of low-flow ischemia and persists after reperfusion.

105 tion of glucose uptake and glycolysis during low-flow ischemia and plays an important protective role

106 During low-flow ischemia and postischemic reperfusion in vitro,

107 We tested the effects of low-flow ischemia and reperfusion on the ratio of tracer

108 2 mL/min per gram wet wt), (D) 90 minutes of low-flow ischemia at 10% of baseline coronary flow (0.29

109 5 minutes of reperfusion), (C) 90 minutes of low-flow ischemia at 10% of baseline coronary flow (0.31

110 uced by coronary artery occlusion and global low-flow ischemia in isolated hearts.

111 hearts, the LV stiffened more rapidly during low-flow ischemia in the old hearts than in the adults,

112 However, whether low-flow ischemia leads to the translocation of glucose

113 In the isolated working rat heart, low-flow ischemia rapidly activated AMPKK activity when

114 Low-flow ischemia resulted in a 270% increase (P:<0.05)

115 During low-flow ischemia simulating an acute myocardial infarct

116 Similarly, after 45 minutes of low-flow ischemia, after diastolic pressure had increase

117 rat hearts were perfused during preischemia, low-flow ischemia, and reperfusion, using (3)H-substrate

118 ng that if activation of PKC occurred during low-flow ischemia, it was not protective.

119 During low-flow ischemia, MyBP-C is dephosphorylated, and the n

120 ine triphosphate content falls slowly during low-flow ischemia, PKC may be activated and translocated

121 ntractile dysfunction that is apparent after low-flow ischemia.

122 deficiency (G4H-/-) were subjected to global low-flow ischemia.

123 ylproprionic acid derivative (RSR13), during low-flow ischemia.

124 o the sarcolemma occurs in vivo during acute low-flow ischemia.

125 PC could protect against injury arising from low-flow ischemia.

126 and albumin: controls (6 mL/min, n = 6) and low-flow ischemic (0.5 mL/min, n = 6).

127 it buffer (KH): controls (12 mL/min, n = 6), low-flow ischemic (1 mL/min, n = 7), and hypoxic (12 mL/

128 ocardial uptake and retention in hypoxic and low-flow ischemic models.

129 before and after RSR13 administration during low-flow LAD ischemia.

130 ersions and numerous ablation lesions in the low-flow left atrium, but cerebral embolic risk in ventr

131 are the outcome of patients with paradoxical low-flow (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] >/=5

132 rdiography suggested that low gradient (LG), low flow (LF) aortic stenosis (AS) has more pronounced l

133 Low flow (LF) can occur with reduced (classic) or preser

134 n pulmonary flow and pressure were analyzed: low flow (LF, n=21), high flow/low pressure (systolic pu

135 Low-flow (LF) severe aortic stenosis (AS) is an independ

136 The prognosis and treatment of patients with low-flow (LF) severe aortic stenosis are controversial.

137 Forty-one subjects (25 with low flow [LF], stroke volume index [SVI] </=35 ml/m(2),

138 ventricular flow state (normal flow [NF] vs. low flow [LF]: 35 ml/m(2)) and pressure gradient levels

139 atified by stroke volume index (<35 mL/m(2) [low flow, LF] versus >/=35 mL/m(2) [normal flow, NF]) an

140 Severe low-gradient, low-flow (LG/LF) aortic stenosis with preserved left ven

141 ntitation of THC and THCA in oral fluid with low-flow liquid chromatography and a Q Exactive mass spe

142 imes-weekly HD regimen, a three-times-weekly low-flow/long-time regimen results in comparable effecti

143 A daily low-flow/long-time regimen substantially increases the e

144 : F = 7, T = 100, QB = 350, QD = 600; C/D/E (low-flow/long-time): F = 3/5/7, T = 480, QB = 300, QD =

145 Low-flow low-gradient (LFLG) is sometimes observed in se

146 Poor outcomes after AVR are associated with low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis, severe ventricula

147 The pathophysiology of low flow, low gradient severe aortic stenosis (LGSAS) wi

148 Low-flow, low-gradient (LF-LG) aortic stenosis (AS) may

149 ical relevance and management of paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis (LFLG-AS) with pr

150 Prognosis of patients with paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe AS was definitely worse th

151 Decision making in patients with low flow-low gradient aortic stenosis mainly depends on

152 In patients with low flow-low gradient aortic stenosis, 2-dimensional str

153 In 47 patients with low flow-low gradient aortic stenosis, global peak systo

154 CE resolution and simultaneously generates a low flow (<100 nL/min) for fraction collection.

155 sing conventional plates can accommodate the low-flow (< 1 microL/min) separation protocols typically

156 Aortic valve area was lower in low flow/LVEF groups (LEF: 0.71 +/- 0.20 cm(2) and PLF:

157 whether such forces similarly influence the low-flow lymphatic system is unknown.

158 nitial response was similar in high flow and low flow MA1, and included rapid reduction in MYPT1 and

159 Endothelial activation and unusually low flow may be a setting prone to receptor-mediated RBC

160 Very low flow may further reduce bioenergetic recovery withou

161 Conversely, low-flow mediated constriction increased (PRE: -1.3+/-0.

162 rization and subsequent exercise training on low-flow mediated vasoconstriction (L-FMC) has not previ

163 nin I elevation was not considered an event, low flow-mediated dilation remained an independent predi

164 Flow-mediated dilation, low-flow-mediated constriction, and reactive hyperaemia

165 Based on detection of flow in low-flow microvessels, a new sharp contrast image was de

166 Sharp images of low-flowing microvessels were enabled by introducing inv

167 During mean August conditions (generally low-flow, minimal dilution) in receiving rivers, the med

168 VSVI status (severe low flow [SLF], moderate low flow [MLF], and normal flow [(NF]).

169 c indices, including stream discharge during low-flow months, do not display statistically significan

170 creasing by 100-400% (400-2000 mug/L) during low-flow months, when metal concentrations are highest.

171 ts with good early response to induction and low flow-MRD levels after consolidation is quite favorab

172 n=7), reduced by partial outflow occlusion (low flow, n=7), or increased by ligation of the left CCA

173 s for improving MS interface performance for low-flow (nano- to micro-) electrosprays.

174 rting at a CPAP level of 5 cm H2O), standard low-flow nasal cannula (2 L/min), or high-flow nasal can

175 er high flow (O2 supply-independent VO2) and low flow (O2 supply-dependent) conditions.

176 nique for the introduction of samples from a low flow of liquid, and the interfacing of SAWN with liq

177 It includes periods of sustained low flow of multiple decades in duration, suggesting the

178 ain surface (sulci) and possibly promoted by low flow of the cerebrospinal fluid in these areas.

179 ever, there are few data about the impact of low flow on outcomes following TAVR.

180 en evaluated nor has the impact of prolonged low flow on vascular function been established.

181 m greater clearance from normal areas versus low-flow or transiently occluded areas.

182 oderate-severe COPD, and (2) to test whether low flow oxygen administration improves endothelial func

183 ped early because of higher mortality in the low-flow oxygen group than in the bubble CPAP group, and

184 ath than the children who received oxygen by low-flow oxygen therapy (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07-0.89; p=0.

185 CPAP group had treatment failure than in the low-flow oxygen therapy group (relative risk [RR] 0.27,

186 e CPAP group, ten (15%) children died in the low-flow oxygen therapy group, and ten (13%) children di

187 e oxygen therapy by bubble CPAP, 67 (30%) to low-flow oxygen therapy, and 79 (35%) to high-flow oxyge

188 received bubble CPAP, 16 (24%) had received low-flow oxygen therapy, and ten (13%) had received high

189 umonia and hypoxaemia compared with standard low-flow oxygen therapy.

190 severe childhood pneumonia and hypoxaemia is low-flow oxygen therapy.

191 h normal flow (P<0.05), a 366% increase with low flow (P<0.005), and only a 38% increase with high fl

192 Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a low flow pathology often prevented by vascular compressi

193 udy, we test the hypothesis that a period of low flow perfusion before full reperfusion improves vent

194 Low-flow perfusion caused a significant 6-fold increase

195 ceived 10% or 1% of baseline flow during the low flow period.

196 l be most extreme and most widespread during low flow periods.

197 overy under both high (mussel dominated) and low flow (plant dominated) conditions.

198 severe aortic stenosis (AS) and paradoxical low flow (PLF) have worse outcome compared with those wi

199 ith low ejection fraction (LEF), paradoxical low flow (PLF), and normal flow (NF) after aortic valve

200 A subgroup of low-flow POTS patients had exaggerated venoconstriction

201 etry (LDF) combined with iontophoresis in 15 low-flow POTS patients, 17 normal-flow POTS patients, an

202 The pattern of thermal hyperemia response in low-flow POTS subjects during saline administration rese

203 heating, which was insensitive to L-NAME in low-flow POTS subjects.

204 ural tachycardia syndrome (POTS), designated low-flow POTS, is associated with decreased peripheral b

205 ent cutaneous vasoregulation was similar for low-flow POTS, normal-flow POTS, and reference subjects.

206 produces decreased peripheral blood flow in low-flow POTS, we performed experiments using laser-Dopp

207 dependent nitric oxide release is reduced in low-flow POTS.

208 Low-flow push-pull perfusion is a sampling method that y

209 In this work, in vivo low-flow push-pull perfusion sampling was utilized with

210 These results demonstrate that low-flow push-pull perfusion with segmented flow can be

211 sampling of amino acid neurotransmitters by low-flow push-pull perfusion.

212 conductive solutions (K = 0.4 S/m) and at a low flow rate (2 nL/min).

213 4.5x10(14 )ions/second); or 5) ionization at low flow rate (93 minutes, 1.7x10(11) ions/second).

214 acellular liquid is passively extracted at a low flow rate (~10 nL/s) through a small bore silica cap

215 ng" phenomenon with plasma only entering the low flow rate branch.

216 to 15 microm) liquid chromatography (nanoLC)/low flow rate electrospray (nanoESI) mass spectrometry (

217 ly thin walls at the orifice facilitate very low flow rate operation; stable ESI-MS signals were obta

218 le, and single-step interface design between low flow rate separation techniques, such as sheathless

219 nteers and patients undergoing treatment for low flow rate.

220 electrospray sample introduction system for low-flow rate applications using inductively coupled pla

221 tion efficiency and increased sensitivity at low flow-rate conditions.

222 vances in HPLC column technology have led to low flow-rate HPLC such as capillary HPLC and nanoflow H

223 s perfused directly through each scaffold at low flow rates ( 0.15mL/min).

224 -end plate distance, were optimized for very low flow rates ( approximately 5 nL/min) in order to att

225 ing narrow (<30 microm i.d.) capillaries and low flow rates (<100 nL/min).

226 to dissolved lead by 19%, while sampling at low flow rates (<5.2 LPM) was found to consistently supp

227 All designs were relatively successful at low flow rates (0.06 cm/s, > or = 75% mixing), but had v

228 e of matrix, sample can be deposited at very low flow rates (150 nL/min).

229 s perfused directly through each scaffold at low flow rates (~0.15mL/min).

230 rong dc component, a low-frequency branch at low flow rates and applied voltages, and a high-frequenc

231 Shallow gradients at low flow rates are applied in the first dimension, where

232 At very low flow rates below 50 nL.min(-1) very sharp, pulled na

233 nsfer limitations were evident at relatively low flow rates but were absent at higher flow rates.

234 As a result, low flow rates can be used to separate the sperm cells f

235 y (MS) and becomes more challenging for very low flow rates due to extra column volume effects on sep

236 Livers from fed rats were perfused at low flow rates for 75 min.

237 liquids are detectable in flow systems with low flow rates of 20 muL min(-1) by means of optical emi

238 Because of the low flow rates used (50 nL/min), it is challenging to us

239 The deuterium recovery measured at low flow rates using this system spanned a range of 66-7

240 cities at the edges of the vena contracta at low flow rates, resulting in a parabolic profile.

241 ental studies have shown that, at relatively low flow rates, turbulence in pipes is transient, and is

242 The reference sprayer is optimized for low flow rates, whereas the sample sprayer is a conventi

243 lled more slowly and regularly on 2-GSP-6 at low flow rates.

244 he average velocity at the vena contracta at low flow rates.

245 more porous and loosely attached biofilms at low flow rates.

246 in cytometry that are inherently limited to low flow rates.

247 lowed high-flow rates for sample loading and low-flow rates for elution.

248 Livers were initially perfused at low-flow rates to induce pericentral hypoxia followed by

249 sion injury to the liver was studied using a low-flow, reflow perfusion model and a liver transplanta

250 berry oil on hepatic reperfusion injury in a low-flow, reflow reperfusion model were investigated in

251 Our findings unveil a low-flow regime in which endothelial cell mechanics is a

252 growth patterns well across both natural and low flow regimes.

253 me ratio for extraction, while retaining the low flow resistance commensurate with open channels.

254 The low flow resistance enables high flow rates of up to 10

255 s DNA extraction method with a high-density, low-flow resistance microchannel pattern sets the stage

256 and have long-term stability and minimal or low-flow sensitivity.

257 and tested a new SESI configuration, termed low-flow SESI, that permits the reduction of the require

258 phs of sufficient density, access to flow in low-flow settings provides an advantage to taller archit

259 Studies of TAVR in low-flow severe aortic stenosis patients have demonstrat

260 n, diagnosis, and treatment of patients with low-flow severe aortic stenosis remains challenging.

261 ow/shear segments and regression of adjacent low flow/shear segments.

262 t of the variation in macroalgal coverage at low flow sites and also mussel recovery at high flow sit

263 o tertiles by discharge LVSVI status (severe low flow [SLF], moderate low flow [MLF], and normal flow

264 s of 0.3%+/-3.1% for tumor and 16%+/-11% for low-flow soft tissue (muscle plus fat).

265 in LVR solutions increased tolerance to the low flow state by two and fivefold, respectively, normal

266 the interstitial space are enhanced during a low flow state of cerebral ischemia.

267 s likely to be an important component of the low-flow state, isolated adult rat cardiac myocytes were

268 Moreover, the 'low flow' state of cerebral ischemia, produced by tradit

269 heterogeneity in muscularis at both high and low flow states, and in mucosa under high flow condition

270 be due to the accumulation of sulfide during low flow states.

271 n), and encompassed a wide range of high and low flow states.

272 IRS can certainly assist in the detection of low-flow states (low cardiac output).

273 to determine the accuracy of the methods in low-flow states and to develop an approach for a partial

274 Acute renal failure (ARF) in low-flow states may be reversed by increasing renal perf

275 osttransplant renal artery flow and to avoid low-flow states that could induce acute tubular necrosis

276 of cardiac output to the kidney; however, in low-flow states, this reduces already compromised system

277 effects of nitroglycerin, especially during low-flow states.

278 gh-flow states, with more of a difference at low-flow states.

279 Under low-flow stream conditions, flocs may settle, become bur

280 ibution of Fe and As in flocs collected from low-flow streams (pH 5.3-6.3) of the naturally As-enrich

281 time following a 20-minute wash in period of low flow supplemental oxygen to normalize arterial oxyge

282 In this cohort, 334 (52.3%) patients had a low flow (SVi <35 ml/m(2)) and these patients had increa

283 Low-flow synoptic sampling campaigns are often used as t

284 Low-flow synoptic sampling results indicate that concent

285 rtal hypertension and mesenteric artery high/low flow, the portal vein and first order mesenteric art

286 In contrast, under continued low flow, there was further switching to the MYPT1 leuci

287 o-flow) time, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (low-flow) time, and temperature.

288 nal demand management strategy of installing low-flow toilets.

289 Hemodynamic forces such as low flow upregulate injury-induced MMP-2 mRNA and appear

290 Venous malformations are low-flow vascular lesions consisting of disorganized thi

291 ascular anomalies, differentiating high- and low-flow vascular malformations.

292 idance were performed in three patients with low-flow vascular malformations.

293 h presented nonoverlapping intervals between low flow velocities and medium or high flow velocities (

294 When discriminating between low flow velocities and medium or high flow velocities,

295 pneumophila adhesion on these biofilm under low flow velocity (0.007 m/s) positively correlated with

296 but that dechlorination failed at medium or low flow velocity (0.080 or 0.036 m/d).

297 ere compared based on TTF measurements (<20 [low flow] vs >/=20 mL/min [normal flow]) and PI values (

298 e classified according to flow and gradient: low flow was defined as a stroke volume index </=35 mL/m

299 estimates of the flow parameter at high and low flow were separated by several s.d.s for both the si

300 gher than in first draw samples collected at low flow with stagnation, demonstrating a new "worst cas