ライフサイエンスコーパス: low-protein diet

1 idney development and function by a maternal low protein diet.

2 did not increase during overfeeding with the low protein diet.

3 s affecting the urea cycle while consuming a low protein diet.

4 changes in fat distribution in response to a low-protein diet.

5 MA-B (P = 0.004) in participants consuming a low-protein diet.

6 day 4 of the high-protein compared with the low-protein diet.

7 ts of soy-protein intake resemble those of a low-protein diet.

8 s the ability of the patient to respond to a low-protein diet.

9 econdary hyperparathyroidism on day 4 of the low-protein diet.

10 rs in the initial IMCD (IMCD1) of rats fed a low-protein diet.

11 ihydroxyvitamin D] in subjects consuming the low-protein diet.

12 core were significant only in animals on the low protein diets.

13 ructural size to captive-reared goslings fed low-protein diets.

14 n Association for the Study of Diabetes, and low-protein diets.

15 s by the gut compared with animals receiving low-protein diets.

16 construed as an argument against the use of low-protein diets.

17 due to maternal malnutrition via high-fat or low-protein diets.

18 Patients were prescribed a very low protein diet (0.3 g/kg) plus supplemental essential

19 s were instructed and their adherence to the low-protein diet (0.6 g/kg of body weight per day) was e

20 - 3.9 micromol kg-1 h-1, HP + W) but not the low protein diet (51.1 +/- 5.9 micromol kg-1 h-1, LP + G

21 protein diet (18% casein; NPD) or isocaloric low protein diet (9% casein; LPD) restricted to one ovul

22 diet plus resistance training (n = 14) or a low-protein diet alone (n = 12) for 12 weeks.

23 her, these findings indicate that a maternal low-protein diet alters microRNA and mTOR expression in

24 ng most pronounced in female animals fed the low protein diets and the effects of protein reduction b

25 ary calcium decreased significantly with the low-protein diet and increased significantly with the hi

26 to be effective against the catabolism of a low-protein diet and uremia in patients with renal failu

27 goose goslings were unable to survive on the low-protein diets, and those fed high- or medium-protein

28 Low protein diets are commonly prescribed for patients w

29 When low-protein diets are prescribed, patients should be clo

30 Studies have compared high- and low-protein diets, but there are few data on carbohydrat

31 Low-protein diets cause a urinary concentrating defect i

32 ion of renal disease in patients receiving a low-protein diet compared with patients receiving a usua

33 nd by day 14 1.6-2.7 times higher during the low-protein diet compared with the medium-protein diet.

34 The impaired NO release in the MA of low protein diet dams was not accompanied by reduced eNO

35 In contrast, offspring of a low-protein diet displayed no deficits in operant learni

36 We have shown maternal low protein diet exclusively during mouse preimplantatio

37 Offspring of males fed a low-protein diet exhibited elevated hepatic expression o

38 In addition, after the low-protein diet, food preferences for savory high-prote

39 oduced significantly less weight gain in the low protein diet group (3.16 kg; 95% CI, 1.88-4.44 kg) c

40 In the low-protein diet group whose excess energy was fat, the

41 SleepEE was unchanged by overfeeding in the low-protein diet group, and baseline surface area predic

42 47, respectively) but not in subjects in the low-protein-diet group (P = 0.384 and 0.078, respectivel

43 Canada and snow goose goslings fed low-protein diets had reduced growth rates of the tarsus

44 tudies demonstrated that in mouse dams fed a low-protein diet hepatic expression of FOXA2 and FOXA3 m

45 hancing autophagy by exposure to a prolonged low-protein diet improved cardiac function in Python mic

46 The effect of maternal low protein diet in pregnancy on the function of offspri

47 n used to model the effects of exposure to a low protein diet in utero on adult blood pressure.

48 e reported previously that rats exposed to a low-protein diet in utero and postnatal catch-up growth

49 usly, we demonstrated that rats exposed to a low-protein diet in utero that underwent postnatal catch

50 searched for studies examining the effect of low-protein diets in humans with chronic renal disease.

51 we hypothesized that exposure to a maternal low-protein diet increases glomerular Ang II AT1 recepto

52 of ketoanalogue-supplemented vegetarian very low-protein diet (KD) compared with conventional low-pro

53 promoted impulsivity, whereas exposure to a low-protein diet led to marked inattention.

54 With the low protein diet leucine oxidation rates during feeding

55 we revealed that newborns of dams exposed to low-protein diet (LP0.5) throughout pregnancy exhibited

56 We studied maternal low protein diet (LPD) during pregnancy/lactation in mic

57 Maternal low protein diet (LPD) fed during only the preimplantati

58 reover, there is no evidence that the use of low protein diets (LPD) in the predialysis period result

59 NPY-Y2R system is also activated by maternal low-protein diet (LPD) and linked to obesity in offsprin

60 protein diet (KD) compared with conventional low-protein diet (LPD).

61 ites in CRF may be a beneficial adjunct to a low-protein diet (LPD).

62 of support for protein leverage effects on a low-protein diet may stem from the fact that protein int

63 tary manipulations in the daughters in a rat low-protein diet model.

64 ng sheep were fed either a control (n=15) or low-protein diet (n=16, 17 vs. 8.7 g crude protein/MJ me

65 dard diet; a high-carbohydrate, low-fat, and low-protein diet; or a low-carbohydrate, high-fat, and h

66 They were randomly assigned to a low-protein diet plus resistance training (n = 14) or a

67 muscle wasting, which may be exacerbated by low-protein diets prescribed to delay disease progressio

68 In maternal low protein diet rat models of programming, administrati

69 after infection, with those on the high fat/low protein diet showing 30% survival at 8 days, vs. alm

70 five studies of nondiabetic renal disease, a low-protein diet significantly reduced the risk for rena

71 es of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, a low-protein diet significantly slowed the increase in ur

72 In rats with renal disease, low-protein diets slow the decline in renal function, hi

73 hase protein intake was 13% higher after the low-protein diet than after the high-protein diet (253 +

74 Pigs fed a low-protein diet that were not vaccinated with SLT-IIe(E

75 nce of one or more cofactors, particularly a low-protein diet, thiamine deficiency, alcoholism, and h

76 f the total visceral CO2 production during a low protein diet, this increase did not compensate entir

77 Fractional calcium absorption after the low-protein diet was 0.19+/-0.03, which was significantl

78 ion model, in which animals are exposed to a low-protein diet while in utero and then are cross-foste