ライフサイエンスコーパス: low-protein diet

1 idney development and function by a maternal low protein diet.

2 did not increase during overfeeding with the low protein diet.

3 s affecting the urea cycle while consuming a low protein diet.

4 the very-low-protein diet compared with the low-protein diet.

5 MA-B (P = 0.004) in participants consuming a low-protein diet.

6 changes in fat distribution in response to a low-protein diet.

7 day 4 of the high-protein compared with the low-protein diet.

8 ts of soy-protein intake resemble those of a low-protein diet.

9 s the ability of the patient to respond to a low-protein diet.

10 econdary hyperparathyroidism on day 4 of the low-protein diet.

11 rs in the initial IMCD (IMCD1) of rats fed a low-protein diet.

12 ihydroxyvitamin D] in subjects consuming the low-protein diet.

13 core were significant only in animals on the low protein diets.

14 of the diet, with mortality being highest on low-protein diets.

15 wth rate in vivo, which peaked in larvae fed low-protein diets.

16 due to maternal malnutrition via high-fat or low-protein diets.

17 ructural size to captive-reared goslings fed low-protein diets.

18 n Association for the Study of Diabetes, and low-protein diets.

19 s by the gut compared with animals receiving low-protein diets.

20 construed as an argument against the use of low-protein diets.

21 Patients were prescribed a very low protein diet (0.3 g/kg) plus supplemental essential

22 s were instructed and their adherence to the low-protein diet (0.6 g/kg of body weight per day) was e

23 - 3.9 micromol kg-1 h-1, HP + W) but not the low protein diet (51.1 +/- 5.9 micromol kg-1 h-1, LP + G

24 protein diet (18% casein; NPD) or isocaloric low protein diet (9% casein; LPD) restricted to one ovul

25 diet plus resistance training (n = 14) or a low-protein diet alone (n = 12) for 12 weeks.

26 her, these findings indicate that a maternal low-protein diet alters microRNA and mTOR expression in

27 Low protein diet and sodium or glycerol phenylbutyrate,

28 ng most pronounced in female animals fed the low protein diets and the effects of protein reduction b

29 ary calcium decreased significantly with the low-protein diet and increased significantly with the hi

30 r time can be assessed by 24-h overfeeding a low-protein diet and measurements of plasma FGF21 concen

31 to be effective against the catabolism of a low-protein diet and uremia in patients with renal failu

32 goose goslings were unable to survive on the low-protein diets, and those fed high- or medium-protein

33 The preference for low protein diets apparently occurred early in the evolu

34 Low protein diets are associated with healthy aging in h

35 Low protein diets are commonly prescribed for patients w

36 When low-protein diets are prescribed, patients should be clo

37 Studies have compared high- and low-protein diets, but there are few data on carbohydrat

38 Low-protein diets cause a urinary concentrating defect i

39 ion of renal disease in patients receiving a low-protein diet compared with patients receiving a usua

40 n participants randomly assigned to the very-low-protein diet compared with the low-protein diet.

41 nd by day 14 1.6-2.7 times higher during the low-protein diet compared with the medium-protein diet.

42 etween participants randomly assigned to the low-protein diet compared with the moderate-protein diet

43 ctivation of TFEB, TFE3 and mTORC1 under the low-protein diet condition, causing accelerated tumour g

44 The impaired NO release in the MA of low protein diet dams was not accompanied by reduced eNO

45 In contrast, offspring of a low-protein diet displayed no deficits in operant learni

46 use model combined with a high phosphate and low protein diet effectively replicated medial artery an

47 this issue of Molecular Cell that a paternal low-protein diet elevates ROS in the testicular germ cel

48 We have shown maternal low protein diet exclusively during mouse preimplantatio

49 Offspring of males fed a low-protein diet exhibited elevated hepatic expression o

50 Primary osteoblasts from low protein diet fed mice showed decreased in vitro bone

51 tion in weanling mice, induced by 2-weeks of low protein diet feeding from weaning, leads to an impai

52 In addition, after the low-protein diet, food preferences for savory high-prote

53 h the significance of a sup-optimal paternal low protein diet for offspring vascular homeostasis and

54 oduced significantly less weight gain in the low protein diet group (3.16 kg; 95% CI, 1.88-4.44 kg) c

55 In the low-protein diet group whose excess energy was fat, the

56 SleepEE was unchanged by overfeeding in the low-protein diet group, and baseline surface area predic

57 47, respectively) but not in subjects in the low-protein-diet group (P = 0.384 and 0.078, respectivel

58 A low protein diet had minimal effects on paternal cardiov

59 Canada and snow goose goslings fed low-protein diets had reduced growth rates of the tarsus

60 dividuals with a blunted FGF21 response to a low-protein diet have a thrifty metabolism and are at ri

61 tudies demonstrated that in mouse dams fed a low-protein diet hepatic expression of FOXA2 and FOXA3 m

62 hancing autophagy by exposure to a prolonged low-protein diet improved cardiac function in Python mic

63 enzyme activity were programmed by paternal low protein diet in a sperm and/or seminal plasma specif

64 The effect of maternal low protein diet in pregnancy on the function of offspri

65 n used to model the effects of exposure to a low protein diet in utero on adult blood pressure.

66 e reported previously that rats exposed to a low-protein diet in utero and postnatal catch-up growth

67 usly, we demonstrated that rats exposed to a low-protein diet in utero that underwent postnatal catch

68 searched for studies examining the effect of low-protein diets in humans with chronic renal disease.

69 we hypothesized that exposure to a maternal low-protein diet increases glomerular Ang II AT1 recepto

70 A low-protein diet inhibited mTORC1 signalling in cancer c

71 of ketoanalogue-supplemented vegetarian very low-protein diet (KD) compared with conventional low-pro

72 promoted impulsivity, whereas exposure to a low-protein diet led to marked inattention.

73 With the low protein diet leucine oxidation rates during feeding

74 we revealed that newborns of dams exposed to low-protein diet (LP0.5) throughout pregnancy exhibited

75 We studied maternal low protein diet (LPD) during pregnancy/lactation in mic

76 Maternal low protein diet (LPD) fed during only the preimplantati

77 ein diet (NPD; 18% protein) or an isocaloric low protein diet (LPD; 9% protein) for a minimum of 7 we

78 reover, there is no evidence that the use of low protein diets (LPD) in the predialysis period result

79 NPY-Y2R system is also activated by maternal low-protein diet (LPD) and linked to obesity in offsprin

80 Isocaloric low-protein diet (LPD) consumption in mice recapitulated

81 Exposure to gestational low-protein diet (LPD) results in the inappropriate expr

82 oanalogues (sVLPD), compared with a standard low-protein diet (LPD), improves outcomes in patients wi

83 protein diet (KD) compared with conventional low-protein diet (LPD).

84 ites in CRF may be a beneficial adjunct to a low-protein diet (LPD).

85 of support for protein leverage effects on a low-protein diet may stem from the fact that protein int

86 tary manipulations in the daughters in a rat low-protein diet model.

87 Paternal low protein diet modified F1 male offspring testicular e

88 Paternal low protein diet modified F1 neonatal and adult offsprin

89 ng sheep were fed either a control (n=15) or low-protein diet (n=16, 17 vs. 8.7 g crude protein/MJ me

90 dard diet; a high-carbohydrate, low-fat, and low-protein diet; or a low-carbohydrate, high-fat, and h

91 They were randomly assigned to a low-protein diet plus resistance training (n = 14) or a

92 muscle wasting, which may be exacerbated by low-protein diets prescribed to delay disease progressio

93 ation analyses and studied angiogenesis in a low protein diet rat model of IUGR.

94 In maternal low protein diet rat models of programming, administrati

95 amino acids in in vitro and in vivo models (low-protein diet) reverted drug resistance, revealing a

96 However, dams fed the low protein diet showed extensive bone loss by the end o

97 after infection, with those on the high fat/low protein diet showing 30% survival at 8 days, vs. alm

98 five studies of nondiabetic renal disease, a low-protein diet significantly reduced the risk for rena

99 es of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, a low-protein diet significantly slowed the increase in ur

100 In rats with renal disease, low-protein diets slow the decline in renal function, hi

101 Whether a very low-protein diet supplemented with ketoanalogues (sVLPD)

102 hase protein intake was 13% higher after the low-protein diet than after the high-protein diet (253 +

103 Pigs fed a low-protein diet that were not vaccinated with SLT-IIe(E

104 nce of one or more cofactors, particularly a low-protein diet, thiamine deficiency, alcoholism, and h

105 f the total visceral CO2 production during a low protein diet, this increase did not compensate entir

106 ategy that incorporated a high phosphate and low protein diet to promote medial artery and cutaneous

107 Fractional calcium absorption after the low-protein diet was 0.19+/-0.03, which was significantl

108 ese infants, who typically eat a high-fibre, low-protein diet, were part of a double-blind, randomize

109 ion model, in which animals are exposed to a low-protein diet while in utero and then are cross-foste