ライフサイエンスコーパス: lower limit

1 per limit without a commensurate increase of lower limit.

2 Karimui) and 123 m (Karkar Island) for lower limits.

3 69% (31/99) of controls were below these lower limits.

4 [n=1467] 1.145 L [0.008]; one-sided 97.5% CI lower limit -0.026 L; p<0.0001).

5 rence) for both endpoints, then superiority (lower limit 95% CI >0%) if non-inferiority was achieved.

6 hierarchical fashion, first non-inferiority (lower limit 95% CI greater than -10% for group differenc

7 Upper thermal limits vary less than lower limits among related species of terrestrial ectoth

8 signal acquisition and (iii) outliers in the lower limit and margin events in the upper limit of the

9 om lakes and reservoirs, where the upper and lower limits are respectively the 5th and 95th confidenc

10 etry may underestimate electrode size from a lower limiting current owing to an invalid assumption of

11 However, 2,6-DBA was estimated as a lower limit due to breakthrough from polyurethane foam t

12 These values may be lower limit estimates of the fraction of the oil that wa

13 ntial with the catalytic rate constant and a lower-limit estimation of these parameters.

14 lly exceeds a recently obtained, theoretical lower limit for biochemical feedback systems.

15 or 2, which are far exceeded by the accepted lower limit for hydrazine (10 ppb) set by the US EPA.

16 ation of a metadata set we conclude that the lower limit for nitrification in lakes is around pH 3.

17 h REL, and diacetyl levels were close to the lower limit for occupational exposures.

18 However, the lower limit for pathological expansions is unknown (the

19 rtial second turn, suggesting the b10 is the lower limit for stable helical conformations in b ions.

20 To establish a lower limit for successful adoptive T-cell therapy, we c

21 rm the S(T) = 0 ground state and establish a lower limit for the exchange coupling, -J >/= 30 cm(-1).

22 r grains, their elemental composition, and a lower limit for the ISD flux at Saturn.

23 s fourth assessment report (AR4)-providing a lower limit for the isolated GHG contribution-may have l

24 These results suggest a lower limit for the pore diameter in nanostructured elec

25 with an efficiency of 4%, which is likely a lower limit for these hybrid systems.

26 Lower limits for the very high formation and dissociatio

27 lowered this way consequently drive down the lower-limit for peptide-spectrum match score acceptance.

28 insufficient to inhibit signaling, setting a lower-limit for the threshold level of Axin in the major

29 R range, 2.99-23.85; 95% confidence interval lower limit, >1); there were significant declines over t

30 Indeed, 21% had values below the lower limit observed in the term-born adults and 6% had

31 The lower limit of (13)C NMR detection under our experimenta

32 (LOA) for the longest diameter ranged from a lower limit of -1.1 mm and an upper limit of 1.0 mm to -

33 educed the junctional STIM1:Orai1 ratio to a lower limit of 0.3-0.6, indicating that binding of one t

34 riority (ie, meeting the prespecified 90% CI lower limit of 0.8) was then confirmed in stage 2, with

35 ntramolecular CH-pi interactions, provides a lower limit of 0.95 kcal/mol for each aryl CH-fullerene

36 Yeast eccDNAs ranged from an arbitrary lower limit of 1 kb up to 38 kb and covered 23% of the g

37 ~50 cells for statistical reasons, but at a lower limit of 1 receptor- and 1 reference-cell, specifi

38 s, respectively (absolute difference, -1.6%; lower limit of 1-sided 95% confidence interval, -10.7%;

39 part-time patching group (difference, 5.4%; lower limit of 1-sided exact 95% confidence interval, 2.

40 tion of cholesterol concentration provided a lower limit of 100 mM for their dissociation constant.

41 odium should be limited to 2300 mg/d, with a lower limit of 1500 mg/d for adults aged >50 y, non-Hisp

42 We reinvestigated the proposed lower limit of 2 microm for the diameters of neuronal so

43 A conservative estimate places a lower limit of 345 +/- 70 PgC year(-1) on the cycling fl

44 1.7% in controls (absolute difference -0.6%; lower limit of 95% confidence interval [CI]: -9.3%; p =

45 from 2.0 to 7.0 log(10) copies/ml and had a lower limit of 95% detection of 57 copies/ml.

46 1.0 to 7.0 log10 cDNA equivalents/mul and a lower limit of 95% detection ranging from 1.7 to 7.6 cDN

47 ive slope that was more negative than the 5% lower limit of aging), 18% simulated normal eyes were st

48 ns of mean arterial blood pressure below the lower limit of autoregulation (relative risk 1.02; 95% c

49 gnificant decrease in the perfusion pressure lower limit of autoregulation compared to postarrest, no

50 rared spectroscopy accurately identified the lower limit of autoregulation during normothermia and hy

51 An identifiable lower limit of autoregulation was ascertained in 348 pat

52 en mean arterial blood pressure is below the lower limit of autoregulation, cerebral oximetry index a

53 creased cerebral perfusion and decreased the lower limit of autoregulation.

54 er in the inferior vena cava to identify the lower limit of cerebral autoregulation at 6 hrs postresu

55 n cerebral saturation >15%) and explored the lower limit of cerebral autoregulation at patient and po

56 The lower limit of cerebral autoregulation varied substantia

57 ormly without excess of saliva describes the lower limit of chewing frequency, scaling approximately

58 cessful quantitative analysis, which has its lower limit of chromatographic resolution Rs at some min

59 d BP biosensor showed both high sensitivity (lower limit of detection 10ng/ml) and selectivity towar

60 ng via SERS is used for greater accuracy and lower limit of detection (0.1 ppb) for quantitative dete

61 a wide range of concentration detection, and lower limit of detection (0.186 microM) than NiO nanoshe

62 The lower limit of detection (1.2 ng/L) as well as cutoff co

63 wer platform achieved approximately the same lower limit of detection (1.25x10(-2) pg of C. difficile

64 d not oriented) were compared highlighting a lower limit of detection (5pg/ml) for the not oriented i

65 ents with week 12 HCV RNA levels between the lower limit of detection (9.3 IU/mL) and the lower limit

66 pg mL(-1)), reproducibility (R(2)=0.96), and lower limit of detection (98 pg/mL) first in purified sa

67 g parameter with analyte concentration), and lower limit of detection (i.e., minimum detectable conce

68 The protein and peptide assay showed a lower limit of detection (LLOD) of 200 fM and 460 fM res

69 Our results show that the lower limit of detection (LLOD) of the colorimetric and

70 The lower limit of detection (LLOD) of the multiplex assay w

71 ntitative measurements, and sensitivity with lower limit of detection (LLOD) values of 7.2 pM (=90 pg

72 emonstrated excellent reproducibility at the lower limit of detection (LLOD).

73 her assay sensitivity and at least a 10-fold lower limit of detection (LOD) as compared to hydrated p

74 In this study, we determined the lower limit of detection (LOD) of the GeneXpert MTB/RIF

75 e PA immunoassay provided approximately 143x lower limit of detection (LOD) than observed with the go

76 three standards for quantitative linearity, lower limit of detection (LOD), and accuracy.

77 earity, lower limit of quantification (LOQ), lower limit of detection (LOD), precision, accuracy, rec

78 rsive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) was below the lower limit of detection (LOD).

79 ion of the membrane components resulted in a lower limit of detection (~1.6 microM) than previous rep

80 el dengue immunoassay, we observed a 15-fold lower limit of detection and 4-fold higher fluorescence

81 dence-filtering automatically determined the lower limit of detection based on the strength of the Pp

82 ument demonstrated an approximately 100-fold lower limit of detection compared to current automated m

83 1% (w/w), or 50 ng, OSCS in heparin and the lower limit of detection estimated at approximately 0.20

84 exchange extraction process, we improved the lower limit of detection for most of the apelin peptides

85 ermined using an ultrasensitive assay with a lower limit of detection of <.3 copy/mL) and a change in

86 The AIF method achieved a lower limit of detection of 0.85 ng muL(-1) and a lower

87 This beacon yielded a lower limit of detection of 1 ng/mL in buffer using a sp

88 " to a fluorescent detector molecule, with a lower limit of detection of 10(-7) M in unprocessed plas

89 Defining a lower limit of detection of 1000 copies/ml when includin

90 n (65 nM) in raw human CSF with an estimated lower limit of detection of 3.25 nM, within the clinical

91 on had a linear range from 5 to 100 nM and a lower limit of detection of 5 nM IFN-gamma.

92 The median lower limit of detection of all peptides was 71.5 amol/m

93 The lower limit of detection of both assays for all targets

94 The lower limit of detection of the assays was equal to the

95 sing performance in terms of sensitivity and lower limit of detection of the MOSPR biosensor with res

96 The lower limit of detection of the stool real-time PCR was

97 The sequential format had a 4- to 10-fold lower limit of detection than the premix format, dependi

98 The lower limit of detection was 1 mug/L (130 pmol/L).

99 The lower limit of detection was 10(3) CFU/mL.

100 The lower limit of detection was 10(3) genome copies per sam

101 m 2(-1) to 2(4) HAU/50 mul was found and the lower limit of detection was 2(-1) HAU/50 mul.

102 The lower limit of detection was 30pM Substance P (SP, 2pg/5

103 The lower limit of detection was 40 genomes/PCR; the sensiti

104 Using serial dilutions, the lower limit of detection was determined to be 1 CFU/mul.

105 The lower limit of detection was further improved from 0.4 t

106 e detection of proteins which were below the lower limit of detection when analyzed by conventional S

107 dition, freebase guanidination allowed for a lower limit of detection when combined with another deri

108 d BP biosensor showed both high sensitivity (lower limit of detection ~10ng/ml) and selectivity towar

109 ignificant increase in sensitivity (that is, lower limit of detection).

110 Plasma viremia (lower limit of detection, <2 copies/mL), T-cell activati

111 This way, a higher sensitivity and lower limit of detection, compared to those of conventio

112 Taking into account the lower limit of detection, the fluorescence sensing repor

113 The low-coverage sensor has a lower limit of detection, wider optimal AC frequency ran

114 o give faster detection and in practice also lower limit of detection.

115 eted (discovery) proteomics with ca. 25 amol lower limit of detection.

116 most analytical techniques is to reduce the lower limit of detection; however, it is sometimes neces

117 mination of micromolar H(2)O(2) in milk, the lower limit of determination was 0.1 muM, and the recove

118 The lower limit of differentiation and detection were 0.1% (

119 cortical electric fields reach 0.8 V/m, the lower limit of effectiveness in animal studies.

120 sal curve under shifting and rescaling and a lower limit of intrinsic noise for any mean expression l

121 nly E(0), Ru, and CDL being quantified and a lower limit of k(0) being reported; e.g., k(0) >/= 9 cm

122 This implies a lower limit of metastability of liquid water just below

123 These massive galaxies place a lower limit of more than 4 x 10(11) solar masses of dark

124 h odds ratios for FEV1 and FVC less than the lower limit of normal (LLN) (defined as a z-score < -1.6

125 tipinhole SPECT/CT system and determined the lower limit of normal (LLN) SPECT-derived HMR and the co

126 1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) under the lower limit of normal (LLN), excluding individuals with

127 e a-wave amplitude remained greater than the lower limit of normal (mean, -2 SD) for 72% of XLRS male

128 io (H/M; either in relation to the estimated lower limit of normal [1.60] or as a continuous variable

129 ed with H/M (either in relation to estimated lower limit of normal [1.60] or as a continuous variable

130 and Quanjer reference equation (FEV(1)/FVC < lower limit of normal [LLN]), and categorized by severit

131 ion fraction dropped below the institutional lower limit of normal at week 12 in one (0.8%) of 130 pa

132 For the 60-min infusion at 60 min, the lower limit of normal for the GBEF was 38% defined at th

133 rmed after adjustments using the mean and 5% lower limit of normal rates of aging, respectively.

134 ricans had substantially lower predicted and lower limit of normal values for FVC and FEV1 than those

135 s may provide more appropriate predicted and lower limit of normal values, enabling more accurate dia

136 creases in hemoglobin level to less than the lower limit of normal were more frequent in group 1 (42.

137 ) subjects had a CD4 count </=441 cells/muL (lower limit of normal) and 11 (55%) had a CD4 count less

138 Subjects with an IgM less than 56 (lower limit of normal) failed to respond to standard tre

139 ) subjects had a CD8 count </=125 cells/muL (lower limit of normal).

140 ity (FVC) of less than 70% and less than the lower limit of normal, and FEV1 of less than 80% of the

141 r VWF ristocetin cofactor activity below the lower limit of normal, whereas 36% had normal VWF levels

142 d disease status; cases had FEV(1) less than lower limit of normal, whereas control subjects had FEV(

143 We defined COPD as FEV1:FVC less than the lower limit of normal.

144 erence equations for the predicted value and lower limit of normal.

145 normal to as much as a factor of 3 below the lower limit of normal.

146 ronchodilator spirometric (FEV1 /FVC) ratio <lower limit of normal.

147 subjects had FEV(1) greater than or equal to lower limit of normal.

148 a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC less than the lower limit of normal.

149 ses were not accounted for, thereby posing a lower limit of particle sizes and limiting the accuracy

150 ven by this concept, this study examines the lower limit of perimetric sensitivity for reliable testi

151 correlation between the growth mode and the lower limit of precursor ions in the steady state of a s

152 te than surface diffusion by controlling the lower limit of precursor ions in the steady state.

153 All patients achieved HCV RNA below lower limit of quantification (<12 IU/mL) by end of trea

154 the aqueous VEGF concentrations to below the lower limit of quantification (<4 pg/mL) in all patients

155 dictive value (NPV) of HCV RNA less than the lower limit of quantification (<LLOQ) at EOT for SVR12 w

156 ction and decision limit (0.008-0.070mg/kg), lower limit of quantification (0.02-0.2mg/kg), detection

157 lower limit of detection (9.3 IU/mL) and the lower limit of quantification (25 IU/mL) who continued t

158 ts with HCV RNA concentrations less than the lower limit of quantification (COBAS TaqMan HCV test, ve

159 py (SVR12), defined as HCV RNA less than the lower limit of quantification (either target detected un

160 Recovery, lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) and imprecision wer

161 rm 2 with vRVR, defined as HCV RNA below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) from treatment week

162 The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was 1.00 pg/ml for

163 ortion of participants with a GTVL below the lower limit of quantification (LLQ) at week 48 (90%) and

164 The lower limit of quantification (LOQ) of MC-LR by SERS on

165 The selectivity, linearity, lower limit of quantification (LOQ), lower limit of dete

166 pray-MS method was employed to achieve a low lower limit of quantification (LOQ).

167 rimary endpoint was HCV viral load below the lower limit of quantification 12 weeks after completion

168 the aqueous humor were suppressed below the lower limit of quantification after intravitreal afliber

169 achieve titres equal to or greater than the lower limit of quantification at months 6 (57% [n=93/163

170 end point was SVR12 (HCV RNA level below the lower limit of quantification at posttreatment week 12).

171 y-three percent had HCV RNA levels below the lower limit of quantification at week 4.

172 inical matrices, (ii) assay sensitivity with lower limit of quantification goal of single-digit ng/ml

173 itative gelatin species determination with a lower limit of quantification of 0.05%.

174 rity over a range of 0.65-821 mBq/mL, with a lower limit of quantification of 0.65 mBq/mL (correspond

175 -phase extraction from plasma, resulted in a lower limit of quantification of 10 pg/mL, while introdu

176 d EMA guidelines for assay validation with a lower limit of quantification of 2.5 ng/mL for the ERAs,

177 limit of detection of 0.85 ng muL(-1) and a lower limit of quantification of 2.54 ng muL(-1).

178 The final method has a lower limit of quantification of 20 ng/mL (ca. 350 pM) a

179 ive hSBA titres equal to or greater than the lower limit of quantification to each test strain, compa

180 mean duration of VEGF suppression below the lower limit of quantification was >71 +/- 18 days.

181 The lower limit of quantification was 10 ng/mL.

182 he VEGF concentration recovered to above the lower limit of quantification was 55 days in 1 patient a

183 The lower limit of quantification was 94 and 90 amol for dG-

184 44, hSBA titres equal to or greater than the lower limit of quantification were shown in 37% (n=18/49

185 RNA concentrations lower than 43 IU/mL (the lower limit of quantification).

186 mputed measures include; limit of detection, lower limit of quantification, linearity, carry-over, pa

187 stem was validated by testing the linearity (lower limit of quantification, LLOQ, 0.25-10 nM and uppe

188 tablished, with a Hct range of 0.19 to 0.63 (lower limit of quantification, LLOQ, to upper limit of q

189 t of variation (CV) was less than 15% at the lower limit of quantification.

190 Plasma JDTic levels were below the lower limit of quantitation (0.1 nM) in all subjects.

191 ad an AR-13503 concentration higher than the lower limit of quantitation (0.11 ng/mL).

192 ho had an hSBA titer at least as high as the lower limit of quantitation (1:8 or 1:16) for all 4 stra

193 tients (10 mg/kg) achieved HCV RNA below the lower limit of quantitation (25 IU/mL), one of whom (a p

194 tected HCV RNA level that is below the assay lower limit of quantitation (detectable/BLOQ) is compara

195 Extraction recovery was >/=87.9% at both the lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) and the upper limit o

196 A lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) at 0.2 ng/mL with 50

197 The LC-MS/MS assay showed lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) at 5 mug/mL for mAb-A

198 testosterone in human serum (200 muL) with a lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) of 1 pg/mL (3.47 pmol

199 2 pM (=90 pg/mL) and 4.5 pM (=210 pg/mL) and lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) values of 24 pM (=300

200 The lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) was 0.10ng/ml for T a

201 se at 12 weeks (SVR12; HCV RNA less than the lower limit of quantitation at 12 weeks after the end of

202 asma AR-13324 concentrations higher than the lower limit of quantitation at any time point in any sub

203 in treatment) is based on an assay-specified lower limit of quantitation cutoff.

204 Most measurements in 2010 were less than the lower limit of quantitation for PFBS, PFPeA, PFHxA, and

205 d to the NBOMe concentration with an average lower limit of quantitation of 0.01 mg/mL for both of th

206 The assay is sensitive (lower limit of quantitation of 0.05 microM), selective,

207 d cynomolgus monkey serum and tissues with a lower limit of quantitation of 0.78 pg/mL based on the i

208 nd accuracy (97-118%) for all analytes and a lower limit of quantitation of 1 pg injected onto the co

209 parated peptides than SS-AMS, resulting in a lower limit of quantitation of 50 zmol (14)C/peak.

210 The method had a lower limit of quantitation of 7.5 pg/mL and was linear

211 toxin levels estimated to be higher than the lower limit of quantitation of the assay (4 EU/mL) throu

212 ntage of patients with viral loads below the lower limit of quantitation rose from 29% in 1999 to 72%

213 12 eyes (58%) had ketorolac levels above the lower limit of quantitation.

214 We now aim to establish the lower limit of radioactivity that can be administered to

215 e with cerebral perfusion pressure less than lower limit of reactivity was associated with unfavorabl

216 essure below (%cerebral perfusion pressure < lower limit of reactivity), above (%cerebral perfusion p

217 e (odds ratio %cerebral perfusion pressure < lower limit of reactivity, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.06; p <

218 The lower limit of reliable quantification of the assay was

219 Therefore, the lower limit of sensitivity for the substrate is limited

220 l, whereas others continue growing until the lower limit of soil-available water.

221 We determined the imaging sensitivity (lower limit of T cell detection) of each reporter using

222 erior to PEP after pertussis exposure if the lower limit of the 1-sided 95% confidence interval (CI)

223 95% CI = -0.41 to 0.43): i.e., less than the lower limit of the 95% CI of -0.5 days predetermined to

224 eved, superiority was to be concluded if the lower limit of the 95% CI was greater than 0%.

225 Noninferiority was defined by the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the d

226 Noninferiority of WC2031 was inferred if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the d

227 Noninferiority required the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the d

228 Noninferiority was to be declared if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) on the d

229 ia (HGG) was defined as IgG levels below the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval for age.

230 Noninferiority was considered met if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval for between-g

231 the end of therapy (SVR12) (based on a -11% lower limit of the 95% lower confidence interval for the

232 fficacy were considered significant when the lower limit of the 96.2% CI around the point estimate wa

233 s, data were considered significant when the lower limit of the 96.2% CI was greater than 0%.

234 The lower limit of the 97.5% CI was above the prespecified n

235 Within each age stratum, the lower limit of the 98.3% confidence interval for the day

236 ntage points (95% CI, -9.6 to 6.5), thus the lower limit of the CI exceeds the noninferiority margin

237 gh this mechanism is ill constrained, as the lower limit of the electron energy distribution, or low-

238 This lower limit, parametrized by the lower limit of the electron momentum - pmin - is critica

239 (123/123) with a GCK mutation were above the lower limit of the HbA1c age-appropriate reference range

240 repancies arise for metabolites far from the lower limit of the mass scan range, due to the weaker co

241 ime (GMRT) of total lymphocyte counts to the lower limit of the normal range (LLN; >/=1.0x10(9) cells

242 metry (FEV1:FVC >/=0.70 and an FVC above the lower limit of the normal range after bronchodilator use

243 Cone density was reduced to 70% of the lower limit of the normal range at the foveal center (78

244 never smoked and who had an FEV(1) below the lower limit of the normal range increased during the fir

245 s to values >/=0.7 U/ml (70% of normal), the lower limit of the normal range.

246 r more, and had NCC concentrations above the lower limit of the normal reference range (>/=0.8 mumol/

247 The lower limit of the one-sided 90% CI for RR was 31.2%.

248 number of available sites on the seed if the lower limit of the steady state is below a critical valu

249 rity of ceftaroline fosamil was defined as a lower limit of the two-sided 95% CI for the difference i

250 e non-inferior to that of active yaws if the lower limit of the two-sided 95% CI for the difference i

251 Non-inferiority was concluded if the lower limit of the two-sided 95% CI for the treatment di

252 eriod; noninferiority was established if the lower limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval was

253 eriod; noninferiority was established if the lower limit of the two-sided 97.5% confidence interval w

254 docarpus macrofossils ~1000 meters below the lower limit of their modern distribution indicates a rel

255 otyledons, whereas YABBY seemed to be at the lower limit of their sensitivity.

256 able low moduli from 1 to 100 kPa, below the lower limit of traditional elastomers; moreover, the sol

257 he full coalescence, however, constrains the lower limit of volume delivery because reproducible drop

258 A lower limit of ~300 s(-1) per cobalt atom for the cataly

259 ced neural responses and thereby account for lower limits of attentional dwell time.

260 the block co-oligomers, useful to study the lower limits of block copolymer phase segregation in det

261 anded dynamic ranges (0.09-136.56 ng L(-1)), lower limits of detection (0.007 +/- 0.001 ng L(-1)), an

262 Lower limits of detection (2-20 ng/mL) were obtained usi

263 The lower limits of detection (at 1% quenching) vary with th

264 The lower limits of detection (LLD) were 9, 43, and 10 copie

265 mpared with 4,4'-o-BBV, 2-fold reductions in lower limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ)

266 al-to-noise ratio was improved, resulting in lower limits of detection and improved identification at

267 thus revealing that enhanced sensitivity and lower limits of detection are achieved with polar protic

268 The lower limits of detection for our singleplex real-time P

269 Lower limits of detection may be further achieved if the

270 ted high sensitivity and applicability, with lower limits of detection of 12CFUmL(-1) in broth sample

271 s compared to the antibody based assay, with lower limits of detection of 3.54 x 10(7) and 1.34 x 10(

272 ve detection of different NS1 serotypes with lower limits of detection within the clinically relevant

273 (FEV(1)/FVC) both less than their respective lower limits of normal as determined by published refere

274 Reference values (lower limits of normality) were as follows: 6-segment RV

275 The quantitative exploration of the lower limits of Pt cocatalyst loading reported here, and

276 The lower limits of quantification (LLOQs) for these analyte

277 re of the single-molecule regime to achieved lower limits of quantification (LOQ).

278 The lower limits of quantification for E2, T, and DHT were 0

279 Lower limits of quantification were determined at or clo

280 us week, PrEP drugs were detected (above the lower limits of quantification) more frequently in women

281 The lower limits of quantitation were 3.8 and 2.7 mg/L for k

282 s a reduction in systemic glucose toward the lower limits of the "normal" range.

283 The upper and lower limits of the curve are the k of biofilm-free medi

284 inal segmentation schemes in which upper and lower limits of the heart were determined from CT and th

285 g variation from sample to sample, and has a lower-limit of 84 MW m(-2)K(-1), taking into considerati

286 ion rates, we determine a spatially variable lower limit on adaptive rRNA:protein allocation and henc

287 e for abortive initiation, thereby setting a lower limit on polymerase-promoter complex lifetime and

288 A lower limit on the electromigration rate is calculated f

289 the stretch-bend cross peak, we determined a lower limit on the lifetime of this complex of 480 femto

290 Instead, the user must provide a lower limit on the probability of isotopologues of inter

291 We obtain a lower limit on the rate of this intramolecular electron

292 Theoretical lower limits on the relative variance are known to decre

293 pore germination kinetics as well as setting lower limits on the size of the GR-GerD complex in the s

294 This lower limit, parametrized by the lower limit of the elec

295 total interaction energy was variable, with lower limits ranging from 11% to 50%.

296 We estimate, as a lower limit, that DC-SIGN and HA nanodomains contain on

297 formation of the salt on the surface with a lower limit to the reaction probability of gamma > 10(-6

298 Lower limits were also evaluated and limits of detection

299 ests (with climatically determined upper and lower limits) whose distributional shifts are well chara

300 ased on gene deletions only and represents a lower limit, yet the variation is already in a similar r