ライフサイエンスコーパス: lower limit of

1 educed the junctional STIM1:Orai1 ratio to a lower limit of 0.3-0.6, indicating that binding of one t

2 riority (ie, meeting the prespecified 90% CI lower limit of 0.8) was then confirmed in stage 2, with

3 ntramolecular CH-pi interactions, provides a lower limit of 0.95 kcal/mol for each aryl CH-fullerene

4 Yeast eccDNAs ranged from an arbitrary lower limit of 1 kb up to 38 kb and covered 23% of the g

5 ~50 cells for statistical reasons, but at a lower limit of 1 receptor- and 1 reference-cell, specifi

6 s, respectively (absolute difference, -1.6%; lower limit of 1-sided 95% confidence interval, -10.7%;

7 part-time patching group (difference, 5.4%; lower limit of 1-sided exact 95% confidence interval, 2.

8 violation of Lorentz invariance, and place a lower limit of 1.2E(Planck) on the scale of a linear ene

9 (LOA) for the longest diameter ranged from a lower limit of -1.1 mm and an upper limit of 1.0 mm to -

10 tion of cholesterol concentration provided a lower limit of 100 mM for their dissociation constant.

11 The lower limit of (13)C NMR detection under our experimenta

12 odium should be limited to 2300 mg/d, with a lower limit of 1500 mg/d for adults aged >50 y, non-Hisp

13 We reinvestigated the proposed lower limit of 2 microm for the diameters of neuronal so

14 A lower limit of ~300 s(-1) per cobalt atom for the cataly

15 A conservative estimate places a lower limit of 345 +/- 70 PgC year(-1) on the cycling fl

16 g variation from sample to sample, and has a lower-limit of 84 MW m(-2)K(-1), taking into considerati

17 reached as a result of insufficient events (lower limit of 95% CI, 6.2 months), and median progressi

18 1.7% in controls (absolute difference -0.6%; lower limit of 95% confidence interval [CI]: -9.3%; p =

19 from 2.0 to 7.0 log(10) copies/ml and had a lower limit of 95% detection of 57 copies/ml.

20 1.0 to 7.0 log10 cDNA equivalents/mul and a lower limit of 95% detection ranging from 1.7 to 7.6 cDN

21 ive slope that was more negative than the 5% lower limit of aging), 18% simulated normal eyes were st

22 regate predictions had lower mean biases and lower limits of agreement than did the individual predic

23 ron paramagnetic resonance techniques give a lower limit of approximately (50 ns)(-1) on the rates.

24 a function of concentration have indicated a lower limit of approximately 5 ng/microL, below which th

25 response to ssDNA target was detected with a lower limit of approximately 50 fmol of complement and w

26 ced neural responses and thereby account for lower limits of attentional dwell time.

27 ns of mean arterial blood pressure below the lower limit of autoregulation (relative risk 1.02; 95% c

28 gnificant decrease in the perfusion pressure lower limit of autoregulation compared to postarrest, no

29 rared spectroscopy accurately identified the lower limit of autoregulation during normothermia and hy

30 An identifiable lower limit of autoregulation was ascertained in 348 pat

31 en mean arterial blood pressure is below the lower limit of autoregulation, cerebral oximetry index a

32 creased cerebral perfusion and decreased the lower limit of autoregulation.

33 the block co-oligomers, useful to study the lower limits of block copolymer phase segregation in det

34 er in the inferior vena cava to identify the lower limit of cerebral autoregulation at 6 hrs postresu

35 n cerebral saturation >15%) and explored the lower limit of cerebral autoregulation at patient and po

36 The lower limit of cerebral autoregulation varied substantia

37 ormly without excess of saliva describes the lower limit of chewing frequency, scaling approximately

38 cessful quantitative analysis, which has its lower limit of chromatographic resolution Rs at some min

39 pressure of the coronary arteries, below the lower limit of coronary autoregulation.

40 d BP biosensor showed both high sensitivity (lower limit of detection 10ng/ml) and selectivity towar

41 ng via SERS is used for greater accuracy and lower limit of detection (0.1 ppb) for quantitative dete

42 a wide range of concentration detection, and lower limit of detection (0.186 microM) than NiO nanoshe

43 The lower limit of detection (1.2 ng/L) as well as cutoff co

44 wer platform achieved approximately the same lower limit of detection (1.25x10(-2) pg of C. difficile

45 d not oriented) were compared highlighting a lower limit of detection (5pg/ml) for the not oriented i

46 ents with week 12 HCV RNA levels between the lower limit of detection (9.3 IU/mL) and the lower limit

47 pg mL(-1)), reproducibility (R(2)=0.96), and lower limit of detection (98 pg/mL) first in purified sa

48 g parameter with analyte concentration), and lower limit of detection (i.e., minimum detectable conce

49 The lower limit of detection (LLOD) for the label free direc

50 The protein and peptide assay showed a lower limit of detection (LLOD) of 200 fM and 460 fM res

51 Our results show that the lower limit of detection (LLOD) of the colorimetric and

52 The lower limit of detection (LLOD) of the multiplex assay w

53 ntitative measurements, and sensitivity with lower limit of detection (LLOD) values of 7.2 pM (=90 pg

54 emonstrated excellent reproducibility at the lower limit of detection (LLOD).

55 her assay sensitivity and at least a 10-fold lower limit of detection (LOD) as compared to hydrated p

56 In this study, we determined the lower limit of detection (LOD) of the GeneXpert MTB/RIF

57 e PA immunoassay provided approximately 143x lower limit of detection (LOD) than observed with the go

58 three standards for quantitative linearity, lower limit of detection (LOD), and accuracy.

59 earity, lower limit of quantification (LOQ), lower limit of detection (LOD), precision, accuracy, rec

60 rsive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) was below the lower limit of detection (LOD).

61 ion of the membrane components resulted in a lower limit of detection (~1.6 microM) than previous rep

62 Use of the PED method improved the lower limit of detection 10- to 100-fold in model DNA hy

63 el dengue immunoassay, we observed a 15-fold lower limit of detection and 4-fold higher fluorescence

64 most sensitive to date, with a 62.5 attomol lower limit of detection and a linear range spanning gre

65 dence-filtering automatically determined the lower limit of detection based on the strength of the Pp

66 CSF levels of the proteins were near the lower limit of detection by Western blot or enzyme-linke

67 ument demonstrated an approximately 100-fold lower limit of detection compared to current automated m

68 1% (w/w), or 50 ng, OSCS in heparin and the lower limit of detection estimated at approximately 0.20

69 The lower limit of detection for an enzyme-linked immunosorb

70 exchange extraction process, we improved the lower limit of detection for most of the apelin peptides

71 For detection of HIV-1 p24, the lower limit of detection for the europium NP-based immun

72 ermined using an ultrasensitive assay with a lower limit of detection of <.3 copy/mL) and a change in

73 The AIF method achieved a lower limit of detection of 0.85 ng muL(-1) and a lower

74 This beacon yielded a lower limit of detection of 1 ng/mL in buffer using a sp

75 " to a fluorescent detector molecule, with a lower limit of detection of 10(-7) M in unprocessed plas

76 Defining a lower limit of detection of 1000 copies/ml when includin

77 ative over a two-log detection range, with a lower limit of detection of 11 ng/mL for CRP and 40 ng/m

78 The PLP enzymatic assay has a lower limit of detection of 14.8 nmol l(-1) and is linea

79 n (65 nM) in raw human CSF with an estimated lower limit of detection of 3.25 nM, within the clinical

80 be detected in the cornea or aqueous at the lower limit of detection of 3.6 mg/L.

81 on had a linear range from 5 to 100 nM and a lower limit of detection of 5 nM IFN-gamma.

82 virus was quantifiable with an assay, with a lower limit of detection of 50 copies/ml.

83 The median lower limit of detection of all peptides was 71.5 amol/m

84 The lower limit of detection of both assays for all targets

85 The lower limit of detection of the assays was equal to the

86 sing performance in terms of sensitivity and lower limit of detection of the MOSPR biosensor with res

87 The lower limit of detection of the stool real-time PCR was

88 The sequential format had a 4- to 10-fold lower limit of detection than the premix format, dependi

89 The lower limit of detection was 1 mug/L (130 pmol/L).

90 The lower limit of detection was 10(3) CFU/mL.

91 The lower limit of detection was 10(3) genome copies per sam

92 m 2(-1) to 2(4) HAU/50 mul was found and the lower limit of detection was 2(-1) HAU/50 mul.

93 The lower limit of detection was 30pM Substance P (SP, 2pg/5

94 The lower limit of detection was 40 genomes/PCR; the sensiti

95 The lower limit of detection was 5 ng/mL.

96 Using serial dilutions, the lower limit of detection was determined to be 1 CFU/mul.

97 The lower limit of detection was further improved from 0.4 t

98 e detection of proteins which were below the lower limit of detection when analyzed by conventional S

99 dition, freebase guanidination allowed for a lower limit of detection when combined with another deri

100 d BP biosensor showed both high sensitivity (lower limit of detection ~10ng/ml) and selectivity towar

101 ignificant increase in sensitivity (that is, lower limit of detection).

102 Plasma viremia (lower limit of detection, <2 copies/mL), T-cell activati

103 nd morphology, slide noise, spot background, lower limit of detection, and reproducibility.

104 This way, a higher sensitivity and lower limit of detection, compared to those of conventio

105 Taking into account the lower limit of detection, the fluorescence sensing repor

106 The low-coverage sensor has a lower limit of detection, wider optimal AC frequency ran

107 spectively), thus exceeding the FDA-required lower limit of detection.

108 o give faster detection and in practice also lower limit of detection.

109 eted (discovery) proteomics with ca. 25 amol lower limit of detection.

110 most analytical techniques is to reduce the lower limit of detection; however, it is sometimes neces

111 anded dynamic ranges (0.09-136.56 ng L(-1)), lower limits of detection (0.007 +/- 0.001 ng L(-1)), an

112 Lower limits of detection (2-20 ng/mL) were obtained usi

113 The lower limits of detection (at 1% quenching) vary with th

114 The lower limits of detection (LLD) were 9, 43, and 10 copie

115 mpared with 4,4'-o-BBV, 2-fold reductions in lower limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ)

116 al-to-noise ratio was improved, resulting in lower limits of detection and improved identification at

117 thus revealing that enhanced sensitivity and lower limits of detection are achieved with polar protic

118 The lower limits of detection for our singleplex real-time P

119 Lower limits of detection may be further achieved if the

120 pplicable to diverse biological samples with lower limits of detection of 0.7, 0.2, and 0.2 pmol, res

121 ted high sensitivity and applicability, with lower limits of detection of 12CFUmL(-1) in broth sample

122 s compared to the antibody based assay, with lower limits of detection of 3.54 x 10(7) and 1.34 x 10(

123 in solution with high sensitivity, achieving lower limits of detection of 30.1 and 40.7 microM for DN

124 ve detection of different NS1 serotypes with lower limits of detection within the clinically relevant

125 mination of micromolar H(2)O(2) in milk, the lower limit of determination was 0.1 muM, and the recove

126 The lower limit of differentiation and detection were 0.1% (

127 cortical electric fields reach 0.8 V/m, the lower limit of effectiveness in animal studies.

128 They examined how varying the lower limits of estimated DMF match probabilities (m sco

129 sal curve under shifting and rescaling and a lower limit of intrinsic noise for any mean expression l

130 Direct measurements put a lower limit of k >/= 210 per second on the rate constant

131 nly E(0), Ru, and CDL being quantified and a lower limit of k(0) being reported; e.g., k(0) >/= 9 cm

132 A lower limit of lipid bilayer permeability to H(2)S, P(M,

133 This implies a lower limit of metastability of liquid water just below

134 These massive galaxies place a lower limit of more than 4 x 10(11) solar masses of dark

135 h odds ratios for FEV1 and FVC less than the lower limit of normal (LLN) (defined as a z-score < -1.6

136 tipinhole SPECT/CT system and determined the lower limit of normal (LLN) SPECT-derived HMR and the co

137 1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) under the lower limit of normal (LLN), excluding individuals with

138 e a-wave amplitude remained greater than the lower limit of normal (mean, -2 SD) for 72% of XLRS male

139 io (H/M; either in relation to the estimated lower limit of normal [1.60] or as a continuous variable

140 ed with H/M (either in relation to estimated lower limit of normal [1.60] or as a continuous variable

141 and Quanjer reference equation (FEV(1)/FVC < lower limit of normal [LLN]), and categorized by severit

142 ion fraction dropped below the institutional lower limit of normal at week 12 in one (0.8%) of 130 pa

143 For the 60-min infusion at 60 min, the lower limit of normal for the GBEF was 38% defined at th

144 This multicenter trial establishes a GBEF lower limit of normal of 38% (first percentile) for a 60

145 rmed after adjustments using the mean and 5% lower limit of normal rates of aging, respectively.

146 ricans had substantially lower predicted and lower limit of normal values for FVC and FEV1 than those

147 s may provide more appropriate predicted and lower limit of normal values, enabling more accurate dia

148 creases in hemoglobin level to less than the lower limit of normal were more frequent in group 1 (42.

149 ) subjects had a CD4 count </=441 cells/muL (lower limit of normal) and 11 (55%) had a CD4 count less

150 Subjects with an IgM less than 56 (lower limit of normal) failed to respond to standard tre

151 adir platelet count <150x10(9)/L (referenced lower limit of normal), during their ACS hospitalization

152 ) subjects had a CD8 count </=125 cells/muL (lower limit of normal).

153 ity (FVC) of less than 70% and less than the lower limit of normal, and FEV1 of less than 80% of the

154 r VWF ristocetin cofactor activity below the lower limit of normal, whereas 36% had normal VWF levels

155 d disease status; cases had FEV(1) less than lower limit of normal, whereas control subjects had FEV(

156 erence equations for the predicted value and lower limit of normal.

157 normal to as much as a factor of 3 below the lower limit of normal.

158 subjects had FEV(1) greater than or equal to lower limit of normal.

159 ronchodilator spirometric (FEV1 /FVC) ratio <lower limit of normal.

160 a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC less than the lower limit of normal.

161 We defined COPD as FEV1:FVC less than the lower limit of normal.

162 (FEV(1)/FVC) both less than their respective lower limits of normal as determined by published refere

163 Reference values (lower limits of normality) were as follows: 6-segment RV

164 ses were not accounted for, thereby posing a lower limit of particle sizes and limiting the accuracy

165 ven by this concept, this study examines the lower limit of perimetric sensitivity for reliable testi

166 d to have a pitch when the rate is above the lower limit of pitch, at approximately 30 Hz.

167 correlation between the growth mode and the lower limit of precursor ions in the steady state of a s

168 te than surface diffusion by controlling the lower limit of precursor ions in the steady state.

169 The quantitative exploration of the lower limits of Pt cocatalyst loading reported here, and

170 All patients achieved HCV RNA below lower limit of quantification (<12 IU/mL) by end of trea

171 the aqueous VEGF concentrations to below the lower limit of quantification (<4 pg/mL) in all patients

172 dictive value (NPV) of HCV RNA less than the lower limit of quantification (<LLOQ) at EOT for SVR12 w

173 ction and decision limit (0.008-0.070mg/kg), lower limit of quantification (0.02-0.2mg/kg), detection

174 lower limit of detection (9.3 IU/mL) and the lower limit of quantification (25 IU/mL) who continued t

175 ts with HCV RNA concentrations less than the lower limit of quantification (COBAS TaqMan HCV test, ve

176 py (SVR12), defined as HCV RNA less than the lower limit of quantification (either target detected un

177 Recovery, lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) and imprecision wer

178 rm 2 with vRVR, defined as HCV RNA below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) from treatment week

179 For 1alpha,25-dihydroxy-VitD(3), a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 5 pg/mL was vali

180 The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was 1.00 pg/ml for

181 ortion of participants with a GTVL below the lower limit of quantification (LLQ) at week 48 (90%) and

182 The lower limit of quantification (LOQ) of MC-LR by SERS on

183 The selectivity, linearity, lower limit of quantification (LOQ), lower limit of dete

184 pray-MS method was employed to achieve a low lower limit of quantification (LOQ).

185 rimary endpoint was HCV viral load below the lower limit of quantification 12 weeks after completion

186 the aqueous humor were suppressed below the lower limit of quantification after intravitreal afliber

187 achieve titres equal to or greater than the lower limit of quantification at months 6 (57% [n=93/163

188 end point was SVR12 (HCV RNA level below the lower limit of quantification at posttreatment week 12).

189 y-three percent had HCV RNA levels below the lower limit of quantification at week 4.

190 inical matrices, (ii) assay sensitivity with lower limit of quantification goal of single-digit ng/ml

191 itative gelatin species determination with a lower limit of quantification of 0.05%.

192 intraday imprecision of 7.5% or lower, and a lower limit of quantification of 0.5 microg/L, equivalen

193 rity over a range of 0.65-821 mBq/mL, with a lower limit of quantification of 0.65 mBq/mL (correspond

194 -phase extraction from plasma, resulted in a lower limit of quantification of 10 pg/mL, while introdu

195 d EMA guidelines for assay validation with a lower limit of quantification of 2.5 ng/mL for the ERAs,

196 limit of detection of 0.85 ng muL(-1) and a lower limit of quantification of 2.54 ng muL(-1).

197 The final method has a lower limit of quantification of 20 ng/mL (ca. 350 pM) a

198 ive hSBA titres equal to or greater than the lower limit of quantification to each test strain, compa

199 mean duration of VEGF suppression below the lower limit of quantification was >71 +/- 18 days.

200 The lower limit of quantification was 10 ng/mL.

201 he VEGF concentration recovered to above the lower limit of quantification was 55 days in 1 patient a

202 The lower limit of quantification was 94 and 90 amol for dG-

203 The lower limit of quantification was established to be 31.2

204 The lower limit of quantification was established to be 31.2

205 44, hSBA titres equal to or greater than the lower limit of quantification were shown in 37% (n=18/49

206 RNA concentrations lower than 43 IU/mL (the lower limit of quantification).

207 mputed measures include; limit of detection, lower limit of quantification, linearity, carry-over, pa

208 stem was validated by testing the linearity (lower limit of quantification, LLOQ, 0.25-10 nM and uppe

209 tablished, with a Hct range of 0.19 to 0.63 (lower limit of quantification, LLOQ, to upper limit of q

210 t of variation (CV) was less than 15% at the lower limit of quantification.

211 The lower limits of quantification (LLOQs) for these analyte

212 re of the single-molecule regime to achieved lower limits of quantification (LOQ).

213 The lower limits of quantification for E2, T, and DHT were 0

214 Additionally, lower limits of quantification of 100 pg/mL (NTproBNP) a

215 Lower limits of quantification were determined at or clo

216 us week, PrEP drugs were detected (above the lower limits of quantification) more frequently in women

217 Plasma JDTic levels were below the lower limit of quantitation (0.1 nM) in all subjects.

218 ad an AR-13503 concentration higher than the lower limit of quantitation (0.11 ng/mL).

219 ho had an hSBA titer at least as high as the lower limit of quantitation (1:8 or 1:16) for all 4 stra

220 tients (10 mg/kg) achieved HCV RNA below the lower limit of quantitation (25 IU/mL), one of whom (a p

221 tected HCV RNA level that is below the assay lower limit of quantitation (detectable/BLOQ) is compara

222 Extraction recovery was >/=87.9% at both the lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) and the upper limit o

223 A lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) at 0.2 ng/mL with 50

224 The LC-MS/MS assay showed lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) at 5 mug/mL for mAb-A

225 testosterone in human serum (200 muL) with a lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) of 1 pg/mL (3.47 pmol

226 2 pM (=90 pg/mL) and 4.5 pM (=210 pg/mL) and lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) values of 24 pM (=300

227 The lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) was 0.10ng/ml for T a

228 E1 and E2 concentrations were below the lower limit of quantitation (LLQ) in most patients after

229 se at 12 weeks (SVR12; HCV RNA less than the lower limit of quantitation at 12 weeks after the end of

230 asma AR-13324 concentrations higher than the lower limit of quantitation at any time point in any sub

231 in treatment) is based on an assay-specified lower limit of quantitation cutoff.

232 Most measurements in 2010 were less than the lower limit of quantitation for PFBS, PFPeA, PFHxA, and

233 The lower limit of quantitation is 0.25 pg/mL for 5-mL urine

234 d to the NBOMe concentration with an average lower limit of quantitation of 0.01 mg/mL for both of th

235 The assay is sensitive (lower limit of quantitation of 0.05 microM), selective,

236 d cynomolgus monkey serum and tissues with a lower limit of quantitation of 0.78 pg/mL based on the i

237 nd accuracy (97-118%) for all analytes and a lower limit of quantitation of 1 pg injected onto the co

238 hod shows good linearity (R(2)>0.99), with a lower limit of quantitation of 1 pmol.

239 parated peptides than SS-AMS, resulting in a lower limit of quantitation of 50 zmol (14)C/peak.

240 The method had a lower limit of quantitation of 7.5 pg/mL and was linear

241 toxin levels estimated to be higher than the lower limit of quantitation of the assay (4 EU/mL) throu

242 ntage of patients with viral loads below the lower limit of quantitation rose from 29% in 1999 to 72%

243 12 eyes (58%) had ketorolac levels above the lower limit of quantitation.

244 Lower limits of quantitation range from 0.01 to 0.5 ng/m

245 The lower limits of quantitation were 3.8 and 2.7 mg/L for k

246 We now aim to establish the lower limit of radioactivity that can be administered to

247 e with cerebral perfusion pressure less than lower limit of reactivity was associated with unfavorabl

248 essure below (%cerebral perfusion pressure < lower limit of reactivity), above (%cerebral perfusion p

249 e (odds ratio %cerebral perfusion pressure < lower limit of reactivity, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.06; p <

250 The lower limit of reliable quantification of the assay was

251 This finding extends the demonstrated lower limits of respiratory energy capable of fueling N2

252 and mantle heterogeneity and melting at the lower limits of seafloor spreading.

253 Therefore, the lower limit of sensitivity for the substrate is limited

254 l, whereas others continue growing until the lower limit of soil-available water.

255 We determined the imaging sensitivity (lower limit of T cell detection) of each reporter using

256 erior to PEP after pertussis exposure if the lower limit of the 1-sided 95% confidence interval (CI)

257 95% CI = -0.41 to 0.43): i.e., less than the lower limit of the 95% CI of -0.5 days predetermined to

258 eved, superiority was to be concluded if the lower limit of the 95% CI was greater than 0%.

259 Noninferiority was defined by the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the d

260 Noninferiority of WC2031 was inferred if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the d

261 Noninferiority required the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the d

262 Noninferiority was to be declared if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) on the d

263 n duration of the response was 32 weeks (the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval [CI] was 24;

264 ia (HGG) was defined as IgG levels below the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval for age.

265 Noninferiority was considered met if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval for between-g

266 the end of therapy (SVR12) (based on a -11% lower limit of the 95% lower confidence interval for the

267 fficacy were considered significant when the lower limit of the 96.2% CI around the point estimate wa

268 s, data were considered significant when the lower limit of the 96.2% CI was greater than 0%.

269 The lower limit of the 97.5% CI was above the prespecified n

270 Within each age stratum, the lower limit of the 98.3% confidence interval for the day

271 ntage points (95% CI, -9.6 to 6.5), thus the lower limit of the CI exceeds the noninferiority margin

272 gh this mechanism is ill constrained, as the lower limit of the electron energy distribution, or low-

273 This lower limit, parametrized by the lower limit of the electron momentum - pmin - is critica

274 (123/123) with a GCK mutation were above the lower limit of the HbA1c age-appropriate reference range

275 repancies arise for metabolites far from the lower limit of the mass scan range, due to the weaker co

276 ime (GMRT) of total lymphocyte counts to the lower limit of the normal range (LLN; >/=1.0x10(9) cells

277 metry (FEV1:FVC >/=0.70 and an FVC above the lower limit of the normal range after bronchodilator use

278 Cone density was reduced to 70% of the lower limit of the normal range at the foveal center (78

279 never smoked and who had an FEV(1) below the lower limit of the normal range increased during the fir

280 s to values >/=0.7 U/ml (70% of normal), the lower limit of the normal range.

281 r more, and had NCC concentrations above the lower limit of the normal reference range (>/=0.8 mumol/

282 The lower limit of the one-sided 90% CI for RR was 31.2%.

283 The lower limit of the range reflects a position where the s

284 number of available sites on the seed if the lower limit of the steady state is below a critical valu

285 e non-inferior to that of active yaws if the lower limit of the two-sided 95% CI for the difference i

286 rity of ceftaroline fosamil was defined as a lower limit of the two-sided 95% CI for the difference i

287 Non-inferiority was concluded if the lower limit of the two-sided 95% CI for the treatment di

288 eriod; noninferiority was established if the lower limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval was

289 eriod; noninferiority was established if the lower limit of the two-sided 97.5% confidence interval w

290 s a reduction in systemic glucose toward the lower limits of the "normal" range.

291 The upper and lower limits of the curve are the k of biofilm-free medi

292 inal segmentation schemes in which upper and lower limits of the heart were determined from CT and th

293 Also, the lower limits of the K(2)(#) values are comparable under

294 docarpus macrofossils ~1000 meters below the lower limit of their modern distribution indicates a rel

295 otyledons, whereas YABBY seemed to be at the lower limit of their sensitivity.

296 For time to INR more than or equal to the lower limit of therapeutic range, adding either early IN

297 res of warfarin sensitivity (time to INR >/= lower limit of therapeutic range; time to INR > 4; and f

298 able low moduli from 1 to 100 kPa, below the lower limit of traditional elastomers; moreover, the sol

299 he full coalescence, however, constrains the lower limit of volume delivery because reproducible drop

300 The upper and lower limits of vulnerability, action potential duration