1 stimulated a search for novel approaches to
lung volume reduction.
2 lying emphysema progression before and after
lung volume reduction.
3 aim to summarise clinical trial evidence on
lung volume reduction and provide guidance on patient se
4 e reduction surgery (LVRS) and bronchoscopic
lung volume reduction (
bLVR) are palliative treatments a
5 Bronchoscopic
lung volume reduction (
BLVR), a minimally invasive proce
6 ress the various techniques of bronchoscopic
lung volume reduction (
BLVR).
7 This pilot study suggests that
lung volume reduction can be achieved in animals without
8 Lung-volume reduction can be achieved with unilateral br
9 assessed the clinical benefits and safety of
lung volume reduction coils (LVRCs) for the treatment of
10 bronchodilators but increased after surgical
lung volume reduction compared with medical therapy.
11 There were two deaths in the bronchoscopic
lung volume reduction group and one control patient was
12 In the bronchoscopic
lung volume reduction group, FEV1 increased by a median
13 Lung volume reduction (
LVR) is an effective therapy for
14 lation and select candidates for valve-based
lung volume reduction (
LVR) therapy.
15 Lung volume reduction of emphysematous lobes results in
16 ve unilateral lobar occlusion (bronchoscopic
lung volume reduction)
or a bronchoscopy with sham valve
17 Airway bypass is a bronchoscopic
lung-volume reduction procedure for emphysema whereby tr
18 Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) and bronchoscopic l
19 25 patients with severe emphysema undergoing
lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) and correlated thei
20 Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) as a bridge to lung
21 Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) for emphysema has b
22 Current datum more than 2 yr after
lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) for emphysema is li
23 Interest has recently been renewed in
lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) for end-stage emphy
24 Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) has been suggested
25 Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) is a treatment opti
26 Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) is associated with
27 es have demonstrated inconsistent effects of
lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) on PaCO2; however,
28 Since
lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) reduces end-expirat
29 Most studies of bilateral
lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) report increases in
30 ve diaphragm stretch occurring acutely after
lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) results in fiber in
31 Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS), a recently describ
32 Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS), the removal of dam
33 t effects of single lung transplantation and
lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS), we used a computat
34 hods used in the care of patients undergoing
lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS).
35 ortant determinant of increased FEV(1) after
lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS).
36 ratively in 37 patients undergoing bilateral
lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS).
37 ed respiratory failure postoperatively after
lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS).
38 ic changes occurring in patients who undergo
lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS).
39 hange, and exercise capacity after bilateral
lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS).
40 er bilateral (n = 15) or unilateral (n = 13)
lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS).
41 and exercise capacity follows thoracoscopic
lung volume reduction surgery (TLVRS) in patients with s
42 study led to a decrease in the acceptance of
lung volume reduction surgery as a therapy.
43 Lung volume reduction surgery can predictably improve ob
44 In conclusion,
lung volume reduction surgery effects an improvement in
45 anisms for symptomatic improvement following
lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema are poorly u
46 h asthma, heavy smokers, patients undergoing
lung volume reduction surgery for severe emphysema, and
47 After
lung volume reduction surgery heart rate decreased at th
48 entify the physiologic mechanism(s) by which
lung volume reduction surgery improved exercise, we perf
49 Early experience suggests that
lung volume reduction surgery improves exercise toleranc
50 Lung volume reduction surgery improves survival in selec
51 Lung volume reduction surgery in patients with severe em
52 at performance of chest CT in candidates for
lung volume reduction surgery is appropriate not only to
53 Lung volume reduction surgery recently has been advocate
54 primary lung cancer in patients selected for
lung volume reduction surgery suggests that performance
55 hs obtained in 57 patients who had undergone
lung volume reduction surgery were retrospectively score
56 Twenty-six patients underwent
lung volume reduction surgery with a 3-month follow-up o
57 intravenous anesthesia may be beneficial in
lung volume reduction surgery, lung transplantation and
58 Lung volume reduction surgery, where 20-30% of lung is r
59 are needed that compare valve placement with
lung volume reduction surgery.
60 ged as an important predictor of response to
lung volume reduction surgery.
61 nd lesser improvement in lung function after
lung volume reduction surgery.
62 could have benefits that are comparable with
lung volume reduction surgery.
63 n]) with advanced pulmonary emphysema before
lung volume reduction surgery.
64 ixteen of these 148 nodules were resected at
lung volume reduction surgery.
65 nary emphysema who were scheduled to undergo
lung volume reduction surgery.
66 1 consecutive patients before and 3 mo after
lung volume reduction surgery.
67 ring maximal exercise, before and 3 mo after
lung volume reduction surgery.
68 ation in patients who undergo evaluation for
lung volume reduction surgery.
69 tients with end-stage emphysema selected for
lung volume reduction surgery.
70 FVC (forced vital capacity) were seen after
lung volume reduction surgery.
71 undergo, lung transplantation, lobectomy, or
lung volume-reduction surgery, or had selective IgA defi
72 Lung-volume reduction surgery (LVRS) improves static lun
73 ve assessment of emphysema in candidates for
lung-volume reduction surgery is potentially useful.
74 seven patients with severe emphysema before
lung-volume-reduction surgery and 3 mo later.
75 e excluded, the cost-effectiveness ratio for
lung-volume-reduction surgery as compared with medical t
76 In conclusion,
lung-volume-reduction surgery decreased dynamic pressure
77 med to further define operative criteria for
lung-volume-reduction surgery for emphysema.
78 Lung-volume-reduction surgery has been proposed as a pal
79 Overall,
lung-volume-reduction surgery increases the chance of im
80 and benefits over three years of follow-up,
lung-volume-reduction surgery is costly relative to medi
81 17 medical centers were randomly assigned to
lung-volume-reduction surgery or continued medical treat
82 tation and were randomly assigned to undergo
lung-volume-reduction surgery or to receive continued me
83 Trial, a randomized clinical trial comparing
lung-volume-reduction surgery with medical therapy for s
84 ne exercise capacity are poor candidates for
lung-volume-reduction surgery, because of increased mort
85 nd hyperinflation are optimal candidates for
lung-volume-reduction surgery, particularly by staple-re
86 with chronic obstructive lung disease before
lung-volume-reduction surgery.
87 re for selecting patients with emphysema for
lung-volume-reduction surgery.
88 Lung volume reduction using nitinol coils is a bronchosc
89 ssion, which we use to track the response to
lung volume reduction via LVRS and bLVR.
90 nhaled bronchodilator treatment and surgical
lung volume reduction were analyzed to evaluate the resp
91 Bronchoscopic
lung-volume reduction with the use of one-way endobronch