ライフサイエンスコーパス: lung volume reduction surgery

1 ged as an important predictor of response to lung volume reduction surgery.

2 could have benefits that are comparable with lung volume reduction surgery.

3 n]) with advanced pulmonary emphysema before lung volume reduction surgery.

4 ixteen of these 148 nodules were resected at lung volume reduction surgery.

5 nary emphysema who were scheduled to undergo lung volume reduction surgery.

6 are needed that compare valve placement with lung volume reduction surgery.

7 1 consecutive patients before and 3 mo after lung volume reduction surgery.

8 ring maximal exercise, before and 3 mo after lung volume reduction surgery.

9 ation in patients who undergo evaluation for lung volume reduction surgery.

10 tients with end-stage emphysema selected for lung volume reduction surgery.

11 FVC (forced vital capacity) were seen after lung volume reduction surgery.

12 nd lesser improvement in lung function after lung volume reduction surgery.

13 with chronic obstructive lung disease before lung-volume-reduction surgery.

14 re for selecting patients with emphysema for lung-volume-reduction surgery.

15 seven patients with severe emphysema before lung-volume-reduction surgery and 3 mo later.

16 study led to a decrease in the acceptance of lung volume reduction surgery as a therapy.

17 e excluded, the cost-effectiveness ratio for lung-volume-reduction surgery as compared with medical t

18 ne exercise capacity are poor candidates for lung-volume-reduction surgery, because of increased mort

19 Lung volume reduction surgery can predictably improve ob

20 In conclusion, lung-volume-reduction surgery decreased dynamic pressure

21 In conclusion, lung volume reduction surgery effects an improvement in

22 anisms for symptomatic improvement following lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema are poorly u

23 h asthma, heavy smokers, patients undergoing lung volume reduction surgery for severe emphysema, and

24 med to further define operative criteria for lung-volume-reduction surgery for emphysema.

25 Lung-volume-reduction surgery has been proposed as a pal

26 After lung volume reduction surgery heart rate decreased at th

27 entify the physiologic mechanism(s) by which lung volume reduction surgery improved exercise, we perf

28 Early experience suggests that lung volume reduction surgery improves exercise toleranc

29 Lung volume reduction surgery improves survival in selec

30 Lung volume reduction surgery in patients with severe em

31 Overall, lung-volume-reduction surgery increases the chance of im

32 at performance of chest CT in candidates for lung volume reduction surgery is appropriate not only to

33 ve assessment of emphysema in candidates for lung-volume reduction surgery is potentially useful.

34 and benefits over three years of follow-up, lung-volume-reduction surgery is costly relative to medi

35 intravenous anesthesia may be beneficial in lung volume reduction surgery, lung transplantation and

36 Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) and bronchoscopic l

37 25 patients with severe emphysema undergoing lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) and correlated thei

38 Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) as a bridge to lung

39 Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) for emphysema has b

40 Current datum more than 2 yr after lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) for emphysema is li

41 Interest has recently been renewed in lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) for end-stage emphy

42 Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) has been suggested

43 Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) is a treatment opti

44 Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) is associated with

45 es have demonstrated inconsistent effects of lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) on PaCO2; however,

46 Since lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) reduces end-expirat

47 Most studies of bilateral lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) report increases in

48 ve diaphragm stretch occurring acutely after lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) results in fiber in

49 Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS), a recently describ

50 Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS), the removal of dam

51 t effects of single lung transplantation and lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS), we used a computat

52 hods used in the care of patients undergoing lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS).

53 ortant determinant of increased FEV(1) after lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS).

54 ratively in 37 patients undergoing bilateral lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS).

55 ed respiratory failure postoperatively after lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS).

56 ic changes occurring in patients who undergo lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS).

57 hange, and exercise capacity after bilateral lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS).

58 er bilateral (n = 15) or unilateral (n = 13) lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS).

59 Lung-volume reduction surgery (LVRS) improves static lun

60 17 medical centers were randomly assigned to lung-volume-reduction surgery or continued medical treat

61 tation and were randomly assigned to undergo lung-volume-reduction surgery or to receive continued me

62 undergo, lung transplantation, lobectomy, or lung volume-reduction surgery, or had selective IgA defi

63 nd hyperinflation are optimal candidates for lung-volume-reduction surgery, particularly by staple-re

64 Lung volume reduction surgery recently has been advocate

65 primary lung cancer in patients selected for lung volume reduction surgery suggests that performance

66 and exercise capacity follows thoracoscopic lung volume reduction surgery (TLVRS) in patients with s

67 hs obtained in 57 patients who had undergone lung volume reduction surgery were retrospectively score

68 Lung volume reduction surgery, where 20-30% of lung is r

69 Twenty-six patients underwent lung volume reduction surgery with a 3-month follow-up o

70 Trial, a randomized clinical trial comparing lung-volume-reduction surgery with medical therapy for s