戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 itical role for BCL-W in B cell survival and lymphomagenesis.
2 ssion of apoptosis with implications for EBV lymphomagenesis.
3  of IRF5, p53 and PUMA in DNA damage-induced lymphomagenesis.
4 mu-Myc mouse model, resulting in decelerated lymphomagenesis.
5  proliferation, processes fundamental to EBV lymphomagenesis.
6 id context that K171E IKKbeta contributes to lymphomagenesis.
7 r effects allowing for the oncogene to drive lymphomagenesis.
8 tors, the disruption of which contributes to lymphomagenesis.
9 on of apoptosis resistance during Myc-driven lymphomagenesis.
10 Dnmt1 in a mouse model of MYC-induced T-cell lymphomagenesis.
11 rom cell proliferation and those specific to lymphomagenesis.
12 tivation, potentially contributing to B-cell lymphomagenesis.
13  an unexpected role of the IL-10R pathway in lymphomagenesis.
14 bolic pathways that contribute to sustaining lymphomagenesis.
15 tic activation, processes fundamental to EBV lymphomagenesis.
16 r microenvironment contributes to EBV-driven lymphomagenesis.
17 guish early versus late genetic eventsduring lymphomagenesis.
18 ropose that these genes play a role in DLBCL lymphomagenesis.
19 q21 may be a critical determinant of NK cell lymphomagenesis.
20 y accelerated the rate of Myc-induced B-cell lymphomagenesis.
21 r understanding of the molecular programs of lymphomagenesis.
22  is implicated in control of GC reaction and lymphomagenesis.
23 AIP3 targeting on miR-125a/miR-125b-mediated lymphomagenesis.
24 n about the additional lesions necessary for lymphomagenesis.
25 ion promotes immune evasion and virus-driven lymphomagenesis.
26 f evidence supports a causal role of PCBs in lymphomagenesis.
27 tor (BCR) signaling by PAX5 contributes to B-lymphomagenesis.
28 t knowledge on BCL6 function and its role in lymphomagenesis.
29 cer-associated ARED genes is disabled during lymphomagenesis.
30 alone and cooperate in development of B-cell lymphomagenesis.
31  contribute to c-Myc-induced KSHV-associated lymphomagenesis.
32       The deficient mice are prone to B-cell lymphomagenesis.
33 demonstrating the oncogenic role of MALT1 in lymphomagenesis.
34  expected to be mutually exclusive events in lymphomagenesis.
35 terations targeting key loci in human T cell lymphomagenesis.
36 ism of GC selection and the role of c-Myc in lymphomagenesis.
37 cusses recent findings on the role of AID in lymphomagenesis.
38 lted in rapid, fatal lymphoproliferation and lymphomagenesis.
39 est that FOXO1 repression contributes to cHL lymphomagenesis.
40 our understanding of oncogenic mechanisms in lymphomagenesis.
41 vated Dnmt3b in a mouse model of MYC-induced lymphomagenesis.
42 ation and whose de-regulation is involved in lymphomagenesis.
43 l loss of E6AP attenuated Myc-induced B-cell lymphomagenesis.
44  to RAG-initiated genomic rearrangements and lymphomagenesis.
45 hat reduction in HAT dosage is important for lymphomagenesis.
46 llular oncogenic processes that arise during lymphomagenesis.
47 ubclinical immune system function influences lymphomagenesis.
48 regulated NF-kappaB signaling can facilitate lymphomagenesis.
49 flammation and chronic B-cell stimulation in lymphomagenesis.
50 epigenetic modifications might contribute to lymphomagenesis.
51 o-operative mutations leading to spontaneous lymphomagenesis.
52 genes might initiate genomic instability and lymphomagenesis.
53 us tumors and showed accelerated Myc-induced lymphomagenesis.
54 e to DNA damage and the suppression of early lymphomagenesis.
55 ggesting that chronic HBV infection promotes lymphomagenesis.
56 tions for understanding the role of Gfi-1 in lymphomagenesis.
57 an oncoprotein that cooperates with c-Myc in lymphomagenesis.
58 rminal center (GC) reaction and important in lymphomagenesis.
59 n in tumor-derived cells suppressed leukemia/lymphomagenesis.
60 -renewal, and differentiation while opposing lymphomagenesis.
61 uming that HIV is only indirectly related to lymphomagenesis.
62 t non-Ig genes and thereby promote GC B-cell lymphomagenesis.
63 eculation that vitamin D may protect against lymphomagenesis.
64 from a chromosomal translocation involved in lymphomagenesis.
65 ion of pre-B cells and, subsequently, during lymphomagenesis.
66 nal center (GC) B cells and is implicated in lymphomagenesis.
67 ough its ability to accelerate c-Myc-induced lymphomagenesis.
68 nce survival in a mouse model of Myc-induced lymphomagenesis.
69 ha in Notch pathway activation during T-cell lymphomagenesis.
70 er immune function, which may be relevant to lymphomagenesis.
71 have examined the role of circadian genes in lymphomagenesis.
72  in B cell development, immune function, and lymphomagenesis.
73 t regulate cell survival, proliferation, and lymphomagenesis.
74 inal center (GC) formation and implicated in lymphomagenesis.
75 erate with MYC over-expression to accelerate lymphomagenesis.
76  ear development, and has been implicated in lymphomagenesis.
77 t that blocking this pathway is critical for lymphomagenesis.
78 stream kinase ERK plays an important role in lymphomagenesis.
79 endent apoptosis, has been shown to suppress lymphomagenesis.
80 on in caspases may play an important role in lymphomagenesis.
81 3-dependent non-apoptotic pathways in B-cell lymphomagenesis.
82  into the pathways that contribute to B-cell lymphomagenesis.
83 e various B cell subsets while counteracting lymphomagenesis.
84 oncogene by cooperating with Akt2 to promote lymphomagenesis.
85 ity for non-Hodgkin lymphomas may illuminate lymphomagenesis.
86 tumors, p52 transgenic mice are not prone to lymphomagenesis.
87 ements that cooperate with activated Akt2 in lymphomagenesis.
88 ed, which could be critical for BCL6-induced lymphomagenesis.
89 tical insight into normal B-cell biology and lymphomagenesis.
90 al center (GC) reaction and is implicated in lymphomagenesis.
91 s apoptosis during the preleukemic period of lymphomagenesis.
92  repressor known to play a causative role in lymphomagenesis.
93 s are varied in their efficiency in inducing lymphomagenesis.
94 et this TCR must be downregulated for T-cell lymphomagenesis.
95 tes resulted in thymic involution instead of lymphomagenesis.
96  vivo genetic evidence for a role of MTA1 in lymphomagenesis.
97  tumor progression, loss of E2f2 accelerated lymphomagenesis.
98 n because its conditional ablation abrogates lymphomagenesis.
99 sion, resulting in an acceleration of B-cell lymphomagenesis.
100 n signaling that in turn prevent MYC-induced lymphomagenesis.
101 tations might play an important role in PTFL lymphomagenesis.
102 d NF-kappaB pathway previously implicated in lymphomagenesis.
103 es cause GC B cells to become susceptible to lymphomagenesis.
104 ay represent a novel animal model of gastric lymphomagenesis.
105 ph nodes to identify potential mechanisms of lymphomagenesis.
106 ene expression in mouse GC B cells, promotes lymphomagenesis.
107 sibility that HIV may directly contribute to lymphomagenesis.
108 null mice, show delayed onset of MYC-induced lymphomagenesis.
109 n mechanism of NF-kappaB deregulation during lymphomagenesis.
110  of malignant transformation in virus-driven lymphomagenesis.
111 ) checkpoint are required for ThPOK-mediated lymphomagenesis.
112 tential mechanism of gammaherpesvirus-driven lymphomagenesis.
113 d we add new mechanistic insight into B-cell lymphomagenesis.
114 viously unrecognized role of BRCA1 in B-cell lymphomagenesis.
115 initiate and maintain oncogenesis, including lymphomagenesis.
116 lation of epigenetic-repressive marks during lymphomagenesis.
117 hat MTHFR variants contribute to pSS-related lymphomagenesis.
118 n, tumour apoptosis and prevention of T-cell lymphomagenesis.
119 ng a critical function of PTEN in preventing lymphomagenesis.
120 t substitute for LMP1 in EBV-positive B cell lymphomagenesis.
121 novel link between ThPOK, TCR signaling, and lymphomagenesis.
122 clonogenicity, suggesting a role of vp17s in lymphomagenesis.
123  its repression by MYC contributes to B-cell lymphomagenesis.
124  establish PTPN1 mutations as new drivers in lymphomagenesis.
125 tudy the multistep transformation process in lymphomagenesis.
126 implications for the role of NF-kappaB in GC lymphomagenesis.
127 ressor function of IRF5 in IR-induced thymic lymphomagenesis.
128 function in CD40-driven B-cell expansion and lymphomagenesis.
129 with tumor suppressor properties involved in lymphomagenesis.
130 BCL6 may function in a 'hit-and-run' role in lymphomagenesis.
131 thereby contribute to B-cell homeostasis and lymphomagenesis.
132 a critical component of API2-MALT1-dependent lymphomagenesis.
133 type p53 it leads to significantly increased lymphomagenesis (56%) when compared with control mice (2
134  decreased DGK activity also promotes thymic lymphomagenesis accompanying elevated Ras and Erk1/2 act
135 on are thought to be the main drivers of HIV lymphomagenesis, although the current scenario does not
136 be an important mechanism involved in B-cell lymphomagenesis among severely immunocompromised and hea
137 ement, and restoring TTP impairs Myc-induced lymphomagenesis and abolishes maintenance of the maligna
138 transgenic mouse model of Myc-induced T cell lymphomagenesis and analyzed tumor progression in mice d
139                 Identifying the mechanism of lymphomagenesis and cell-of-origin from which PTCLs aris
140 ir-146b significantly delayed PTEN-deficient lymphomagenesis and delayed c-myc oncogene induction, a
141 berrant transcriptional programming leads to lymphomagenesis and development of targeted antilymphoma
142 at, while loss of one copy of Rpl22 promotes lymphomagenesis and disseminated disease, loss of both c
143                We review competing models of lymphomagenesis and highlight evolving evidence that som
144 on by constitutively active EZH2 facilitates lymphomagenesis and identifies EZH2 as a possible therap
145 -cell lymphoma 6 plays a fundamental role in lymphomagenesis and is an excellent therapeutic target f
146 tand the pathobiologic link of HCV in B cell lymphomagenesis and its optimal management in the oncolo
147                                     Finally, lymphomagenesis and lymphoma proliferation depended upon
148 of NF-kappaB that are implicated in leukemia/lymphomagenesis and modulates their transcriptional and
149 mu-Myc transgenic mouse, greatly accelerates lymphomagenesis and mortality.
150 ficantly accelerated p19Arf deletion-induced lymphomagenesis and promoted rapid metastasis.
151 ressor that directly protects against B cell lymphomagenesis and provides a strong rationale for bloc
152      Strikingly, PARP14 deficiency delayed B lymphomagenesis and reversed the block to B-cell maturat
153 etwork, we can elucidate known mechanisms of lymphomagenesis and suggest candidate tumorigenic altera
154 mor development, accelerated Emu-Myc-induced lymphomagenesis and susceptibility to carcinogenesis.
155  mouse model of Burkitt lymphoma accelerates lymphomagenesis and that approximately 75% of Emu-Myc ly
156 aneously arising tumors in a murine model of lymphomagenesis and that c-Myc is involved in their regu
157 on and subsequent induction of BCL6 promotes lymphomagenesis and that this pathway may be a potential
158 y controlled therapeutic targets involved in lymphomagenesis and tumor progression.
159 e(+)/Emicro-myc mice significantly inhibited lymphomagenesis, and all lymphomas that did arise in the
160          LCL formation serves as a model for lymphomagenesis, and LCLs are phenotypically similar to
161 viral integration site in retrovirus-induced lymphomagenesis, and new, emerging data suggest a role o
162    This study implicates oncogenic NKX2-3 in lymphomagenesis, and provides a valid experimental mouse
163  as miRNAs during B-cell differentiation and lymphomagenesis, and recent advancements in targeted str
164 mor development, accelerated Emu-Myc-induced lymphomagenesis, and rendered mice susceptible to carcin
165 ng of the processes and pathways involved in lymphomagenesis, and some of the pathways mutated here m
166 3 dysfunction, recent advances implicated in lymphomagenesis, and therapeutic approaches to overcomin
167                                              Lymphomagenesis appears stepwise from the t(14;18) trans
168 e found that DNA methylation profiles during lymphomagenesis are largely influenced by the methylatio
169 echanisms underlying API2-MALT1-induced MALT lymphomagenesis are not fully understood.
170 ors that predispose individuals toward viral lymphomagenesis are poorly understood.
171 t collaborative roles between MYC and EBV in lymphomagenesis are unclear.
172 quences of these mutations and their role in lymphomagenesis are unknown.
173 tion of INK4 control on Cdk4 does not affect lymphomagenesis, B-cell maturation, and functions in Cdk
174 o have implications for the role of FOXO1 in lymphomagenesis because they suggest that constitutive F
175 C1, PRC2 is a tumor suppressor in Emicro-myc lymphomagenesis, because disease onset was accelerated b
176  the Rel proteins are implicated in leukemia/lymphomagenesis but the mechanism is not fully understoo
177 verses and prevents the onset of MYC-induced lymphomagenesis, but fails to reverse or prevent tumorig
178 s of Dicer function was not advantageous for lymphomagenesis, but rather, Dicer ablation was strongly
179  of just one Rpl22 allele accelerates T-cell lymphomagenesis by activating NF-kappaB and inducing the
180 ption of one or both Patz1 alleles may favor lymphomagenesis by activating the BCL6 pathway.
181 ng indicates that EBV and KSHV contribute to lymphomagenesis by affecting genomic stability and by su
182 rant expression of FOXP1 might contribute to lymphomagenesis by blocking this terminal B-cell differe
183 somatic mutations of MEF2B may contribute to lymphomagenesis by deregulating BCL6 expression, and MEF
184  investigate the mechanism of Stat5-mediated lymphomagenesis by exploring the contributions of major
185 Activation-induced deaminase (AID) can drive lymphomagenesis by generating off-target DNA breaks at l
186                         EBV therefore drives lymphomagenesis by hijacking long-range enhancer hubs an
187  conditional knockout in T cells accelerated lymphomagenesis by increasing cellular proliferation, wh
188 ss all MZL subtypes, which may contribute to lymphomagenesis by inducing constitutive NF-kappaB activ
189 VEM interaction with BTLA may play a role in lymphomagenesis by interfering with Vgamma9Vdelta2 T-cel
190  the loss or activation of which may promote lymphomagenesis by leading to abnormally prolonged NF-ka
191 suppressor gene whose early loss facilitates lymphomagenesis by remodeling the epigenetic landscape o
192 y and sufficient for promoting c-myc-induced lymphomagenesis by repressing apoptosis.
193            We show that loss of Dnmt1 delays lymphomagenesis by suppressing normal hematopoiesis and
194 e analyses demonstrate that miR-17~92 drives lymphomagenesis by suppressing the expression of multipl
195 ll expansion and potentially KSHV-associated lymphomagenesis by targeting C/EBPbeta.
196                                              Lymphomagenesis can be accelerated by crossing in a furt
197            PDK1 is shown to be essential for lymphomagenesis caused by deletion of PTEN in T cell pro
198 capacity to support division, while limiting lymphomagenesis caused by deregulated growth.
199 641F) can collaborate with Myc to accelerate lymphomagenesis demonstrating a cooperative role of EZH2
200 at HIV structural proteins may contribute to lymphomagenesis directly, because they can persist long
201 ese events are not restricted to APL because lymphomagenesis driven by deletion of p53 or, to a lesse
202 mplete ablation of Hdac1 and Hdac2 abrogated lymphomagenesis due to a block in early thymic developme
203  humans and mouse models have indicated that lymphomagenesis evolves through the accumulation of mult
204 ions, opening the possibility that multi-hit lymphomagenesis gradually occurs throughout life during
205 (+/-) mice showed a dramatic acceleration of lymphomagenesis, greater even than that observed in Emic
206 role for B-cell-receptor (BCR) signalling in lymphomagenesis has been inferred by studying immunoglob
207    A genetic or functional role for FOXP1 in lymphomagenesis, however, remains unknown.
208 c fibroblasts (MEFs) and impairs Myc-induced lymphomagenesis in a transgenic mouse model of human Bur
209 s inhibited by rapamycin, which also rescues lymphomagenesis in Atm-deficient mice.
210                         Importantly, reduced lymphomagenesis in c-Myc(Tg)CD19(-)/(-) mice was not due
211  the INK4-Cdk4 checkpoint can participate in lymphomagenesis in conjunction with additional alteratio
212  mice induces GC hyperplasia and accelerated lymphomagenesis in cooperation with BCL2.
213 , genetic inactivation of Dnmt3b accelerated lymphomagenesis in Dnmt3a(Delta/Delta) mice, demonstrati
214 ents potentially responsible for the delayed lymphomagenesis in Dnmt3a(Delta/Delta) mice.
215      As such, the loss of caspase-2 enhances lymphomagenesis in Emicro-Myc transgenic mice, and caspa
216 gnaling also appears to modulate the risk of lymphomagenesis in gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid ti
217 ent promotes Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-driven lymphomagenesis in Hodgkin lymphoma by a novel pathway i
218 the many genes whose mutation contributes to lymphomagenesis in humans, relatively little is known ab
219 vo, establish a preclinical model for B cell lymphomagenesis in immunosuppressed patients, and valida
220                                          The lymphomagenesis in mice derived from a reprogrammed T ce
221 omic instability and germinal center derived lymphomagenesis in mice infected with Plasmodium to recr
222 del, we observed a significant inhibition of lymphomagenesis in mice lacking one or both alleles of S
223 as and co-suppression of both genes promotes lymphomagenesis in mice.
224  malignancy or accelerate Myc-induced B-cell lymphomagenesis in mice.
225 with p53 deficiency, progressed rapidly into lymphomagenesis in mice.
226  identify which genes cooperate with BCL6 in lymphomagenesis in our BCL6 transgenic mice.
227 f p53 greatly accelerates the rate of B-cell lymphomagenesis in p37(Ing1b)-null mice.
228 GCs, suggesting that S1P(2) loss may promote lymphomagenesis in part by disrupting GC B-cells homeost
229 te that BCL6 expression is maintained during lymphomagenesis in part through DNA methylation that pre
230  mechanisms underlie genomic instability and lymphomagenesis in Rag2(c/c) p53(-/-) and Atm(-/-) mice.
231  c-rel-/- mice display significantly earlier lymphomagenesis in the c-Myc driven, Emu-Myc model of B-
232 e, and loss of Prdm11 accelerates MYC-driven lymphomagenesis in the Emicro-Myc mouse model.
233                                              Lymphomagenesis in the presence of deregulated MYC requi
234 e and observed spontaneous follicular B-cell lymphomagenesis in this model to show that ING proteins
235     Of these, only eIF4E was able to enhance lymphomagenesis in vivo.
236 p27(kip1) degradation process, to accelerate lymphomagenesis in vivo.
237 ency shortens the life span of, and promotes lymphomagenesis in, mice deficient in p53.
238 increased Mdm2 expression facilitated B-cell lymphomagenesis, in part, through regulation of p53 by a
239 rmore, CDK6-deficient mice were resistant to lymphomagenesis induced by active Akt, a downstream targ
240 at Src kinase is pathogenically activated in lymphomagenesis induced by FGFR1 fusion genes, implying
241 FIP200 did not further accelerate or inhibit lymphomagenesis induced by inactivation of p53 in mice.
242 en suggested as a major mechanism underlying lymphomagenesis induced by NF-kappaB2 mutations, which o
243                                         SMZL lymphomagenesis involves antigen and/or superantigen sti
244  Previous studies have shown that MYC-driven lymphomagenesis is associated with mammalian target of r
245 involvement of paired box gene 5 (PAX5) in B-lymphomagenesis is based largely on the discovery of Pax
246      It is well known that IR-induced thymic lymphomagenesis is markedly enhanced by p53 deficiency,
247                                              Lymphomagenesis is prevented if thymocyte development is
248 tt's lymphoma (BL), the role of the virus in lymphomagenesis is unclear.
249 -17 approximately 92- overexpression induces lymphomagenesis/leukemogenesis, we generated a B-cell-sp
250 ld be used to identify new genes involved in lymphomagenesis/leukemogenesis.
251 gest that predisposition of MIM-null mice to lymphomagenesis may involve aberrant interactions betwee
252 ation in a mouse model of MYC-induced T-cell lymphomagenesis (MTCL).
253  deletion-induced delay in Myc-driven B-cell lymphomagenesis, nor allowed a single B-cell lymphoma to
254 ding of the pathogenesis of autoimmunity and lymphomagenesis of autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndro
255 e role of specific signaling pathways in the lymphomagenesis of MCL and the biologic basis for ibruti
256 sus-like disease of BXSB.Yaa mice and B cell lymphomagenesis of SJL mice.
257 cell growth in mouse xenografts and postpone lymphomagenesis onset in murine transplantation models.
258 pients might be exposed to increased risk of lymphomagenesis or autoimmunity.
259  to reveal novel factors that participate in lymphomagenesis or to define biomarkers of onset or prog
260 V-6A genome from the telomere contributed to lymphomagenesis, or was coincidental, remains unclear bu
261 t gene results in protection from IR-induced lymphomagenesis rather than enhanced susceptibility to.
262 chd1 in Emu-Myc transgenic mice that undergo lymphomagenesis reduced disease latency by 50% relative
263 ement of lesions at the very early stages of lymphomagenesis, refines the diagnostic criteria for som
264 protein cholesterol (HDL-C) may occur during lymphomagenesis, reflecting underlying etiology such as
265 mechanisms that contribute to EBV-associated lymphomagenesis remain unclear.
266                 However, its contribution to lymphomagenesis remains elusive.
267  how higher expression of miR-17-92 promotes lymphomagenesis remains unclear.
268 the relevance of these 2 FL BCR features for lymphomagenesis remains unclear.
269                                              Lymphomagenesis requires Rag activity, which peaks at th
270                                 Furthermore, lymphomagenesis requires the expression of both prerearr
271 ts dysregulation, frequently associated with lymphomagenesis, requires robust dynamical modeling tech
272  penetrance and that, conversely, Myc-driven lymphomagenesis stringently requires two intact alleles
273 BCL that suppresses B-cell proliferation and lymphomagenesis, suggesting pharmaceutical targeting of
274  serial transplantation models of MYC-driven lymphomagenesis, supporting the idea that the mutational
275 Our findings identify Ment as an enhancer of lymphomagenesis that contributes to the tumor suppressor
276 ght into the role of the microenvironment in lymphomagenesis, these findings expose a unique molecula
277 7 overexpression also promotes mature B-cell lymphomagenesis; this is physiologically relevant as we
278     Constitutive expression of BCL6 mediates lymphomagenesis through aberrant proliferation, survival
279 ations and deletions in FBXO11 contribute to lymphomagenesis through BCL6 stabilization.
280 iates the humoral immune response and drives lymphomagenesis through formation of bivalent chromatin
281 rging evidence supports a key role of AID in lymphomagenesis through genome-wide off-target induction
282  of routine residential UVR exposure against lymphomagenesis through mechanisms possibly independent
283 oes not change the overall rate, it modifies lymphomagenesis to favor mature B cell lymphomas that ar
284 port that SIRT4 represses Myc-induced B cell lymphomagenesis via inhibition of mitochondrial glutamin
285  of T-cell malignancy, and found that T-cell lymphomagenesis was accelerated in mice bearing both mut
286                                  Accelerated lymphomagenesis was associated with increased accumulati
287 role of BCR/ITAM signaling in Pax5-dependent lymphomagenesis was corroborated in Syk, an ITAM-associa
288         To study the role of Notch in T-cell lymphomagenesis, we developed a highly tumorigenic cell
289 further characterize these EZH2 mutations in lymphomagenesis, we generated a mouse line where EZH2(Y6
290 nd the role of miRNAs in B cell function and lymphomagenesis, we generated short-RNA libraries from n
291        Given that c-Myc is often involved in lymphomagenesis, we hypothesized that it is deregulated
292                   To identify TFs central to lymphomagenesis, we identified lymphoma type-specific ac
293 e p53 deficient mouse model with accelerated lymphomagenesis, we previously observed whole chromosome
294 ein synthesis and attenuation of Myc-induced lymphomagenesis, we showed that Myc-induced UPR activati
295 rts its effects and how it may contribute to lymphomagenesis, we sought to characterize the outcome o
296                   In a phenotypic screen for lymphomagenesis, we tested candidate genes acting upstre
297 e relationship between parasitic disease and lymphomagenesis, we used Plasmodium chabaudi (Pc) to pro
298 ar subsets has implications for human B cell lymphomagenesis, which originates mostly from GC B cells
299 or during the onset of Emu-myc-driven B cell lymphomagenesis, while p73 modulated tumor dissemination
300 of PTEN was found to be a powerful driver of lymphomagenesis within the thymus characterized by overe

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top