ライフサイエンスコーパス: macroevolution

1 s major shifts in evolutionary trajectories (macroevolution).

2 etween fossil and phylogenetic approaches to macroevolution.

3 applied to both cultural microevolution and macroevolution.

4 have explanatory limitations with regard to macroevolution.

5 t contributors to adaptation, speciation and macroevolution.

6 epts in understanding pattern and process in macroevolution.

7 selection on variability is a major force of macroevolution.

8 and duplication can catalyse major steps of macroevolution.

9 phylogenetic methods to reconstruct cultural macroevolution.

10 n organisms and for interpreting patterns of macroevolution and biogeography.

11 o the challenges imposed by tumor micro- and macroevolution and developing deeper insight into parall

12 Here, I will discuss why microevolution, macroevolution and developmental biology all have to be

13 We argue that macroevolution and speciation on "rugged" fitness landsc

14 Lifespan extension could equate with macroevolution and subsequent modifications with microev

15 hesis of genetics and evolution: embryology, macroevolution, and homology.

16 m animal behavior and ecology to speciation, macroevolution, and human language.

17 nthesis is emerging that attempts to explain macroevolution as well as microevolutionary events.

18 sm for maintaining genetic variation, and in macroevolution, as a means of generating phenotypic nove

19 a novel body plan may be a common feature of macroevolution, as first hypothesized by G.G. Simpson mo

20 ons or unusual physical events as drivers of macroevolution, but they do suggest that the turnover of

21 of cetaceans is one of the best examples of macroevolution documented from the fossil record.

22 Macroevolution examines the temporal patterns of biologi

23 the trends of atomic composition during the macroevolution from prokaryote to eukaryote, five atoms

24 Its importance in speciation and macroevolution has been questioned, however, because phe

25 Although macroevolution has been subject to considerable controve

26 ir markedly different life-history phases to macroevolution has rarely been analysed.

27 species may represent the principle mode of macroevolution in RNA viruses.

28 Here we use an explicit model of macroevolution including gene birth, transfer, duplicati

29 ve similarity with the empirical facts about macroevolution, including broadly distributed extinction

30 r model permits numerous applications beyond macroevolution, including protein and RNA evolution.

31 rivers of geological-scale patterns in plant macroevolution is limited by a hesitancy to use measurab

32 As a result, the role of predation in macroevolution is often dismissed in favor of competitio

33 tions and their related functional groups in macroevolution made eukaryotic proteins carry more usefu

34 Patterns of mammalian macroevolution must be reinterpreted in light of these n

35 ic analysis of the Apidae sheds light on the macroevolution of a bee family that is of evolutionary,

36 ogeny and comparative method to evaluate the macroevolution of body and egg mass, incubation and fled

37 events have played an important role in the macroevolution of certain groups, but only when ecologic

38 I assessed the macroevolution of fruit traits in response to variation

39 d quantifying universal hypotheses about the macroevolution of gene regulatory mechanisms.

40 Across environmentally diverse habitats, the macroevolution of leaf defenses can be predicted by the

41 s of epicontinental seas have influenced the macroevolution of marine animals, but the extent to whic

42 portant, yet overlooked, role in shaping the macroevolution of plant defenses against arthropod herbi

43 -plant genes, an event that is linked to the macroevolution of plant vegetative and reproductive orga

44 er, our results provide new insight into the macroevolution of sexual signalling in insects.

45 to the importance of natural enemies in the macroevolution of species.

46 Here we apply this approach to study the macroevolution of the forelimb in primates, a structure

47 To study the macroevolution of vomeronasal sensitivity, we identified

48 play among the biotic and abiotic drivers of macroevolution remains limited.

49 ed both in nature and in the laboratory, and macroevolution (speciation and the origin of the divisio

50 observed for oxygen and sulfur atoms in the macroevolution; the variation of oxygen and sulfur compo

51 This is challenging because macroevolution typically uses lineage-based models, wher

52 We explored bird macroevolution using full genomes from 48 avian species

53 These include: biological time, direction, macroevolution verses microevolution, ageing and the ext

54 r results also indicate a basic asymmetry in macroevolution: very large decreases (such as extreme in