ライフサイエンスコーパス: magnetic stimulation

1 citability were performed using transcranial magnetic stimulation.

2 overcoming the limitations of electrical or magnetic stimulation.

3 ics, with a particular focus on transcranial magnetic stimulation.

4 noninvasive approaches, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation.

5 diation therapy, and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

6 MRI, magnetoencephalography and transcranial magnetic stimulation.

7 tly inactivating the DLPFC with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

8 onsible for the increase in CBF after pulsed magnetic stimulation.

9 h motor-evoked potentials under transcranial magnetic stimulation.

10 evoked potentials elicited with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

11 ectrodes or noninvasively using transcranial magnetic stimulation.

12 Transcranial magnetic stimulation also induced anticorrelated connect

13 potentials (DiMEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation and (2) spontaneous ventilation, as

14 A new study using transcranial magnetic stimulation and a virtual reality navigation ta

15 neural function via repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and assessed, using fMRI, activity

16 Transcranial magnetic stimulation and deep brain stimulation have eme

17 In the current study, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation and demonstrated that temporary dis

18 ysiology (EEG) and simultaneous transcranial magnetic stimulation and EEG that the transfer of WM tra

19 We used concurrent single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography (TMS-EEG

20 tions, as can be assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography (TMS-EEG

21 Concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation and fMRI in healthy participants de

22 ability conditions by combining transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional magnetic resonance i

23 cked in vivo using single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation and further highlight a novel thala

24 multiple parameters of repetitive cerebellar magnetic stimulation and have described the optimal sett

25 ssues, we combined single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation and motor-evoked potentials while h

26 r physiology was performed with transcranial magnetic stimulation and somatosensory physiology with v

27 Using transcranial magnetic stimulation and tasks designed to assess differ

28 non-invasive such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current sti

29 m extensor carpi radialis using transcranial magnetic stimulation, and fractional anisotropy (FA) in

30 by testing if a suprathreshold transcranial magnetic stimulation applied over the primary motor cort

31 but existing devices (that is, transcranial magnetic stimulation) are large, reducing their translat

32 a rationale for further exploration of micro-magnetic stimulation as a prospective tool for clinical

33 s that had been identified with transcranial magnetic stimulation-based functional localization, phon

34 reatment including medications, transcranial magnetic stimulation, biofeedback, target-specific botul

35 -cortical spreading depression, transcranial magnetic stimulation blocked the propagation of cortical

36 dentified several brain regions activated by magnetic stimulation, but the central neural mechanisms

37 tic arm positioned a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation coil over a subject-specific dorsal

38 erve electrical stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation) combined with electroencephalograp

39 to stop selectively (indexed by transcranial magnetic stimulation) corresponds to striatal, pallidal,

40 Transcranial magnetic stimulation cortical excitability and inhibitio

41 , we use continuous theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (cTBS) to test this model causally.

42 (CBI): a conditioning pulse of transcranial magnetic stimulation delivered to the cerebellum before

43 close temporal contiguity with transcranial magnetic stimulation delivered to the contralateral prim

44 Although transcranial magnetic stimulation disrupted neural activity in task-r

45 Double-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (dpTMS) was used to examine inhibit

46 Dual-site transcranial magnetic stimulation (dsTMS) has highlighted the timing

47 Dual site transcranial magnetic stimulation (dsTMS) has revealed interhemispher

48 the left dlPFC with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation during the same task, and show that

49 ncephalographic measurements of transcranial magnetic stimulation-evoked activity in 4 cortical areas

50 Several transcranial magnetic stimulation-evoked electroencephalographic osci

51 A subsequent fMRI-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation experiment confirmed dissociable ro

52 rther support was obtained by a transcranial magnetic stimulation experiment, where subjects whose fr

53 his is further supported by our transcranial magnetic stimulation experiment: subjects whose right in

54 Transcranial magnetic stimulation focused on either the left anterior

55 Here, we use 180 pairs of transcranial magnetic stimulation for approximately 30 min over the h

56 humans, we applied theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation, guided by subject-specific connect

57 More generally, our novel transcranial magnetic stimulation-guided lesion-deficit mapping appro

58 ants, we show how damage to our transcranial magnetic stimulation-guided regions affected performance

59 e for the contribution that the transcranial magnetic stimulation-guided regions make to language tas

60 classification accuracy of the transcranial magnetic stimulation-guided regions was validated in a s

61 th and without damage to these 'transcranial magnetic stimulation-guided' regions remained highly sig

62 A single pulse of transcranial magnetic stimulation has been shown to be effective for

63 ysiology of the brain employing transcranial magnetic stimulation has convincingly demonstrated a pre

64 advantages over electrical and transcranial magnetic stimulation, has proven effective in activating

65 Recently, single pulses of cerebellar magnetic stimulation have been shown to directly evoke r

66 Electrical and transcranial magnetic stimulations have proven to be therapeutically

67 ephalography (EEG) responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation in 22 participants during 29 h of w

68 ngs from functional imaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation in healthy participants, we show ho

69 ry capacity that may explain the efficacy of magnetic stimulation in the treatment of migraine with a

70 eas neuronal activation using high-intensity magnetic stimulation increases barrier permeability and

71 magnetic resonance imaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation indicated the involvement of the le

72 In a second experiment, transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced disruption was used to demo

73 y alterations were monitored by transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced motor-evoked potential ampl

74 Plasticity was monitored by transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced motor-evoked potential ampl

75 l excitability was monitored by transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced motor-evoked potential ampl

76 ndicated by specific markers of transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced muscle and brain responses

77 gms, we report that noninvasive transcranial magnetic stimulation interference with a reactivated mot

78 Neuromodulation using transcranial magnetic stimulation is one of the most promising techni

79 the experimental procedure, called low field magnetic stimulation (LFMS).

80 pinal excitability at rest with transcranial magnetic stimulation, local concentrations of basal GABA

81 n (STN-DBS) with motor cortical transcranial magnetic stimulation (M1-TMS) at specific times can indu

82 Low field magnetic stimulation may produce rapid changes in mood u

83 idence for this idea stems from transcranial magnetic stimulation measuring corticospinal excitabilit

84 iomarkers were assessed using a transcranial magnetic stimulation multiparadigm approach in 13 presym

85 Transcranial magnetic stimulation normalized depression-related subge

86 articipants, whether repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of a frontal midline node of the ci

87 y and secondary dystonia, using transcranial magnetic stimulation of motor cortex and eye blink class

88 ments we define an effective means of pulsed magnetic stimulation of the facial nerve for the purpose

89 evoked potentials, elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex, with electrica

90 ding deep brain stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation, offer yet another direction to enh

91 ional MRI-guided, single-pulse, transcranial magnetic stimulation on human subjects to test the role

92 euronal populations by applying transcranial magnetic stimulation over M1 with different coil orienta

93 Transcranial magnetic stimulation over primary motor cortex provided

94 We used paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation over primary motor cortex to measur

95 Using transcranial magnetic stimulation over the arm representation of the

96 d potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the ipsilateral motor cortex w

97 Transcranial magnetic stimulation over the left primary motor cortex

98 In the second study, using transcranial magnetic stimulation over the occipital lobe, we showed

99 e, created with 1-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the pharyngeal cortex in 12 he

100 Transcranial magnetic stimulation over the PPC is used to study cogni

101 corticospinal excitability with transcranial magnetic stimulation over the primary motor cortex.

102 Magnetic stimulation overcomes these limitations but exi

103 r evoked potentials elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation, paired-pulse intracortical inhibit

104 Using a dual-site transcranial magnetic stimulation paradigm, we examined the age-relat

105 haracteristics of activation using different magnetic stimulation parameters.

106 cuss how recent methods such as transcranial magnetic stimulation, positron emission tomography, MRI,

107 A targeted pulse of transcranial magnetic stimulation produced a brief reemergence of the

108 mulation (cTBS) is a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol that can inhibit human mot

109 ask with a real-time repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol, we provide evidence indic

110 We used transcranial magnetic stimulation protocols to evaluate motor excitab

111 ortex target, and 50 repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation pulses were delivered at 10 Hz (exc

112 ruption of rSMG with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation resulted in a substantial increase

113 For Go trials, single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation revealed a rapid increase in motor

114 A causal intervention with transcranial magnetic stimulation revealed clear specialization along

115 While repetitive magnetic stimulation (rMS) has been shown to induce plas

116 o learn more about the effects of repetitive magnetic stimulation (rMS), we established an in vitro m

117 Here, we used repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and fMRI to determine the sp

118 ed waveforms such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial alternating

119 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied over the right poste

120 ervation by means of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied to the inferior pari

121 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can noninvasively stimulate

122 of studies exploring repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for the treatment of auditor

123 suggest efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for the treatment of negativ

124 n (TBS) protocols of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) have after-effects on excita

125 everal strategies of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) have been investigated as tr

126 gnitive responses to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in bipolar II depressed pati

127 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasive neuromodula

128 ain stimulation like repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an increasingly popular s

129 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is increasingly used as a tr

130 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is used as a therapeutic too

131 ute session of 10 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of Brodmann Area (BA) nine o

132 ts of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the right dorsolateral pr

133 we demonstrated that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the right supramarginal g

134 memories, we applied repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over right lateral prefronta

135 ting depression with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) remains unknown.

136 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) targeted over the dorsolater

137 icacy in curtailing AVHs via 1-Hz repetitive magnetic stimulation (rTMS) targeting a site in each reg

138 se to treatment with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to dorsomedial prefrontal co

139 e imaging (fMRI) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to examine the role of S1 in

140 Here we used repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to infer the functional orga

141 nance imaging-guided repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to the dorsomedial prefronta

142 ch as high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), and can be studied in healt

143 specific protocol of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), induces changes in cortical

144 Using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), we have recently shown a fu

145 sk and low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS).

146 nditioning with 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; rTMS) and unilateral stroke, where

147 Transcranial magnetic stimulation selectively modulates functional co

148 ted this hypothesis by applying transcranial magnetic stimulation separately over either dorsolateral

149 Single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation significantly inhibited both mechan

150 Additionally transcranial magnetic stimulation significantly inhibited the spontan

151 of phonological processing, or transcranial magnetic stimulation sites that did not use functional l

152 ning the borders of each of the transcranial magnetic stimulation sites to include areas that were co

153 ent with functional imaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation studies in human Parkinson's diseas

154 nctional assessments along with transcranial magnetic stimulation studies were taken on 15 patients w

155 tcomes in studies of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation suggest the possibility that applic

156 lective regions with thetaburst transcranial magnetic stimulation (TBS) and measuring the effects of

157 estion by combining theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (TBS) with fMRI to test the predict

158 We finally confirm, using transcranial magnetic stimulation, that the fMRI-identified medial wa

159 Both transcranial direct current and magnetic stimulation therapies are in early stages, but

160 also predict responsiveness to transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy (n = 154).

161 t) inferior frontal gyrus using transcranial magnetic stimulation, thereby eliminating the engrained

162 rupting cerebellar activity via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) abolished the adaptation of M

163 By using double-coil transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencephalography (E

164 Combining transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencephalography (E

165 l cortex (DLPFC) using combined transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencephalography (E

166 ed their functional roles using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and two different numerosity-

167 sess this, we used single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) applied to visual cortical ar

168 This fMRI study used concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) as a causal perturbation appr

169 merging from the application of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) as a research and clinical to

170 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at beta frequency has previou

171 inhibition (LAI) measured with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can be used to measure sensor

172 p (N=17) underwent single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) concurrent with fMRI to exami

173 er high-frequency, non-invasive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) delivered twice a week over a

174 elbow flexors was assessed via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) during maximum voluntary cont

175 Here we employed EEG-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) during non-rapid eye movement

176 vated us to conduct a series of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) experiments to examine in det

177 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been shown to modulate mu

178 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has emerged as an important t

179 I) of motor cortex, measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in a passive (resting) condit

180 ing single-pulse and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in healthy humans, we provide

181 Previous studies have used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in humans to demonstrate the

182 rsal interosseous muscles using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in young and older adults rec

183 We combine transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) interference, EEG recordings,

184 est by combining the FCM with a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) intervention that transiently

185 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a novel therapeutic approa

186 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a widely used non-invasive

187 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a widely used, noninvasive

188 sual qualia can be induced when transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is applied over the patients'

189 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is widely used in clinical in

190 We demonstrate that paired transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) near ventral premotor cortex

191 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of human occipital and poster

192 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the dorsolateral prefronta

193 on of these circuitries by deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the PFC and insula bilater

194 equential task while undergoing transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the RLPFC versus two prefr

195 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) offers a safe, non-invasive m

196 e shown asymmetrical effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on task performance, but it i

197 entials (MEPs) were obtained by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on the primary motor cortex w

198 sted this by using single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over primary motor cortex (M1

199 succeeds lbif) while undergoing transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the cortical motor repre

200 ed this possibility by means of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the hand area of the pri

201 scheme, we tested the effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the hand area of the pri

202 gated the disruptive effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the human prefrontal and

203 The application of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the occipital cortex mod

204 We used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the occipital cortex to

205 found that applying theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the PPC, but not the dor

206 By applying transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the primary motor cortex

207 hibition by using an innovative transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) protocol combining repetitive

208 end, we exploited a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) protocol over frontal cortex

209 Delivering transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) shortly after the end of a vi

210 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies have provided evidenc

211 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies in humans have shown

212 ic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) study.

213 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) therapy can modulate patholog

214 rrent study, we used MRI-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to assess whether temporary d

215 s, and fMRI-guided single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to causally test this interhe

216 derwent MRI-guided single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to co-localise pharyngeal and

217 Here, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to examine the physiological

218 l lesion methodology offered by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to explore the impact of pre-

219 Here we applied transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to human left PMd at low or h

220 participants using single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to interfere with postmovemen

221 To test this idea, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to interrupt processing in th

222 gnetic resonance imaging-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to investigate the role of th

223 l nerve stimulation paired with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to primary motor cortex (M1)

224 e) brain noninvasively, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to probe the excitability of

225 Here we used fMRI-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to shed light on the role of

226 Here, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to test the effects of a sing

227 Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to the left dorsolateral pref

228 It has been shown that transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to the left LO disrupts objec

229 A in human adults, we delivered transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to the right OPA (rOPA) or th

230 The effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) vary depending on the brain s

231 Here, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to establish a causa

232 We delivered double-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) while moving a single tactile

233 s using MRI-guided paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) while subjects listen to Refe

234 the process by combining online transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with computational modeling o

235 Here, by combining transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with EEG we aimed at investig

236 of this mechanism by combining transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with functional MRI to causal

237 We employed transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with simultaneous electroence

238 d (FEF) by combining repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with subsequent magnetoenceph

239 we hypothesized that inhibitory transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) would reduce appetitive neuro

240 Using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), 25 motor-evoked potentials (

241 using fMRI, psychophysics, and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), all within the same human pa

242 Next we used single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), guided spatially by our fMRI

243 The most common are transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), transcranial electric stimul

244 Using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), we applied a novel cortico-c

245 Using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), we assessed the functions of

246 Here, using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), we provide causal evidence i

247 ity of the cortical response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)--an approach that has proven

248 omotor interaction using paired transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

249 entrain") these oscillations by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

250 tudy addressed this issue using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

251 ly disrupted using single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

252 ponse selection conflicts using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

253 in the same participants using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

254 is for contagious yawning using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

255 tients by means of paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

256 e addressed this question using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

257 topographic visual memory using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

258 e perception) through occipital transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

259 tic resonance imaging-navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

260 was investigated with fMRI and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

261 a variety of brain disorders is transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

262 tatory or inhibitory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to a subject-specific frontal-cingu

263 Using transcranial magnetic stimulation to alter brain function during retr

264 eripheral nerve stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation to alter functional responses in th

265 We used transcranial magnetic stimulation to assess whether application of De

266 Here, we use repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to briefly interfere with neural ac

267 esonance imaging and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to demonstrate the representation o

268 We used transcranial magnetic stimulation to determine menstrual cycle-relate

269 We used transcranial magnetic stimulation to evaluate whether neural mechanis

270 e used low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to examine whether the PPC and DLPF

271 Using transcranial magnetic stimulation to inhibit the right frontopolar co

272 Applying rhythmic transcranial magnetic stimulation to interfere with early retrieval p

273 We used fMRI and transcranial magnetic stimulation to investigate the neural underpinn

274 We tested this idea using transcranial magnetic stimulation to measure corticospinal excitabili

275 Further, using transcranial magnetic stimulation to measure corticospinal excitabili

276 This was achieved by applying a transcranial magnetic stimulation to the medial prefrontal cortex (Br

277 We used transcranial magnetic stimulation tools to investigate the mechanisms

278 echniques, including repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimul

279 ulation in addiction, including transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimul

280 stimulation techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimul

281 motor-cortical excitability via transcranial magnetic stimulation up to 2 h after stimulation.

282 healthy young females underwent transcranial magnetic stimulation using an excitatory PAS(25) protoco

283 tential mechanisms of action of transcranial magnetic stimulation, using a transcortical approach, in

284 deoed partner, and double-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation was applied around the turn-switch

285 Inhibitory theta-burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation was applied to the left DLPFC or to

286 Transcranial magnetic stimulation was delivered at 80, 240, and 400 m

287 articipants, threshold-tracking transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to assess cortical functio

288 By using combined EEG-TMS (transcranial magnetic stimulation), we here address these fundamental

289 Third, using transcranial magnetic stimulation, we demonstrate that the anterior r

290 Using theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation, we disrupted PFC function in human

291 Using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, we show that stimulating human vis

292 th rTPJ activity through online transcranial magnetic stimulation, we showed that participants were l

293 Using transcranial magnetic stimulation, we sought direct physiological evi

294 l femoral nerve stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation were obtained to assess neuromuscul

295 muscle action potentials evoked by cervical magnetic stimulation were unaffected by tsDCS.

296 iffusion and perfusion MRI, and transcranial magnetic stimulation were used to study structural conne

297 Furthermore, the orientation-dependence of magnetic stimulation, which leads to specific changes in

298 Recently, micro-magnetic stimulation, which may offer advantages over el

299 means of continuous theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation, while measuring effort perception

300 hibitory continuous theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation with model-based functional MRI, we