ライフサイエンスコーパス: main effect

1 ffering) or generally throughout daily life (main effects).

2 Gender modified this main effect.

3 , possibly due to the small magnitude of the main effect.

4 in magnitude were greater than environmental main effect.

5 tions can have important implications beyond main effects.

6 fication of important G x E interactions and main effects.

7 orphisms, not just those showing significant main effects.

8 ne association approach used to test genetic main effects.

9 for estimating the genetic and environmental main effects.

10 ions and correlation patterns in addition to main effects.

11 ey tended to be small compared with stimulus main effects.

12 pproach could detect epistatic QTL with weak main effects.

13 d on whether or not the loci have individual main effects.

14 uality measure that balances interaction and main effects.

15 ed only for pairs of loci of which both have main effects.

16 onic SNP exhibited statistically significant main effects.

17 by-DAR interactions partially counteract the main effects.

18 erformed using maternal and paternal PTSD as main effects.

19 ) or are proportional to respective exposure main effects (a variant of Tukey's one-degree test).

20 5g.L(-1) lecithin showed its main effects after 16days of storage: highest SSC, highe

21 1g.L(-1) lecithin showed its main effects after 8days of storage by reduction in tota

22 10g.L(-1) lecithin showed its main effects after 8days of storage with highest SSC, ch

23 Main effects analysis of sensory experience revealed les

24 By main effects analysis, peak VO2 was increased significan

25 plication of this method illustrates mapping main effect and interacting QTLs for heading time in the

26 etween pairs of SNPs providing evidence of a main effect and observed 17 significant interactions (16

27 10(-8)) loci by using joint tests of the SNP main effect and SNP-age interaction.

28 Eight markers showed significant main effects and 18 markers showed significant Q x E int

29 netic values while incorporating both marker main effects and epistatic effects.

30 trol and analytical procedures for measuring main effects and for evaluating environmental exposure m

31 thors also compared 2 joint tests of genetic main effects and G-E interaction.

32 oss males, both in terms of the magnitude of main effects and in the epistatic interactions.

33 Thus, we find positive evidence for both main effects and interaction between genetic loci and de

34 puting platform that can systematically scan main effects and interaction effects among all possible

35 Joint tests of main effects and interactions are performed conditional

36 Main effects and interactions between lifetime asthma, a

37 peated-measures design allowed assessment of main effects and interactions of light level, viewing co

38 Interpretation of the main effects and interactions subsequently enables the s

39 sition at 6 and 24 mo were obtained for gene main effects and interactions with a low-fat diet (20% f

40 to test single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) main effects and SNP x education interaction effects on

41 On simulated data with main effects and statistical interactions, we compare ac

42 On average, the sum of all significant main effects and the sum of all significant epistatic ef

43 We used global tests of main effects and treatment interactions, adjusting the P

44 can that may have been conducted for genetic main effects, and thus has the potential to uncover new

45 els slightly overestimate genetic variances, main effects are assessed accurately and precisely.

46 Two main effects are proposed to explain biodiversity-ecosys

47 The main effects are represented by the means of QTL effects

48 ar, quadratic, and cubic BSA terms and a sex main effect as independent variables.

49 esearch in Transplantation Network to detect main effect association signals across regions such as t

50 ypic association results, EMDR confirmed the main effect at RS1912960 (in GABRA4).

51 cold storage and subsequent shelf life, the main effect being observed for those fruits coated with

52 Analyses of variance revealed main effects, but not an interaction, for apolipoprotein

53 ility loci that, on their own, have marginal main effects by use of gene-gene interaction tests have

54 A significant main effect comparing the two groups (F (1, 43)=21.90, p

55 hat responded to soil drying and hundreds of main-effect eQTLs.

56 For most scenarios, main-effect estimates for cadmium and lead with increasi

57 The main effects examined were microbiological sputum conver

58 LHF total score with exercise and with diet (main effect: exercise, -1 unit [95% CI, -8 to 5], P = .7

59 dy Short Form 36 Physical Component Summary) main effect: F(1, 172) = 9.87, P < 0.01].

60 R-E group than for the NR-E group (treatment main effect: F1,68 = 5.4, P = .02, d = 0.50, and Delta =

61 r than stage-wise strategies (i.e. selecting main effects first, and interactions second, from those

62 balance scores were different, with a large main effect for age and a small effect for sex.

63 analysis showed that there was a significant main effect for DHT exposure, but not for genotype, indi

64 There is some evidence of a main effect for genotype and some evidence for a gene by

65 ificant in the women (P < 0.05); there was a main effect for method but not race-ethnicity.

66 There was a main effect for site but not for treatment condition.

67 89, p<0.001, Partial Eta Squared=0.57) and a main effect for time (F (2, 43)=3.76, p=0.03, Partial Et

68 (CON group) and by 10% +/- 10% (LEU group) (main effect for time, P < 0.05), but no differences betw

69 d haplotypes and risk of NHL, as well as the main effects for all independent SNPs from a gene in mul

70 yes method that simultaneously estimates 127 main effects for all markers and 127(127-1)/2=8001 inter

71 One can also estimate main effects for exposures and now flexibly assess model

72 population-based controls are not included, main effects for exposures cannot be estimated, and cons

73 Findings revealed significant main effects for individual and neighborhood predictors

74 miodarone was tested using a Cox model, with main effects for randomized treatment and amiodarone and

75 Results revealed main effects for the executive attention and orienting n

76 rtional odds logistic regression model, with main effects for three readers, two techniques, and four

77 Main effects for understanding were found for processabi

78 The main effects found were that explicitness and reassuranc

79 statistically significant associations from main-effect genome-wide association studies may be more

80 ffects are more frequent and larger than the main effects: half of the interactions explained >20% of

81 mong patients treated with aprotinin, with a main-effects hazard ratio for death of 1.32 (95% confide

82 % CI, 0.96-1.45; P = 0.12; lutein/zeaxanthin main effect HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.85-1.28; P = 0.71).

83 significantly different (omega-3 fatty acids main effect HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.96-1.45; P = 0.12; lutei

84 These results support the main effects hypothesis and indicate that hypothalamic-p

85 all relevant data to examine evidence for a main effect (i.e., the effect in a model that does not i

86 mary objective in inference, rather than the main effect in a model with gene-environment interaction

87 affirm transition state stabilization as the main effect in enhancing chemical rates and provide a un

88 al divergence of Scr roles during embryonic (main effect in labium) and post-embryonic (main effect i

89 (main effect in labium) and post-embryonic (main effect in prothorax) development.

90 However, phonological priming main effects in both the N2 and P3 ranges were indisting

91 ased on random regression analysis, revealed main effects in favor of FBT on all measures of eating p

92 Results also revealed significant group main effects in the amygdala and insula bilaterally, ref

93 Latinos exhibited significant haplotype main effects in two blocks even after adjusting for admi

94 ots for SNPs in ALOX5AP, TNF, and KCNJ11 for main effects; in LPL and TUB for glycemic index interact

95 Lower prices have two main effects: increasing overall energy consumption, and

96 high computational cost, do not respect the "main effect, interaction" hierarchical structure, or use

97 Regression modeling refined the Chr 4 main effect into an approximately 50-cM region with thre

98 Instead, the main effect is seen in legs.

99 ifies their behavior to varying extents, its main effect is to regulate the function of AMPAR subunit

100 ns, especially when the marginal strength of main effects is weak.

101 Locomotion had two main effects: it increased spontaneous activity, and it

102 dy tissues triggered by DvSnf7 RNAi were the main effects leading to the death of WCR.

103 We report 58 significant main effect loci and 24 significant epistatic interactio

104 The PS is frequently estimated using main-effects logistic regression.

105 Fully adjusted main effect models resulted in hazard ratios of 1.01 (95

106 en BC and blood markers were not observed in main effects models or when stratified by obesity status

107 Synergism was the main effect observed among the tested mixtures, mainly f

108 The main effects observed were lowering of total blood lipid

109 IL-6 (main effect odds ratio [OR] 1.72; 95% confidence interva

110 No main effect of ACEs on average BP levels was found.

111 There was a main effect of ADM over CBT on the HAM-D (beta = -0.88;

112 There was a main effect of adversity but not of monoamine oxidase A

113 olume-corrected [(11)C]PBR28 data revealed a main effect of alcohol dependence (P=0.034), correspondi

114 In a subsample of normal controls, both the main effect of amyloid deposition of worse memory perfor

115 We observed a main effect of anxiety levels on fullness and bloating (

116 By either mechanism, the main effect of both MTAs is to effectively stabilize the

117 There was a significant main effect of breakfast condition (P = 0.04) on total d

118 There was no significant main effect of breakfast condition on energy intake at l

119 Kinetic experiments show that a main effect of BRICHOS is to prolong the lag time in a c

120 Thus, a main effect of Ca(2+) on E-Syt1 is to reverse an autoinh

121 A significant main effect of calorie (high compared with low; P < 0.00

122 There was a significant main effect of castration and social context.

123 production in the liver, we suggest that the main effect of central insulin on hepatic glucose metabo

124 The main effect of circadian misalignment, either phase adva

125 Although there was no beneficial main effect of citalopram, it reduced Stop-Signal Reacti

126 The results revealed a main effect of COMT genotype in the ventral striatum and

127 f distribution values revealed a significant main effect of condition (SHS vs control) (F(1,22) = 42.

128 om the unaffected limb [PSS = -18 +/- 13 ms; main effect of condition F (1, 9) = 98.6, P < 0.001].

129 rror rate that the authors observed when the main effect of continuous body mass index was misspecifi

130 f distress and coping revealed a significant main effect of coping (OR = 0.7 [95% CI = 0.7-0.8]), but

131 The main effect of DAT1 genotype was seen in robust blood-ox

132 During successful inhibition, a main effect of diagnosis emerged in the right nucleus ac

133 In both the PET and fMRI studies, a main effect of diagnosis was observed, with PMDD patient

134 s a repeated measure indicated a significant main effect of diagnosis, F(1,24)=8.38, P=0.008, with si

135 Analysis of covariance showed a main effect of diagnostic group, with the CHR group show

136 Time to dropout had a significant main effect of dose, with mean time to dropout of 27, 36

137 There was a significant main effect of encoding, showing superior recall perform

138 ed over the ensuing year, such that only the main effect of fire was evident after 16 months.

139 A main effect of genotype was observed in the DLPFC and hi

140 The main effect of genotype was significantly greater activa

141 y significant activation associated with the main effect of group for the comparison of correct no-go

142 A main effect of group revealed elevated response in the m

143 There was no main effect of group status on thalamic volume and no si

144 that missing urine samples were positive, a main effect of group was not found for any drugs tested

145 A main effect of group, distinguishing cocaine from sucros

146 ive supranuclear palsy relative to controls [main effect of group, F(2,41) = 17.5, P < 0.0001; region

147 ression analysis was applied to test for the main effect of HapA and its interaction with dietary pro

148 We found a main effect of haplotype on ADRB2 density (P = 0.03) wit

149 In the mental stress trial, there was a main effect of haplotype on cardiac output (P = 0.04), a

150 There was partial evidence to suggest a main effect of haplotype on the change in SVR (P = 0.06)

151 There was a decreasing trend in the main effect of heat on childhood diarrhea in Brisbane ac

152 While the main effect of hepatitis C virus (HCV) is hepatitis, HCV

153 for age of onset and hyperglycemia exposure (main effect of hypoglycemia category, F [2,88] = 6.4, P

154 The main effect of IL-7 was an expansion of effector memory

155 ls based on these results suggested that the main effect of increasing odor concentration was to recr

156 Repeated-measures ANOVAs indicated a main effect of intensity for both anodal and cathodal tD

157 linear mixed model was used to determine the main effect of interventions and interaction term to ass

158 Our results argue that the main effect of intramolecular disulfide bond formation i

159 The main effect of LA addition is that it allows performing

160 on, a 1-factor ANOVA was run to discover any main effect of lifestyle.

161 weight that are similar in magnitude to the main effect of litter size on weight.

162 There was a significant main effect of LoR in the frequencies of 0.073-0.198 Hz

163 Post hoc analyses also revealed a main effect of MAOA genotype on having a disposition tow

164 This main effect of maternal status suggests a general differ

165 Collectively, the main effect of microcracks is not to slow down fracture

166 Finally, while there was no main effect of number of optimal solution paths, this pa

167 Importantly, the activation of the main effect of pain and the nocebo effect spatially over

168 The model predicts that the main effect of peg-IFN is to reduce HDV production/relea

169 a decreased independent of diet composition (main effect of phase, P < 0.01; between diets, P = NS).

170 lled experimental conditions, data support a main effect of prenatal nutrition on highly translatable

171 on in PTSD symptoms in all 4 groups, but the main effect of prolonged exposure therapy was not statis

172 There was a significant between-pair main effect of PTSD diagnosis (as determined in the comb

173 A main effect of reduced BOLD signal in bilateral occipita

174 In contrast, with fast-rate RSVP, we found a main effect of repetition that did not interact with sen

175 We used a twin model that allowed for a main effect of SES on intelligence, as well as a moderat

176 ight status, race, and meal instruction, the main effect of sex (P < 0.001) remained significant, but

177 gained weight during the study; there was a main effect of sex, but not BPA treatment on body weight

178 The results showed no main effect of stimulus type on temporal discrimination

179 Nevertheless, no main effect of stimulus type was found, on either proact

180 nt learning (session 2), though there was no main effect of stress on RPE.

181 We observed a main effect of task on left vOT activity but not stimulu

182 ects of task in dorsal PAG and right LC; and main effect of temperature in RVM and a task x temperatu

183 ag non-linear model was used to quantify the main effect of temperature on emergency department visit

184 Moreover, on neuroimaging measures with a main effect of the AKT1 genotype, there was significant

185 There was also a dose-dependent, main effect of the epsilon2 allele (p<0.0001), suggestiv

186 The main effect of the exposure was a shift in the response

187 No main effect of the GABRA6 rs3219151 was detected, but in

188 No significant main effect of the interventions emerged on cancer-speci

189 In comparison with the LC-CONV diet, the main effect of the LC-P-LGI diet was a greater decrease

190 The kinetic parameters indicate that the main effect of the mutation of Arg228 to lysine is on th

191 The magnitude of the main effect of the SNP increased with increasing levels

192 a 2-factor analysis, there was a significant main effect of the TB (P < 0.0001) but not CC (P = 0.128

193 Furthermore, there was a significant main effect of the TB on increasing apolipoprotein A-I (

194 o be the skeletal subspaces that receive the main effect of the treatment.

195 In contrast, the main effect of the V1300F mutation was a depolarizing sh

196 Repeated measures ANOVA showed a main effect of time-point (F = 4.59, df = 1, P = 0.035)

197 esidual mass decreased in both groups by 6% (main effect of time: P = 0.021), with no effect of alloc

198 The main effect of treatment did not reach conventional leve

199 nced by a lack of significant interaction or main effect of treatment during hemodialysis and in the

200 tes did not differ significantly either as a main effect of treatment or as an interaction with sever

201 57% +/- 0.11%/d; placebo, 1.48% +/- 0.08%/d; main effect of treatment: P < 0.001) and REX (pooled mea

202 .87% +/- 0.09%/d; placebo, 1.71 +/- 0.10%/d; main effect of treatment: P < 0.001) legs.

203 There was no main effect of vitamin D level on overall survival in th

204 The main effect of Y208T, Y208S, and Y208A mutations is to c

205 linear mixed-effects models to estimate the main effects of air pollutants and effect modification b

206 There were no main effects of APOE genotype.

207 Furthermore, the significant main effects of castration and social context were the r

208 analysis of variance was performed examining main effects of condition and group and group-by-conditi

209 The main effects of D treatment, but not of E treatment, on

210 In the DLPFC, there were no main effects of diagnosis or gender on Glx/W or GABA/W.

211 We tested the main effects of drug (placebo vs Nicorette gum) and time

212 ed, compared with that needed to demonstrate main effects of either genes or exposures.

213 There were main effects of FH (FH negative > FH positive) in the le

214 Main effects of genotype and diagnosis on activation and

215 Main effects of Group (p<0.005 height threshold, familyw

216 Significant main effects of Group (p<0.05) revealed decreased fALFF

217 In contrast, our findings for the main effects of life stressors (strong risk factor) and

218 are influenced by many factors including the main effects of many quantitative trait loci (QTLs), the

219 he rights of others (p < .05), there were no main effects of MAOA genotype, and MAOA genotype was not

220 Region-of-interest analyses indicated no main effects of medication or A118G genotype.

221 Thus, the main effects of metamorphosis on insect chemistry were l

222 Main effects of noxious thermal stimulation were observe

223 rge number of effects, including covariates, main effects of numerous loci, and gene-gene (epistasis)

224 ion that most genetic variance is due to the main effects of QTL.

225 The genetic main effects of QTLs, QE interaction effects and the cor

226 Main effects of sex were not detected.

227 While we revealed significant main effects of sex, there were no significant effects o

228 Main effects of smoking status and PTSD symptom severity

229 Main effects of smoking, snus, and the rs1051730 variant

230 r among all species and substrates, with few main effects of species or substrate observed throughout

231 the brainstem nuclei revealed the following: main effects of task in dorsal PAG and right LC; and mai

232 The results show main effects of the COMT gene variant (P = .002), birth

233 Univariate GLM exploring the main effects of the independent variables on physical an

234 rom extracellular ATP is responsible for the main effects of the latter in human cervical cancer cell

235 Although none of the main effects of the loci were significant, estimated anc

236 ysis was used to compare BOLD activation for main effects of the PS, ED, and their interaction.

237 There were no main effects of the SNPs on PTSD symptoms and no signifi

238 ion that can simultaneously capture both the main effects of the variants within a genomic region and

239 sis-generating observations suggest that the main effects of ticagrelor may not relate to the rapidit

240 There were main effects of time (indicating improvement across the

241 Significant main effects of time by group interaction for fractional

242 The main effects of time were observed in the total and subs

243 od and beverage intakes, we investigated the main effects of time, treatment, and the treatment-by-ti

244 Cox proportional hazards models showed no main effects of treatment (P=0.61) or AS (P=0.72) for ti

245 The main effects of treatment demonstrated no overall improv

246 While there were no main effects of treatment, venlafaxine treatment was ass

247 The main effects of treatments and their interaction were as

248 In this review, the main effects of vitamin E on enzymes involved in signal

249 Somatization levels had a main effect on all 5 symptoms (P < .0001), independent o

250 Paternal depression did not have a main effect on any psychiatric disorder in adolescents a

251 We found that acute stress had a main effect on mtRNA expression and that expression of N

252 Conversion of Gly-336 to valine has its main effect on the Kd of serine binding to one form of t

253 Installation of information signage had no main effect on visitor attitudes or learning.

254 CRF produced three main effects on dLGN stimulus evoked activity: (1) incre

255 TPD did not exert main effects on mood or on task behavior, but affected b

256 ntrols, we found that rs3782206 genotype had main effects on the 1-back task (P=0.005), the 2-back ta

257 e, and physical properties of emulsions with main effects on their quality and stability.

258 The rs1344706 genotype produced significant main effects on total, frontal, and parietal lobe WM vol

259 interval [95% CI] 1.12, 2.66) and TNFalpha (main effect OR 1.49; 95% CI 1.16, 1.90) concentrations w

260 Each of the other markers had either a main effect or a Q x E interaction effect but not both.

261 the absence of a significant combat exposure main effect or diagnosis x exposure interaction.

262 rrespective of whether it is mostly due to a main effect or due to some interaction effect(s), via an

263 th time to a suicidal event and no treatment main effect or treatment x time interaction on suicidal

264 tivity index (SIT 56 +/- 15%, ET 29 +/- 12%; main effect P < 0.05).

265 ilt: 49 +/- 14 vs. 40 +/- 10 bursts min(-1); main effect, P < 0.05).

266 8.6 +/- 3.6 ml min(-1) (100 g)(-1)) men (age main effect, P = 0.001).

267 (-1); old men: 25.1 +/- 15.4 ml min(-1); age main effect, P = 0.77) as blood flow per unit mass of mu

268 pports conventional hypothesis tests for QTL main effect, pleiotropy, and QTL-by-environment interact

269 Main effect plots showed total FAAs extraction was favou

270 sent study, a heritability-adjusted genotype main effect plus genotype x environment (HA-GGE) biplot

271 e (ANOVA) and heritability adjusted-genotype main effect plus genotype-environment interaction (HA-GG

272 In the first stage, main effect QTL are searched and mapped.

273 The search for main effect QTL is robust and does not bias the search f

274 In all, 44 main effect QTL were detected above a 5% genome-wide sig

275 We found that the largest main-effect QTL (single marker) and the largest epistati

276 Thus by first mapping those main-effect QTL, the statistical power for the second an

277 A total of 78 main-effect QTLs (M-QTLs) and 10 E-QTLs have been detect

278 This study identified a total of 78 main-effect QTLs (M-QTLs) with up to 42.33% phenotypic v

279 -age interactions only in whites but had DBP main effects replicated (p = 8.3 x 10(-4)) in 8,682 Asia

280 able logistic regression controlling for the main effects revealed that previous cardiac surgery, chr

281 Analysis of main effects revealed that training induced 33, 105 and

282 s first, and interactions second, from those main effects selected) in finding true interactions, esp

283 nt of Framingham risk score and DM, and such main effects significantly differed from controls (P = 0

284 on was primarily due to selection on genetic main effects tailored to temperature-dependent plasticit

285 Crystal structures revealed their main effect to be a weakening of interactions with the C

286 The linear model demonstrates that QTL main effects varied with DAR, and that some epistasis or

287 At P7-15 the drug's main effect was behavioral depression; i.e., kittens, aw

288 Parametrically, no main effect was found for TICV when predicting a dementi

289 A statistically significant main effect was found for time (F1,198 = 75.92; P = .001

290 The main effect was observed in prothorax of Scr-RNAi adults

291 effects of group according to sex on GMV and main effects were analyzed throughout the whole brain by

292 .19 and OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.36-0.83], but no main effects were found among African-Americans.

293 The qSD1 and qSD7-1 main effects were increased, while the qSD12 additive ef

294 ions were significant (P < 0.05) in the men; main effects were nonsignificant.

295 required analysis of 16 samples in which the main effects were not confounded by two-factor interacti

296 Significant group main effects were observed for both response (odds ratio

297 Within men, group main effects were observed involving these same regions,

298 d early degenerative mechanisms, because the main effects were seen at 7 d and lasted beyond the trea

299 be underestimated or even go undetected as a main effect when it is hidden in gene-by-environment (Gx

300 ction being driven by a significant genotype main effect (wildtype>heterozygote>null mutant).