ライフサイエンスコーパス: mandible

1 th) to 60% (OSCC in the alveolar part of the mandible).

2 giant keratocystic odontogenic tumor of the mandible.

3 nge, 0.7-3.3 cm), occurring primarily in the mandible.

4 and craniofacial abnormalities such as small mandible.

5 c forces clinically modify the growth of the mandible.

6 109 patients with 280 implants placed in the mandible.

7 rus based on a single, relatively incomplete mandible.

8 we identify at least four distinct types of mandible.

9 and BIC among the groups in the maxilla and mandible.

10 Four implants were placed in each edentulous mandible.

11 less peri-implant bone loss in the posterior mandible.

12 ding craniofacial dysmorphology with a small mandible.

13 major forces affecting the form of the human mandible.

14 and periodontal and implant surgeries in the mandible.

15 ng potential of osseous defects in the human mandible.

16 rly cap stages, and severe hypoplasia of the mandible.

17 l plate perforation for IIP in the posterior mandible.

18 gual nerve and perform safe surgeries in the mandible.

19 nd distal surfaces or the maxilla versus the mandible.

20 e implants were submerged on one side of the mandible.

21 technique was planned for both areas in the mandible.

22 bmarginally around first molars at the right mandible.

23 the proximal aboral region of the developing mandible.

24 length) placed in the premolar region of the mandible.

25 chondrogenesis in the proximal region of the mandible.

26 een the alveolar process and the body of the mandible.

27 een the body and the alveolar process of the mandible.

28 1.20 mm (PM), and 0.99 mm (A) in the dentate mandible.

29 ase in patients with neoplasms involving the mandible.

30 ved two implants in the posterior maxilla or mandible.

31 the maxilla and 24 months postloading in the mandible.

32 ight implants were loaded immediately in the mandible.

33 ium also partially restored outgrowth of the mandible.

34 th 1.5-mm peri-implant defects in the canine mandible.

35 d lower incisor within the hypoplastic fused mandible.

36 1.92 mm (PM), and 1.24 mm (A) in the dentate mandible.

37 l vault, the maxilla, and, most notably, the mandible.

38 xilla and the thickest area in the posterior mandible.

39 ut differences exist between the maxilla and mandible.

40 defects around dental implants in the canine mandible.

41 terior to the cuspids (n = 20) mostly in the mandible.

42 membrane (SIM) on the lateral aspect of the mandible.

43 int of tooth mobility in the right posterior mandible.

44 growth located on the lingual surface of the mandible.

45 rs ago for a tooth from the Irhoud 3 hominin mandible.

46 ciated Le Fort fracture or a fracture of the mandible.

47 t appears in the archived CBCT images of the mandible.

48 into bone and connective tissue to form the mandible.

49 for the maxilla and 94.9% (SD 15.6%) for the mandible.

50 c tumour with a strong preponderance for the mandible.

51 domain results in partial duplication of the mandible.

52 expressing epithelial cells in the embryonic mandible.

53 (51% vs. 8%, P = 4 x 10(-62)) but not in the mandible.

54 F mutations are predominant in tumors of the mandible.

55 ch of the fossil record for dogs consists of mandibles.

56 ured aggregates or in developing whole mouse mandibles.

57 etaphyseal dysplasia, including hyperostotic mandibles.

58 ative taxonomic analyses of isolated hominin mandibles.

59 equired for normal metamorphic growth of the mandibles.

60 implant after 2 months of healing in minipig mandibles.

61 classifies 99.5% of the modern dog and wolf mandibles.

62 rphology and "Boltcutters", with short, wide mandibles.

63 xes itself permanently to a substrate by its mandibles.

64 8 mm (PM), and 1.36 mm (A) in the edentulous mandible; 2.23 mm (M), 1.62 mm (PM), and 1.59 mm (A) in

65 8 mm (PM), and 1.66 mm (A) in the edentulous mandible; 2.35 mm (M), 2.0 mm (PM), and 1.95 mm (A) in t

66 ed symphyseal outlines from 180 recent human mandibles (90 male, 90 female) representing nine geograp

67 ng for an immediate implant in the posterior mandible, a CT scan taken before tooth extraction can be

68 However, only 4 of 26 Ust'-Polui fossil mandibles, a Russian Arctic site occupied from 250BCE to

69 malities, including undergrowth of the lower mandible, accompanied in some individuals by cranial asy

70 ative backscattered electron images of human mandibles aged 16-96 years.

71 dentified as dogs and none of the 20 Ivolgin mandibles, an Iron Age site in southern Russia, were ide

72 elf elevation that may result from the small mandible and a failure of lowering the tongue.

73 pmental defects, including hypoplasia of the mandible and asymmetric fusion of ribs to the sternum.

74 rate capabilities of the ITOP by fabricating mandible and calvarial bone, cartilage and skeletal musc

75 pecific enhancer also leads to a hypoplastic mandible and cleft palate formation in mice.

76 bsence of all but the most distal tip of the mandible and complete absence of the inner, middle and e

77 the face and cranium affected, including the mandible and frontal and nasal bones.

78 Both mandible and long-bone BMSCs differentiated into osteobl

79 We established a protocol for rat mandible and long-bone marrow stromal cell (BMSC) isolat

80 ucent areas and marked bony expansion in the mandible and maxilla, with sparing of the mandibular con

81 ignificantly different (P >0.05) between C3H mandible and maxilla.

82 bnormal fusion between the palatal shelf and mandible and preventing palatal shelf elevation.

83 measurements in the posterior region of the mandible and provide adequate visualization of the mandi

84 ts with an extraoral incision lateral to the mandible and reflection of the masseter muscle.

85 e placed in the anterior maxilla or anterior mandible and restored with fixed restorations.

86 fluenced the evolutionary acquisition of the mandible and secondary palate.

87 occupation at Mezzena, we analysed the human mandible and several cranial fragments from the site usi

88 he masticatory-functional hypothesis for the mandible and suggesting population continuity among farm

89 alveolar process compared to the body of the mandible and that the bone anabolic activity is greater

90 haracterized by bilateral enlargement of the mandible and the maxilla that presents with varying degr

91 failure of Meckel's cartilage to extend the mandible and thereby allow the palatal shelves to elevat

92 reduced expression of Endothelin1 (EDN1) in mandible and transcription factors that are critical for

93 Three of the Ust'-Polui mandibles and 8 of the Ivolgin mandibles were identified

94 (for example, antlers, horns, tail feathers, mandibles and dewlaps), show that the giant sperm of som

95 arts of early oxyporines, including enlarged mandibles and greatly enlarged apical labial palpomeres

96 smotic mini-pumps were implanted in animals, mandibles and tibiae were isolated, and multinucleated c

97 l bone/bone-marrow-derived MSCs (OMSCs) from mandibles and verified their MSC characteristics by sing

98 e percent of the implants were placed in the mandible, and 27% were placed in the maxilla.

99 iscovered HSC-like cells in postnatal murine mandible, and benchmarked them with donor-matched, mesod

100 splay a round skull, hypoplastic maxilla and mandible, and cleft palate resulting from a failure of p

101 present a virtual reconstruction of the OH 7 mandible, and compare it to other early Homo fossils.

102 rly skeletal metastases in the femur, tibia, mandible, and spine detected by whole-body EGFP fluoresc

103 ater than that of either dentate or edentate mandibles, and there was a significant increase in the s

104 diameter) and placed on the cortex near the mandible angle with a titanium screw.

105 The minute larval mandibles appear to act in a manner that is analogous to

106 impact, while those in the juvenile hominin mandible are consistent with a blow to the face.

107 ic structures are absent, but the tongue and mandible are relatively developed in the conditional mut

108 gn neoplasm which develops in the maxilla or mandible, arising from the dental lamina or basal cells

109 The high speeds of the mandibles assist in capturing prey, while the extreme ac

110 However, can fossil canid mandibles be reliably identified as dogs or wolves?

111 "Gammas", "Alphas" which express large, long mandibles, "Betas" which have long mandibles with differ

112 c origin, most frequently encountered in the mandible between the roots of canines and premolars.

113 Mandible BMSC cultures formed more colonies, suggesting

114 However, mandible BMSCs demonstrated augmented alkaline phosphata

115 portantly, upon implantation into nude mice, mandible BMSCs formed 70% larger bone nodules containing

116 teogenic potential and augmented capacity of mandible BMSCs to induce bone formation in vitro and in

117 cial development, Meckel's cartilage and the mandible bone derive from the first branchial arch, and

118 entified specific defects in incisor, molar, mandible, bone, and root development and late stage enam

119 he whale by the current created by the lower mandible breaking the surface of the water.

120 indicates that the mutation does not affect mandible, but causes premature fusion of the premaxilla-

121 en shown to stimulate new bone growth on rat mandibles, but much of the bone is lost over time.

122 ults in defects in formation of the proximal mandible by shifting expression of Fgf8, Bmp4 and their

123 He received a facial allograft, including mandible, cheeks, lips, and chin, in November 2009.

124 During predatory strikes, O. bauri mandibles close at speeds ranging from 35 to 64 m.s-1 wi

125 was significantly greater (P = 0.05) in the mandible compared to the maxilla.

126 The mandibles comprise a long, fused, and nearly edentulous

127 Immunohistochemistry of rat mandibles confirmed localization of GPR68 in the enamel

128 nd manipulation of Pitx2 expression in chick mandible cultures revealed an autonomous function in exp

129 ivo effect, we employed a Sprague-Dawley rat mandible defect model utilizing 1 microg (optimal) or 0.

130 Finally, adult mandible development is considered in light of the gnath

131 tor-beta (TGF-beta) signaling is crucial for mandible development.

132 ating the fate of CNC cells during tooth and mandible development.

133 ts the interconnection of palate, tongue and mandible development.

134 senchymal cell survival and outgrowth of the mandible during development.

135 Villmoare et al. report on a hominin mandible from the Ledi-Geraru research area, Ethiopia, w

136 y, which in turn leads to an abnormal palate-mandible fusion and prevents palatal shelf elevation.

137 Female mandibles had more porous cortices.

138 rvation of the diagnostically important OH 7 mandible has hindered attempts to compare this specimen

139 CNC-derived cells in the proximal region of mandible have a cell intrinsic requirement for TGF-beta

140 mice we found that the neural crest-derived mandible heals with neural crest-derived skeletal stem c

141 ort differences in the mechanisms underlying mandible homeostasis and the pathophysiology of diseases

142 Predation risk predators had mandibles impaired to prevent killing.

143 aberrant fusion between the palate shelf and mandible in addition to severely deformed palatal shelve

144 and basal osseous dimensions of the anterior mandible in healthy individuals and evaluate potential c

145 apical bone and the anatomy of the posterior mandible in the area of the anticipated extraction site.

146 The results demonstrate that the mandible, in contrast to the cranium, significantly refl

147 2, some of which is paralleled in the Oase 1 mandible, indicates both complex population dynamics as

148 t of which is homeotic transformation of the mandible into a maxilla-like structure.

149 t the time of implant placement in posterior mandible is a potential surgical complication, and prese

150 ree tiny middle ear bones from the reptilian mandible is an important innovation of modern mammals.

151 During its development, the majority of the mandible is formed through intramembranous ossification

152 The human mandible is highly mineralized.

153 ckness in various regions of the maxilla and mandible is largely missing.

154 The mandible is more commonly affected than the maxilla (2:1

155 urprisingly we found that the Riparo Mezzena mandible is not from a Neanderthal but belonged to an an

156 not evolve as rapidly as the cranium and the mandible is not reliable for identifying early dog fossi

157 The upper mandible is relatively deep and short with a straight cu

158 The reconstructed mandible is remarkably primitive, with a long and narrow

159 with a straight cutting edge, and the lower mandible is strengthened and upturned.

160 Integral to the development of the mandible is the signaling interplay between Fgf8 and Bmp

161 mastication, but its role in patterning the mandible is unknown.

162 that our analysis of Australopithecus sediba mandibles is flawed and that specimen LD 350-1 cannot be

163 gion of BA1, which gives rise to most of the mandible, is dependent upon an optimal level of bone mor

164 berries that GJB, which has blunt spatulate mandibles, is otherwise unable to exploit.

165 +/- 0.13 mm, whereas in edentulous posterior mandibles it was 2.52 +/- 0.32 mm.

166 e maxilla was 1.3 +/- 0.4 mm, whereas in the mandible, it was 1.5 +/- 0.5 mm (P = 0.164).

167 e maxilla was 2.5 +/- 1.3 mm, whereas in the mandible, it was 1.6 +/- 0.4 mm (P = 0.006).

168 e maxilla was 2.7 +/- 0.8 mm, whereas in the mandible, it was 1.7 +/- 0.4 mm (P <0.001).

169 e maxilla was 6.5 +/- 2.5 mm, whereas in the mandible, it was 4.8 +/- 1.3 mm (P = 0.017).

170 involved in RNA metabolism, plays a role in mandible, laryngeal, and limb morphogenesis.

171 hin protrusion, we documented alterations of mandible length in mice with modified Edar funtion.

172 the indentation moduli of the jaws (maxilla/mandible), location (anterior/posterior), and bone type

173 Cranial (mandible, maxilla, parietal, and frontal) bones and ulna

174 re, called the rhamphotheca, that covers the mandible, maxillae, and premaxillae.

175 ges, as all have a modified piercing-sucking mandible-maxillary complex that allows them to drain flu

176 Previous studies have suggested that the mandible may be more influenced by mechanical loading th

177 Our results demonstrate that the mandible may not evolve as rapidly as the cranium and th

178 Mandibles (MB) and maxillae possess unique metabolic and

179 haracterized by absence or hypoplasia of the mandible, microstomia, hypoglossia/aglossia, and variabl

180 ped and characterized a novel ex vivo murine mandible model of inflammatory bone destruction.

181 inflammation over mouse calvaria and in rat mandible models.

182 trikes in O. bauri and find that the extreme mandible movements serve two distinct functions: predati

183 st gene expression as well as atrophy in the mandible muscles of its ant host, but it is unknown how

184 cases were located in the posterior region: mandible (n = 12/14; 86%) and maxilla (n = 2/14; 14%).

185 d that the origins of the larger, dysmorphic mandible observed in adult Ts1Rhr mice develop from larg

186 Defects in the lower jaw, or mandible, occur commonly either as isolated malformation

187 LMF implants were inserted in the edentulous mandible of 24 patients.

188 ure of four implants placed in the posterior mandible of a 48-year-old female patient.

189 ntal implants were placed in the maxilla and mandible of a patient who smoked.

190 g loss of soft tissue, bone and tooth in the mandible of a rabbit.

191 of gene expression were also observed in the mandible of Ctip2(-/-) mice: expression of the ameloblas

192 The teeth and mandible of Dmp1-KO/D213A-Tg mice were compared with tho

193 ation defects were surgically created in the mandibles of 40 rats.

194 PFDs were surgically created in the mandibles of 80 rats.

195 Artificial osseous defects were created on mandibles of dry skulls.

196 Replicate samples were implanted into the mandibles of host Yucatan mini-pigs and grown for 3 or 6

197 rmed bilaterally into multirooted sockets in mandibles of mini-pigs.

198 examples of exaggerated traits, such as the mandibles of stag beetles (Lucanidae), the claspers of p

199 cally in the bone sections obtained from the mandibles of the rats.

200 , willingness to engage in trophallaxis, and mandible opening were affected by both hunger and ethano

201 Inebriated bees were more likely to exhibit mandible opening, which may represent a form of aggressi

202 and less likely to antennate and to display mandible opening.

203 opulations derived from regions of the fetal mandible or calvaria that do not undergo endochondral os

204 ement (expansion) is planned in the anterior mandible or involving the maxillary premolars.

205 Here, we utilize an established ex vivo mandible organ culture model to model these complex inte

206 ion showed that CRISPLD2 is expressed in the mandible, palate and nasopharynx regions during craniofa

207 initiation and development, defects in early mandible patterning and altered expression of key patter

208 at ALK5 regulates tooth initiation and early mandible patterning through a pathway independent of Tgf

209 and observations for Australopithecus sediba mandibles presented are incorrect or are not included in

210 g from the gingival mucosa of the maxilla or mandible, presenting in neonates.

211 Rehbachiella kinnekullensis [3] and isolated mandibles preserved as small carbonaceous fossils [4-6]

212 known fossil 'ape', represented by a partial mandible preserving dental features that place it with '

213 lar and first and second upper molars, and a mandible preserving the lower second premolar and lower

214 k length and initial hyoid distance from the mandible prior to the swallow.

215 The buccal plate of the dentate maxilla and mandible ranged from 1.6 to 2.2 mm in thickness, with th

216 ived signaling controls morphogenesis of the mandible remains elusive.

217 s, we over-expressed in the developing chick mandible, replication-competent retroviruses carrying tr

218 he regeneration of large bone defects in the mandible require a preclinical model that accurately rec

219 y fusion between the maxilla and hypoplastic mandible, resembling the bony syngnathia syndrome in hum

220 that was bound by Smad1/5 in the developing mandible, revealing direct Smad-mediated regulation.

221 s was also evaluated radiographically in the mandible samples of each group.

222 igand (RANKL) activation was analyzed in the mandible samples stereologically.

223 Short implants in the posterior area of the mandible seem to be preferable to vertical augmentation

224 ero-posterior relation of the maxilla to the mandible) seem to be the skeletal subspaces that receive

225 e treated with scaling and root planing, and mandible sides were randomly selected to receive three w

226 loci (QTL) exhibiting imprinting effects on mandible size and shape traits in a large F(3) populatio

227 We discovered a total of 51 QTL affecting mandible size and shape, 6 of which exhibited difference

228 showed that only one of these QTL (affecting mandible size) exhibited a pattern consistent with true

229 asts and the dentin or into the pulp core of mandible slices and subsequently cultured for up to 10 d

230 pecies exhibit a linear relationship between mandible stiffness and volume, as expected in isometric

231 Consequently, an O. bauri mandible strike directed against the substrate produces

232 xtreme accelerations result in instantaneous mandible strike forces that can exceed 300 times the ant

233 Here we investigate the biomechanics of mandible strikes in O. bauri and find that the extreme m

234 However, the remarkably rapid mandible strikes of the trap-jaw ant, Odontomachus bauri

235 are usually associated with fractures of the mandible, temporal bone or other facial bones.

236 ty is greater in the alveolar process of the mandible than in the maxilla.

237 The surface activity was greater in the C3H mandible than in the maxilla.

238 in males, and more often encountered in the mandible than maxilla, it affects mostly canines.

239 rers having consistently longer and narrower mandibles than agriculturalists.

240 al expansion of jawbones, more pronounced in mandibles than in maxillae.

241 Mice lacking Nog in NCCs have an enlarged mandible that results from increased cell proliferation

242 a pathologic fracture of the right posterior mandible that was managed by reduction and stabilization

243 mong living and extinct ants and scythe-like mandibles that extend high above the head, both demonstr

244 In the mandible, the buccal aspect of the midline was the most

245 specially affecting pre-maxilla, nasal bone, mandible, tibia, and clavicle.

246 thanized, and intracardiac blood samples and mandible tissues were obtained for biochemical and histo

247 of the study, intracardiac blood samples and mandible tissues were obtained for histologic, biochemic

248 al models of Afar and date the LD 350-1 Homo mandible to 2.80 to 2.75 Ma.

249 ory stress among agriculturalists causes the mandible to grow and develop differently.

250 r basis of ACS as a homeotic transformation (mandible to maxilla) in humans.

251 a form of benthic skim feeding by using its mandible to probe for and obtain prey.

252 fect, is characterized by bony fusion of the mandible to the maxilla.

253 new multitissue model of composite hemiface/mandible/tongue allograft containing lymphoid and vascul

254 role of different components of the hemiface/mandible/tongue allograft on induction and maintenance o

255 Treated hemiface/mandible/tongue allotransplants survived up to 385 days,

256 (BM) compartment, and histology for hemiface/mandible/tongue architecture.

257 Twenty-two composite hemiface/mandible/tongue transplantations were performed in three

258 (n=8)-allograft rejection controls-hemiface/mandible/tongue transplants performed across major histo

259 nd2 is sufficient for upper jaw (maxilla)-to-mandible transformation by regulating the expression of

260 is proposed based on the four corners of the mandible (two angles and two canines): class I (lateral)

261 ification whereas the proximal region of the mandible undergoes endochondral ossification.

262 n: the middle ear bones are connected to the mandible via an ossified Meckel's cartilage.

263 or Islet1, resulting in a distally truncated mandible via unbalanced cell apoptosis and decreased cel

264 Here, we hypothesized that rat mandible vs. long-bone marrow-derived cells possess diff

265 M2 in relation to the inferior border of the mandible was also determined at 24 weeks.

266 Each side of the mandible was randomly assigned for implantation at day 0

267 rest mesenchyme destined to form bone in the mandible was transplanted from quail to duck.

268 e buccal cortical plate thickness in dentate mandibles was 2.76 +/- 0.13 mm, whereas in edentulous po

269 rosity in the posterior of partially dentate mandibles was significantly greater than that of either

270 Acquisition of the lower jaw (mandible) was evolutionarily important for jawed vertebr

271 Focusing on the mandible, we observed that cellular hypertrophy and hype

272 The odds of M3 impaction in the mandible were 57.58% (95% CI: 43.3% to 68.3%, P < 0.0001

273 Slices of mandible were cultured for 14 days in the presence or ab

274 hy patients needing surgery in the posterior mandible were enrolled in this observational study (grou

275 feeding modules, the pulp of 4 molars on the mandible were exposed, and meal duration was measured fo

276 ior and posterior regions of the maxilla and mandible were obtained from 6 mature male beagle dogs.

277 Specimens from the mandible were processed for morphometric and microcomput

278 acortical vascular canal spaces of the human mandible were studied so that we could determine possibl

279 after no oral hygiene, tissue blocks of the mandible were taken for blinded histometric analysis to

280 At termination, animals were sacrificed, and mandibles were collected for microcomputed tomography (m

281 he Ust'-Polui mandibles and 8 of the Ivolgin mandibles were identified as wolves.

282 KR/J (AKR) control mice were sacrificed, and mandibles were prepared for stereomicroscopy and histolo

283 red for surgical procedures in the posterior mandible when there is risk of injury to the IAN.

284 t in primates, hard food eaters have stiffer mandibles when compared to those that rely on softer die

285 grates toward a Shh-expressing region in the mandible, where the tooth placode will initiate.

286 and CT were significantly longer than in the mandible, whereas for the JE, no statistically significa

287 r phenotype is likely due to hyperostosis of mandibles, which distinguishes Ank (KI/KI) mice from the

288 a rigid body with the cycling motion of the mandible, while the posterior section of the tongue undu

289 first molecular evidence of a two-segmented mandible with a subcoxal segment in insects.

290 or restoring atrophic posterior areas of the mandible with dental implants and compare these procedur

291 ficant increase in the size of canals in the mandible with increasing age.

292 was to describe the anatomy in the posterior mandible with respect to the inferior alveolar nerve (IA

293 we report the discovery of a partial hominin mandible with teeth from the Ledi-Geraru research area,

294 rge, long mandibles, "Betas" which have long mandibles with different morphology and "Boltcutters", w

295 e neural crest transformed the maxillae into mandibles with duplicated Meckel's cartilage, which resu

296 Treating control mandibles with exogenous BMP4 recapitulated the capacity

297 Harvested mandibles with implanted TB constructs were fixed in for

298 g was found at buccal furcation sites in the mandible, with a kappa-coefficient of 0.52, and buccal f

299 1.0 to 2.1 mm in the edentulous maxilla and mandible, with the thinnest area in the anterior maxilla

300 st jaws, whilst omnivores have the strongest mandibles within the order Primates.