ライフサイエンスコーパス: manometric

1 Manometric abnormalities were seen in 32 cases (68.1%) o

2 pendent variable controlling for independent manometric and clinical variables.

3 Manometric and endoscopic video-recording times were syn

4 tients with UES dysphagia using a concurrent manometric and video endoscopic technique.

5 ion are separately extracted from concurrent manometric and videofluoroscopic data.

6 me relationships were assessed by a barostat manometric assembly in 35 healthy women and 111 women wi

7 ressures were measured using a miniaturized, manometric assembly in decerebrate, unanaesthetized ferr

8 ressures were measured using a miniaturized, manometric assembly in decerebrate, unanaesthetized ferr

9 A 36-channel solid-state manometric assembly was placed spanning from stomach to

10 A solid-state manometric assembly with 36 circumferential sensors spac

11 th pharyngeal dysphagia underwent a detailed manometric assessment of the upper esophageal sphincter

12 A manometric catheter equipped with a high-compliance bag

13 High-fidelity manometric catheters and respirometry were used to study

14 ssure was measured in anesthetized mice with manometric catheters, and echocardiography was performed

15 tive case control study (n = 121) evaluating manometric changes after MSA.

16 No manometric changes occurred in both groups; 24-hour MII-

17 To evaluate the manometric changes, function, and impact of magnetic sph

18 Manometric changes, pH testing, and proton pump inhibito

19 of this study was to critically evaluate the manometric criteria in a population of patients with idi

20 deotaped fluoroscopy and was correlated with manometric data.

21 s established with clinical, radiologic, and manometric data.

22 ed, accurate and reproducible recognition of manometric diagnoses by HRM will allow the clinician to

23 The manometric diagnosis of distal esophageal spasm (DES) us

24 d waves detected in 18 subjects referred for manometric evaluation of unexplained symptoms.

25 nts with pharyngeal swallowing disorders and manometric evidence of defective sphincter opening and i

26 Seventy-eight tLESRs had manometric evidence of flow and the majority had evidenc

27 ed on barium esophagograms who had undergone manometric examinations and met the inclusion criteria.

28 No other clinical or manometric features differed between groups.

29 ariants of achalasia were defined by finding manometric features that significantly differed from the

30 ith a well defined pathology, characteristic manometric features, and good response to treatments dir

31 e recognition that these sometimes confusing manometric findings are consistent with achalasia when c

32 Intravascular US and manometric findings clarify the mechanisms of branch-ves

33 Radiologic and manometric findings were correlated with clinical findin

34 patient comorbidity, preoperative diagnosis, manometric findings, and prior anal pathology).

35 MSA results in significant manometric improvement of the LES without apparent delet

36 lope of the relationship between TonoLab and manometric IOP in all the mice was 0.998, with an interc

37 The relation of the TonoLab reading to manometric IOP was evaluated in multivariate linear regr

38 nometry, or for increasing versus decreasing manometric IOP.

39 was monitored by optical, amperometric, and manometric kinetic techniques, and the results were math

40 y 18% of patients with a normal preoperative manometric LES deteriorated to a lower category.

41 Manometric measures were equivalent prior to banding in

42 er, without a disease-specific biomarker, no manometric pattern is absolutely specific.

43 Although manometric patterns have been defined for these disorder

44 motility disorders comprise various abnormal manometric patterns which usually present with dysphagia

45 to confirm that non-endoscopic peroral manometric placement of WC is as effective and better to

46 of all the TP readings from one eye at each manometric pressure setting, showed a slope 0.692 +/- 0.

47 Linear regression analysis of TP on manometric readings for grouped data from all six eyes,

48 topography plots compared with conventional manometric recordings are (1) accurately delineating and

49 Clinical histories and manometric recordings of 58 patients with idiopathic ach

50 ant differences among the groups relative to manometric results, frequency of bowel movements, incont

51 The manometric signature of opening was pressure equalizatio

52 PT) has dramatically changed the paradigm of manometric studies.

53 We evaluated whether manometric subtype was associated with response to treat

54 ed mice, LES pressures were recorded using a manometric technique and response to electrical stimulat

55 d mouse strains by a larger bore microneedle manometric technique.

56 Manometric tracings were classified according to the 3 C

57 of patients with type II achalasia (based on manometric tracings) are treated successfully with PD or

58 ed by comparing the measurements against the manometric (true) IOP determined in cannulated mouse eye

59 Manometric values of "gastroesophageal junction" signifi

60 Clinical and manometric variables including treatment response were c