ライフサイエンスコーパス: manometry

1 loss) were correlated with LES relaxation at manometry.

2 e used to guide treatment without a need for manometry.

3 lic blood pressure by computerized tail-cuff manometry.

4 ital Anxiety and Depression scale), and anal manometry.

5 esophageal pH and lower esophageal sphincter manometry.

6 tatus was assessed by questionnaire and anal manometry.

7 geal contractions not observed with standard manometry.

8 d patients through high-resolution anorectal manometry.

9 onents analysis of high-resolution anorectal manometry.

10 geal function was assessed by pH testing and manometry.

11 trasonography, and high-resolution impedance manometry.

12 e reproducible and in close concordance with manometry.

13 vals by pneumotonometry, tonometry, WIT, and manometry.

14 re likely to change the clinical practice of manometry.

15 of achalasia when compared with conventional manometry.

16 episcleral venous pressure (Pe) measured by manometry.

17 otting represents an evolution in esophageal manometry.

18 with chronic constipation evaluated by colon manometry.

19 (EGJ) pressure segment using high-resolution manometry.

20 al spasm, achalasia and patients with normal manometry.

21 apy, ambulatory pH monitoring, or esophageal manometry.

22 ic findings of achalasia had aperistalsis at manometry.

23 High-resolution pH-metry (12 sensors) and manometry (36 sensors) were performed in upright and sup

24 cuation i.e., abnormal evacuation pattern on manometry, abnormal balloon expulsion test or impaired r

25 g (off PPIs), and high-resolution esophageal manometry analyses.

26 six patients with complete LES relaxation at manometry and 10 with incomplete relaxation.

27 hma without reflux symptoms using esophageal manometry and 24-h esophageal pH testing.

28 Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, esophageal manometry and 24-hour pH monitoring were done in 52, 47

29 ients (50%) agreed to functional evaluation (manometry and 24-hour pH monitoring); 90 patients (85%)

30 Patients were also assessed by esophageal manometry and a timed barium esophagogram.

31 erwent stationary esophageal high-resolution manometry and ambulatory 24-hour impedance-pH monitoring

32 Manometry and esophageal pH were recorded for 30 minutes

33 Anorectal manometry and imaging are useful for evaluating anal and

34 were monitored by concurrent high-resolution manometry and intraluminal impedance.

35 Newer diagnostic tools (eg, high-resolution manometry and magnetic resonance defecography) provide a

36 d underwent objective assessment for reflux (manometry and pH/impedance).

37 position using concurrent UES and esophageal manometry and polysomnography.

38 High-resolution manometry and recently described analysis algorithms, su

39 Respiratory measurements using esophageal manometry and respiratory inductance plethysmography wer

40 rograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with manometry and sphincterotomy.

41 ents were prospectively evaluated using anal manometry and subjective functional results.

42 Postoperative manometry and timed barium swallows showed significant i

43 They were submitted to esophageal manometry and to pH-metric examination with two pH-metri

44 Simultaneous manometry and ultrasound imaging reveal that, during per

45 l clip movement was assessed with concurrent manometry and videofluoroscopy during swallowing to exam

46 w limitation (measured by RIP and esophageal manometry) and classified as subglottic or supraglottic

47 L questionnaire, upper endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and 24-hour impedance pH (24-hour MII-pH) mon

48 questionnaires, upper endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and 24-hour impedance-pH monitoring before an

49 Endoscopy, stationary esophageal manometry, and 24-hour impedance-pH monitoring off PPIs

50 ients with BE underwent RFA, high-resolution manometry, and 24-hour impedance-pH testing; they receiv

51 d questionnaire, upper endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and 24-hour pH monitoring before and 24 month

52 ent included physical examination, anorectal manometry, and anal endosonography.

53 ng myoelectric complexes on small intestinal manometry, and by presence of tachygastria on cutaneous

54 underwent symptomatic assessment, esophageal manometry, and esophageal pH monitoring (using a probe w

55 a major technological tweak on conventional manometry, and impedance pH monitoring yields informatio

56 results of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), manometry, and pH monitoring were collected and analyzed

57 res, measured with high-resolution anorectal manometry, and rectal balloon expulsion time in 62 healt

58 ements by scintigraphy, gastroduodenojejunal manometry, and surface electrogastrography in humans.

59 ed and high-resolution colonic and anorectal manometry as well as the barostat, despite their technic

60 In two protocols an endoluminal ultrasound-manometry assembly was drawn through the human gastro-oe

61 tients were studied via 24-hour pH study and manometry at 6 months postoperatively.

62 y at 1, 6, and 12 months and venography with manometry at 6-month intervals after the procedure.

63 nt 24-hour ambulatory esophageal monitoring, manometry, autonomic function testing and GER symptom as

64 Esophageal high-resolution manometry before and after laparoscopic or endoscopic my

65 minutes after extubation, RIP and esophageal manometry better identified patients who subsequently re

66 Anodermal blood flow was measured during manometry by laser Doppler flowmetry.

67 Esophageal contractility not observed with manometry can be detected in patients with achalasia usi

68 RIP and esophageal manometry can objectively identify subglottic UAO after

69 r relaxations (tLESRs) using high-resolution manometry coupled with simultaneous fluoroscopy.

70 ractions (n = 186 [17.4%] using conventional manometry criteria; n = 85 [7.9%] using EPT criteria) we

71 Esophageal pretreatment manometry data were collected from 176 patients who part

72 ssure patterns using High Resolution Colonic Manometry during a baseline period and in response to a

73 ients (67%) had incomplete LES relaxation at manometry during swallowing, and seven (33%) had complet

74 Objective testing (manometry, endoscopy, timed-barium swallow) was performe

75 ted peroral placement or SC after esophageal manometry (ESM).

76 number of novel techniques - high-resolution manometry, esophageal electrical impedance and intra-lum

77 All had esophageal manometry, esophageal evoked potentials to electrical st

78 y (n = 141) or sham (n = 73) irrespective of manometry findings.

79 cation patients were studied with concurrent manometry, fluoroscopy, and stepwise controlled barostat

80 All patients underwent esophageal manometry, gastric emptying study, and sham-feeding test

81 Systematic use of esophageal manometry has the potential to improve ventilator manage

82 n it shows entirely normal findings, because manometry helps in part to exclude dysmotility as a caus

83 Both high-resolution manometry (HRM) and impedance-pH/manometry monitoring ha

84 High-resolution manometry (HRM) coupled with high-resolution esophageal

85 The use of high-resolution manometry (HRM) to diagnose oesophageal motility disorde

86 stalsis are discernable with high-resolution manometry (HRM).

87 Manometry identifies patterns suggestive of myopathy, ne

88 di dysfunction; pancreatic sphincter of Oddi manometry identifies which high-risk patients may benefi

89 lity and flow were measured using a combined manometry-impedance catheter and small intestinal transi

90 frequently suggested in IBS-C and anorectal manometry in FC.

91 inically useful when expertise in esophageal manometry is not available or not tolerated and when eso

92 SO manometry is valuable to select patients with sphincter

93 namic gallbladder scintigraphy and sphincter manometry) is controversial.

94 adiographic findings are equivocal, however, manometry may be required for a more certain diagnosis.

95 ignificant results pertain to transit tests; manometry may contribute importantly to the diagnostic p

96 The concordance between the WIT and direct manometry measurements was high.

97 re distinct or overlap is unclear; anorectal manometry might be used in diagnosis, but healthy person

98 nuous surface electromyography and footplate manometry monitored task performance.

99 -resolution manometry (HRM) and impedance-pH/manometry monitoring have established themselves as rese

100 intravascular ultrasound (US) (n = 35), and manometry (n = 56).

101 Manometry (n = 86), endoscopy (n = 101), pH monitoring (

102 ith biopsy), barium swallow, and oesophageal manometry, no obstructive cause may be found.

103 ailable or not tolerated and when esophageal manometry or barium videofluoroscopy results are equivoc

104 or animals, for open versus closed stopcock manometry, or for increasing versus decreasing manometri

105 agnosis, prior anal pathology, abnormal anal manometry, patient comorbidity, pouch-perineal or pouch-

106 piration, laryngitis, GERD, GORD, endoscopy, manometry, pH monitoring, proton pump inhibitors, and Ni

107 piration, laryngitis, GERD, GORD, endoscopy, manometry, pH monitoring, proton pump inhibitors, open f

108 It can be combined with manometry, pH, and impedance measurement techniques to d

109 GERD was confirmed by gastroscopy, manometry, pH-metry and barium swallow.

110 egree of soiling/incontinence, and anorectal manometry profile(s).

111 A search of radiology and manometry records identified 21 patients (12 men, nine w

112 Manometry reports were reviewed for presence or absence

113 Continence and anal manometry results were improved in incontinent patients

114 Manometry results were not associated with the outcome.

115 f esophageal motor disorders, and esophageal manometry retains its position as the diagnostic gold st

116 Manometry should be performed if achalasia is suspected.

117 Esophageal manometry showed a high prevalence of a hypotensive lowe

118 GROUND & AIMS: The role of sphincter of Oddi manometry (SOM) in the management of patients with idiop

119 n after cholecystectomy undergoing ERCP with manometry, sphincterotomy vs sham did not reduce disabil

120 Esophageal manometry studies revealed a decrease in lower esophagea

121 patients with normal antroduodenal and colon manometry studies that were performed simultaneously.

122 rent esophageal infusion and high-resolution manometry to determine UES, lower esophageal sphincter,

123 uctance plethysmography (RIP) and esophageal manometry to identify clinically significant post-extuba

124 We used colon manometry to study the effect of intravenous erythromyci

125 Intraluminal manometry using a customized micro-sized catheter assemb

126 Esophageal manometry was associated with small but statistically si

127 Anal manometry was performed 3 and 12 months after treatment

128 Manometry was performed by using a sleeve catheter passe

129 Pyloric sphincter manometry was performed in wild-type controls, neuronal

130 bands were surgically placed, and esophageal manometry was performed prebanding, at 2-week intervals

131 Synchronized videofluoroscopy and manometry was used in 8 volunteers (5 men and 3 women) t

132 ge 1 sleep were no different when esophageal manometry was used.

133 n patients with carditis whose sphincter, on manometry, was structurally defective.

134 erexpressing, and wild-type mice using still manometry; we analyzed defecation induced by acute parti

135 Electrogastrography and antroduodenal manometry were performed in 9 nonsmokers and 9 smokers d

136 Combined high-resolution pH measurement and manometry were performed in fasted state for 20 minutes

137 hic abnormalities, the diagnosis may rely on manometry, which is the most sensitive test for the dise

138 Continuous perfusion manometry with a low-compliance machine was performed in