戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 the short-term and long-term consequences of marijuana use.
2 mplex neuroadaptive processes in response to marijuana use.
3 rug availability in the neighborhood promote marijuana use.
4 epression, smoking exposure, and alcohol and marijuana use.
5 onsumption, and 3.2% reported an increase in marijuana use.
6 e cocaine than were those with no history of marijuana use.
7 nterval, 2.4 to 9.5) in the 60 minutes after marijuana use.
8 , race, income, smoking, X-ray exposure, and marijuana use.
9 eased following legalization of recreational marijuana use.
10 tional states that may legalize recreational marijuana use.
11 ic variables, disease severity, and previous marijuana use.
12 red questionnaires that include questions on marijuana use.
13 n increase in the odds ratios of engaging in marijuana use (1.09 [95% CI, 1.04-1.14]), smoking (1.07
14        Few individuals seeking treatment for marijuana use achieve sustained abstinence.
15 loyment outcomes may be poorer among regular marijuana-using adolescents.
16 ences were found in perceived harmfulness or marijuana use among 12th graders in Washington or for an
17                           Despite widespread marijuana use among adolescents, accurate information on
18 ho are in a position to identify problematic marijuana use among adolescents.
19  cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, and marijuana use among residents of Manhattan, New York Cit
20 ing number of states legalizing recreational marijuana use and authorizing medical marijuana programs
21        The associations between increases in marijuana use and decreases in perceiving great risk of
22                                    Past-year marijuana use and DSM-IV marijuana use disorder (abuse o
23 -reported adolescent alcohol, cigarette, and marijuana use and early onset (before 14 years of age) o
24                        Lifetime histories of marijuana use and exposure to known OSCC risk factors we
25                   Associations between heavy marijuana use and HIV disease markers or white blood cel
26 compared changes in perceived harmfulness of marijuana use and in past-month marijuana use in Washing
27                                              Marijuana use and legalization are a pressing issue for
28  known about whether the prevalence rates of marijuana use and marijuana use disorders have changed i
29  use disorders in the late 20s, as did early marijuana use and other illicit drug use.
30                                   Changes in marijuana use and risk perception generally began in 200
31 vide data examining the relationship between marijuana use and semen quality from young men recruited
32 r variables, there is no association between marijuana use and standard volumetric or shape measureme
33 ical marijuana laws could contribute to both marijuana use and the passage of medical marijuana laws,
34                Thus, understanding trends of marijuana use and use disorders and examining factors th
35 each survey year, we estimated prevalence of marijuana use and use disorders, initiation of marijuana
36  recent and/or cumulative history of regular marijuana use and whether these effects were sustained f
37  perception of state legalisation of medical marijuana use, and mean number of days of marijuana use
38 s sensitivity analyses, including redefining marijuana use as any use in the previous year or frequen
39 n structures suggested to be associated with marijuana use, as follows: the nucleus accumbens, amygda
40 ere associated with changes in prevalence of marijuana use, as seen in the lower prevalence of mariju
41 ed variations of drug, alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana use, as well as school, prevention, and effect
42  education >12 years, and 20% reported heavy marijuana use at >/=50% of biannual visits during follow
43 ts indicated that perceptions of legality of marijuana use (beta, 0.378; 95% CI, 0.205 to 0.444; P <
44  tract initially increased following regular marijuana use but decreased with protracted regular use.
45 t this may soon change; not due to decreased marijuana use, but to an amendment in marijuana's illega
46                                              Marijuana use by teenagers often predates the use of har
47           The second was whether the risk of marijuana use changed after passage of medical marijuana
48 stic regression provided useful estimates of marijuana use clustering and can be used to estimate clu
49 fter marijuana use is common among underage, marijuana-using college students.
50 rijuana use and use disorders, initiation of marijuana use, daily or near daily use, perception of gr
51 ders in Washington, perceived harmfulness of marijuana use decreased and marijuana use increased foll
52 g eighth and 10th graders, respectively, and marijuana use decreased by 1.3% and 0.9% over the same p
53           Past-year marijuana use and DSM-IV marijuana use disorder (abuse or dependence).
54                   However, the prevalence of marijuana use disorder among marijuana users decreased s
55 w exceptions, increases in the prevalence of marijuana use disorder between 2001-2002 and 2012-2013 w
56                         Because the risk for marijuana use disorder did not increase among users, the
57  use, more adults in the United States had a marijuana use disorder in 2001-2002 than in 1991-1992.
58  nearly 3 of 10 marijuana users manifested a marijuana use disorder in 2012-2013.
59 e among users, the increase in prevalence of marijuana use disorder is owing to an increase in preval
60 as lifetime incidence of comorbid cocaine or marijuana use disorder underlie differential patterns of
61           The past-year prevalence of DSM-IV marijuana use disorder was 1.5% (0.08) in 2001-2002 and
62 ce, either alone or with comorbid cocaine or marijuana use disorder.
63                                     Further, marijuana use disorders among marijuana users significan
64 of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) marijuana use disorders and how prevalence has changed i
65       Among illicit substance use disorders, marijuana use disorders are the most prevalent in the po
66 2012-2013, and there was a large increase in marijuana use disorders during that time.
67 er the prevalence rates of marijuana use and marijuana use disorders have changed in the 21st century
68                                     However, marijuana use disorders in adults remained stable at abo
69                                 The study of marijuana use disorders is urgently needed because of in
70               Increases in the prevalence of marijuana use disorders were most notable among young bl
71 ugh it also may detect tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana use disorders, further refinement is needed be
72                       Men who reported daily marijuana use displayed significant lower sperm concentr
73 se cognitive deficits indicates that chronic marijuana use does not alter cortical networks, or that
74 ed with a 2% increased risk of riding with a marijuana-using driver (95% CI, 1.01-1.03).
75 f female students rode as a passenger with a marijuana-using driver (P = .21).
76 y driving after marijuana use, riding with a marijuana-using driver, driving after alcohol use, and r
77                                      Regular marijuana use during adolescence, but not adulthood, may
78 ients should be specifically proscribed from marijuana use during periods of high steroid administrat
79 uana use, as seen in the lower prevalence of marijuana use each year during 2006-14 than in 2002 when
80 th graders: % [SD], -9.0 [3.8]; P = .02) and marijuana use (eighth graders: % [SD], 5.0 [1.9]; P = .0
81 ed whether adolescents who engage in regular marijuana use exhibit a systematic increase in subclinic
82 rceived harmfulness or past-month adolescent marijuana use following legalization.
83  be particularly relevant in states in which marijuana use for glaucoma is legal, as in the case of t
84                       As more states approve marijuana use for medical indications, physicians will b
85 Four of the 5 trials assessing self-reported marijuana use found statistically significant difference
86  and concurrent cigarette use, the effect of marijuana use from time 2 to time 3 remained significant
87 onsumed licit drugs and then transitioned to marijuana use (gateway sequence) (N=97), and boys who us
88                     Perceived harmfulness of marijuana use (great or moderate risk to health from smo
89 e), heavy alcohol use (>4 drinks/day), heavy marijuana use (&gt;21 times of marijuana use/year), and rec
90 arijuana for medical purposes and adolescent marijuana use has been controversial.
91 d gastrointestinal associations with regular marijuana use have also been established.
92                          Research on regular marijuana use highlights a unique susceptibility of the
93 rmly established causality, onset of regular marijuana use in adolescence is associated with later de
94  severity of glaucoma, prior knowledge about marijuana use in glaucoma, past marijuana use, perceptio
95 rrent practice patterns and attitudes toward marijuana use in patients with advanced heart failure be
96                         However, the risk of marijuana use in states before passing medical marijuana
97                                              Marijuana use in the age group prone to coronary artery
98                         With rising rates of marijuana use in the general population and an increasin
99 a withdrawal symptoms, yet does not decrease marijuana use in the laboratory or clinic.
100 The primary outcome of this analysis was any marijuana use in the previous 30 days.
101 al marijuana use, and mean number of days of marijuana use in the previous year.
102 half (43.8%) of all patients reported weekly marijuana use in the year following treatment (dropping
103 er states that did not legalize recreational marijuana use in this period.
104 dical community and legislative groups about marijuana use in transplant candidates is needed to ensu
105 t for all but x, is largest for: 1) paternal marijuana use in transposition of great arteries with in
106 ion between the legalization of recreational marijuana use in Washington and Colorado in 2012 and the
107 rmfulness of marijuana use and in past-month marijuana use in Washington and Colorado prior to recrea
108 eighth and 10th graders, respectively, while marijuana use increased 2.0% and 4.1% from 2010-2012 to
109 d harmfulness of marijuana use decreased and marijuana use increased following legalization of recrea
110                                              Marijuana use increased from 10.4% (95% CI 9.97-10.82) t
111                  Prevalence and frequency of marijuana use increased in adults in the USA starting in
112                                Driving after marijuana use increases the risk of a motor vehicle cras
113                                        Heavy marijuana use is a risk factor for CV disease in HIV-inf
114  for recreational use on rates of adolescent marijuana use is a topic of considerable debate.
115     The findings of this study indicate that marijuana use is associated with decreased neural respon
116                                        Heavy marijuana use is associated with residual neuropsycholog
117 ased case-control study to determine whether marijuana use is associated with the development of oral
118           Recent research has suggested that marijuana use is associated with volumetric and shape di
119                     Driving and riding after marijuana use is common among underage, marijuana-using
120       Our findings are of public interest as marijuana use is common and may be contributing to recen
121                        Importance: Medicinal marijuana use is currently legal in 23 states and the Di
122 hether the transition from licit drug use to marijuana use is determined by particular risk factors,
123                        Although states where marijuana use is legal have higher rates of use than non
124  begins in adolescence, and heavy adolescent marijuana use is often associated with impaired cognitiv
125                                              Marijuana use is prevalent among persons infected with h
126   A common misperception among youth is that marijuana use is without harm.
127  these trends (eg, perceptions of harms from marijuana use) is essential.
128 coma, past marijuana use, perceptions toward marijuana use (legality, systemic adverse effects, safet
129                                   Over time, marijuana use may alter anticipatory reward processing i
130                                              Marijuana use may alter ventral striatal response to rew
131 based case-control study have suggested that marijuana use may be a risk factor for squamous cell hea
132                          However, adolescent marijuana use may have measurable, durable, and potentia
133           These results suggest that regular marijuana use may significantly increase the risk that a
134                            The prevalence of marijuana use more than doubled between 2001-2002 and 20
135 e the stability in the overall prevalence of marijuana use, more adults in the United States had a ma
136 ), cocaine use (n=60), heroin smoking (n=6), marijuana use (n=79), oral narcotic abuse (n=20), and in
137 se (odds ratio, 4.0; 95% CI, 3.6-4.4), heavy marijuana use (odds ratio, 3.5; 95% CI, 3.2-3.7), and re
138 Questions surrounding the effects of chronic marijuana use on brain structure continue to increase.
139                                   Effects of marijuana use on cardiovascular (CV) events and other en
140  some studies showing detrimental effects of marijuana use on cognitive functioning and others showin
141 ion in multiple jurisdictions, the effect of marijuana use on future risk of psychiatric disorders, a
142  influence of perceptions of the legality of marijuana use on intentions to use this substance as a t
143  to date, little data exist on the impact of marijuana use on male fertility.
144 is uncertain, further study on the impact of marijuana use on male reproductive health is warranted a
145 search is needed to determine the effects of marijuana use on neural function involved in reward resp
146 viders regarding the negative association of marijuana use on semen quality.
147                  The effect of prior regular marijuana use on subsequent subclinical psychotic sympto
148 ars vs none; OR, 9.2; 95% CI, 1.4-59.4), and marijuana use (OR, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.3-12.4).
149 ette use (P<.001), alcohol use (P<.001), and marijuana use (P<.001).
150 lth from smoking marijuana occasionally) and marijuana use (past 30 days).
151 l states have passed legislation prohibiting marijuana-using patients from being denied transplant li
152 espondents from states with laws prohibiting marijuana-using patients from being denied transplant li
153 nied transplant listing reported denying all marijuana-using patients or mandating abstinence before
154 nth and lifetime diagnoses, the mean days of marijuana use per year were 225.3 (SE=5.7) and 274.2 (SE
155 ng states that did not legalize recreational marijuana use, perceived harmfulness decreased by 4.9% a
156 wledge about marijuana use in glaucoma, past marijuana use, perceptions toward marijuana use (legalit
157 luations of the health consequences of heavy marijuana use; recommends against the use of smoked mari
158 g the adult US population, the prevalence of marijuana use remained stable at about 4.0% over the pas
159      Self-reported past-28-day driving after marijuana use, riding with a marijuana-using driver, dri
160                              Long-term heavy marijuana use showed no significant associations with vi
161                                        Among marijuana-using students, 43.9% of male and 8.7% of fema
162                   Self-reported frequency of marijuana use, subclinical psychotic symptoms, and sever
163 be an increase in health problems related to marijuana use, such as dependence/addiction, psychosis,
164 sitively correlated with problems related to marijuana use, such that greater BOLD activation was ass
165 sence of increased frequency and quantity of marijuana use, suggesting that the concomitant increase
166 nly delinquency was more strongly related to marijuana use than licit drug use.
167  differential effects of initial and chronic marijuana use that may reflect complex neuroadaptive pro
168                              With very heavy marijuana use, the net association with FEV(1) was not s
169 each year adolescent boys engaged in regular marijuana use, their expected level of subsequent subcli
170 erval 1.22-1.42) for the lifetime history of marijuana use to 2.0 (95% confidence interval 1.6-2.6) f
171 of the likelihood of adverse consequences of marijuana use to policy makers, professionals, and the p
172                                 Furthermore, marijuana-using twins failed to show significantly great
173                  The past-year prevalence of marijuana use was 4.1% (SE, 0.15) in 2001-2002 and 9.5%
174                               Self-report of marijuana use was assessed through audio computer-assist
175                                      Greater marijuana use was associated with later blunted activati
176                        The first was whether marijuana use was higher overall in states that ever pas
177                                              Marijuana use was more prevalent in states that passed a
178                Occasional and low cumulative marijuana use was not associated with adverse effects on
179                                              Marijuana use was not associated with OSCC risk in this
180                                              Marijuana use was self-reported at the time of each cogn
181 ze brain alterations associated with chronic marijuana use, we measured gray matter (GM) volume via s
182 dds ratios for associations with features of marijuana use were adjusted for sex, education, birth ye
183  Corresponding risks associated with current marijuana use were BMI <20, OR = 2.05 (95% CI: 0.89, 4.7
184    Sixty-three healthy men with a history of marijuana use were randomly assigned to receive oral SR1
185 otal number of sexual partners, and lifetime marijuana use, whereas an increased risk was associated
186 neuroadaptive state in the setting of active marijuana use, while the long-term chronic effect of mar
187 ent study was to examine the associations of marijuana use with changes in intellectual performance i
188 sed the association of cigarette smoking and marijuana use with functional ovarian cyst risk by using
189  models were used to test the association of marijuana use with neural response in the NAcc to reward
190 hors test for and estimate the clustering of marijuana use within United States neighborhoods, making
191 inks/day), heavy marijuana use (>21 times of marijuana use/year), and recreational drug use.

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top