ライフサイエンスコーパス: mask

1 pe of surgery they were receiving (to ensure masking).

2 pain or discomfort, as compared to the face mask.

3 of manipulable object pictures with mondrian masks.

4 array and an array of random phase/amplitude masks.

5 ome assessors were not masked; analyses were masked.

6 Treatment group assignments were not masked.

7 g ophthalmologists and participants were not masked.

8 Physicians providing EUC were masked.

9 ns, assessments, and data analysis were done masked.

10 Treatment allocation was not masked.

11 e attributes of the materials used for taste masking.

12 alamus is also involved or how it influences masking.

13 finding that is attributed to informational masking.

14 during the first decade of the 21st century mask a shift from firearm deaths towards a rapid rise in

15 The reaction utilizes a masked acyl cyanide (MAC) reagent, which enables the one

16 ma-C(sp(3) )-H functionalization guided by a masked alcohol.

17 Participants and outcome assessors were not masked; analyses were masked.

18 urveyed the existing literature, performed a masked analysis of longitudinal multimodal imaging for a

19 Group allocations in both studies were not masked and primary and safety analyses were done on an i

20 st 135/85 mm Hg and was further divided into masked and sustained hypertension.

21 onally subliminal duration and followed by a mask, and the Emotional Test Battery in which reaction t

22 The masked ANG does not stimulate endothelial cell prolifera

23 nd pesticides), but large annual variability masked any inter-site differences in the frog spawn.

24 The pair of optical masks are taken as the encryption keys.

25 compared with a standard nonocclusive facial mask at the same clinically set FiO2 (20 min/step).

26 of RGCs which regulate the circadian clock, masking behavior, melatonin suppression, the pupillary l

27 monophosphate or monophosphonate groups are masked by an aromatic group and an amino acid ester moie

28 ion or the raw fluorescence emissions can be masked by background signals or distorted by variations

29 We recorded phonotaxis to a cricket song masked by band-limited noise.

30 among neighbourhoods in King County that are masked by county-level estimates.

31 orescence of a small-molecule fluorophore is masked by esterification until entry into a cell, where

32 This circuit is masked by feedback and redundancy when chemoattractant i

33 positively charged surface that is partially masked by its intramolecular interaction with R9.

34 naccessible genes or domains with phenotypes masked by lethality or redundancy.

35 elations are present, their discovery can be masked by noise.

36 x NLSs that lie next to bulky domains or are masked by quaternary structures.Importin alpha3 facilita

37 urface but their unique properties are often masked by residual carriers in the bulk.

38 Masked by rotational anisotropies, xthe nonlinear chirop

39 inophils revealed that Siglec-8 is partially masked by sialylated cis ligands.

40 mmunoglobulin repeat 21 (Ig21) of filamin is masked by the adjacent repeat Ig20, resulting in autoinh

41 Counter-intuitive effects such as masking by invisible noise may occur in neural circuits

42 Under some conditions, the presence of the mask can be seen as scaling the contrast of the driving

43 Patients self-administered masked capsules, once daily, 1 h before breakfast during

44 This DBD-LBD interaction masked CAR's dimer interface, preventing CAR homodimer f

45 was well-tolerated, because the helmet-type mask caused no pain or discomfort, as compared to the fa

46 ated ileitis) on ileocolonoscopy scored by a masked central reader.

47 ecimens obtained during surgery, analysed by masked central review of local histopathology reports.

48 Measurements were performed by masked, certified Reading Center graders using the Visan

49 The SRD process also allows for sample masking checks.

50 ic sciences where thin, highly turbid layers mask chemically distinct subsurface structures.

51 STUDY Randomized, controlled, investigator-masked clinical trial.

52 Multicenter masked clinical trial.

53 each optical beam is modulated by an optical mask containing either the fingerprint of the person who

54 multicenter, randomized, prospective, double-masked, controlled superiority trial.

55 Randomized, single-masked, controlled trial.

56 clinical studies-3 with a randomized, double-masked crossover design and 1 with 4 parallel crossover

57 the second interim and final analysis by the masked Data and Safety Monitoring Board.

58 n have used a reductionist approach, perhaps masking differential regulation.

59 Thus, the aim of this parallel, double-masked, dual-center, randomized clinical trial is to eva

60 n, a protective negative feedback mechanism, masking EADs.

61 t population trends and drivers, potentially masking ecologically relevant population sub-structure a

62 ong-term potentiation (LTP) can override the masking effect of the GFP tag.

63 owever, more insights regarding reducing and masking effects of production-related factors on boar ta

64 be hard to determine due to synergistic and masking effects.

65 keratinized tissue were assessed by the same masked examiners as after the 6-month RCT.

66 Two independent masked experts read the scans, and both outcomes were co

67 s from a dermatology clinic were examined in masked fashion by a dermatopathologist and a dermatologi

68 d November 18, 2015, and randomized 1:1 in a masked fashion to receive bevacizumab or aflibercept.

69 chocardiograms, and neurological events in a masked fashion.

70 e intention-to-treat population, assessed by masked field researchers.

71 )F-FMISO dPET in a customized immobilization mask, followed by 10-min static acquisitions starting at

72 sked to group allocation, but allocation was masked from data entry researchers and from the trial st

73 ntervention assignment; the statistician was masked from intervention assignment.

74 Participants and investigators were not masked from the dietary intervention, but investigators

75 n, but investigators analysing the data were masked from the randomisation order.

76 tudy has found that, despite strong acoustic masking from background noise, female treefrogs are able

77 s, such as deriving channel sensitivity from masking functions, remain approximately valid.

78 conducted across broad spatial extents that mask geographical variation.

79 These images were mixed randomly and a masked glaucoma specialist was asked to distinguish if e

80 Optic disc photographs were read by 2 masked glaucoma specialists for VCDR and HCDR estimation

81 esicles, suggests that cholesterol does not "mask" GM1, at least not in NDs.

82 stem based on color fundus photography and a masked grader.

83 Two masked graders assessed the presence, absence, or uncert

84 Masked graders reviewed structural OCT alone, en face OC

85 tcomes included objective change assessed by masked grading of color fundus photography and Early Tre

86 Glaucoma was diagnosed based on a masked grading of optic disc stereophotographs.

87 ) N-isocyanate precursors: the effect of the masking group and the reaction scope have been delineate

88 Masking groups are often employed to circumvent this pro

89 ous esterases catalyze the hydrolysis of the masking groups, generating fluorescence.

90 amygdalar responses increased while viewing masked happy faces but decreased to masked sad faces in

91 Reductions in masking have been observed for a wide range of target an

92 e and isoxazolo[3,4-b]quinolin-3(1H)-one as "masked" heterocyclic hydroxylamines to generate Paal-Kno

93 urrent aggregate classification of Hispanics masks heterogeneity in CVD mortality reporting, leading

94 Compared with the facial mask, HFNC significantly improved oxygenation (P < 0.001

95 Masked hypertension (MHT), defined as nonelevated blood

96 ifying the subgroup of individuals with both masked hypertension and high predicted ASCVD risk.

97 After pooling data from the Masked Hypertension Study (n = 811), a cross-sectional c

98 between participants with versus without any masked hypertension was 0.681 (95% confidence interval,

99 The prevalence of any masked hypertension was 54.0%.

100 lthough the discrimination of ASCVD risk for masked hypertension was not superior to clinic BP, risk

101 nce ratios (95% confidence interval) for any masked hypertension were 1.36 (1.03-1.79), 1.62 (1.22-2.

102 One third of the patients had masked hypertension, 32% had LVH, and 38% had estimated

103 P), it is unclear who should be screened for masked hypertension, defined as having hypertension base

104 on were independently associated with having masked hypertension.

105 s associated with an increased prevalence of masked hypertension.

106 characterization of two distant double-slit masks illuminated by chaotic light, in the absence of fi

107 Masked image evaluations by trained readers showed good

108 , while this effectiveness in carbon storage masks important patterns of spatial heterogeneity across

109 ensity of a parent peak, mimicking and often masking impurity signals.

110 essure ventilation (NPPV) with a helmet-type mask in two young children with acute severe bronchial a

111 ver static and dynamic heterogeneity usually masked in molecular ensembles.

112 utant which enables a functional epitope(s), masked in refp17, to elicit B-cell growth-promoting sign

113 r, all mutations provide access to a surface masked in the wild-type enzyme, and that access correlat

114 was progression-free survival, assessed by a masked independent review committee using Response Evalu

115 Existing strategies for masking Infinium probes overlapping repeats or single nu

116 Masked interviewers administered questionnaires by telep

117 but endpoints at 12 months were assessed by masked investigators.

118 A phase mask is placed in the emission path of our dual SECM/opt

119 Drug taste masking is a crucial process for the preparation of pedi

120 It is not known whether masking is wavelength-dependent in other vertebrates, no

121 ing of 1 screening and 2 separate randomized-masked ITN treatments (sham extranasal or intranasal).

122 MD was assessed in a masked manner by an expert grader.

123 Diabetic Retinopathy fields were graded in a masked manner using a modified Airlie House grading syst

124 dentical in appearance and administered in a masked manner; patients, investigators, other site staff

125 of emphysema was assessed using the density mask method with a threshold of -950 HU (%LAA-950).

126 utput factors that are related to each taste masking method.

127 Several taste masking methods are reported, however this review has fo

128 Twelve-week, phase III, randomized, double-masked, multicenter, placebo-controlled study.

129 2-month phase 3b visual acuity (VA) assessor-masked, multicenter, randomized, interventional study.

130 oyed strategy involves initial assembly of a masked N-aryl tetramic acid which is advanced via a high

131 cyclization of N-isocyanates using blocked (masked) N-isocyanate precursors: the effect of the maski

132 of conventional fluorescence microscopy can mask nanometer-scale features.

133 Images were read by 3 masked neuro-ophthalmologists, and the final image inter

134 Subsequently, two masked observers performed HEs measurements using previo

135 acular Traction Study Group by 2 independent masked observers.

136 CD33 interactions resulting from sialic acid masking of CD33C2 domains suggests a process for regulat

137 tools for quick assessment, sorting and hole masking of electron micrographs.

138 The assay is based on the masking of GSH in a GSH and GSSG mixture via a 1,4-addit

139 was open label from week 16 onwards, with no masking of participants or investigators.

140 Masking of participants to receipt of a personal letter

141 Due to the nature of the interventions, masking of participants, study investigators, and care p

142 y to overcome informational versus energetic masking of speech.

143 frequency domain to complete modulation and masking of the input frequencies.

144 vised a method that graphically resolved the masking of unlabeled ligand binding by the increase of r

145 Here, we report the effects of a stationary mask on the reflexive eye movements induced by a moving

146 Primary outcome assessors were masked optometrists.

147 ify the circumstances under which the use of masks or respirators is most warranted.

148 provided evidence of a protective effect of masks (OR = 0.13; 95% CI: 0.03-0.62) and respirators (OR

149 to 12 hours, delivered through an open face mask) or ambient air.

150 icipants were followed up for 12 months with masked outcome assessments.

151 rly signs of recovery, and climate change is masking ozone recovery from ozone-depleting substances i

152 This prospective, double-masked, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, randomized c

153 or delirium and catatonia by independent and masked personnel using Confusion Assessment Method for t

154 isoflavone aglycones/d and probiotics) or a masked placebo [control (CON)].RCE significantly attenua

155 pants previously treated with fenofibrate or masked placebo.

156 CME) using a prospective, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical study.

157 A randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled crossover trial.

158 er Treatment Trial II, a multicenter, double-masked, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial tha

159 ere enrolled in a randomized, 3-month double-masked, placebo-controlled trial of daily 2 g DHA or pla

160 s of the study included that it could not be masked post-randomisation and that fetal losses were not

161 se T4P as receptors selects for strains that mask potential phage binding sites using glycosylation.

162 Furthermore, large-area mask-projection scanning stereolithography demonstrates

163 unprecedented 3D printing of PMDA-ODA using mask-projection stereolithography, and the preparation o

164 Finally, output factors, include taste masking quality and yield.

165 This noninferiority, double-masked, randomized clinical trial recruited children age

166 A multicenter, double-masked, randomized noninferiority clinical trial was con

167 Double-masked, randomized noninferiority clinical trials: Rho K

168 erating room (OR) assessed by 3 independent, masked raters using a previously validated task-specific

169 Two masked readers measured CDR and noted possible evidence

170 ated against a manual consensus reading of 2 masked reading center graders.

171 We propose that Rev multimerization and NES masking regulates Rev's trafficking to and retention wit

172 The masking release (MR; i.e., better speech recognition in

173 rectus and the orbital roof was assessed by masked review of computed tomography or magnetic resonan

174 study was to validate the use of VAS in the MASK-rhinitis (MACVIA-ARIA Sentinel NetworK for allergic

175 The MASK-rhinitis VAS is a reliable and valid tool to assess

176 viewing masked happy faces but decreased to masked sad faces in the experimental versus control grou

177 Previous work has shown that masked-sentence recognition is particularly poor when th

178 Patient-level data from 6 randomized, double-masked, sham- and laser-controlled clinical trials.

179 This single-center, masked, sham-controlled randomized clinical trial was pe

180 data will reduce the need for using solvent masking software (e.g. SQUEEZE) to obtain acceptable cry

181 hardwood species indicates that land use may mask species range shifts caused by changing climate.

182 Spatial release from masking (SRM) occurs when spatial separation between a s

183 in the vicinity of the active site, thereby masking subtle dynamic features that might be uniquely a

184 Exposing 32 participants to an Information Masking Task with concurrent speakers, we find significa

185 During the backward-masking task, amygdalar responses increased while viewin

186 onally valenced stimuli including a backward-masking task, which measures the amygdalar hemodynamic r

187 Taste masking techniques aim to prevent drug release in saliva

188 Informational masking tends to be largest when the target and masker t

189 We have developed a synthetic boronic acid mask that restrains the ribonucleolytic activity of ANG.

190 additional flexibilities in the molecule can mask the contribution.

191 y and autoimmune findings that often slow or mask the diagnosis.

192 is overly ambitious, the aggregate outcomes mask the diversity in progress at the country level.

193 ity of circadian oscillator proteins and can mask the effects of ethylene on the circadian system, id

194 d heaving domination in global oceans cannot mask the extra heat in the ocean during the recent "hiat

195 ly, standard mathematical modeling practices mask the importance of parameters that control contact i

196 ein Rev self-association acts to transiently mask the NES peptide(s), thereby biasing Rev's trafficki

197 A dark dorsum and lighter ventrum helps to mask the three-dimensional shape of the body by reducing

198 on the use of chromatic and spatial noise to mask the use of these cues in a luminance discrimination

199 The use of toppings masked the effect of lowering the sodium content, allowi

200 mers, suggesting that each protein component masked the IgE-reactive epitopes in the other protein co

201 Such changes masked the modifications in the lipid profile due to the

202 however, has complicated interpretation and masked the number of unique metabolites actually being m

203 nt breeding efforts have maintained yield by masking the most damaging recessive mutations in the het

204 rminal transactivation domain (AF-1) thereby masking the TAK1 kinase domain.

205 Using a beacon architecture that masks the catalytic template, we show that this methodol

206 pheres are obscured by dust, which partially masks the convective patterns.

207 eld) and movement between spike domains that masks the epitope conformation.

208 However in winter, the presence of snow masks the influence of the built and vegetated fractions

209 p120 binding masks the motif, stabilizing the cadherin at cell juncti

210 novel hypothesis that self-attenuation can "mask" the LQT3 phenotype by reducing the driving force a

211 In the binary mask, the overestimated values were rescaled below 42 HU

212 , if spatial and chromatic noise are used to mask those cues.

213 ration between a signal and masker decreases masked thresholds.

214 monic-TDD method was demonstrated by using a mask to digest designated sections of the sample surface

215 Readers were masked to all eye examination results, previous gradings

216 el that reviewed radiology and endoscopy was masked to allocation and visits.

217 Staff masked to allocation made home visits every week from en

218 Data collectors and the data manager were masked to allocation.

219 ster-randomised controlled trial with raters masked to an online computer-generated randomisation sys

220 diovascular by a panel of WISE cardiologists masked to angiographic data.

221 e intervention did not allow the staff to be masked to arm of the trial; however, randomisation was d

222 Two graders masked to clinical and ancestry data reviewed and graded

223 personnel, and those assessing outcomes were masked to dose group allocation.

224 staff who obtained outcome measurements were masked to group allocation and clinical staff who delive

225 mployees, and all other study personnel were masked to group allocation until after database lock.

226 d intervention physiotherapists could not be masked to group allocation, but allocation was masked fr

227 Investigators who did the analyses were masked to group allocation.

228 but the remainder of the research team were masked to group allocation.

229 es by reviewers using an a priori rubric and masked to group assignment and pretesting/posttesting st

230 ipants and nearly all investigators remained masked to group assignment until age 5-6 years.

231 stigators, study staff, and the sponsor were masked to group assignment until all participants had co

232 tors, their site personnel, and sponsor were masked to group assignment.

233 ding those assessing outcomes data were also masked to group assignment.

234 Only statisticians were masked to group.

235 assessed daily by 2 trained nurses who were masked to intervention status by using the Confusion Ass

236 ucose concentrations; outcome assessors were masked to neonatal glycemic status.

237 Clinicians were masked to neonatal interstitial glucose concentrations;

238 ne were done by follow-up assessors who were masked to participants' group and counsellor allocation.

239 staff working within the hospital were also masked to participants' randomisation status.

240 50) by angiographic laboratory investigators masked to patient characteristics and outcomes.

241 urch leaders or their congregations were not masked to random assignment.

242 ants, ward staff, and outcome assessors were masked to randomisation where possible; masking was obvi

243 vestigators with access to the raw data were masked to study group by coding the groups until after t

244 ns other than the DBS programming nurse were masked to the choice of lead.

245 All observers were masked to the clinical and microbiologic data.

246 team, and anyone involved in the study were masked to the identity of the treatment until unblinding

247 esearchers, managers, and employees were not masked to the outcome of randomisation.

248 Team members were masked to the postoperative outcomes.

249 th a +3.00 by a second certified orthoptist, masked to the previous measurements.

250 judicated by an independent review committee masked to the treatment.

251 Participants were not masked to their allocated intervention group.

252 and 24 weeks, by research assessors who were masked to therapy allocation.

253 Investigators and participants were masked to treatment allocation, and an unmasked team of

254 nts, investigators, and trial personnel were masked to treatment allocation.

255 Neither patients nor study staff were masked to treatment allocation.

256 ors, and those completing data analyses were masked to treatment allocation.

257 investigators, and central study staff were masked to treatment allocation.

258 ors assessing primary efficacy outcomes were masked to treatment allocation.

259 am (excluding the neuroradiologist) were not masked to treatment allocation.

260 investigators, and central study staff were masked to treatment allocation.

261 rticipants and clinical trial staff were not masked to treatment allocation.

262 ating physicians, and outcome assessors were masked to treatment allocation.

263 Participants and site staff were masked to treatment allocation.

264 Study site staff and participants were masked to treatment assignment from enrolment through we

265 tigators (including local radiologists) were masked to treatment assignment from randomisation until

266 t assignment; however, the study sponsor was masked to treatment assignment until database lock.

267 el, including those assessing outcomes, were masked to treatment assignment.

268 Investigators and patients were not masked to treatment assignment.

269 inical research staff, and participants were masked to treatment assignment.

270 ganisation, investigators, and patients were masked to treatment assignment.

271 nd clinical, data, and laboratory staff were masked to treatment assignment.

272 Participants and investigators were masked to treatment assignment.

273 Patients and investigators were masked to treatment assignment.

274 estigators, and study sponsor personnel were masked to treatment assignment.

275 Investigators, patients, and the funder were masked to treatment assignment.

276 All study personnel and participants were masked to treatment assignment.

277 Patients, investigators, and clinicians were masked to treatment assignment.

278 stigators, staff, and outcome assessors were masked to treatment assignment.

279 Investigators and patients were not masked to treatment assignment; however, the study spons

280 Patients and investigators were masked to treatment assignments.

281 atients, investigators, and study staff were masked to treatment assignments.

282 nts were completed by independent evaluators masked to treatment condition at baseline and 2 weeks an

283 All study staff and patients were masked to treatment group allocation.

284 and assessing outcomes, and the funder were masked to treatment group.

285 udy staff, and those assessing outcomes were masked to treatment group.

286 Participants were not masked to treatment, but the adjudication panel that rev

287 linical and research staff and patients were masked to treatment.

288 Both patients and investigators were masked to treatment.

289 ers of the adjudication pathology panel were masked to vaccination groups.

290 mmed by the pre-swelling step with different masks to encode the buckling directions of separate doma

291 his clinical, controlled, randomized, double-masked trial used a split-mouth design, and quadrants we

292 Multicenter, randomized, prospective, single-masked trial.

293 In 2 large, randomized, double-masked trials reported here, once-daily dosing of netars

294 overall LOS distributions that might either mask true treatment effects or suggest false treatment e

295 er-person contact with suboptimal protective mask usage.

296 s were unaware of treatment allocations, and masking was achieved by use of identical opaque capsules

297 Masking was achieved with the use of multipart labels on

298 were masked to randomisation where possible; masking was obviously not possible for the surgeon.

299 however, the phase angle of entrainment and masking were indistinguishable.

300 or elements (Fe(3+), Ti) are circumvented by masking with ascorbic acid and hydrofluoric acid, respec