ライフサイエンスコーパス: matched group

1 sus 80% and 60%, respectively [P=0.0025], in matched groups).

2 6, and 9 months of age (P < 0.01 for all age-matched groups).

3 This result was confirmed in a propensity-matched group.

4 r adverse gastrointestinal events than their matched group.

5 almost double those of control hearts in age-matched groups.

6 al rates between the study and the recipient-matched groups.

7 cked, and subdivided into seven age- and sex-matched groups.

8 ion using logistic regression conditional on matched groups.

9 on in CCL11 levels in patients among the age matched groups.

10 ission, or variable direct costs between the matched groups.

11 onal hazards models stratified on propensity-matched groups.

12 ality rates were compared for the propensity-matched groups.

13 each outcome was compared between propensity-matched groups.

14 and overall outcome was analyzed between the matched groups.

15 val after stroke were assessed in propensity-matched groups.

16 .76 to 2.46; P=0.30; hazard ratio in the HLA-matched group, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.48 to 1.28; P=0.33).

17 .51 to 3.25; P=0.60; hazard ratio in the HLA-matched group, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.65 to 2.58; P=0.46).

18 ividuals were divided into four age- and sex-matched groups: 18 patients with hyperlipidemia and CP (

19 .22 to 7.38; P=0.02; hazard ratio in the HLA-matched group, 2.92; 95% CI, 1.34 to 6.35; P=0.007).

20 k for all adverse events compared with their matched group and with the screening and diagnostic colo

21 Cox regression was stratified by matched groups and also adjusted for age, injury year, t

22 ive cataract surgery were divided into three matched groups and immunodepleted of albumin, IgG, IgA,

23 re hand weakness were randomly assigned to 2 matched groups and participated in 17.8 +/- 1.4 days of

24 ic adolescents in comparison with (i) an age-matched group, and (ii) a reading-matched group younger

25 Retrospective study using case-control matched groups at a university transplant center.

26 ng-Evans rats were divided into three weight-matched groups based on access to sweetened vegetable sh

27 re dichotomized into well-matched and poorly matched groups based on subjective evaluation of the geo

28 For propensity-matched groups, both early (p = 0.01) and late survival

29 4 patients stratified into four age- and sex-matched groups: both ACS and CP, ACS only, CP only, and

30 were no differences in early outcome between matched groups, but the 5-year actuarial survival was hi

31 percentage performance differences between 2 matched groups carrying out the same task but with 1 gro

32 Fifteen-year follow-up of a nonrandomized, matched-group cohort of 1539 low-income, mostly black ch

33 d-of-preschool follow-up of a nonrandomized, matched-group cohort of predominantly low-income, ethnic

34 Cataract-matched group comparisons appear more precise in the con

35 F-FDG dynamic PET scans were obtained in age-matched groups comprising AD patients (n = 8), patients

36 Twenty-four rats assigned to 1 of 3 matched groups (control, entorhinal cortex [EC], and par

37 Similarly, in the propensity-matched group, DES remained associated with lower mortal

38 The temperamentally matched group did not differ significantly from either g

39 Subjects were organized into 3 sex-matched groups, each including 10 subjects according to

40 Even within age-matched groups, each individual mouse exhibited a unique

41 opensity score matching was used to create 2 matched groups for comparative analysis.

42 based on intent to treat, with 3 propensity-matched groups formed based on demographics, symptoms, c

43 thout DM were analyzed in 2 propensity score-matched groups further stratified according to lesion co

44 The C*03:03/C*03:04 mismatched and the 8/8 matched groups had identical outcomes (HR ranging from 0

45 tio [HR] = 1.38; p = 0.004), but similar for matched groups (HR = 1.03; p = 0.97).

46 ], .88-1.12), as did those in the propensity-matched groups (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, .88-1.21).

47 Subgroup analysis of propensity-matched groups identified off-pump survival benefits in

48 ing was used to estimate differences between matched groups in the rates of subsequent admission with

49 on serum IgG subclass concentrations in race-matched groups: LJP, G-EOP, and age-matched periodontall

50 Relative to the reading-matched group (n = 12; mean 9.8 years), the dyslexic gro

51 Relative to the age-matched group (n = 19; mean 14.4 years), the dyslexic gr

52 ences in the baseline characteristics of the matched groups (n = 408 for both groups).

53 For the propensity score-matched groups (n=197 matched pairs), there was no diffe

54 es mellitus subjects were divided into 2 age-matched groups (newly diagnosed [<5 years] and longer-du

55 studied age-, sex-, and postmortem interval-matched groups: no major psychopathology (controls); unm

56 antly better than that of an age- and gender-matched group obtained from life tables (p < 0.0001).

57 g +/- coronary stenting were compared with a matched group of 100 sternotomy CABG patients using IMA

58 3 children and adolescents with TS to a well-matched group of 103 children without tics.

59 A matched group of 125 patients who underwent radical neph

60 ween patients with NOCAD and an age- and sex-matched group of 1347 people from the general population

61 Ninety-three outpatients and a matched group of 2,701 comparison subjects were compared

62 s who had a history of self-mutilation and a matched group of 23 suicide attempters with cluster B pe

63 -valve abnormalities was analyzed in a final matched group of 233 pairs of patients and controls.

64 between the scans were compared with an age-matched group of 24 patients who were treated with psych

65 patients are compared to an age- and surgeon-matched group of 31 eyes of 27 patients who underwent th

66 oup receiving both treatments caught up to a matched group of 32 nonstunted children.

67 compared with that of an age- and education-matched group of 45 comparison subjects without mood dis

68 An age- and gender-matched group of 48 persons with no history of major dep

69 o 2012 were analyzed and compared with (i) a matched group of ABO-compatible transplant recipients an

70 Analysis of a validation series containing a matched group of aggressive and indolent cPTCs confirmed

71 essional musicians (keyboard players) with a matched group of amateur musicians and non-musicians.

72 (n = 66) were retrospectively compared to a matched group of APKD patients who underwent LRT alone (

73 vere bTBI, which was more frequent than in a matched group of civilian moderate to severe nbTBI subje

74 on health plans from 2005 through 2008 and a matched group of commercially insured individuals in Ore

75 ocaine users and then compared to those of a matched group of comparison subjects.

76 nce of cardiac valvular insufficiency than a matched group of control subjects.

77 when patients were compared with a strictly matched group of controls.

78 Results were compared with a matched group of eight cocaine-dependent men.

79 r genetic reasons took part, together with a matched group of healthy controls (n = 21).

80 Participants in a matched group of healthy subjects (n = 15) completed 1 s

81 rformance was compared with a twice-scanned, matched group of low-stress controls.

82 all Board-certified female internists and a matched group of male internists who had graduated from

83 d hospitals compared with those treated in a matched group of non-IDS-affiliated centers.

84 editation practitioners (LTMs, n = 31) and a matched group of non-meditators (Controls, n = 38).

85 udication and a sedentary, asymptomatic, age-matched group of non-PAD persons.

86 Compared with the 1:1 matched group of nonsurgical weight management, these ch

87 and to compare such outcomes with a control-matched group of normal topographies.

88 e, end-stage renal disease etiology, and PRA matched group of patients remaining on dialysis during t

89 sion compared with an age-matched, remission-matched group of patients treated at St Bartholomew's Ho

90 are occurred after vaccination compared to a matched group of patients who did not experience a disea

91 A matched group of patients with hay fever who had not rec

92 tcomes for IBD patients were compared with a matched group of patients with sporadic cancer.

93 determined (n = 20) and compared with an age-matched group of patients without SAT (n = 100).

94 es (E + P) compared to the hormone treatment-matched group of saline-exposed females.

95 ubset of ARL cases were also compared with a matched group of similarly treated HIV-negative cases.

96 irectly compared to an age-matched, movement-matched group of typically developing, unaffected adoles

97 -infected older adults and a demographically-matched group of uninfected controls performed a verbal

98 In 16 adult converted left-handers and age-matched groups of 16 consistent right-handers and 16 lef

99 atients with uncomplicated AMI, comprising 2 matched groups of 17 patients with ant-AMI, and 22 patie

100 relevant psychometric data were assessed in matched groups of 28 PTSD patients and 27 traumatized an

101 After building 2 propensity score-matched groups of 354 patients each with either access r

102 We used propensity scores to construct 2 matched groups of 563 patients for comparative outcomes

103 against retinal proteins was examined in age-matched groups of 60 patients with normal-pressure glauc

104 Age- and sex-matched groups of AD dementia (n = 19) patients and clin

105 among treated vacant lots were compared with matched groups of control vacant lots that were eligible

106 olinguistically, visually and phonologically matched groups of familiar words and meaningless pseudow

107 Two age-matched groups of female subjects, 70 eyes each, age app

108 ximate circadian rhythm) given for 4 days to matched groups of healthy subjects (n = 51).

109 (40 mg/d and 160 mg/d), given for 4 days to matched groups of healthy subjects (n=47).

110 omedial amygdala (CMA) networks across three matched groups of juveniles: CD offenders with CU traits

111 oard in a 30-month period were compared with matched groups of nondisciplined physicians.

112 PFC of schizophrenic subjects compared with matched groups of normal control and nonschizophrenic ps

113 By testing well-matched groups of participants on the same task, we aime

114 abolism was first compared between education-matched groups of patients and controls.

115 Outcomes of propensity-matched groups of patients undergoing elective BAV or TA

116 The urine from several age-matched groups of patients was examined for these compou

117 In propensity-matched groups of patients with ischemia, there was no a

118 poA-I kinetics were assessed in age- and sex-matched groups of rabbits (n=3 each) with high, low, or

119 monitored by positron emission tomography in matched groups of six dyslexic adults and six control ad

120 Participants included 4 age-matched groups of volunteer boys aged 7.8 to 17.9 years

121 nse to psycholinguistically and acoustically matched groups of words and pseudowords.

122 (p < 0.001), but 3.1% and 5.6% in propensity-matched groups (p = 0.008).

123 In this propensity-matched group, patients with moderate to severe congesti

124 Survival was compared using propensity score-matched groups: patients in the bottom quartile of trave

125 s no difference in procedure success between matched groups (r-PCI 97.3% versus transfemoral PCI 96.6

126 Age-matched groups raised without any treatment or with Velc

127 receiving combination therapy with VPT to a matched group receiving VC.

128 ith either azithromycin or chloroquine or to matched groups receiving a placebo.

129 isk women in the entire database and the age-matched group, respectively.

130 Comparison of the matched groups revealed that implementation of the bundl

131 With better matched group size and age (HT = 11 vs non-HT = 11, age

132 eneity and confounding within the propensity-matched group, surgical therapy remained significantly a

133 =0.001); the risk was also higher in the HLA-matched group than in the cord-blood group but not signi

134 riate data among the 400 patients within the matched groups, the adjusted hazard ratio for mortality

135 Among propensity score-matched groups, the median overall survival was 37.3 (95

136 Among the propensity-matched group, there were 84 deaths during a median of 3

137 owing a second logistic model applied to the matched groups to adjust for residual differences, a sig

138 In the matched groups, TTE was beneficial for pT3 SCC (P = 0.00

139 The model was repeated in propensity-matched groups undergoing MT versus revascularization.

140 g for residual differences in the propensity matched groups using conditional logistic regression, ri

141 ting interventions were compared between the matched groups using the McNemar and Wilcoxon matched-pa

142 The morbidity of the case-matched group was 15.1% in the open group and 12.5% in t

143 nce of TTF on the risk of blindness in the 2 matched groups was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method.

144 k women in the entire database and in an age-matched group were evaluated by using receiver operating

145 ts from 118 hospitals identified, propensity-matched groups were composed of 31,863 patients exposed

146 (b) an age-matched and transplantation year-matched group who did not undergo coronary angiography (

147 isorders and from typically developing males matched group-wise on age (range 12-24 years), intellige

148 ype (3-year estimated survival, 61%) and the matched group with conventional adenocarcinoma (3-year e

149 ed (E' known) normal versus pseudonormal age-matched groups with normal left ventricular ejection fra

150 l variables at presentation and compared the matched groups with respect to therapeutic interventions

151 Subjects with EOP and a matched group without EOP were identified within a natio

152 (i) an age-matched group, and (ii) a reading-matched group younger than the dyslexic group but equal