ライフサイエンスコーパス: matched pair

1 date (incidence date of FI for case in each matched pair).

2 years) were also studied (1037 age- and sex-matched pairs).

3 antly higher in cases than controls (N = 476 matched pairs).

4 ents and healthy adults were studied (n = 10 matched pairs).

5 the XDB from the door-to-needle time in each matched pair.

6 l hazards model with stratification for each matched pair.

7 sed a risk set sampling method to select 788 matched pairs.

8 burden, and decade of diagnosis) yielded 221 matched pairs.

9 ar survival of 43% compared with 52% for 8/8 matched pairs.

10 ed with risk of colorectal cancer in the 455 matched pairs.

11 eline clinical variables yielded 1021 unique matched pairs.

12 1:1 propensity score matching resulted in 92 matched pairs.

13 cteristics, including diagnosis, yielded 140 matched pairs.

14 l to the transtracheal isolate in 70% of the matched pairs.

15 " of terminal care by 91% of physician-nurse matched pairs.

16 using age, KPS, and surgery resulted in 133 matched pairs.

17 hes are common in HLA-A and -B serologically matched pairs.

18 rol for baseline imbalances and yielded 3649 matched pairs.

19 oxon singed-rank test and Student t test for matched pairs.

20 ity score matching was used to identify 1745 matched pairs.

21 aracteristics and after comparing propensity-matched pairs (2.5% vs 3.7%, P<.001).

22 Of 1563 eligible patients, 195 matched pairs (390 patients) were created.

23 This was significantly higher in DPB1-matched pairs (74%) as compared with DPB1-mismatched pai

24 In matched pairs, alloreactive helper T-lymphocyte precurso

25 -adjusted logistic regression analyses and a matched pair analyses by propensity scores were used to

26 city analyses for diagnostic performance and matched pair analyses were performed on vertebral fractu

27 Matched pairs analyses were performed using data from ea

28 Matched-pair analyses of patients who received six to ei

29 Matched-pair analyses revealed significant differences i

30 Recent retrospective matched-pair analyses support its use in appropriately s

31 culations for Gleason scores using iterative matched-pair analyses.

32 In matched-pairs analyses, the odds ratio in the highest ve

33 and adjusted (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.91) matched-pairs analyses.

34 on by immunohistochemistry in a case-control matched pair analysis.

35 Statistical analysis was based on matched pairs analysis by t-tests, i.e. boxers and healt

36 We used a matched pairs analysis design.

37 A matched pairs analysis revealed that time on ventilator

38 d for total volume of emphysema and age, and matched pairs analysis was used to relate emphysema dist

39 Retrospective cohort analysis and matched pairs analysis with historic controls were perfo

40 Further survival analysis was performed by matched-pair analysis according to three prognostic vari

41 mpared with matched controls using McNemar's matched-pair analysis and conditional logistic regressio

42 related donor UCB versus bone marrow (BM), a matched-pair analysis comparing the outcomes of recipien

43 Furthermore, matched-pair analysis demonstrated smoking was associate

44 In a matched-pair analysis of 81 pregnant women matched to 81

45 ned statistically significant (P=0.017) in a matched-pair analysis of n=336 IPAH patients.

46 A matched-pair analysis of NF-kappa B expression was perfo

47 terogeneity, favoring an ongoing prospective matched-pair analysis of patients with similar disease s

48 Matched-pair analysis of subtypes showed that 69% of sam

49 Matched-pair analysis of the 45 RetroNeph versus 45 LapN

50 Propensity scoring and matched-pair analysis resulted in 269 matched pairs of p

51 A matched-pair analysis showed that integrated MIEX and co

52 The differences were similar in a matched-pair analysis that adjusted for age, sex, transp

53 We performed a matched-pair analysis to compare our institution's exper

54 We did a matched-pair analysis to compare outcome in MMF versus a

55 We performed a matched-pair analysis to compare the capacity for hypert

56 To assess the benefit of NAAD, a matched-pair analysis was performed.

57 In matched-pair analysis, antibiotic prophylaxis for sponta

58 cant difference was preserved in the Gleason-matched-pair analysis.

59 e led to false inference using the standard, matched-pair analysis.

60 alized prostate cancer in this retrospective matched-pair analysis.

61 ined using both direct risk adjustment and a matched-pairs analysis based on propensity for preoperat

62 The matched-pairs analysis found that the difference in mort

63 A matched-pairs analysis was performed and confirmed a hig

64 Where appropriate, a matched-pairs analysis was performed and these were comp

65 A separate matched-pairs analysis was used to assess the benefit of

66 A total of 205 commercially/Medicare-insured matched pairs and 136 Medicaid matched pairs were select

67 er than those of corresponding unsubstituted matched pairs and can be rationalized from increased hyd

68 ld increase in potency relative to monomeric matched pairs and represent the most potent FimH antagon

69 ed genotype and haplotype frequencies in 455 matched pairs, and characterized the tumor characteristi

70 The first method used 70,040 matched pairs, and the other 2 techniques used the entir

71 A matched-pair brain morphometry approach was used to cont

72 SRL had an equivalent effect in matched pairs but was associated with a significantly hi

73 in tear fluid in scarring trachoma, a large matched-pair case-control study was performed in The Gam

74 TP53(+/-) matched-pair cell lines were used to determine if knockd

75 2 conditional knockout mouse, we established matched-pair cells with and without the Arp2/3 complex.

76 We conducted a matched-pair, cluster-randomized, controlled trial in 60

77 patients by intention-to-treat analysis in a matched-pair cohort and in subsets defined by age, cardi

78 The matched-pair cohort included 5,480 patients (mean age 67

79 in a motorcycle crash can be estimated using matched-pair cohort methods.

80 A matched-pair cohort study of two-vehicle, head-on, fatal

81 In a retrospective matched-pair cohort study, 113 of 131 patients with AAVs

82 sing propensity score methods to construct a matched-pairs cohort to reduce baseline differences betw

83 Conditional Poisson regression for matched-pair cohorts was used to estimate risk ratios ad

84 lure for 7/8 and 6/8 (allele and/or antigen) matched pairs compared with 8/8 matched transplants was

85 Using a matched-pair comparison of villages in northern Benin (t

86 l was designed as an equivalence trial, with matched-pair comparisons between the cancer-detection ra

87 enesis, we compared the genes expressed in a matched pair composed of vascularized breast tumor and i

88 Compared to matched-paired controls, significant hypoadiponectinemia

89 mutation-based exact logistic regression for matched pairs data.

90 pective analysis of nearly 46,000 propensity-matched pairs demonstrated no statistically significant

91 Analysis of normal/tumor matched pairs derived from colon and rectum demonstrates

92 Using a matched pairs design in which each of 28 Caucasian schiz

93 annot be excluded, this was minimized by the matched-pair design, as remaining group differences afte

94 ts screened and genotyped, and compared in a matched-pairs design, in which each patient was matched

95 d 38,522 singleton children and 92 twins (46 matched pairs) discordant in antibiotic exposure.

96 ust SEs that accounted for the clustering of matched pairs, DM was the strongest predictor of structu

97 In analysis of 1312 propensity score-matched pairs, early coronary angiography was associated

98 these changes nor the MS were present in age-matched, pair-fed MG(-) mice.

99 A case-control analysis of 284 matched pairs found no association between antiplatelet

100 rans-acyl transferase PKSs, exemplified by a matched pair from the virginiamycin (Vir) system.

101 The matched-pair Gehan rank test for censored survival was u

102 eyes of a reference collective (n = 30) and matched-pairs group (n = 8) after primary DMEK for Fuchs

103 In ALL, DPB1-matched pairs had a significantly worse overall survival

104 ic comparison of 1,2,4- and 1,3,4-oxadiazole matched pairs in the AstraZeneca compound collection.

105 estimated by paired testing in twins and in matched pairs in the cohorts, and by meta-analysis over

106 Propensity matching resulted in 678 matched pairs in the current vs never smoker grouping an

107 We genotyped 83 matched pairs, in which one or both members of the pair

108 In a Cox model in which each matched pair is a strata, there was no difference betwee

109 missive HLA-DPB1 mismatches in otherwise HLA-matched pairs is indicated.

110 In 340 propensity score-matched pairs, IVUS was also associated with significant

111 re analyzed by using the Student t, Wilcoxon matched pair, Mann-Whitney, Spearman rank correlation, a

112 Of 201 propensity score-matched pairs, mean age was 63 +/- 17 years, 51% were ma

113 e folding and hybridization models deal with matched pairs, mismatches, symmetric and asymmetric inte

114 70% of human colon carcinoma specimens from matched pairs (n = 19, p < 0.0002) and in a cohort of in

115 Analysis of sepsis-matched pairs (n = 27) revealed significant reductions i

116 In the 10 of 10 matched pairs (n = 282), the 3-year probability of relap

117 Analysis of trauma-matched pairs (n = 46) revealed significant reductions i

118 Matched cases and controls for AIDS (n = 50 matched pairs), non-AIDS-defining (n = 63) events and de

119 ancer specimens but little to no staining in matched-paired normal colon tissues.

120 iple 'omics' approach to investigate patient-matched, paired NSCLC tumor and non-malignant parenchyma

121 -1 RNA levels of >50 copies/ml than Monitor (matched-pair odds ratio [mOR] = 4.2; modified Obuchowski

122 Unadjusted matched-pair odds ratios follow: 2.4 (95% confidence int

123 loyment and seat belt use were measured with matched-pair odds ratios.

124 elected to examine and treat patients with a matched pair of carious teeth, and each pair of teeth wa

125 ved from genetically unrelated embryos and a matched pair of colon tumor and adjacent normal colon ti

126 A matched pair of follicular and transformed lymphoma samp

127 idered to be a structurally and functionally matched pair of inputs from two eyes, although there are

128 l Fas status and malignant phenotype using a matched pair of naturally occurring primary (Fas-sensiti

129 son of gene expression profiles of a patient-matched pair of NPFs vs CAFs identified 671 transcripts

130 plicability of (44)Sc/(47)Sc as an excellent matched pair of nuclides for PET imaging and radionuclid

131 he immunological properties of a genetically matched pair of primary tumor- and metastasis-derived pr

132 Oligoarray analysis of a matched pair of prostate cancer and normal cell lines de

133 tle or no differential in activity against a matched pair of vinblastine sensitive and resistant (Pgp

134 e (ACh) +/- L-arginine was carried out in 33 matched pairs of African American and white subjects wit

135 f activator function through the analysis of matched pairs of AP-1*DNA complexes differing only in th

136 Seven time-matched pairs of blood plasma (BP) and saliva samples we

137 ytes by generating "on-target" DNA breaks at matched pairs of bona fide recombination signal sequence

138 by real-time RT-PCR screening of a panel of matched pairs of breast tumors.

139 The number of matched pairs of cases and controls varied by veterinari

140 4 (mCD14) in lipid efflux was assessed using matched pairs of cell lines that express or fail to expr

141 ressed in human colorectal cancer tissue, 21 matched pairs of colorectal tumor and adjacent normal ti

142 We inoculated tonsil histocultures with matched pairs of congenic viruses that differed only by

143 correlated with malignant phenotype between matched pairs of differentially aggressive malignant sub

144 A total of 10,089 propensity score-matched pairs of DPP-4 inhibitor users and sulfonylurea

145 By comparing matched pairs of duplex and junction species, we were ab

146 rated randomisation sequence, we selected 12 matched pairs of eligible hospitals.

147 erence to 18 essential birth practices in 15 matched pairs of facilities at 2 and 12 months after the

148 analysis, we compared the claims patterns of matched pairs of FEHB and control plans by examining the

149 isolates from each of 5 center A patients, 5 matched pairs of fluconazole-susceptible/resistant isola

150 ed HCV-infected persons.We identified 34,480 matched pairs of HCV-infected subjects and controls.

151 We randomly assigned treatment within 74 matched pairs of health clusters-ie, health facility cat

152 The two populations consisted of matched pairs of healthy individuals (n = 374), of which

153 Analysis of matched pairs of hepatic tissue (normal and tumor) from

154 Four matched pairs of hGFs and hPDLFs were cultured.

155 We analysed 12 matched pairs of histologically normal squamous mucosa a

156 b levels were compared in serum samples from matched pairs of HIV-positive rapid progressors (RPs) an

157 ignificantly varying miRNAs in a panel of 29 matched pairs of human cervical cancer and normal cervic

158 Using matched pairs of human myometrial and leiomyoma smooth m

159 responding outcomes based on iGFR using 9742 matched pairs of iGFR and serum creatinine measurements.

160 We compared six matched pairs of IMCs and PVs.

161 Twenty-four matched pairs of isolates of Pasteurella haemolytica and

162 solates of Pasteurella haemolytica and three matched pairs of isolates of Pasteurella multocida were

163 Identical EGFR genotypes were found in matched pairs of ISP and associated SNSCC, providing the

164 Of the 9 matched pairs of LGFCL and progressed DLCL with interpre

165 ) tumor-suppressor gene loci, we analyzed 11 matched pairs of LGFCL and their corresponding progresse

166 s for a set of 805 human miRs collected from matched pairs of migratory and migration-restricted cell

167 ospective cohort study, GH was identified in matched pairs of mothers with GDM or without GDM (matche

168 sex, race, and postmortem interval, and in 5 matched pairs of nonschizophrenic psychiatric case subje

169 sex, race, and postmortem interval, and in 5 matched pairs of nonschizophrenic psychiatric case subje

170 Matched pairs of normal and tumor DNA from 57 consecutiv

171 tories compared MSI analyses performed on 10 matched pairs of normal and tumor DNA from patients with

172 nes that were consistently different between matched pairs of normal and tumor specimens; a selected

173 ys to study the expression profiles of eight matched pairs of normal thyroid and PTC tissues.

174 long-term mortality between propensity score-matched pairs of PAH patients with and without beta-bloc

175 This resulted in 1519 well-matched pairs of patients (73%).

176 ng and matched-pair analysis resulted in 269 matched pairs of patients and demonstrated that patients

177 ubjects, a study population comprised of 198 matched pairs of patients and healthy controls (52 SZ/co

178 ensity score matching analysis identified 79 matched pairs of patients to compare outcomes.

179 n a case-control analysis of a subset of 215 matched pairs of patients who did and did not undergo RH

180 We identified 39,966 matched pairs of patients who had undergone either open

181 Comparison of 287 prognostically matched pairs of patients who underwent immediate (after

182 We analyzed 103 propensity score-matched pairs of patients who underwent percutaneous PFO

183 In the 243 matched pairs of patients with end-stage renal disease o

184 The study population included 7877 matched pairs of patients with PD (65 women [0.8%] and 7

185 PNA concentration and UVA dose and required matched pairs of pcPNAs.

186 To test this hypothesis, we obtained matched pairs of peripheral blood lymphocytes and serum

187 Cox regression stratified on matched pairs of PH cases and control subjects confirmed

188 ltage signals and 314 epicardial/endocardial matched pairs of points were analyzed.

189 cinoma, where Fas expression was examined in matched pairs of primary and metastatic cell lines as we

190 We analyzed RNA expression in matched pairs of primary breast cancer biopsies before a

191 l carcinoma (HNSCC) patients, including five matched pairs of primary tumors and lymph node metastase

192 n for the rapid progressors in three of five matched pairs of rapid progressors and slow progressors

193 fficient for Ras-mediated radioresistance in matched pairs of RIE-1 rat intestinal epithelial cells e

194 Using the changes in ASE in matched pairs of samples we discover 71 genes with exces

195 Examining GABAAR subunit N-glycosylation in matched pairs of schizophrenia (N=14) and comparison (N=

196 was evaluated by in situ hybridization in 22 matched pairs of schizophrenia and comparison subjects a

197 PFC tissue sections from 20 matched pairs of schizophrenia and comparison subjects w

198 METHOD: In matched pairs of schizophrenia and comparison subjects,

199 In matched pairs of schizophrenia and comparison subjects,

200 delta subunits in prefrontal cortex from 23 matched pairs of schizophrenia and comparison subjects.

201 BDNF Val66Met genotyping was performed in 27 matched pairs of schizophrenia and comparison subjects.

202 al cortex layers 2 and 4, respectively, from matched pairs of schizophrenia and comparison subjects.

203 mpal volumes and shape characteristics in 15 matched pairs of schizophrenia and control subjects.

204 orsolateral prefrontal cortex area 9 from 62 matched pairs of schizophrenia and healthy comparison su

205 cortical regions in the vsWM network from 20 matched pairs of schizophrenia and unaffected comparison

206 Prefrontal cortex tissue sections from 20 matched pairs of schizophrenia and unaffected comparison

207 containing prefrontal cortex area 9 from 10 matched pairs of schizophrenic and comparison subjects w

208 pression profiling of prefrontal cortex from matched pairs of schizophrenic and control subjects and

209 ctive neurons in areas 9, 46, and 17 from 15 matched pairs of schizophrenic and normal comparison sub

210 HCF-1 contains two matched pairs of self-association sequences called SAS1

211 Simultaneous measurements of 10 matched pairs of sibling trees of the opposite sex but s

212 amination, we reviewed retrospectively 1,408 matched pairs of simultaneous catheter-drawn and venipun

213 of DLPFC deep layer 3 were collected from 56 matched pairs of subjects with schizophrenia and compari

214 e layers of prefrontal cortex area 9 from 20 matched pairs of subjects with schizophrenia and normal

215 the transcriptome of DLPFC L3 PV cells in 36 matched pairs of SZ and unaffected comparison subjects.

216 tegy for de novo peptide sequencing based on matched pairs of tandem mass spectra (MS/MS) obtained by

217 have been performed with a set of molecular matched pairs of tiotropium on a large variety of mutate

218 n assays), alongside cytotoxicity tests with matched pairs of topoisomerase II-resistant and topoisom

219 djusted and propensity-matched analyses (594 matched pairs of treated and untreated patients) were pe

220 ii) analysis of experimental data from three matched pairs of tumor and normal cell lines.

221 sues, we extended our analysis to additional matched pairs of tumor tissues obtained from breast, lun

222 Analysis of 107 matched pairs of vaccine and nonvaccine patients reveale

223 Three var. immuginata populations and three matched pairs of var. clausa populations, including both

224 gistic regression and an analysis using 2265 matched pairs of VHA and Medicare patients, there were n

225 Using a combination of sampling methods at matched-pairs of lit and unlit sites, we found significa

226 With the concept of a "matched pair" of isotopes, 111In is used as a surrogate

227 By estimating effects among naturally matched pairs on the same motorcycle, one can account fo

228 d a comparison of BMR of 13 phylogenetically matched pairs, one species from the tropics and one from

229 n ischemic tissue compared with non-ischemic matched pairs (p<0.001) and both TKR and VV controls, ho

230 In the matched pairs, patients exposed to TXA received less red

231 rthermore, in a Cox model of 3976 propensity-matched pairs, patients who received chemotherapy during

232 er clearance for the azetidines than for the matched-pair piperidines.

233 In propensity-matched pairs, placement of a DES compared with a BMS in

234 t between LOH identified in BM aspirates and matched-pair primary tumors.

235 or burden, the readers conducted a consensus matched-pair reading to determine the sensitivity of eac

236 Propensity score-matched pairs showed a nonsignificant trend toward lower

237 model of conditional logistic regression for matched pairs showed that a history of intra-abdominal s

238 individual strains from each of two serovar-matched pairs showed that these pairs were very similar

239 Both Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test and the sign test of matc

240 Mann-Whitney, Fisher exact, and Wilcoxon matched-pair signed rank tests were performed.

241 The Wilcoxon test matched-pair signed ranks were used to analyze the outco

242 assessed by using the nonparametric Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test, and differences between

243 als, and CNR were compared with the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test.

244 urality, which were compared with a Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test.

245 ach scenario were tested by using a Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test.

246 es between groups were evaluated by Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test.

247 atched groups using the McNemar and Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed ranks tests.

248 xon Mann-Whitney U test, chi2 test, Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test, life-table analysis, Kap

249 lts analyzed by Bonferroni-adjusted Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank tests found pain suppression s

250 Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank tests were used for pre-post c

251 The data were evaluated by the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test and the Fisher exact tes

252 The Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test was used to compare pre-

253 LC (mean 24.5+/-11.4 mN) (P = 0.75, Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test).

254 CCC mean 29.1+/-23.1 mN; P = 0.012, Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test).

255 sibility were analyzed by using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test.

256 aser mean 26.1+/-6.8 mN; P = 0.012, Wilcoxon matched-pairs, signed-ranks test).

257 within-subjects analysis of each physician's matched-pair simulation encounters, adjusting for order

258 ential of (203)Pb-DOTA-Re(Arg(11))CCMSH as a matched-pair SPECT agent for (212)Pb-DOTA-Re(Arg(11))CCM

259 properties, highlighting its potential as a matched-pair SPECT agent for (212)Pb-DOTA-Re(Arg(11))CCM

260 Propensity score-matched pairs, subgroups, and sensitivity analyses did n

261 Matched-pair survival was compared using the Cox proport

262 We analyzed 112 patients with matched/paired synchronous metastases (SM#1 and SM#2) pr

263 icipants with and without glaucoma (P < .05, matched-pair t tests).

264 One-sided matched-paired t tests were performed to compare data fr

265 were compared to the fellow eye by Wilcoxon matched pair test.

266 t test for parametric data and the Wilcoxon matched pairs test for non-parametric data.

267 The nonparametric Wilcoxon matched pairs test was used to analyze the significance

268 t test, unmatched Student t test, Wilcoxon's matched pairs test, and the Mann Whitney U Test with P <

269 e of both methods as detectors was compared (matched-pair test design).

270 ts were analyzed with nonparametric Wilcoxon matched-pairs test and Spearman correlation.

271 alcohol compared with the control (Wilcoxon matched-pairs test, P=0.002).

272 , followed by the Tukey test or the Wilcoxon matched-pairs test.

273 Friedman analysis of variance and Wilcoxon matched-pairs tests were performed for statistical compa

274 lts in four major histocompatibility complex-matched pairs that were mismatched for the porcine allel

275 According to analysis of matched pairs, the 2-year, risk-adjusted mortality rates

276 r the propensity score-matched groups (n=197 matched pairs), there was no difference in wait-list mor

277 In the matched pairs, there were no significant differences in

278 A matched-pair tissue array analysis demonstrated the sign

279 ation or a corresponding quarterly update in matched pairs to avoid immortal time bias.

280 ns using conditional logistic regression for matched pairs to calculate odds ratios (ORs).

281 ities in Thailand were randomly allocated in matched pairs to receive 36 months of community-based vo

282 uter-generated random numbers used to assign matched pairs to study groups.

283 pleen Tx in major histocompatibility complex-matched pairs treated with CsA+/-thymic irradiation resu

284 and 3215 psoriasis and spondyloarthropathies matched pairs using TNF-alpha antagonists and comparator

285 The identity of each matched pair was confirmed biochemically and serological

286 The mutational status of the matched pairs was highly concordant (> 90% concordance f

287 er, and a nested case-control study with 512 matched pairs was used for analysis of the association b

288 The resulting cohort of 933 matched pairs was used to compare mortality/myocardial i

289 Propensity scoring with matched pairs was used to perform Kaplan-Meier survival

290 Propensity matching (908 matched pairs) was used for balanced comparison of outco

291 Individuals in a matched pair were randomly assigned by computer-generate

292 by the four most significant covariates, 447 matched pairs were formed between patients seen before o

293 Twenty-six matched pairs were identified.

294 Matched pairs were selected for the independent discover

295 icare-insured matched pairs and 136 Medicaid matched pairs were selected.

296 Fifty-two matched pairs were studied.

297 The 389 propensity-matched pairs were then used to analyze differences in r

298 pairs signed rank test and the sign test of matched pairs were used to compare estimated functional

299 Among 38 matched pairs who were both on calcium antagonists, the

300 lled, and masked contralateral comparison of matched-pair, within-patient recession defects, collagen