ライフサイエンスコーパス: maxilla

1 in the mandible, and 27% were placed in the maxilla.

2 ed vertical height is available at posterior maxilla.

3 ales and more often in the mandible than the maxilla.

4 ere gingival overgrowth on both mandible and maxilla.

5 wo complex bony structures: the mandible and maxilla.

6 er success rates than implants placed in the maxilla.

7 tic restorations in the edentulous posterior maxilla.

8 neither could induce Dlx5 expression in the maxilla.

9 omo rudolfensis and with the A.L. 666-1 Homo maxilla.

10 loss (MBL) around implants in the posterior maxilla.

11 erized by bony fusion of the mandible to the maxilla.

12 implants had a higher BIC% in the posterior maxilla.

13 ing dental-implant treatment in the anterior maxilla.

14 ntulous anterior maxilla compared to dentate maxilla.

15 greater bone loss was detected in SP/ON-null maxilla.

16 control was injected into the contralateral maxilla.

17 number and distribution along the edentulous maxilla.

18 ed implant rehabilitations in the edentulous maxilla.

19 r (P = 0.05) in the mandible compared to the maxilla.

20 different (P >0.05) between C3H mandible and maxilla.

21 dictors for implant failure in the posterior maxilla.

22 he restoration of single ICs in the anterior maxilla.

23 alveolar process of the mandible than in the maxilla.

24 -three implants were placed in the posterior maxilla.

25 received dental implant(s) in the posterior maxilla.

26 was greater in the C3H mandible than in the maxilla.

27 A total of 73 dental implants (57 in the maxilla, 16 in the mandible) were placed.

28 mandible is more commonly affected than the maxilla (2:1 ratio), and 60% of cases are preceded by a

29 3 mm (PM), and 1.04 mm (A) in the edentulous maxilla; 2.06 mm (M), 1.78 mm (PM), and 1.36 mm (A) in t

30 0 mm (PM), and 1.36 mm (A) in the edentulous maxilla; 2.39 mm (M), 1.88 mm (PM), and 1.66 mm (A) in t

31 Bone loss was more severe in the maxilla, 30.9% (SD 13.8) compared with 26.6% (SD 14.0) i

32 ll orbital region and proportionally slender maxilla, a feature documented in the early 20(th) centur

33 nty-seven patients receiving implants in the maxilla and 15 receiving implants in the mandible were i

34 Forty-seven (47) were placed in the maxilla and 24 in the mandible.

35 as followed for 18 months postloading in the maxilla and 24 months postloading in the mandible.

36 The mean API was 83.6% (SD 20.2%) for the maxilla and 94.9% (SD 15.6%) for the mandible.

37 aluation of an incisional biopsy of the left maxilla and genotypic characterization confirmed the dia

38 in mice, including a bony fusion between the maxilla and hypoplastic mandible, resembling the bony sy

39 placement, success rates were similar in the maxilla and in the mandible as was the case for hydroxya

40 d to homeotic transformation of the proximal maxilla and labium, joint formation required the action

41 he ventromedial sensory center (VMSC) in the maxilla and labium.

42 , were bilaterally inserted in the posterior maxilla and mandible in 4 Macaca mulatta monkeys.

43 cal bone thickness in various regions of the maxilla and mandible is largely missing.

44 , but intraosseous sarcoidosis affecting the maxilla and mandible is rare.

45 Twelve dental implants were placed in the maxilla and mandible of a patient who smoked.

46 The buccal plate of the dentate maxilla and mandible ranged from 1.6 to 2.2 mm in thickn

47 enting anterior and posterior regions of the maxilla and mandible were obtained from 6 mature male be

48 t mutants display a round skull, hypoplastic maxilla and mandible, and cleft palate resulting from a

49 ranged from 1.0 to 2.1 mm in the edentulous maxilla and mandible, with the thinnest area in the ante

50 mmetrical, but differences exist between the maxilla and mandible.

51 sed root surface area (mm2) in the defleshed maxilla and mandible.

52 mas and multiple fibro-osseous tumors of the maxilla and mandible.

53 ckness, MBL, and BIC among the groups in the maxilla and mandible.

54 Loss of the maxilla and midfacial structures after tumour removal ha

55 The discovery of haramiyid dentaries, a maxilla and other skeletal remains in the Upper Triassic

56 lated bone remodeling, mostly limited to the maxilla and the mandible, with loss of bone in the jaws

57 ible, with the thinnest area in the anterior maxilla and the thickest area in the posterior mandible.

58 mon facial features that include a prominent maxilla and upper lip that readily reveal the upper ging

59 leukin-1beta (IL-1beta) were measured in the maxillas and spleens from mice infected with periodontal

60 ontal pathogens and compared to those in the maxillas and spleens from sham-infected controls.

61 tis of peripheral bone, osteomyelitis of the maxilla, and infected endoprostheses.

62 vault, extension of the mandible beyond the maxilla, and kyphosis.

63 flap adaptation, especially in the posterior maxilla, and to the potential use of the mandibular and

64 ys in the ontogeny of the cranial vault, the maxilla, and, most notably, the mandible.

65 gular; and (2) on the bucco-caudal face of a maxilla; and (3) between teeth as islets in the alveolar

66 1.62 mm (PM), and 1.59 mm (A) in the dentate maxilla; and 1.98 mm (M), 1.20 mm (PM), and 0.99 mm (A)

67 2.0 mm (PM), and 1.95 mm (A) in the dentate maxilla; and 2.51 mm (M), 1.92 mm (PM), and 1.24 mm (A)

68 t animals have normal incisors which, in the maxilla, are flanked by a supernumerary pair of incisor-

69 delayed eruption of left second premolar in maxilla, as well as persistent deciduous teeth: right se

70 A partial maxilla assigned to H. habilis reliably demonstrates tha

71 nt dental implant placement in the posterior maxilla at the University of Connecticut Health Center t

72 .3% to 68.3%, P < 0.0001) higher than in the maxilla, but we did not detect any difference in the odd

73 us floor augmentation in a severely atrophic maxilla can be performed in a 1- or 2-stage surgical pro

74 r classified as complete edentulous atrophic maxilla (CEM) and partial edentulous atrophic maxilla (P

75 length was shortened in edentulous anterior maxilla compared to dentate maxilla.

76 ble, and, finally, on implants placed in the maxilla compared to implants placed in the mandible.

77 ad significantly higher success rates in the maxilla compared to the mandible and, in cases of single

78 erial from this ancient snake, including the maxilla, dentary and additional vertebrae.

79 lla suture, smaller premaxilla and malformed maxilla during midface development.

80 nasal passages, abnormal development of the maxilla, exencephaly and anophthalmia.

81 rchaeological data, that a fragment of human maxilla from the Kent's Cavern site, UK, dates to the ea

82 The posterior maxilla has traditionally been one of the most difficult

83 rged from the mandibular arch instead of the maxilla in the mutants.

84 CS as a homeotic transformation (mandible to maxilla) in humans.

85 e study included 27 jaws (23 mandibles and 4 maxillas) in patients who refused to wear a denture or w

86 10 mm) implants in the mandible and 6 in the maxilla, in addition to other requirements.

87 nt hybridization in the developing mandible, maxilla, intestine, and mesencephalic ventricle.

88 However, the maxilla is firmly united with the skull, indicating an a

89 more often encountered in the mandible than maxilla, it affects mostly canines.

90 t of 0.52, and buccal furcation sites in the maxilla, kappa = 0.38.

91 The maxilla (KC4), which was excavated in 1927, was initiall

92 cal B.P. and the IUP-associated modern human maxilla known as "Ethelruda" before approximately 45,900

93 meotic transformation of the mandible into a maxilla-like structure.

94 l wall thickness (LWT) of atrophic posterior maxilla (<10 mm) of patients with complete and partial e

95 Data were compared with calvaria, maxilla, lumbar vertebra, femoral neck, and iliac crest.

96 .001) in the indentation moduli of the jaws (maxilla/mandible), location (anterior/posterior), and bo

97 ion for gender, age, tooth type or location (maxilla/mandible), or surgical procedure.

98 terior region: mandible (n = 12/14; 86%) and maxilla (n = 2/14; 14%).

99 ofacial development, specially affecting pre-maxilla, nasal bone, mandible, tibia, and clavicle.

100 n in the mandible and Dlx2 expression in the maxilla, neither could induce Dlx5 expression in the max

101 articles (test) were placed in the posterior maxilla of 15 patients.

102 de possible the discovery of mandibles and a maxilla of a new genus and species of late Eocene elepha

103 thological findings of PGCG diagnosed in the maxilla of a young male, as well as the successful treat

104 ted tomography (muCT), in the premaxilla and maxilla of Neovenator, a mid-sized allosauroid theropod

105 crestal incision in the anterior edentulous maxilla of Sprague-Dawley rats.

106 ed at the osteogenic initiation stage in the maxilla of Tgfbr2 mutant mice.

107 Dental implant surgery in the posterior maxilla often involves the maxillary sinuses.

108 Finds included a dentally complete Homo maxilla (OH 65) with lower face, Oldowan stone artifacts

109 bia (eight), mandible (five), mastoid (one), maxilla (one), zygomatic arch (one), rib (one), clavicle

110 implant surface were placed in the anterior maxilla or anterior mandible and restored with fixed res

111 rare, benign neoplasm which develops in the maxilla or mandible, arising from the dental lamina or b

112 mass arising from the gingival mucosa of the maxilla or mandible, presenting in neonates.

113 tient received two implants in the posterior maxilla or mandible.

114 ll locations, on implants placed only in the maxilla or the mandible, and, finally, on implants place

115 on of all teeth except #6 through #11 in the maxilla, oral rehabilitation was accomplished with the u

116 Cranial (mandible, maxilla, parietal, and frontal) bones and ulnae were ana

117 axilla (CEM) and partial edentulous atrophic maxilla (PEM).

118 ored the expression of microRNAs (miRNAs) in maxillas (periodontium) and spleens isolated from ApoE(-

119 implants in edentulous areas of the anterior maxilla poses a unique challenge due to variations in th

120 sing occipital bone) and a fragmentary right maxilla preserving part of the nasal floor and two fragm

121 number and distribution along the edentulous maxilla seemed to influence the prosthodontic survival r

122 ut causes premature fusion of the premaxilla-maxilla suture, smaller premaxilla and malformed maxilla

123 ilateral enlargement of the mandible and the maxilla that presents with varying degrees of involvemen

124 had postextraction implants in the anterior maxilla that were inserted in the period from December 2

125 ocesses, olfactory pit, palatal shelf of the maxilla, the eye, the lens of the eye, otic vesicle, pre

126 angle (the antero-posterior relation of the maxilla to the mandible) seem to be the skeletal subspac

127 ence that Hand2 is sufficient for upper jaw (maxilla)-to-mandible transformation by regulating the ex

128 s BMP-2-induced bone formation in the murine maxilla using an injectable gelatin hydrogel (GH) carrie

129 es between mesial and distal surfaces or the maxilla versus the mandible.

130 The junctional epithelium (JE) in the maxilla was 1.3 +/- 0.4 mm, whereas in the mandible, it

131 The connective tissue (CT) in the maxilla was 2.5 +/- 1.3 mm, whereas in the mandible, it

132 The sulcular epithelium (SE) in the maxilla was 2.7 +/- 0.8 mm, whereas in the mandible, it

133 The BW in the maxilla was 6.5 +/- 2.5 mm, whereas in the mandible, it

134 n, formation of the palatal processes of the maxilla was blocked while formation of the palatal proce

135 The alveolar bone of the maxilla was evaluated by microcomputed tomography (micro

136 The gingival tissue of the left maxilla was used for the analysis of lipid peroxidation

137 ts were euthanized, and samples of the right maxilla were defleshed and used for histologic and morph

138 rs; mean age: 39.9 years) of intact anterior maxilla were randomly selected and evaluated by two cali

139 the external surfaces of the premaxilla and maxilla where they are associated with foramina.

140 ed, SMO) are common in ameloblastomas of the maxilla, whereas BRAF mutations are predominant in tumor

141 Six implants were placed in the posterior maxilla with a conventional two-stage approach.

142 er success rates than implants placed in the maxilla, with only a few exceptions noted.

143 nd marked bony expansion in the mandible and maxilla, with sparing of the mandibular condyles.