ライフサイエンスコーパス: maxillary

1 have agenesis of >/=1 third molars and that maxillary agenesis was 36% more likely than mandibular a

2 outcome and clinical performance of anterior maxillary all-ceramic implant crowns (ICs) based either

3 in the female gender and mostly involves the maxillary alveolar ridge.

4 A total of 31 maxillary and 35 mandibular single-rooted human premolar

5 3D scanning technology was used to probe 36 maxillary and 35 mandibular single-rooted premolars.

6 how adult endites, the inner branches of the maxillary and labial appendages, are formed at metamorph

7 First, we tested the prediction that maxillary and labial palps are patterned using conserved

8 opeltus giant is a canonical gap gene in the maxillary and labial segments and also plays a gap-like

9 During analysis of CT studies we evaluated maxillary and mandibular alveolar processes for presence

10 m) to restore partially edentulous posterior maxillary and mandibular areas is limited.

11 tions and less precise axonal sorting of the maxillary and mandibular branches within the trigeminal

12 eural crest cells (NCCs) that develop in the maxillary and mandibular buds of pharyngeal arch 1 (PA1)

13 L) injected into the gingival tissue (GT) of maxillary and mandibular first molars and into the inter

14 of multifocal melanoacanthoma affecting the maxillary and mandibular gingiva and the hard palate.

15 ange in crestal bone levels (AvBL) for 5 x 8 maxillary and mandibular implants after 5.9 years of fol

16 FoxJ1(-/-) mice maxillary and mandibular incisors are reduced in length

17 Grem2(-/-) mice have small, malformed maxillary and mandibular incisors, indicating that Grem2

18 correlated with the dramatic differences in maxillary and mandibular molar phenotypes in Bmp4(f/f);W

19 ects of loss of activin or Bmp4 signaling on maxillary and mandibular molar tooth morphogenesis are m

20 Both maxillary and mandibular premolars demonstrated a nonsig

21 , are expressed in the ectomesenchyme of the maxillary and mandibular processes and have been suggest

22 2, Dlx2, Msx1, Barx1, Foxc2 and Fgf8, in the maxillary and mandibular processes of the mutants, indic

23 sions arise along the sites of fusion of the maxillary and mandibular prominences early in facial dev

24 distribution along the line of fusion of the maxillary and mandibular prominences.

25 ultation and construction of the provisional maxillary and mandibular prostheses.

26 abnormalities such as mandibular hypoplasia, maxillary and mandibular skeletal deformation, and cleft

27 When comparing the healing between the maxillary and mandibular teeth at 6 months, the VRD redu

28 nduced by placing silk ligatures around both maxillary and mandibular teeth.

29 f Wnt antagonists, particularly Dkk2, in the maxillary and mandibular tooth mesenchyme.

30 vent plaque removal during brushing over one maxillary and one mandibular posterior dental sextant fo

31 ome conformation capture assay in developing maxillary and periocular tissues suggest that the DNA re

32 In mice, the ophthalmic, maxillary, and mandibular trigeminal nerve branches main

33 males were, in descending order, mandibular, maxillary, and sphenoid bones, while the sphenoid bone w

34 Each maxillary anterior area was photographed before and 3 mo

35 from four study centers, each with a single maxillary anterior Miller Class I or II recession defect

36 gingiva and underlying alveolar bone in the maxillary anterior region and to establish their associa

37 posterior non-pit and fissure surfaces, (C4) maxillary anterior surfaces, and (C5) mid-dentition surf

38 Maxillary anterior teeth (n = 306) were studied in 56 hu

39 A facial bone (<2 mm) overlying maxillary anterior teeth may be prone to resorptive proc

40 Maxillary anterior teeth were atraumatically extracted.

41 ts 1 to 5 mm from the bone crest for the six maxillary anterior teeth.

42 ominantly thin facial bone overlying the six maxillary anterior teeth.

43 ome-wide map of candidate enhancers from the maxillary arch (primordium for the upper jaw) of mouse e

44 essential for the expression of Lhx8 in the maxillary arch cells and that Lhx8_enh1 was a direct tar

45 had higher rates of dental anomalies in the maxillary arch than did controls for primary (21% vs. 4%

46 ssions affecting canines or premolars in the maxillary arch.

47 lium, as well as the emerging mandibular and maxillary arches were sampled.

48 derlying neuroepithelium, the mandibular and maxillary arches, including both their mesenchymal and e

49 ere prominent in the ocular, mandibular, and maxillary areas.

50 vestigated peripheral axons of the zebrafish maxillary barbel (ZMB), an optically clear sensory appen

51 rol) were implanted into experimental rabbit maxillary bone defects.

52 Destruction and invasion of mandibular and maxillary bone frequently occurs and contributes to morb

53 years; mean age: 58 +/- 9.2 years) requiring maxillary bone reconstruction prior to implant placement

54 t therapy in OSCC to preserve mandibular and maxillary bone volume and function.

55 revealed that 2 lesions were situated in the maxillary bone, 2 in the frontal, and 1 in the zygoma, a

56 In the maxillary bone, the BW, SE, and CT were significantly lo

57 We have used a rat model of injury to the maxillary branch (V2) of the trigeminal nerve to produce

58 e subsequently underwent embolization of the maxillary branch of the left ECA using Embozene(R) Micro

59 ; and 3) 10 mm distoapical to the CEJ of the maxillary canine (edentulous ridge).

60 oth recession defects, oral sites other than maxillary canine and premolar teeth, and Miller Class II

61 ed at the bracket level (tipping) of a human maxillary canine.

62 Twenty-five GRs in maxillary canines and premolars were treated with corona

63 phy-based finite element models comprising a maxillary central incisor socket and 4.5 x 13 mm outer-d

64 issing the mandibular second molar and their maxillary central incisors are most susceptible to micro

65 involved making semilunar incisions over the maxillary central incisors that blended into a frenectom

66 Complete root coverage was achieved over the maxillary central incisors that initially presented with

67 ed flap with a frenectomy in a case in which maxillary central incisors were impinged upon by a broad

68 sitioning gingiva for root coverage over the maxillary central incisors while simultaneously performi

69 us surface involvement being highest for the maxillary central incisors, followed by maxillary poster

70 using standardized periapical radiographs of maxillary central incisors.

71 nce of the gingival recession involving both maxillary central incisors.

72 alveolar mucosa on the facial aspect of her maxillary central incisors.

73 able outcomes after regenerative therapy for maxillary Class III furcation defects are limited to cli

74 Evidence supporting regenerative therapy in maxillary Class III furcation defects in maxillary molar

75 ll have a modified piercing-sucking mandible-maxillary complex that allows them to drain fluids from

76 that the majority (58.7%) would recommend a maxillary CT scan before a sinus-lift surgery.

77 R defect was surgically induced on bilateral maxillary cuspids under general anesthesia.

78 For the more extensive maxillary defects, there is consensus that a free flap i

79 ponsible for both mandibular prognathism and maxillary deficiency.

80 uate and safe anesthesia for the majority of maxillary dental procedures.

81 ere characterised in both the mandibular and maxillary dentition by a loss of the permanent canines,

82 nal implants to support the interim complete maxillary denture during the healing period.

83 mains potentially relevant to mandibular and maxillary development.

84 ng does not result in significant changes in maxillary development.

85 pulsed electrical currents to ophthalmic and maxillary divisions of the right trigeminal nerve and ce

86 shund, are required for metamorphosis of the maxillary endites.

87 hibited a significantly higher percentage of maxillary epithelium in contact with mandibular epitheli

88 l display in the presence of slight vertical maxillary excess and hypermobility of the upper lip.

89 nt of a gummy smile associated with vertical maxillary excess and hypermobility of the upper lip.

90 analysis pointed to the presence of vertical maxillary excess.

91 ubmitted to orthodontic treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy.

92 Conventional treatment approaches use maxillary expansion techniques to develop normal speech,

93 Through maxillary explant culture assays, we demonstrate that th

94 Osteotomies were created in healed maxillary extraction sites 1) by drilling or 2) by drill

95 ogically and clinically for the treatment of maxillary facial or interproximal and mandibular facial

96 ed regenerative therapy for the treatment of maxillary facial, mesial, distal, and mandibular facial

97 ignificantly correlated with graft loss in a maxillary FFBA augmentation.

98 e-induced experimental periodontitis between maxillary first and second molars (M1-M2).

99 e of a lambdoidal junction (formed where the maxillary first arch meets the frontonasal processes) in

100 e, age-dependent expansion of the PDL at the maxillary first molar (M1) furcation area was observed.

101 ed into 4 groups: 50-cN force applied to the maxillary first molar (O), force application plus soft t

102 Immunohistochemistry (IHC) of mouse maxillary first molars localized FAM20A in secretory-sta

103 the palatal gingival tissues adjacent to the maxillary first molars three times per week for 4 weeks.

104 The maxillary first molars were extracted, and a tooth-assoc

105 One month after extraction of maxillary first molars, a titanium mini-implant was inse

106 The treatment with a maxillary fixed orthodontic appliance was finished after

107 to the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) of the maxillary fourth premolar (PM4; thin bone over root); 2)

108 After 7, 15, 30, and 50 days, maxillary fragments were embedded in paraffin.

109 After 7, 15, 30, and 50 days, maxillary fragments were processed for paraffin embeddin

110 We found that, in the turtle, mandibular and maxillary ganglion neuron rostrocaudal segregation and t

111 We show that maxillary growth remodelling (bone formation and resorpt

112 Sixty patients with single maxillary GRs >/= 2 mm, without loss of interproximal so

113 history of periodontal disease received one maxillary implant each.

114 re and one with a V-shaped thread design, in maxillary incisor extraction sockets.

115 Various factors affect the central maxillary incisor papilla height (PH) and central clinic

116 xty-four patients underwent therapy in their maxillary incisor region.

117 Noggin(-/-) mice exhibited a solitary median maxillary incisor that developed from a single dental pl

118 cells rescues the development of molars and maxillary incisor, but the rescued teeth exhibit a delay

119 incisive canal and the roots of the central maxillary incisors should be kept in mind during dental-

120 In vivo, rat maxillary incisors were atraumatically extracted (withou

121 Only maxillary incisors were included to eliminate any potent

122 phthalmic terminal fields, with only a small maxillary input ventrally.

123 at FPD treatment in posterior mandibular and maxillary jaws with NDIs was as reliable as with SDIs, a

124 dentures (FPDs) in posterior mandibular and maxillary jaws.

125 ight central incisor was 1.41 mm and for the maxillary left central incisor was 1.45 mm.

126 two maxillary left second premolars and one maxillary left first molar occurs after sinus-augmentati

127 nd bone loss around an implant replacing the maxillary left first molar.

128 PD was induced by cotton ligature around the maxillary left first molars (PDSG and PDCimG).

129 Periodontal disease was induced in the maxillary left first molars (PDSG and PDCimG); maxillary

130 was induced by ligature placement around the maxillary left second molar of rats for 11 days.

131 were submitted to EP by ligature around the maxillary left second molars for 11 days.

132 is case series, loss of pulp vitality of two maxillary left second premolars and one maxillary left f

133 Among treated patients the CoA segment (the maxillary length) and the ANB angle (the antero-posterio

134 l base, short upper facial height, and short maxillary length.

135 mandibular arch-derived structures into more maxillary-like structures, indicating a loss of NCC iden

136 residual ridge height (RH), sex, and age on maxillary LWT.

137 one impressions were taken of mandibular and maxillary master casts, and eight stone replicas of each

138 and Taf1 together in primary mouse embryonic maxillary mesenchymal cells results in up-regulated oste

139 c differentiation in primary mouse embryonic maxillary mesenchymal cells, as seen in Tgfbr2 mutant ce

140 ar development arrested at the bud stage and maxillary molar development arrested at the bud-to-cap t

141 Msx1 heterozygosity enhanced maxillary molar developmental defects whereas Osr2 heter

142 to two study groups after healing from right maxillary molar extractions.

143 on titanium implants in a novel, in vivo rat maxillary molar implant model.

144 stilbamidine into the gingival sulcus of the maxillary molar in 14 rats.

145 Attachment of ligature to a second maxillary molar induced DC-STAMP messenger RNA and prote

146 abundantly expressed in the mandibular than maxillary molar mesenchyme in wild-type embryos and that

147 Rats (n = 22) had the right maxillary molar teeth extracted under local and general

148 the mandibular molar tooth germs while their maxillary molar tooth germs completed morphogenesis.

149 Runx2(-/-) mutant mice, both mandibular and maxillary molar tooth germs progressed to the early bell

150 ly higher levels of Dkk2 than the developing maxillary molar tooth mesenchyme, these data indicate th

151 opmental arrest at the bud stage but allowed maxillary molars and incisors to develop to mineralized

152 in maxillary Class III furcation defects in maxillary molars is limited to clinical case reports.

153 th-old rats were ovariectomized (OVX) or had maxillary molars removed from one side to induce unilate

154 duced around the first mandibular and second maxillary molars using ligatures.

155 Finite element (FE) models of the first maxillary molars were constructed from muCT scans to cal

156 The first maxillary molars were extracted 8 days before sacrifice.

157 Four weeks later, the second maxillary molars were extracted; sockets were allowed to

158 Gingival tissues of maxillary molars were subjected to real-time polymerase

159 In maxillary molars, the mesiobuccal root had a significant

160 facial and interproximal Class I defects in maxillary molars; 2) facial and lingual Class I defects

161 interproximal Class II furcation defects in maxillary molars; 4) facial and lingual Class II furcati

162 ar molars; 5) Class III furcation defects in maxillary molars; 6) Class III furcation defects in mand

163 ectoderm covering the frontonasal (FNP) and maxillary (MxP) processes.

164 omeres (tritocerebrum, mandibular neuromere, maxillary neuromere, labial neuromere) of the SEZ at all

165 ar ganglion neurons are located rostrally to maxillary neurons, with some intermingling, supporting p

166 Adults scheduled to receive bone grafting in maxillary, non-molar, single-tooth extraction sites were

167 ically linked to specific loci that regulate maxillary or mandibular growth.

168 Maxillary or mandibular left or right quadrants were ran

169 creened the olfactory sensory neurons of the maxillary palp (MP-OSNs) using a large number of natural

170 stematically examine the role of Acj6 in the maxillary palp and in a major subset of antennal ORNs.

171 However, the functional significance of the maxillary palp remained unknown.

172 eptor (Or) gene expression in the Drosophila maxillary palp, one of the two adult olfactory organs.

173 us investigation has primarily concerned the maxillary palp, the simpler of the fly's two olfactory o

174 Or gene are dispersed on the antenna and the maxillary palp.

175 two peripheral olfactory organs, antenna and maxillary palp.

176 cluding the compound eyes, ocelli, antennae, maxillary palps and surrounding head capsule.

177 Ablation of the antennae and maxillary palps reduced, but did not eliminate, the resp

178 These neurons project from the antennae and maxillary palps to the antennal lobe (AL) and from the l

179 omonas gingivalis W50 (P. gingivalis) in the maxillary periodontium to induce periodontitis.

180 howed a trend for increased anomalies of the maxillary permanent dentition.

181 mandibular patterning defect resulting in a maxillary phenotype (i.e., homeotic transformation).

182 species, which, when disrupted, results in a maxillary phenotype.

183 y, genetic reduction of Fgf8 ameliorates the maxillary phenotypes.

184 the maxillary central incisors, followed by maxillary posterior premolars and molars.

185 Experimental gingivitis was induced in one maxillary posterior sextant in nine healthy individuals.

186 GCF samples were collected from maxillary posterior sites with paper strips.

187 Maxillary posterior tooth region is an important area wi

188 furcation defects were surgically created in maxillary premolar teeth in adult, female, mini-pigs and

189 We present five cases in which a maxillary premolar was extracted and an implant placed i

190 Each subject required maxillary premolar, canine, or central incisor tooth ext

191 This is particularly true for maxillary premolars with multiple roots.

192 ed in the anterior mandible or involving the maxillary premolars.

193 7) Class I, II, or III furcation defects in maxillary premolars.

194 Rather, increased neural crest expands the maxillary primordia.

195 ateral and medial nasal processes and of the maxillary process of the first branchial arch are integr

196 est in the mandibular process but not in the maxillary process of the first branchial arch.

197 ficantly retarded outgrowth of the nasal and maxillary processes due to reduced proliferation of mese

198 y outgrowth from the oral side of the paired maxillary processes flanking the primitive oral cavity.

199 dergoing fusion between the medial nasal and maxillary processes.

200 ls (activates beta-catenin pathway) into the maxillary prominence or by knocking down endogenous WNT1

201 RCAS::WNT11 retrovirus was injected into the maxillary prominence, and the majority of embryos develo

202 which EDNRA is ectopically activated in the maxillary prominence, resulting in a maxillary to mandib

203 aled that WNT11 prevented lengthening of the maxillary prominence, which was due in part to decreased

204 shelves from the oral side of the embryonic maxillary prominences, elevation of the initially vertic

205 bilateral palatal shelves (PS), arising from maxillary prominences, fuse at the midline, forming the

206 elop as outgrowths from the medial nasal and maxillary prominences, respectively, remodel and fuse to

207 Maxillary PSAA was visualized in 36 patients (70%).

208 e percentage of TLR4-positive neurons in the maxillary region and among the neurons innervating infla

209 R4 was detected in 19% of the neurons in the maxillary region of TG and in 29% of neurons innervating

210 the skull and in the neck (e.g., 78% for the maxillary region).

211 ts received a single implant in the anterior maxillary region.

212 A is an important structure in the posterior maxillary region; the clinician should be aware of its l

213 For the maxillary right and left canines, the crestal bone thick

214 For the maxillary right and left lateral incisors, the crestal b

215 d by apically positioned flap surgery in the maxillary right and left posterior areas.

216 d by apically positioned flap surgery in the maxillary right and left posterior areas.

217 bone thickness at 3 mm from the CEJ for the maxillary right central incisor was 1.41 mm and for the

218 was subperiosteally injected into the murine maxillary right diastema between the incisor and the fir

219 red-breeder rats underwent extraction of the maxillary right first molar and standard surgical defect

220 for 5 min/day on the occlusal surface of the maxillary right first molar at a very low magnitude of l

221 ne hundred twenty male Wistar rats had their maxillary right incisor extracted.

222 xillary left first molars (PDSG and PDCimG); maxillary right molars were used as non-ligature control

223 In all groups, the maxillary right third molar was extracted.

224 gatures were placed subgingivally around the maxillary second molars and remained there for 2 weeks b

225 o the subperiosteal palatal area adjacent to maxillary second molars every other day.

226 y placing ligatures around the cervix of the maxillary second molars for 21 days.

227 Silk ligatures were applied to the maxillary second molars in the presence or absence of li

228 atures (size 7-0) were tied around the mouse maxillary second molars on day 0, followed by the inject

229 Maxillary second molars were extracted in Sprague Dawley

230 In a second study, maxillary second molars were extracted, and PTH was admi

231 In EP, a ligature was placed around maxillary second molars.

232 an unusual location on the palatal roots of maxillary second molars.

233 hat was localized to the palatal side of the maxillary second molars.

234 ingiva around implants at the right and left maxillary second premolar sites.

235 an unusual location in the palatal roots of maxillary secondary molars.

236 hat was localized to the palatal side of the maxillary secondary molars.

237 are the thickness of the lateral wall of the maxillary sinus (TLWMS) and the thickness of the Schneid

238 riptions of sinus involvement other than the maxillary sinus add to the variability of presentation.

239 All bioglass and/or allograft placed in the maxillary sinus after the osteotome technique underwent

240 al findings and mucosal abnormalities of the maxillary sinus among dental patients, using cone-beam c

241 distances from lower margin to the floor of maxillary sinus and alveolar crest in the 1(st) molar an

242 ior superior alveolar artery to the floor of maxillary sinus and alveolar crest.

243 ery (PSAA) is located on the lateral wall of maxillary sinus and may become injured during such surgi

244 s sites with <10 mm between the floor of the maxillary sinus and the alveolar crest were selected.

245 e meatus cannot be used as a surrogate for a maxillary sinus aspirate in children with ABS, although

246 A quantitative culture of a maxillary sinus aspirate is the gold standard for determ

247 in bone particles harvested intraorally for maxillary sinus augmentation and to assess the clinical

248 ospective record review was performed of all maxillary sinus augmentation cases performed during the

249 Maxillary sinus augmentation is a routine procedure perf

250 The lateral window approach to maxillary sinus augmentation is a well-accepted treatmen

251 indings suggest that the %VB formation after maxillary sinus augmentation is inversely proportional t

252 Maxillary sinus augmentation is one of the most reliable

253 The maxillary sinus augmentation procedure (SAP) using the l

254 rforation is the most common complication of maxillary sinus augmentation procedures and has been ass

255 nine perforations during 104 lateral window maxillary sinus augmentation procedures.

256 around implants placed in sites treated with maxillary sinus augmentation using anorganic bovine bone

257 eriodontopathogens in individuals undergoing maxillary sinus augmentation with a history of periodont

258 saliva in a group of 30 patients undergoing maxillary sinus augmentation.

259 Maxillary sinus carcinoma (MSC) is a rare cancer of the

260 ient with radio- and chemotherapy refractory maxillary sinus carcinoma to gauge the progression of th

261 greatly determined by the dimensions of the maxillary sinus cavity.

262 n 19 of 20 (all 14 patients) and ipsilateral maxillary sinus changes in 12 of 20 (11 patients).

263 Little is known about maxillary sinus compliance, i.e., the intrinsic potentia

264 to 71.1%) of respondents recommended that a maxillary sinus CT scan should be routinely prescribed b

265 Anatomic variations of the maxillary sinus determine the degree of difficulty in pe

266 of the present study, it was concluded that maxillary sinus elevation with 100% ABB gives predictabl

267 lish a referral protocol before performing a maxillary sinus elevation.

268 resent study is to investigate the effect of maxillary sinus floor augmentation on sinus membrane thi

269 s in membrane thickness were evaluated in 65 maxillary sinus floor augmentation procedures via a late

270 The maxillary sinus lateral wall tends to increase in thickn

271 Periapical surgeries, implants and maxillary sinus lift are performed on routine basis.

272 the concept that the new bone formed in the maxillary sinus lift procedure emanates from the endoste

273 ophic ridge, and age were shown to influence maxillary sinus LWT.

274 erative complication has been reported to be maxillary sinus membrane perforation (MSMP).

275 The results indicate that the maxillary sinus membrane, even in healthy clinical condi

276 e from the lateral to the medial wall of the maxillary sinus on the outcomes of sinus augmentation pr

277 rch on the effect of augmentation surgery on maxillary sinus physiology is recommended.

278 Only bilateral concha bullosa affects maxillary sinus volumes.

279 Mean volume of the right maxillary sinus was 17.794 cm(3), while for the left one

280 The mean distance between PSAA and floor of maxillary sinus was 9.96 mm.

281 mucosal thickening and mucosal cysts of the maxillary sinus was recorded.

282 After grafting the maxillary sinus with irradiated allogenic bone, 37 intac

283 of the lateral arterial blood supply to the maxillary sinus) were obtained retrospectively from two

284 niation of the orbital soft tissues into the maxillary sinus.

285 ly associated with mucosal thickening of the maxillary sinus.

286 est to the sinus wall, and height of lateral maxillary sinus.

287 thickness (MT), and perforation rate of the maxillary sinus.

288 bullosa was connected with larger volume of maxillary sinuses (right sinus: p=0.005; left sinus: p=0

289 ifty-five implants were placed in 30 grafted maxillary sinuses in 24 patients.

290 Maxillary sinuses with acute-angled PNRs might present a

291 in the posterior maxilla often involves the maxillary sinuses.

292 =0,430) affected the asymmetry in volumes of maxillary sinuses.

293 did not influence the incidence of bilateral maxillary sinusitis (p=0.495).

294 There was higher incidence of bilateral maxillary sinusitis in patients with septal deviation (p

295 bullosa, has influence on the development of maxillary sinusitis.

296 Thirty-one studies that reported maxillary SMT were considered for qualitative analysis.

297 s statistically significantly greater in the maxillary teeth, but the difference was not statisticall

298 ity of a nasal spray to induce anesthesia of maxillary teeth.

299 in the maxillary prominence, resulting in a maxillary to mandibular transformation, suggesting that

300 healthy adults requiring restoration of one maxillary tooth were randomized in a 1:2 ratio to receiv