ライフサイエンスコーパス: maximum standardized uptake value

1 maximum standardized uptake values ( SUVmax maximum standardized uptake value ).

2 ET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (use of maximum standardized uptake values).

3 and developed with a threshold of 40% of the maximum standardized uptake value.

4 ions 10 mm or greater on CT and expressed as maximum standardized uptake value.

5 The average maximum standardized uptake value (10-12 min) of tumors

6 ng in terms of contrast (-11.3%, P = 0.002), maximum standardized uptake value (-10.7%, P = 0.003), a

7 atic hypertrophy than primary tumors (median maximum standardized uptake value, 2.2 vs. 3.5; P = 0.00

8 igher tracer uptake in TE-11 than TT tumors (maximum standardized uptake value, 24 h: 0.67 +/- 0.09 v

9 detected inflammation in 74 patients (82%) (maximum standardized uptake value, 8.1 +/- 3.9).

10 Regression showed that maximum standardized uptake value and calcium compositio

11 take in the thyroid was semiquantified using maximum standardized uptake value and correlated to the

12 No significant correlation was found between maximum standardized uptake value and TSH (P = 0.09) or

13 og-rank test), which compared favorably with maximum standardized uptake value and tumor volume (haza

14 of 0.71, which was higher than those of the maximum standardized uptake value and tumor volume, with

15 The maximum standardized uptake value and tumor-to-liver upt

16 In the entire group, tumor maximum standardized uptake value and tumor-to-muscle ra

17 s assessed semiquantitatively by determining maximum standardized uptake value and tumor-to-normal br

18 The maximum standardized uptake values and CT HUs of BAT wer

19 The maximum standardized uptake values and CT HUs of BAT wer

20 usion CT, deriving tumor glucose metabolism (maximum standardized uptake value) and regional blood fl

21 Plaque (18)F-FDG uptake was quantified with maximum standardized uptake value, and CT angiography qu

22 and 9 nonresponders using a 42% decrease in maximum standardized uptake value as a cutoff.

23 Maximum standardized uptake value at cycle 1 day 8 corre

24 Reduction of maximum standardized uptake value by at least 35% was pr

25 in which we also examined whether change in maximum standardized uptake values corrected for lean bo

26 Mean maximum standardized uptake value correlated linearly wi

27 method, eg, the change of the difference of maximum standardized uptake value (DeltaSUVmax), is for

28 SULmax (maximum standardized uptake value derived for lean body)

29 Mean maximum standardized uptake values for the hottest voxel

30 n recurrence correlated with higher lesional maximum standardized uptake values: for PFS, P < .0001 t

31 A correlation between maximum standardized uptake value from PET and counting

32 -positive and ERalpha-negative lesions was a maximum standardized uptake value greater than 1.8, whic

33 analysis including all focal lesions with a maximum standardized uptake value > 2.5.

34 higher FDHT uptake (lesion with the highest maximum standardized uptake value) had significantly sho

35 s between patient groups were noted only for maximum standardized uptake value in quadriceps muscles.

36 The maximum standardized uptake value in the primary breast,

37 ardized uptake value, lean (SUV(L MEAN)); or maximum standardized uptake value, lean (SUV(L MAX)), di

38 The mean increase in maximum standardized uptake value, lesion-to-background

39 tumor lesion): mG1, tumor-to-liver ratio of maximum standardized uptake value </= 1.0; mG2, 1.0-2.3;

40 erage standardized uptake value (avgSUV) and maximum standardized uptake value (maxSUV) of changing t

41 ow-up (18)F-FDG PET/CT and the difference in maximum standardized uptake value (n = 11; R(2) = 0.67;

42 ine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake with SUVmax maximum standardized uptake value of 2.2-14.6 (mean, 6.6

43 ptide (PEG3-E[c{RGDyk}]2) uptake with SUVmax maximum standardized uptake value of 2.4-9.4 (mean, 5.6

44 tide (PEG3-E[c{RGDyk}]2) uptake, with SUVmax maximum standardized uptake value of 2.4-9.7 (mean, 5.0

45 ine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake with SUVmax maximum standardized uptake value of 2.8-18.6 (mean, 10.

46 in 15 of 100 patient studies and had a mean maximum standardized uptake value of 4.8 +/- 2.7.

47 ons (95% CI, 92.4% to 96.8%) with an average maximum standardized uptake value of 65.4 +/- 47 (range,

48 The maximum standardized uptake value of brown fat had a sig

49 ake values to assess scanner calibration and maximum standardized uptake values of all 6 lesions to r

50 hymus on axial CT images and measurements of maximum standardized uptake values of anterior mediastin

51 ger patients were more likely to have higher maximum standardized uptake values of brown fat.

52 late these characteristics with the mean and maximum standardized uptake values of brown fat.

53 ions in 22 patients, with a median SUV(max) (maximum standardized uptake value) of 6.9 (range, 2.3-46

54 h AADC expression (n = 15 nonhepatic tumors; maximum standardized uptake value, P = 0.0002; tumor-to-

55 -1 uptake was assessed semiquantitatively by maximum standardized uptake value, ratios of tumor to no

56 (18)F-FDG PET tumor uptake (maximum standardized uptake value, scan 2 - scan 1) corr

57 )Zr-bevacizumab uptake was quantified as the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV max).

58 of 59 lesions (97%), with an average lesion maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) = 5.22.

59 e interpreted both visually and by computing maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) between PET

60 The maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) for lesion

61 Thresholds of 15%-50% the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) have been u

62 The maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) in the prim

63 ponse monitoring studies with (18)F-FDG PET, maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) is commonly

64 In one clinical study, maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) measurement

65 The maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) of all tumo

66 resence, number of lesions, and the size and maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) of the larg

67 PET parameters included maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) of the most

68 We evaluated potential associations between maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) on (18)F-FD

69 Consensus-lesion maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) was highly

70 tatic disease was quantified on the basis of maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)), MATV, and

71 Maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)), mean SUV,

72 tudy was to retrospectively evaluate whether maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)), total lesi

73 lted in an improvement in measurement of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)), which incr

74 assessment typically measures the change in maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)), which is a

75 visual scale and by measuring the myocardial maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)).

76 The mean and maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(mean) and SUV(max

77 For each lesion, the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) and the total le

78 t for Response Criteria in Lymphoma, and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) of the most (18)

79 The maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) of the primary l

80 n glucose (gluc) level corrected mean of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) values ((mean)SU

81 Maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) was calculated f

82 ed-threshold methods at 38%, 50%, and 60% of maximum standardized uptake value (SUV).

83 e is quantified by the PET-derived parameter maximum standardized uptake value (SUV).

84 s measured semiquantitatively in the form of maximum standardized uptake values (SUV(max)) and uptake

85 The maximum standardized uptake values (SUV(max)) of the tum

86 re compared visually and semiquantitatively (maximum standardized uptake value [SUV(max)], mean SUV [

87 tumor uptake was observed with (64)Cu-ATSM (maximum standardized uptake values [SUV(max)], 1.26 +/-

88 otherapy visually and quantitatively by lean maximum standardized uptake value (SUVlean max).

89 o-sample t test was performed to compare the maximum standardized uptake values ( SUVmax maximum stan

90 Global imaging metrics, including maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and total fun

91 FDG uptake in FDG-positive HCC was done with maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and tumor to

92 (NSCLC) tumors that express high normalized maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) are associate

93 The median and range of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) at baseline o

94 was used to calculate the mean difference in maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) between abnor

95 Only (18)F-FDG PET-positive lesions with a maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) greater than

96 The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in malignant

97 Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in pulmonary

98 ke value ratio [SUVr]) was calculated as the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in the tumor

99 In addition to maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) measurements,

100 Lung Cancer has identified both sex and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of (18)F-FDG

101 The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of (18)F-FDG

102 At each individual sampling site, the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of (68)Ga-DOT

103 Sites of abnormal 18F-FDG uptake with a maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of greater th

104 ts, there was an 80% +/- 3% reduction in the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of target les

105 FDG uptake of tumor tissue was quantified by maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the hottes

106 PET/CT parameters were generated, including maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the hottes

107 The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the mass l

108 e was assessed visually and by measuring the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the most i

109 and density (Hounsfield unit [HU]) on CT and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on FDG-PET.

110 ponse, but a semiquantitative approach using maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) reduction bet

111 Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) reductions fr

112 nterquartile range, IQR, 2.0-3.6) and median maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was 7.2 (IQR

113 Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was 8.68 +/-

114 ant, a retention index based on the measured maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was calculate

115 5-point scale from benign to malignant; the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was measured.

116 The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was used to d

117 We measured the highest maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), defined as t

118 CT largest diameter, CT volume, maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), mean SUV (SU

119 The PET parameters maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tu

120 Metabolic activity defined by the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tu

121 HAC and RS patients had higher maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), more frequen

122 Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), peak standar

123 on the pretreatment and posttreatment scans: maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), peak SUV (SU

124 s, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), PET maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), SI on T2-wei

125 A CTE severity score, maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), SUVmax ratio

126 -fresolimumab tumor uptake was quantified as maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax).

127 )Zr-bevacizumab uptake was quantified by the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax).

128 PET parameters included MTV and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax).

129 We assessed the impact of 2 PET parameters, maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) and total le

130 lesion level, visually and quantitatively by maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) for both tra

131 s from DCE MR imaging data and compared with maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) from FDG PET

132 as quantified and compared by calculation of maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) using volume

133 The size and maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) were measure

134 The prognostic value of percentage of maximum standardized uptake value (%SUVmax) remaining in

135 lyzed all scans visually and quantitatively (maximum standardized uptake value [SUVmax] and maximum t

136 were identified by the SUVmaxavg (average of maximum standardized uptake value [SUVmax] for up to 5 t

137 sess an appropriate threshold (percentage of maximum standardized uptake value [SUVmax]) to delineate

138 for each tumor: (18)F-FDG uptake ((18)F-FDG maximum standardized uptake value [SUVmax]), CT texture

139 t differ significantly between both methods (maximum standardized uptake value [SUVmax], +7% +/- 13 f

140 ton emission tomography (PET)/CT parameters (maximum standardized uptake value [SUVmax], total metabo

141 olunteers and to compare (18)F FSPG mean and maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmean and SUVmax,

142 Mean and maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmean and SUVmax,

143 a showed up to a 24% variation in the lesion maximum standardized uptake values (SUVs) between EI and

144 n findings were positive when adrenal lesion maximum standardized uptake values (SUVs) exceeded hepat

145 F-FDG PET/CT studies were analyzed; mean and maximum standardized uptake values (SUVs) in manually dr

146 Maximum standardized uptake values (SUVs) were recorded

147 TMTV was computed by using the 41% maximum standardized uptake value thresholding method, a

148 independent and masked interpreters measured maximum standardized uptake values to quantify metabolic

149 Maximum standardized uptake values, tumor-to-normal cont

150 The mean tumor-to-background ratio for maximum standardized uptake value was 20.4 +/- 17.3 (ran

151 an increase +/- standard deviation in lesion maximum standardized uptake value was 42.2% +/- 38.9 bet

152 of vemurafenib, and the median reduction in maximum standardized uptake value was 63.5% (range, 41.3

153 The maximum standardized uptake value was measured in corres

154 Tumor maximum standardized uptake value was not significantly

155 When the maximum standardized uptake value was set at 3.6, the se

156 The maximum standardized uptake value was significantly high

157 The median of maximum standardized uptake values was 8.5 (range, 1.3-3

158 On quantitative analysis, maximum standardized uptake values was greater in mechan

159 Mean and maximum standardized uptake value were also included.

160 Tumor maximum standardized uptake values were assessed by volu

161 Maximum standardized uptake values were calculated.

162 Tumor maximum standardized uptake values were measured for a m

163 Maximum standardized uptake values were recorded in the

164 uptake was quantified by measurement of the maximum standardized uptake value within a lesion (SUVma