ライフサイエンスコーパス: maze

1 (rotarod) and spatial cognitive functions (Y-maze).

2 orced-choice task in an automated modified T-maze.

3 continuously about the spatial layout of the maze.

4 ad polarized light cues in a four-arm "plus" maze.

5 as open-arm exploration in the elevated plus maze.

6 of three goal locations daily in a multiwell maze.

7 ge of AD in their respective versions of the maze.

8 (low-anxiety phenotype) in the elevated plus maze.

9 non-spatial cue learning on the Morris water maze.

10 working memory evaluated using a radial arm maze.

11 wo behavioral tests, Y maze and Morris water maze.

12 structure reflected the segmentation of the maze.

13 avior in restraint rats in the elevated plus maze.

14 conserved mode for the inhibition of MazF by MazE.

15 memory were then tested in the Morris water maze.

16 ered by spatial learning in the Morris water maze.

17 guide these swimmers through a microfluidic maze.

18 nd mPFC of mice performing a SWM task in a T-maze.

19 ed through binding to its cognate antitoxin, MazE.

20 task in a reward-based alternate trajectory maze.

21 ce exhibited preserved learning on the water maze.

22 d they learned faster to navigate in a water maze.

23 ient to improve the performance in the water maze.

24 long-term spatial memory in the Morris water maze.

25 activity and impairments in the Morris water maze.

26 underwent training for 1 d in a Morris water maze.

27 rmance on the stress-associated Morris water maze.

28 tial memory was investigated on a radial arm maze.

29 e animals as measured with the elevated plus maze.

30 long-term spatial memory in the Morris water maze.

31 xtual fear conditioning and the Morris water maze.

32 ect/place recognition and alternation in a Y-maze.

33 sing a latent learning paradigm in a complex maze.

34 ke a simple spatial discrimination using a T-maze.

35 the passive avoidance task and elevated plus maze.

36 by the open field test and the elevated plus maze.

37 ory when investigated using the Morris water maze.

38 nts retention of spatial memory in the water maze.

39 ssify spatial strategies in the Morris water maze.

40 jected to eight learning sessions in a water maze.

41 the hAPP model and use of the virtual water maze.

42 fear conditioning and in the Barnes circular maze.

43 in an open field box and in an elevated plus maze.

44 was evaluated by the use of eight-arm radial maze.

45 after sleep on one of two unique 3D spatial mazes.

46 he structure of the heterohexameric (MazF)2-(MazE)2-(MazF)2 complex in Bacillus subtilis, supplemente

47 resent a virtual version of the Morris water maze (a common test of spatial learning and memory for r

48 virtual reality version of the Morris water maze, a task involved participants having to swim throug

49 ic spatial navigation using the Morris water maze, a task well known to require dorsal hippocampal in

50 er in the marble burying task, elevated zero maze, acoustic startle response, and forced swim test.

51 The rotarod and Barnes maze acquisition and probe tests were performed within 2

52 or rolipram (0.03 mg/kg) 30 min before water maze acquisition or cue and contextual fear conditioning

53 accuracy and response time, particularly in mazes affording sequential choices.

54 mutated to Ala) mice were tested in a water maze after chronic naltrexone administration.

55 the elevated plus maze and deficits in the T-maze alteration reward test-a task dependent on hippocam

56 al memory task analogous to the Morris water maze and a mirror-tracing procedural memory control task

57 omes as assessed by Rotarod and Morris Water Maze and a reduction in positive Fluoro-Jade B stained i

58 -like behavior assessed in the elevated-plus maze and acoustic startle test, including marked attenua

59 2a gene resulted in severe deficits in water maze and contextual fear learning, whereas mice with del

60 uring the reversal phase of the Morris water maze and deficits in a delayed nonmatch to place T-maze

61 d anxiety-like behavior in the elevated plus maze and deficits in the T-maze alteration reward test-a

62 d anxiety-like behavior in the elevated plus maze and in a light/dark box.

63 s was found to improve learning in the water maze and in object-place recognition.

64 d time in the open arms of the elevated plus maze and increased immobility during the tail suspension

65 -dependent effects on anxiety (elevated plus maze and light/dark box), motor coordination (narrow bea

66 suggest to designate Ssl2245 and Sll1130 as MazE and MazF, respectively.

67 f123aIN/23aIN mice performed poorly on the T-maze and Morris water maze tests, which measure short- a

68 mproved functional recovery on elevated plus maze and Morris water maze, concomitant with reductions

69 unctioning were assessed using elevated plus maze and Morris water maze, respectively.

70 d memory assessed by two behavioral tests, Y maze and Morris water maze.

71 Modified Morris water maze and neurological severity score (mNSS) test were pe

72 ic mice, memory was assessed by Morris water maze and novel object recognition.

73 assessed using the open-field, elevated plus maze and novelty-suppressed feeding tests.

74 earning and memory as examined by the Barnes maze and object location memory tasks.

75 xiolytic phenotype in both the elevated plus maze and open field tests, and increased the startle res

76 , an anxiogenic profile in the elevated plus-maze and open field tests, and reduced social exploratio

77 d anxiety-like behavior on the elevated plus maze and open field.

78 the observed behavior in the rotarod, water maze and peripheral nerve injury tests was possibly affe

79 nsity to avoid open arms in an elevated-plus maze and sign-trackers (ST) that are prone to approach,

80 The Morris water maze and the Barnes maze are the most commonly used tech

81 performance in both the virtual Morris water maze and the CANTAB paired associates learning.

82 uding central area time in the elevated plus maze and thigmotaxis in the open field test revealed inc

83 eneral forms of planar network-random loops, mazes and trees-on the surface of self-assembled DNA ori

84 ovel object recognition, dual solution cross-maze) and also showed markedly reduced levels of anxiety

85 hippocampal-dependent spatial (Morris water maze) and associative (contextual fear conditioning) mem

86 ing strategies in long-term reference (water maze) and working memory (Y-maze) tasks presented at 6 m

87 ry flexibility, assessed in the Morris water maze, and a significant disruption of long-term potentia

88 me spent in the open arm of an elevated plus maze, and an odor aversion associated with early-life fo

89 trols in Morris water maze, radial arm water maze, and fear conditioning.

90 re assessed in the open-field, elevated-plus-maze, and forced swim tests.

91 ting behaviors based on passive avoidance, T-Maze, and nesting behavior tests.

92 g contextual fear-conditioning, Morris water maze, and novel object recognition tests.

93 training on the spatial version of the water maze, and retention was examined 24 h later.

94 the AbrB transition state regulator and the MazE antitoxin and MraW is known to methylate the 16S rR

95 The Morris water maze and the Barnes maze are the most commonly used techniques to assess spa

96 motor (rotarod) and cognitive (Morris water maze) assays compared to controls.

97 ested memory performance in the Morris water maze at 21 months of age.

98 and memory were assessed using Morris water mazes at 3 and 4 months of losartan treatment.

99 AD mice in cognitive ability, as assessed by maze-based behavioral tests.

100 Animals were then tested on a cross-maze-based reversal learning and set-shifting task, afte

101 non-Tg mice exploring the novel arm of the Y maze because of spatial memory impairments (P < .05).

102 I NRG1 improves deficits in the Morris water-maze behavioral task.

103 ct recognition and less severe deficits in Y-maze behaviors.

104 n both groups, measured on the elevated plus maze, but did not affect mechanical hypersensitivity obs

105 l mazes with one (shallow maze) or two (deep maze) choice points.

106 paired reversal learning in the Morris water maze compared to their wild-type littermates, which was

107 heir firing fields across visually identical maze compartments [1, 2].

108 Furthermore, the improvement in maze completion time significantly positively correlated

109 vity in the anterior hippocampus scaled with maze complexity but not size.

110 overy on elevated plus maze and Morris water maze, concomitant with reductions in elevated proinflamm

111 fic behavioural tests (object location and Y-maze continuous alternation tasks) demonstrate that this

112 which cannot be derived from typical Barnes maze data analysis.

113 ing effects as measured on the elevated plus-maze, despite stress-induced gut microbiota changes char

114 ying bees trained to walk into a miniature Y-maze displaying these stimuli in a dark environment lear

115 core reverses its polarization on crossing a maze domain boundary.

116 ne Permalloy film coexists with out-of-plane maze domains in a Co/Pd multilayer.

117 vior in two anxiety paradigms, elevated plus maze (EPM) and fear conditioning.

118 radigm has advantages over the elevated plus-maze (EPM) paradigm with respect to measuring anxiety, y

119 In the elevated plus maze (EPM), AgNS-exposed rats showed greater number of e

120 In this issue of Neuron, Maze et al. (2015) establish histone H3.3 turnover as a

121 iorally stimulated hippocampal ACh efflux or maze exploration (Experiment 1).

122 ker-dependent or -related tests, including Y-maze exploration, horizontal surface approach, bridge cr

123 also occur during brief locomotor pauses in maze exploration, where they appear to support learning

124 agonists to rats tested in the elevated zero-maze (EZM) model of anxiety.

125 tiation [LTP]), and behavioral (Morris water maze, fear-conditioning) approaches.

126 or of flies walking individually in Y-shaped mazes, focusing on variability in locomotor handedness,

127 In contrast, the changes in elevated O-maze, forced-swim, Y-maze spontaneous alternation and no

128 reference) and aversive (i.e., elevated plus-maze, FST) circumstances was then assessed 2 months afte

129 tressors including open-field, elevated plus maze, holeboard, light-dark box and novel object recogni

130 Stand-alone, right 5 cm minithoracotomy, Cox maze III/IV procedure for nonparoxysmal AF was conducted

131 anxiety-like responses in the elevated plus maze in adulthood.

132 in complex with mRNA substrate and antitoxin MazE in Bacillus subtilis.

133 Rats were trained on a plus maze in either a spatial navigation or a cue-response ta

134 ere isolated for rats exploring a radial-arm maze in one environment, and then the rats were fear-con

135 anges when the mouse was tested in different mazes in the same room.

136 ance measures of animals in the Morris Water Maze include the escape latency, and the cumulative dist

137 s time in the open arms of the elevated plus maze, indicating high levels of innate fear and anxiety.

138 aired reversal learning in a modified Barnes maze, indicative of decreased PFC-dependent behavioral f

139 areful study design and analysis, the Morris maze is a sensitive assay for detecting AD-relevant impa

140 The Morris Water Maze is a widely used task in studies of spatial learnin

141 d anxiety-like behavior in the elevated plus maze is dampened.

142 electrochemical growth in a 3D periodic nano-maze is found to cause facet formation of an intrinsical

143 The Cox-Maze IV is currently the gold standard for surgical trea

144 With the introduction of the Cox-Maze IV procedure utilizing bipolar radiofrequency ablat

145 mance, as quantified by reduced Morris water maze latencies on Days 29-32 post-ICH.

146 rphological plasticity which correspond to T-maze learning stages, and which may play a role in the c

147 mary efficacy outcome measure was the Groton Maze Learning Task (GMLT; executive function) of the Cog

148 ing cells of different types, migrating in a maze-like environment with directional cue.

149 memory encoding: what (food flavor), where (maze location), source (self-generated food seeking-runn

150 ormative about task features (trial type and maze locations) changed across days.

151 dly reduced levels of anxiety (elevated plus maze, marble burying, novelty suppressed feeding).

152 es out cleavage and how the formation of the MazE-MazF complex inactivates MazF remain unclear.

153 performance of mice in a place recognition Y-maze model, an effect fully reversible by coadministrati

154 As learning was better in the maze, movement freedom, active vision and behavioral con

155 havioral tests (open field and elevated plus maze), mRGC activation induced behaviors commonly interp

156 memory test in the forms of the Morris water maze (MWM) and contextual fear conditioning at 85 weeks

157 e function was assessed using a Morris water maze (MWM) paradigm.

158 ment in marble burying (MB) and Morris water maze (MWM) tests.

159 We used the Morris water maze (MWM) to test for time of day differences in refere

160 mory deficits, as determined by Morris water maze (MWM), in aged mice.

161 ficantly reduced performance in Morris Water Maze (MWM), long-term memory (LTM) contextual fear testi

162 wed impaired performance in the Morris water maze (MWM), which was accompanied by lower expression of

163 as was their learning, as assessed by Barnes maze navigation, object-location memory, and both contex

164 in spatial tasks dependent on hippocampus (Y-maze, novel object recognition, dual solution cross-maze

165 poor performance in the Morris water maze, Y-maze, novel objective recognition, step-down passive avo

166 sights into the classic and sometimes arcane maze of national databases and methodologies used to det

167 sense suggests that networks are not random mazes of purposeless connections, but that these connect

168 anxiety-like phenotype in the elevated plus maze, open field, and light/dark box tests, and they wer

169 lower levels of anxiety in the elevated plus maze, opposing the known high anxiety in constitutive DO

170 anxiety-like responses in the elevated plus maze or basal acoustic startle amplitude.

171 gle-trial fear conditioning or elevated plus maze or sacrificed for basal diurnal corticosterone and

172 h to a goal in novel mazes with one (shallow maze) or two (deep maze) choice points.

173 novel object recognition in open field and V-maze paradigms), anhedonic behaviours (sucrose preferenc

174 We observed improvements in maze performance after a night of normal sleep that were

175 S1 mice develop deficits in radial-arm water maze performance and novel object recognition as early a

176 a significant impairment in radial arm water maze performance compared with sham KI mice or injured w

177 ased locomotor activity, inferior cued water maze performance, decreased running wheel ability, and a

178 anxiolytic actions and did not affect water-maze performance.

179 its at 6 and 12 months, as demonstrated by Y-maze performance.

180 evels in the mPFC and improved alternation T-maze performance.

181 olation and those who underwent the biatrial maze procedure (61.0% and 66.0%, respectively; P=0.60).

182 , 5.87 [CI, 3.18 to 10.85]) and the surgical maze procedure (including pulmonary vein isolation) done

183 s 44% for ablation patients and 75% with the Maze procedure (P<0.001).

184 on-pump, minimally invasive, stand-alone Cox maze procedure 5 years after surgery.

185 =78]) and AF catheter ablation (n=49) or the Maze procedure at surgical myectomy (n=72).

186 ong surgical approaches to treat AF, the Cox maze procedure performed using alternative energy source

187 on to pulmonary-vein isolation or a biatrial maze procedure.

188 long-term efficacy of minimally invasive Cox maze procedures should be noted.

189 ibuted along a common path in a continuous T-maze (providing all four combinations of provenance and

190 he level of healthy controls in Morris water maze, radial arm water maze, and fear conditioning.

191 stris, using an adaptation of the radial-arm maze (RAM).

192 d time in the open arms of the elevated plus maze relative to control mice.

193 ed using elevated plus maze and Morris water maze, respectively.

194 ed spatial learning performance in the water maze, restored resting-state functional connectivity, an

195 e and contextual fear conditioning and water maze retention.

196 cantly outperformed low and medium groups on maze reversal, a particularly challenging task that dete

197 In the Morris water maze, rifampicin at 1 mg/day improved memory of the mice

198 ns that, instead, fired most strongly before maze running showed elevated pre-start firing rates, but

199 vated pre-start firing rates, but not during maze running, as learning progressed.

200 ion neurons with strong responses during the maze runs had especially elevated responsiveness during

201 specially elevated responsiveness during the maze runs.

202 The garnet film had maze-shaped magnetic domains, and the domain walls disap

203 on, cognitive domains to be tested and which mazes should be utilized to test these cognitive domains

204 within the posterior hippocampus scaled with maze size but not complexity, whereas activity in the an

205 on exploratory behavior in the elevated plus-maze, somatic mechanical threshold, and the autonomic an

206 nation, novel object recognition, and Barnes maze spatial memory tests.

207 Sprague Dawley rats were trained on a water maze spatial task at two different water temperatures (1

208 vel-object recognition test and Morris water-maze spatial task compared to sham.

209 displayed by Ophn1-deficient mice using a Y-maze spatial working memory (SWM) test.

210 e changes in elevated O-maze, forced-swim, Y-maze spontaneous alternation and novel-object recognitio

211 ory tested in the object-placement and the Y-maze spontaneous alternation tasks.

212 y prevented cognitive decline evaluated by Y-maze spontaneous alternation, novel object recognition,

213 g sequences match the structure of a complex maze, suggesting that the structure of the environment i

214 strategy selection after a cue-guided water maze task and competition testing performed 1 or 24 h la

215 mpairments in the reversal phase of a Barnes maze task and in hippocampal synaptic plasticity, withou

216 ning and memory, as measured by Morris water maze task during 1-5 days after exposure to anesthesia.

217 sly reported work aversion in an effortful T-maze task following a binge exposure to methamphetamine,

218 answer this question, we trained mice on a T-maze task in which they chose between a high-cost, high-

219 Limitations of the T-maze task include its two available options, with an eff

220 hose with the best memory in a spatial water maze task remapped the least.

221 of CA3 and CA1 neurons in rats performing a maze task that demanded working memory and a control tas

222 orroborate these findings, we developed an L-maze task that is less complex and is performed entirely

223 al learning and hippocampal coding in a plus maze task that requires both structures.

224 earning in a delayed matching to place water maze task was also not affected by the loss of FMRP in r

225 amine on reward choices in a novel effortful maze task with three possible courses of action, each as

226 tings or implicit trust behaviour in a novel maze task, and no effects of group status or interaction

227 In this study, using the Morris water maze task, we demonstrate that IL-13-deficient mice are

228 In the elevated plus maze task, we found that HT mice after seizures displaye

229 By using a Y-maze task, we show that the position of a neutral cue, p

230 ly or extensively trained on a directional T-maze task.

231 obtain larger rewards on our novel effortful maze task.

232 ability and improvements on a virtual water maze task.

233 nd deficits in a delayed nonmatch to place T-maze task.

234 pondent as the animals learned a conditional maze task.

235 hibit contrasting dynamics as rats acquire T-maze tasks.

236 cal and striatal habit sites as rats learned maze tasks.

237 reference (water maze) and working memory (Y-maze) tasks presented at 6 months, and were distinct fro

238 astened neurocognitive recovery in the Water-Maze test (15/26 vs 9/26 mice with competence to perform

239 cognitive deficit as assessed by the Barnes maze test (P < 0.0001-0.001).

240 Ketone-fed rats completed an 8-arm radial maze test 38% faster than did those on the other diets,

241 ted using Morris Water Maze Test, Radial Arm Maze Test and AChE activity in scopolamine induced amnet

242 nxiety levels evaluated by the elevated plus-maze test and CeA/LA activity.

243 d anxiety-like behavior in the elevated plus maze test and elevated intracranial self-stimulation thr

244 d the development of cognitive deficits in Y-maze test and improved synaptic parameters.

245 d cognitive impairment as shown in the water maze test and step-down test.

246 In the Morris water maze test GluD1 KO mice showed no difference in acquisit

247 Morris water maze test showed that both CCI and S-CCI produced persis

248 resulted in retained cognition (Morris water maze test), decreased amyloid-beta plaque burden, and re

249 In the Barnes maze test, mSOD1 mice displayed a delay in learning, out

250 models of anxiety, namely the elevated plus maze test, open field test, and food neophobia test.

251 ic efficacy was evaluated using Morris Water Maze Test, Radial Arm Maze Test and AChE activity in sco

252 ning and memory, as measured by Morris water maze test, whereas free DHA had no effect.

253 d entries and duration in the novel arm of Y maze test, with acute onset and various timecourse.

254 spatial reference memory in the Morris water maze test.

255 ter percent alternation in the spontaneous Y-maze test.

256 Locomotor activity and elevated plus maze test/forced swim test were conducted on Week 5; ven

257 4, P = 0.01) and a trend in problem solving (mazes test: P = 0.06).

258 In addition, Morris water maze testing showed increased latency to locate a hidden

259 ontextual fear-conditioning and Morris water maze tests compared with wild-type controls.

260 ts), anxiety (black and white, elevated plus maze tests), aggressiveness (resident-intruder test), an

261 formed poorly on the T-maze and Morris water maze tests, which measure short- and long-term spatial m

262 exhibited preserved memory function in water maze tests.

263 , measured by novel object recognition and Y-maze tests.

264 es in the novel open field and elevated plus-maze tests.

265 in the novel object/place recognition and Y-maze tests.

266 reference, tail suspension, or elevated plus maze tests.

267 s assessed by novel object recognition and Y-maze tests.

268 more motile in open field and elevated plus maze than control rats, and they learned faster to navig

269 rains of simple organisms living in a planar maze that they have to traverse as rapidly as possible.

270 f anxiety-like behavior in the elevated plus maze that were correlated with BLA neuronal excitability

271 ent to which performance in the Morris water maze - the most frequently used behavioral assay of spat

272 f anxiety-like behavior in the elevated plus maze, the light/dark box, and the open field test.

273 Both groups learned to navigate the maze to find hidden rewards, but group differences in ne

274 cues to navigate a virtual eight-arm radial maze to find hidden rewards.

275 nstances--decreased as the animals navigated mazes to reach remote rewards, rather than having phasic

276 exhibited substructure that mapped onto the maze topology.

277 ction of IL-13, whereas neither Morris water maze-trained IL-4 nor trained IL-13-deficient mice were

278 pocampus, which was impaired in Morris water maze-trained IL-4- and IL-13-deficient mice.

279 Moreover, Morris water maze-trained wild-type mice were able to increase astroc

280 cue and contextual fear conditioning, water maze training and a spatial working memory task.

281 To pursue this question, we used T-maze training during which rats transition from early, a

282 dressing this issue, we tested whether water maze training influences the gene expression response to

283 Although water maze training itself also regulated nearly 1800 genes, t

284 ation was provided in conjunction with water maze training, combined treatment had no effect on synap

285 EB or control virus, before undergoing water maze training.

286 port vector machine-based, automated, Barnes-maze unbiased strategy (BUNS) classification algorithm,

287 mination of performance on the elevated plus maze under conditions designed to minimize stress reveal

288 he BUNS algorithm can greatly benefit Barnes maze users as it provides a standardized method of strat

289 t stress, forced swimming, and elevated plus maze) was assessed.

290 ater escape device for rodents, the double-H maze, we demonstrated in rats that a bilateral muscimol

291 nxiety-related behaviors in an elevated plus maze were assessed in postpartum rats after administrati

292 pen field, marble burying, and elevated plus maze) were higher, which were alleviated by LHb inhibiti

293 mber of cells that succeed in migration in a maze, which mimics the extracellular environment.

294 1 month, spatial memory was tested in the Y maze with the novel arm prior to sacrifice and immunohis

295 n plans the shortest path to a goal in novel mazes with one (shallow maze) or two (deep maze) choice

296 tioning of the C-terminal helical segment of MazE within the RNA-binding channel of the MazF dimer pr

297 on (but not acquisition) in the Morris water maze, without influencing contextual fear-motivated lear

298 rinking predicted worse performance on the T-maze working memory task in adulthood (Experiment 3).

299 ion task and a prefrontal cortex-dependent T-maze working memory task.

300 nced by poor performance in the Morris water maze, Y-maze, novel objective recognition, step-down pas