コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 he Kaplan-Meier method to estimate patients' median survival time.
2 nd 10-year survival probability and estimate median survival time.
3 d 10-year survival probability and estimated median survival time.
4 nt high-dose cisplatin lavage had a 26-month median survival time.
5 hallenge, ZWC more than doubles the animals' median survival time.
6 ction was associated with a 5.5% increase in median survival time.
7 , as measured by bioluminescent imaging, and median survival time.
8 ting brain tumor with poor prognosis and low median survival time.
10 nd light chain-only (LCO) patients had worse median survival times (1.9 years) than patients with IgA
11 h LIG4 rs7325927 (V) had the worst survival (median survival time, 1.2 years) and exhibited the highe
13 exacerbated in C57BL/6-Kit(W-sh/W-sh) mice (median survival time = 13 vs 60 days in wild-type [WT] m
14 CMV retinitis was associated with mortality (median survival time, 13.6 vs. 29.7 months; P=.007).CONC
15 ients ultimately develop gradual graft loss (median survival time = 140 d), suggesting that alloreact
16 /- CD4+ T cells acutely rejected allografts (median survival time 15 days), whereas recipients recons
17 postoperative administration of LTbetaR-Ig (median survival time: 18 vs. >50 d, respectively, P=0.00
18 nvasion and worse disease-specific survival (median survival time 20.3 versus 43.9 months, log-rank P
20 s 11% +/- 6% for vehicle-treated recipients (median survival time, 25 days) versus 63% +/- 12% for re
21 in patients diagnosed in more recent years (median survival time 3.3 years [95% CI 3.0-3.8] in 2001
22 iously reported IDEC-131-treated allografts, median survival time (35 +/- 31 days) was significantly
23 ared with patients without response (n = 61; median survival time, 35.6 months v not reached, respect
25 was markedly prolonged in BALB/c recipients (median survival time, 37 and 15 days, respectively; p <
26 cal follow-up showed a significantly shorter median survival time (4.1 y, age-adjusted hazard ratios
27 cinogenesis was lowest in the control group (median survival time, 40 weeks) and highest in the group
32 he two arms of the study with respect to the median survival time (6.3 months for the gemcitabine plu
33 with better-than-expected survival (14-month median survival time; 61% 1-year, 32% 2-year, and 30% pr
34 pathCR or pathPR had a significantly longer median survival time (63.9 months) than those achieving
35 eceiving hemodynamic support alone survived (median survival times 65 vs 85 hours, respectively; P =
36 .9%) compared with etoposide plus cisplatin (median survival time, 7.6 months; 1-year survival rate,
39 blockade in addition to lethal irradiation (median survival time, 81 days) when compared to mice tha
40 was 65% overall, 48% in the BDex+AA cohort (median survival time 821 days), and 76% in patients who
41 ion (4.1 v 4.6 months), or overall survival (median survival time, 9.3 months v 10.2 months; P = .74)
42 erved with the combined paclitaxel regimens (median survival time, 9.9 months; 1-year survival rate,
49 ast 8.2% of the subjects in this cohort, and median survival times among men with LOY were 5.5 years
51 With a minimum follow-up of 24 months, the median survival time and 1- and 2-year survival rates we
52 The overall response rate was 60%, with a median survival time and 1-year survival probability of
53 Response rate was the primary end point; median survival time and 1-year survival rate were secon
55 ediction was assessed by using difference in median survival time and area under the curve with time-
57 ligonucleotides (Group 3) did not affect the median survival time and the 35-day survival rate as com
61 h R0, R1 (<1 mm), and R1 (direct) status the median survival times and 5-year survival rates were 41.
62 etween percent maximal cytoreduction and log median survival time, and this correlation remained sign
64 r differentiation according to difference in median survival time between high- and low-risk groups (
75 an time to progression was 21 weeks, and the median survival time for all patients was 19.9 months.
83 In an exact-matched case analysis (n = 38), median survival time for RSR13 patients was 7.3 months v
88 treated controls (P < 0.0001); corresponding median survival times for groups b, c, and d were 36 (P
91 spholipase A(2) IVa) (Group 4) increased the median survival time from 6 to 35 days and the 35-day su
95 survived at the study endpoint, leading to a median survival time greater than 83 days (at least 32%
98 At a median follow-up of 30.2 months, the median survival time has not been reached and the 2-year
99 After the amendment to add bevacizumab, the median survival time has not yet been reached for FOLFIR
100 unistic illness (OI) diagnosed in 1984-1997, median survival time improved from 11 months for 1984 di
101 ART to 57% in the HAART era (P = .0006), and median survival time improved from 8.3 to 43.2 months (P
102 Among patients with stage-specific data, the median survival time improved from 84 months (95% CI, 81
105 amelteon or melatonin significantly improved median survival time in rats (sepsis/melatonin [0.1 mg/k
116 arrow cells displayed a significantly longer median survival time (MST) compared with mice that recei
118 ct against host-type breast cancer cells, as median survival time (MST) increased from 25.6 +/- 2.6 (
119 R mice accepted K skin grafts with increased median survival time (MST) more than 169 days compared t
124 tment with MPA-loaded nanogels increased the median survival time (MST) of lupus-prone NZB/W F1 mice
130 with recipients infused with wild-type SPC (median survival time (MST): 38 vs. 92 days, P=0.02).
131 marrow cells (1.0x10(5) cells per recipient, median survival time (MST)=41 days vs. 2.5x10(7) cells p
132 metB mutant were highly virulent, with mouse median survival times (MST) of 28.5 and 42 days, respect
134 Donor-specific islet grafts were accepted (median survival time [MST] > 180 days, n=6), whereas all
135 on of CIITA greatly enhanced graft survival (median survival time [MST] 36 days) over the survival of
136 compared with treatment with vehicle alone (median survival time [MST] AR-C117977 treated 15; 19 and
137 nificantly delayed by CD8+ T-cell depletion (median survival time [MST], 35 days) when compared to un
138 tched animals that rejected skin in 11 days (median survival time [MST], n=6) and hearts in 35 days (
140 ) in eyes of normal BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice (median survival times, MST, 16 and 10 days, respectively
142 therapeutic advances, which have doubled the median survival time, myeloma continues to be a mostly i
144 with stable or progressive disease (n = 56; median survival time, not reached v 36 months, respectiv
145 e clinician better outcomes than the current median survival time of 1 year for patients with sclerod
146 hose with an SUVr of at least 2.5, who had a median survival time of 10.1 (95% CI: 2.4, 15.9; P = .00
147 <or= 4.9 x 10(-3) (40 of 50 patients) had a median survival time of 10.2 months, compared with 1.9 m
148 deaths from lung cancer were documented with median survival time of 10.3 months (interquartile range
151 H-SRT was well tolerated and resulted in a median survival time of 11 months after H-SRT, independe
152 nths), 71.6% of patients were deceased, with median survival time of 11 months for those who died.
154 aster than single-mutant littermates, with a median survival time of 136 days (versus 158 days in p53
155 the central nervous system associated with a median survival time of 15 months, even with aggressive
157 ths, 55 patients (76%) have died, yielding a median survival time of 18.3 months (95% CI, 14.6 to 22.
158 ion of 8.7 months, response rate of 45%, and median survival time of 19.5 months were observed for FO
159 sepsis without any treatment (Group 1) had a median survival time of 2 days and a zero (0) percent su
160 9 to detect a 33% increase over the expected median survival time of 21 months (one-sided P = .025, l
161 r final cohort included 118 patients, with a median survival time of 21 months from the time of recur
162 5% maximal cytoreduction had a mean weighted median survival time of 22.7 months, whereas cohorts wit
163 tients with SUVr of less than 1.7, who had a median survival time of 23.1 months (95% confidence inte
164 rvival was noted in CCR2-/- recipients, with median survival time of 24 and 12 days for CCR2-/- and W
166 0), and 5-8 (n=17) unfavorable genotypes had median survival time of 24.2, 16.4, 14.4, 9.6, and 7.4 m
170 eceived a salvage autotransplantation; their median survival time of 30 months was only slightly bett
171 5% maximal cytoreduction had a mean weighted median survival time of 33.9 months--an increase of 50%.
174 peritoneal (IP) chemotherapy have reported a median survival time of 49 to 63 months and 2-year survi
177 is with antibiotic treatment (Group 2) had a median survival time of 6 days and a 35-day survival rat
178 oma, a rapidly progressing malignancy with a median survival time of 6 to 9 months, have previously r
179 Although D2 skin grafts were rejected with a median survival time of 63.8 days in B10.A mice given AL
181 n follow-up time of 53 months, the actuarial median survival time of all eligible patients was 38.5 m
185 fibrinogen-coated oil droplets improved the median survival time of B16F10 melanoma-bearing mice fro
186 10-30 mg/kg/day significantly increased the median survival time of BN heart allografts from 7 to 18
187 t 20-30 mg/kg/day significantly extended the median survival time of BN kidney allograft recipients f
193 carcinomas revealed a striking reduction in median survival time of patients with high beta6 express
194 prevalence of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, median survival time of patients, and potential risk fac
196 ll registered patients was 9 months, and the median survival time of resected patients was 13 months.
197 and breast cancer xenografts and doubled the median survival time of TCL1-Tg:p53(-/-) mice, which dev
198 mg/kg intraperitoneally, tid) prolonged the median survival time of the BMT recipients to 56 days.
200 ions, were used to assess the effects on log median survival time of the proportion of each cohort un
203 ; 95.34% CI, 0.713 to 0.937; P = .0032) with median survival times of 13.50 versus 12.06 months, resp
204 rolonged allograft survival (P=0.0007), with median survival times of 14.5 days for Neoral alone, 7 d
205 CNSL face a particularly poor prognosis with median survival times of 2-12 months despite aggressive
206 e, two, or three or more at-risk alleles had median survival times of 27.5, 14.4, and 9.9 months, res
207 with those without diabetes (P < .001), with median survival times of 3 months for long-term diabetic
208 five, and six to seven adverse genotypes had median survival times of 36.2, 23.9, 16.3, 13.0, and 8.3
211 s, with the highly significant difference in median survival times of 68 and >216 months, respectivel
212 with those without diabetes (P = .02), with median survival times of 9 months for long-term diabetic
216 ound an overall survival trend favoring TEM; median survival times of patients treated with DTIC and
218 estimated the time ratio (relative change in median survival time) per 100 working level months (rado
220 treating early-stage micrometastases, giving median survival times similar to those obtained with ant
221 than 25% MCM2 immunoreactivity had a longer median survival time than patients with > or = 25% MCM2
222 Animals that received FUS+DOX (N=8) had a median survival time that was increased significantly (P
224 d antibody-conjugated liposome (b) increased median survival time to 38 days (P = 0.0002 relative to
225 tment with 120 muCi (213)Bi-7.16.4 increased median survival time to 41 days compared with 28 days fo
226 limus but not by CsA at the equivalent dose (median survival time: untreated, 6 days; tacrolimus, 18
227 classical predisposing host factors, and the median survival time was <4 months after diagnosis.
230 low-up of 28.5 months (for living patients), median survival time was 11.8 months (95% CI, 7.4 to 19.
236 median follow-up of 14 months, the predicted median survival time was 14 months, and the 1-year survi
238 after a diagnosis of esophageal cancer, the median survival time was 14.9 months (IQR, 7.1-52.3 mo)
242 low-, intermediate-, and high-dose arms, the median survival time was 16, 14, and 13 months, respecti
250 od of 23 months (range, 9 to 40 months), the median survival time was 22.3 months (95% confidence int
251 , with a median follow-up time of 27 months, median survival time was 23 months for gefitinib (n = 11
255 signed to receive Sr-89 and doxorubicin, the median survival time was 27.7 months (4.9-37.7), and for
258 years [SD 7.2], 54% female, 91% white), the median survival time was 3.8 years (95% CI 3.5-3.8).
261 hs (range, 7.7 to >or= 42.0 months), and the median survival time was 35.8 months (range, 8.8 to >or=
264 At a median follow-up time of 10 months, median survival time was 42 weeks (95% CI, 19.1 to 86.6
273 ee survival was 2.9 months for each arm, and median survival time was 8.3 versus 7.9 months (P = not
276 s 2.3 months (95% CI, 2.1 to 2.6 months) and median survival time was 8.9 months (95% CI, 6.2 to 12.6
280 Results were considered promising if the median survival time was at least 21 months and of no fu
283 ficacy was greater in the MM model, in which median survival time was increased more than 4.5-fold.
285 ship between platinum dose-intensity and log median survival time was not statistically significant.
296 nths vs 8.4 months, respectively, P = .046), median survival times were not statistically different (
297 rated using L1210JF or KG-1 cells, increased median survival times were obtained with f-L-DOX treatme
298 to be detrimental because historical overall median survival times were similar to those of nonrespon
299 Retrospective analysis suggested prolonged median survival time with pertuzumab compared with histo
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。