1 ectronic renderings of the traditional paper
medical chart.
2 ined from patients, their surrogates, or the
medical chart.
3 ics and best-corrected or presenting VA from
medical charts.
4 were extracted from the patients' electronic
medical charts.
5 by ICD interrogations, patient reports, and
medical charts.
6 istory, and HbA1c levels were retrieved from
medical charts.
7 NCDR accurately represent the data from the
medical charts.
8 s were obtained from review of the patients'
medical charts.
9 factors was obtained from the interviews and
medical charts.
10 gic characteristics were abstracted from the
medical charts.
11 d counseling (88%), and documentation in the
medical chart (
89%).
12 ectional study using data from retrospective
medical chart abstraction of a national sample of Medica
13 e questionnaire admitted to all patients and
medical chart abstraction.
14 s, whereas the CDC-sponsored system performs
medical chart abstractions and reference laboratory susc
15 Both the
medical chart and the novel capture individual human liv
16 a retrospective cohort study using data from
medical charts and administrative files.
17 pective cohort study using data created from
medical charts and administrative files.
18 Medical charts and arthroscopic results, when available,
19 In addition,
medical charts and available post-mortem materials were
20 We reviewed
medical charts and bronchoscopic records, examined hospi
21 arameters was collected retrospectively from
medical charts and databases.
22 Investigators reviewed patients'
medical charts and food histories.
23 Correlations between
medical charts and maternal interview were high for birt
24 l criteria for ARDS were identified from the
medical charts and were classified as mild, moderate, or
25 through the interviews and through review of
medical charts at approximately 6 months postdiagnosis.
26 o cases on age, year, enrollment length, and
medical chart availability.
27 Of 70 CrAg+ patients with
medical charts available, 37 (52.9%) had no evidence of
28 e amplification and retrospectively analyzed
medical charts for 115 patients with CLCNKB mutations.
29 We reviewed the
medical charts for patients as described above.
30 conducted a retrospective cohort study using
medical charts from Macha Mission Hospital, a hospital p
31 lf, and Thomas Mann-side by side with actual
medical charts,
I suggest the usefulness of close readin
32 Data were abstracted from the
medical chart,
including documentation during the first
33 Data were extracted from the
medical charts of 1120 African American adolescents who
34 We retrospectively reviewed
medical charts of all patients admitted to Harborview Me
35 2 historical controls identified out of 6867
medical charts of HSCT patients by blinded independent r
36 Medical charts of patients from 1993-1995 were reviewed.
37 Review of the
medical charts of patients with noninfectious scleritis
38 In this essay, I examine the
medical charts of two of my patients in detail and descr
39 Data from
medical charts,
operative notes, and pathology reports w
40 (ERG) from all patients were registered from
medical charts over a mean follow-up of 19 years.
41 ctrophysiologic features were extracted from
medical charts over a mean follow-up of 9 years.
42 l weight measurements were available through
medical chart record abstraction (6727 weight measuremen
43 However, without the ability to review
medical charts,
researchers must carefully decide which
44 A retrospective
medical chart review (cohort study) was conducted.
45 ruly bacteremic and/or candidemic based on a
medical chart review and analytical metrics.
46 D) follow-up of 9.3 (1.9) years, verified by
medical chart review and compared by genotype.
47 o a comprehensive 27-variable model based on
medical chart review and least similar to models based o
48 es with the ability to validate diagnoses by
medical chart review can use a combination of many ICD-9
49 Medical chart review follow-up was available in 86 patie
50 We performed
medical chart review for STEMI patients transferred for
51 dromic vs nonsyndromic) was done via blinded
medical chart review in mGluR positive and randomly sele
52 A
medical chart review of 547 potential diagnoses resulted
53 A retrospective
medical chart review of all PLC visits at an academic de
54 Medical chart review suggested that most of these later-
55 74 self-reported glaucoma cases confirmed by
medical chart review to have primary open-angle glaucoma
56 Medical chart review to obtain information about the use
57 Medical chart review was performed to obtain demographic
58 Medical chart review was the only source of information
59 racteristics were collected by interview and
medical chart review.
60 Registry, the Dutch Pathology Registry, and
medical chart review.
61 2008 were identified through a retrospective
medical chart review.
62 ed 474 self-reported POAG cases confirmed by
medical chart review.
63 All cases were confirmed as CKD by
medical chart review.
64 s, was obtained by psychological autopsy and
medical chart review.
65 formation was collected by questionnaire and
medical chart review; all cases described were laborator
66 and institutional review board approved for
medical chart review; the requirement for informed patie
67 We conducted patient interviews and
medical chart reviews to obtain demographic information,
68 Patient interviews and
medical chart reviews were conducted on 10 men who becam
69 xaminations of ill and convalescent persons,
medical chart reviews, and laboratory testing.
70 linkage with national health databases, and
medical chart reviews.
71 ed a structured implicit review of patients'
medical charts to determine whether patient refusal, out
72 sults of these interviews plus the patients'
medical charts to generate a best-estimate DSM-IV psychi
73 Each patient's
medical chart was reviewed by two independent investigat
74 Using
medical charts,
we collected data on 272 patients who we
75 Medical charts were abstracted for 3,065 of 3,246 eligib
76 Medical charts were abstracted for hospitalized UC.
77 ngs at screening US, all imaging studies and
medical charts were also reviewed.
78 Among enrolled patients whose
medical charts were available for review post-discharge,
79 Medical charts were retrospectively reviewed for elevate
80 All 72 underwent arteriography, and their
medical charts were retrospectively reviewed.
81 Medical charts were reviewed and regression analyses com
82 Medical charts were reviewed for a depression diagnosis.
83 Medical charts were reviewed for US indication, underlyi
84 Center-specific protocols and
medical charts were reviewed on-site.
85 Medical charts were reviewed to determine the eventual d
86 Medical charts were reviewed to obtain demographic, labo
87 Medical charts were reviewed to obtain information on th
88 Medical charts were reviewed to verify disease and treat
89 he study patients were interviewed and their
medical charts were reviewed using a pretested structure
90 reflectance (NIR), color fundus images, and
medical charts were reviewed.
91 Data from the patients'
medical charts were used to calculate QI performance sco