ライフサイエンスコーパス: medical intervention

1 cedural complication or as a complication of medical intervention.

2 tors, only nutritional status is amenable to medical intervention.

3 vention of nuclear war as the only effective medical intervention.

4 hypothetical life-year saved than the median medical intervention.

5 us disease that could be mitigated by timely medical intervention.

6 d the genetics of disease-free aging without medical intervention.

7 ) included a patient demand or request for a medical intervention.

8 cardiac outcomes who may benefit from early medical intervention.

9 restored to normal form and function through medical intervention.

10 actionable genetic variants warranting early medical intervention.

11 iotechnology to innovations in bioenergy and medical intervention.

12 s composition and could be useful in guiding medical intervention.

13 highly lethal disease that is refractory to medical intervention.

14 risks and describing the possible effect of medical intervention.

15 s at the baseline visit, before any laser or medical intervention.

16 ry end point was recurrence of SVT requiring medical intervention.

17 40 were other illnesses that required urgent medical intervention.

18 ng clinical problem that increasingly defies medical intervention.

19 that compare reasonably with other accepted medical interventions.

20 RCA2, little was known about the efficacy of medical interventions.

21 is similar to that of many commonly accepted medical interventions.

22 arable to that of many other widely accepted medical interventions.

23 pression is comparable with that of accepted medical interventions.

24 ck of data to compare the implant with other medical interventions.

25 ac surgical deaths preceded by limitation of medical interventions.

26 was greater than that of other well-accepted medical interventions.

27 s comparable with many generally recommended medical interventions.

28 isodes rather than an increase in success of medical interventions.

29 cost-effective compared with other accepted medical interventions.

30 quivalent to that of many currently accepted medical interventions.

31 ses and be exploited for epidemiological and medical interventions.

32 prediction of future health and response to medical interventions.

33 ens in response to changing environments and medical interventions.

34 enerate evidence to inform public health and medical interventions.

35 and severity of acute illness, and specific medical interventions.

36 icacy and minimize the iatrogenic effects of medical interventions.

37 favorably with many other commonly accepted medical interventions.

38 c diagnosis and the availability of specific medical interventions.

39 alternative for prophylaxis before elective medical interventions.

40 directing potential targets for behavior and medical interventions.

41 harnessed has the potential to revolutionize medical interventions.

42 subset of patients undergoing critical care medical interventions.

43 e effectiveness of drugs, devices, and other medical interventions.

44 arch when assessing efficacy of new drugs or medical interventions.

45 nal radiologic techniques as well as various medical interventions.

46 icacy within the range of generally accepted medical interventions.

47 of life and/or length of life) conferred by medical interventions, allows a measure of comparative e

48 atients who do not require intensive general medical intervention and are willing to accept voluntary

49 Such individuals may benefit from medical intervention and be good candidates for preventi

50 bone marrow histopathology as they relate to medical intervention and communication.

51 educe the time between clinical analysis and medical intervention and minimize artifacts created duri

52 cause rare but severe envenomation requiring medical intervention and sometimes antivenom.

53 etected from clinical cases, the efficacy of medical intervention and the requirements for decontamin

54 th the cost-effectiveness of widely accepted medical interventions and health policy regulations, but

55 y was thought to be summarily independent of medical interventions and resuscitations, we now know th

56 not sufficient to demonstrate that specific medical interventions and services are effective, as thi

57 aster approval of more efficacious and safer medical interventions, and a more personalized implement

58 source consumption, intensity of nursing and medical interventions, and daily patient-related charges

59 on of an aging population, growing number of medical interventions, and surging economic burden of he

60 alth and economic consequences of health and medical interventions, and they have been recommended by

61 y in the evaluation of treatment benefits of medical interventions, and use of patient-centered outco

62 who should receive standard treatment after medical intervention; and frail patients with non-revers

63 irect medical costs alone, demonstrates that medical interventions are more cost effective and, in ma

64 Efficacious medical interventions are needed to help mitigate treatm

65 have profound effects on health and require medical intervention as part of relief operations.

66 e gains in life expectancy from a variety of medical interventions as reported in 83 published source

67 ting the effectiveness of DNA damage related medical interventions at the cellular level.

68 ersonal risk and choose the most appropriate medical interventions based on the genotype and environm

69 cause of acute respiratory illness requiring medical intervention because it affects all age groups a

70 erly population who will most likely require medical intervention because of disease activity.

71 None of these episodes required medical intervention beyond routine treatment.

72 Medical intervention bias can be avoided by censoring an

73 an important measure of the effectiveness of medical interventions, but its interpretation requires t

74 gly used to determine the appropriateness of medical interventions, but these 2 approaches use differ

75 A gain in life expectancy from a medical intervention can be categorized as large or smal

76 ealth economic costs, there are currently no medical interventions capable of delaying or halting its

77 All medical interventions carry risks, but the patient often

78 has become increasingly focused on specific medical interventions designed to improve the health of

79 However, medical intervention efforts require a rapid and accurat

80 ination represents the single most effective medical intervention ever developed.

81 Vaccination is the most effective medical intervention ever introduced and, together with

82 ostic practices, and patient attitudes about medical intervention explain only a small degree of regi

83 ost-effective compared with currently funded medical interventions; follow-up for false-positive find

84 s physical activity, weight maintenance, and medical intervention for health needs.

85 neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) result in medical intervention for large numbers of uninfected inf

86 Our study implies that timely medical intervention for reversing transtentorial hernia

87 ention for symptoms with a score >/= 1 and a medical intervention for symptoms with a score >/= 4.

88 andomized placebo-controlled evaluation of a medical intervention for the prevention of trastuzumab-r

89 Risk of dialysis and medical intervention for worsening renal function were c

90 ices (DT LVADs) are one of the most invasive medical interventions for end-stage illness.

91 This information could focus psychiatric and medical interventions for high-risk patients.

92 apeutics to define and validate regenerative medical interventions for mammalian hair cell loss.

93 Improvements in medical interventions for people with Down's syndrome ha

94 ffered from malignant pain or required acute medical interventions for their pain relief.

95 ip and/or palate (CLP), who undergo numerous medical interventions from infancy, can suffer from life

96 However, like all medical interventions, genetic testing has some specific

97 e to increase over the next 20 years despite medical intervention has stimulated new research into th

98 The comparative effectiveness of medical interventions has recently been emphasized in th

99 Most medical interventions have modest effects, but occasiona

100 inimally invasive alternative to surgical or medical intervention; however, given the variety of mate

101 tiveness ratios compared with other accepted medical interventions; however, the analysis for symptom

102 was the most common complication, requiring medical intervention in 192 infants.

103 ve immunity and may be subject to deliberate medical intervention in a way that can control a chronic

104 ossibility may enable prompt recognition and medical intervention in affected patients.

105 ally more optimistic regarding prospects for medical intervention in the aging process and also sugge

106 An apparent increase in medical interventions in the management of twins may res

107 tiveness well within the acceptable range of medical interventions in the United States.

108 as cost-effective as many routinely accepted medical interventions in this setting.

109 Medical interventions included topical corticosteroids,

110 isorders can be debilitating and may require medical intervention, including alterations in antiretro

111 with cost-effectiveness benchmarks and other medical interventions, including PCS.

112 As improved medical interventions increase the life expectancy of HI

113 nts who are potentially unfit to drive are a medical intervention intended to prevent trauma from mot

114 ent in determining the benefits and harms of medical interventions is the use of well-defined and rel

115 The goal of administering medical interventions is to help patients live longer or

116 -the failure to use effective and affordable medical interventions-is common and responsible for subs

117 Like with all medical interventions, it is important to consider the r

118 tivity, host exploitation, and the impact of medical interventions like drug treatment.

119 is therefore important if we are to develop medical interventions limiting expansion rates.

120 , differences in response or access to newer medical interventions may largely account for these tren

121 Economic analyses of medical interventions must also take into consideration

122 main unclear, leading to a lack of effective medical interventions now.

123 Gastrointestinal-wall disruption requiring medical intervention occurred in 1.2%, 2.8%, and 2.6% of

124 g the frequency of bleeding events requiring medical intervention, of hemorrhagic and nonhemorrhagic

125 Less is known about the impact of specific medical interventions on morbidity such as intellectual

126 e life-threatening and necessitate prolonged medical intervention or removal from trial.

127 estigation is warranted to determine whether medical interventions or alterations to operative strate

128 which patients or their surrogates authorize medical interventions or involvement in research.

129 d 100% against rotavirus illnesses requiring medical intervention (P<.001 for each).

130 These results suggest that other medical interventions, particularly the advent of intens

131 ient diaries and hospital charts focusing on medical interventions provoking edematous attack, and th

132 ntervention and without the need for further medical intervention, represents an important goal in th

133 An evidence synthesis of a medical intervention should assess the balance of benefi

134 8 months, but the patient has not needed any medical intervention since then.

135 Our findings suggest that medical intervention strategies incorporating chronobiol

136 Allocation of very scarce medical interventions such as organs and vaccines is a p

137 Previous research has shown that specific medical interventions, such as newborn screening for con

138 py compared favorably with other established medical interventions, such as screening mammography and

139 In this setting, palliative sedation is a medical intervention that must be considered as part of

140 for years of life saved compared with other medical interventions that are deemed cost-effective.

141 l shapes in Actinobacteria, but also lead to medical interventions that impact human health.

142 A second step is to provide medical interventions that provide good value: medical b

143 associated with CAD makes the development of medical interventions that repair and replace diseased a

144 l and evolutionary responses of pathogens to medical interventions that target the symptoms of infect

145 h trisomy 18, the prognosis with and without medical intervention, the factors that have contributed

146 sample source could delay the initiation of medical intervention, thereby reducing the efficacy of a

147 TP has ranged from close observation without medical intervention to aggressive management with corti

148 eng et al. (2014) use prolonged fasting as a medical intervention to decrease IGF-1/PKA signaling and

149 of infection plays a crucial role in prompt medical intervention to prevent rapid disease progressio

150 disorder include early diagnosis and skilled medical intervention to prevent the inexorable physical

151 Antiviral drugs are a proposed medical intervention to reduce household transmission of

152 Gene therapy was originally conceived as a medical intervention to replace or correct defective gen

153 In high-income countries, medical interventions to address the known risks associa

154 n the future might help clinicians tailoring medical interventions to individual needs.

155 on would be cost-effective relative to other medical interventions under a wide range of assumptions.

156 tients with sepsis and hypotension requiring medical intervention using data from the Multiparameter

157 ffectiveness trials and within the range for medical interventions usually covered by employer-sponso

158 Without appropriate medical intervention, visual impairment may become a gre

159 Medical intervention was required in one ecallantide-tre

160 Because FDC may respond to medical intervention, we have previously recommended tha

161 No excess medical interventions were noted with PHP use.

162 mortality trends reflect the effects of new medical interventions, whereas birth cohort mortality tr

163 e directive does not guarantee that unwanted medical interventions will not be forced on us.

164 es in combination (involving both social and medical interventions) will be required to achieve simil

165 iduals will lead to preventive lifestyle and medical interventions with potential to prevent sudden c

166 Evidence on how much medical interventions work may change over time.