ライフサイエンスコーパス: melting temperature

1 layer that is already stable above the bulk melting temperature).

2 They are strongest near the charge-stripe melting temperature.

3 from an extrapolation of our results to the melting temperature.

4 of the duplex, linearly correlating with the melting temperature.

5 same temperature difference with the model's melting temperature.

6 s convert to the WZ lattice above a critical melting temperature.

7 ompromised for long strands, except near the melting temperature.

8 terms of the reduction in binding energy and melting temperature.

9 ut 17 kcal/mol in enthalpy or 6 degrees C in melting temperature.

10 ture that is 22 degrees C lower than the DNA melting temperature.

11 elting occurs at temperatures much below the melting temperature.

12 ding was found to increase notably the ds-ON melting temperature.

13 d abnormal electrophoretic migration and low melting temperature.

14 previous studies that were performed at the melting temperature.

15 e from nanorod-based complexes below the DNA melting temperature.

16 ient solution temperature well below the DNA melting temperature.

17 8)-fold increase in the reaction rate at the melting temperature.

18 ization temperature but keeping it below the melting temperature.

19 lifiable target length, the sequence, or the melting temperature.

20 10-30 mus for complete dissociation near the melting temperature.

21 scence-based measurement of the "on-surface" melting temperatures.

22 ng of the energy landscape at the respective melting temperatures.

23 adiogenic heat production to achieve crustal melting temperatures.

24 econdary structures like hairpins and higher melting temperatures.

25 and one of the highest cohesive energies and melting temperatures.

26 und six transient denaturing events near the melting temperature (323 and 330 K) and an additional re

27 and catalyst is semicrystalline with a T(m) (melting temperature) = 87 degrees C.

28 ed of ternary mixtures of a lipid with a low melting temperature, a lipid with a high melting tempera

29 though different solvents modify the protein melting temperature, a unique dynamical regime is attain

30 ode made from a refractory metal which has a melting temperature above the melting point of boron.

31 tle silicates and core metal have comparable melting temperatures above 500 to 700 gigapascals, which

32 up to a 14 degrees C decrease in the protein melting temperature after toremifene binding, while ibup

33 or some, but not all, sequence compositions, melting temperature analyses have revealed that both ena

34 e, double-nested PCR approach allowed robust melting temperature analysis with enhanced limits of det

35 A-conjoined copolymers were characterized by melting temperature analysis, circular dichroism spectro

36 e duplex structures were characterized by UV melting temperature analysis, fluorescence spectroscopy,

37 me PCR assays followed by electrophoresis or melting temperature analysis, respectively.

38 moduli, Vickers hardness, Debye temperature, melting temperature and a possible superconductivity of

39 In particular, the sudden drop of the melting temperature and appearance of the dip at N = 56

40 plementary pairs above the oligonucleotides' melting temperature and attaching new bioreceptors.

41 The survey reveals a correlation between melting temperature and downhill folding previously obse

42 n, the Hp53 and Dmp53 proteins had a similar melting temperature and generally showed a similar energ

43 aracterized with dTm/dP < 0, where Tm is the melting temperature and P is pressure, above a high thre

44 able predictions of water properties such as melting temperature and temperature of maximum density.

45 The melting temperature and the heat flow reflect the type a

46 y are highly stable structures with enhanced melting temperatures and cooperative melting behavior.

47 mol/cm2), and as a result, exhibit increased melting temperatures and cooperative melting properties.

48 formation resulted in solids with different melting temperatures and crystallinities, photochemical

49 tion of type I amylose-lipid complexes, with melting temperatures and enthalpies ranging from 82 to 1

50 The melting temperatures and latent heat of CPCMs are in the

51 decreasing differences between the polyester melting temperatures and the experimental temperatures,

52 ween predicted and experimentally determined melting temperatures and unfolding denaturant concentrat

53 We find that the experimentally measured melting temperatures and unzipping forces are approximat

54 low melting temperature, a lipid with a high melting temperature, and cholesterol.

55 slope of the correlation, coincides with the melting temperature, and duplex unfolding occurs at that

56 tabilization may be responsible for the high melting temperature, and hints at residual structure or

57 oil reduced the crystallisation temperature, melting temperature, and melting enthalpy of tristearin.

58 are identified by differences in the duplex melting temperature, and the use of short hybridization

59 emperature is lowered sufficiently below the melting temperature, and then at even lower temperatures

60 sociation constant of 140 muM and raised its melting temperature, and we have determined the binding

61 oil-loaded particles shifted to lower onset melting temperatures, and major polymorphic form transfo

62 Our computed melting temperatures are consistent with existing diamon

63 he structural transitions that occur at each melting temperature, are used to propose that the relati

64 We obtain the same melting temperature (around 45 degrees C) using the bulk

65 previous experiments showed nearly constant melting temperature as a function of pressure, in large

66 These proteins have probe-dependent melting temperatures as high as 80 degrees C and exhibit

67 fluence of small molecular species on, e.g., melting temperature, as well as routes to induce order i

68 Sodium exhibits a pronounced minimum of the melting temperature at approximately 118 gigapascals and

69 l explains this correlation and predicts the melting temperature at which downhill folding becomes po

70 useful tool for designing primers at various melting temperatures at good target coverage.

71 A dispersion of melting temperatures at pH5.3 for individual residues of

72 f the folding transition, dispersions in the melting temperatures at the residue level, and timescale

73 m(Phi) - T m, where T m(Phi) and T m are the melting temperatures at volume fraction Phi of the osmol

74 is, at temperatures below their equilibrium melting temperatures, before eventually crystallizing.

75 Ionic liquids form a class of solvents with melting temperatures below 100 degrees C and, due to ver

76 The shared ancestor has a melting temperature between those of ttRNH and ecRNH; th

77 2), The melting temperature, both in the bulk and at surfaces, d

78 d they not only bind when cooled below their melting temperature, but also rearrange so that aggregat

79 that insertion mutations lower mt-tRNA(Ser) melting temperature by 6-9 degrees C and increase the fo

80 -carbon increases the peptide's triple helix melting temperature by 8.6 degrees C.

81 axially compressed solid state, reducing the melting temperature by 80% or 4,000 K.

82 y of both ALR forms: e.g., by decreasing the melting temperature by about 10 degrees C, by increasing

83 forms of the quadruplex structures differ in melting temperatures by approximately 8 degrees C (60 an

84 binds a relatively small hapten, reduce the melting temperature compared with its germ-line precurso

85 indicated by an 8 degrees C increase in the melting temperature compared with unliganded form and pp

86 The interruptions had little effect on melting temperature, consistent with the high thermal st

87 The melting temperatures decrease linearly as the concentrat

88 the temperature of maximum stability and the melting temperature decreased on encapsulation.

89 while UV melting studies revealed shifts in melting temperature (DeltaT(m)) as large as 10 degrees C

90 indicated by the substantial decrease in its melting temperature (DeltaTm = -22.9 degrees C).

91 ative hybridization but have distinguishable melting temperatures depending on their positions.

92 However, transition melting temperatures derived from the differential scann

93 , and electron microscopy showed that capsid melting temperatures differed by more than 20 degrees C

94 l analysis of c-Met mutants revealed minimal melting temperature differences indicating that the muta

95 an that of the unfolded RNA, the increase in melting temperature due to the two components is additiv

96 RNA/RNA, DNA/RNA and provided corrections to melting temperatures due to the presence of sodium.

97 ucleic acid probes by recording nucleic acid melting temperature during ISH.

98 must be added to free duplex DNA to achieve melting temperatures equivalent to hybridized systems fo

99 ability of target structure in the ensemble, melting temperature, etc.

100 Furthermore, a melting temperature experiment carried out with an STV-d

101 restricted to temperature ranges around the melting temperature for a pseudoknot.

102 tal temperatures appear to be below the bulk melting temperature for a single protein, but above the

103 perature for a single protein, but above the melting temperature for concentrated protein solutions.

104 Thermal melting data illustrate that the melting temperature for CYP231A2 increases nearly 10 deg

105 improves the predication of free energy and melting temperature for duplexes closed by wobble base p

106 curve analysis revealed significantly higher melting temperatures for DNA in the presence of oxidized

107 parameters, to facilitate the calculation of melting temperatures for perfectly matching sequences, m

108 Acetylation decreased onset and peak melting temperatures for the insoluble complexes, wherea

109 sequences, which exhibit large deviations in melting temperature from predictions made by additive th

110 The melting temperatures from the specific heat profiles are

111 Probe length, melting temperature, GC content, SNP location in the pro

112 es C but with a conspicuous twist: While the melting temperature goes down the cold unfolding moves i

113 thermal unfolding of MW is reversible with a melting temperature >70 degrees C at 100 muM peptide con

114 an 94% folded at 298 K (97.5% at 280 K) with melting temperatures > 75 degrees C.

115 stability; five of six mutants analyzed have melting temperatures >89 degrees C.

116 personic vehicles because of their very high melting temperatures (>4000 K) among other properties.

117 Computing accurate nucleic acid melting temperatures has become a crucial step for the e

118 with experimentally measuring high pressure melting temperatures has motivated the use of ab initio

119 folding (no barrier), the WW domain average melting temperatures have to be >/=50 degrees C for inci

120 torically eluded researchers due to its high melting temperature, high reactivity and unfavorably hig

121 triplexes formed from three G-triads exhibit melting temperatures higher than 37 degrees C, especiall

122 As this represents ~90% of their melting temperature, if higher-temperature engines are e

123 The power law dependence of the melting temperature increase (DeltaT(m)) on the volume f

124 The apparent CD melting temperatures indicated that the introduction of

125 All serogroups were found to display unique melting temperatures, indicating that mutations have acc

126 ing T, and at high-pressure we show that the melting temperature is only 5000 K at 120 GPa, a value l

127 It was found that the melting temperature is very similar for KGE and KGD pept

128 ences have identical length, GC content, and melting temperature; (iv) the identity of each standard

129 ayers composed of a ternary mixture of a low-melting temperature lipid, a high-melting temperature li

130 e of a low-melting temperature lipid, a high-melting temperature lipid, and cholesterol.

131 chain-melting temperature lipids, low chain-melting temperature lipids, and cholesterol undergo late

132 de variety of ternary mixtures of high chain-melting temperature lipids, low chain-melting temperatur

133 ion by eliminating spilling because its high melting temperature means it is solid at room temperatur

134 approximately 0.3 kcal/mol) calculated from melting temperature measurements comparing matched vs. m

135 A combination of chemical ON synthesis, melting temperature measurements, cyclic voltammetry (CV

136 na (like surface melting, size dependence of melting temperature, melting of few nm-size particles an

137 (Ni, Pt, Pd), when dissolved in inactive low-melting temperature metals (In, Ga, Sn, Pb), produce sta

138 on in beta-Sn, unlike grain rotation in high melting temperature metals which undergo displacive defo

139 tool ensures consistent oligomer overlapping melting temperatures, minimizes the likelihood of misann

140 304 bp amplicon, which compared well to the melting temperature obtained using a conventional PCR sy

141 and maintains good thermal stability with a melting temperature of 37 degrees C.

142 The FSD-1 apparent melting temperature of 41 degrees C may be a reflection

143 e peptide forms a stable triple helix with a melting temperature of 41 degrees C.

144 However, E2 has a high melting temperature of 84.8 degrees C, which is more aki

145 rated using IR heating, and this indicated a melting temperature of 85 degrees C for the 304 bp ampli

146 icles into superstructures, we show that the melting temperature of a 10-base DNA sequence is depende

147 We find that for a given CDK, the melting temperature of a CDK/cyclin/inhibitor complex co

148 When the agarose-GUVs are heated above the melting temperature of agarose for 2 h before use, vesic

149 Phonon density of states, entropy and melting temperature of aluminum were calculated using th

150 terpreted as melting, it would be the lowest melting temperature of any material at these high pressu

151 milar to each other and should not reach the melting temperature of any of the matched hybrids.

152 E3330-amide has no effect on the melting temperature of APE1, suggesting that it does not

153 However, this interaction lowers the melting temperature of APE1, which is consistent with a

154 PPO, isotactic PPO is semicrystalline with a melting temperature of approximately 67 degrees C.

155 The model describes the melting temperature of DNA as a function of composition

156 f polymerization correlate with the apparent melting temperature of each building block, which is dep

157 The melting temperature of ice in the aerosols decreases mon

158 arth rely critically on the knowledge of the melting temperature of iron at the pressure conditions o

159 Here we report new data on the melting temperature of iron in a laser-heated diamond an

160 Our results show a melting temperature of iron in agreement with most previ

161 pG methylation on the basis of the increased melting temperature of methylated DNA, termed denaturati

162 emperatures more than 30 degrees C above the melting temperature of naked DNA.

163 The melting temperature of nanoparticles can be designed to

164 es below unacetylated fibrils, and below the melting temperature of native Cu2,Zn2-SOD1 (e.g., fibril

165 otein that lacks cysteine residues and has a melting temperature of nearly 100 degrees C.

166 are which computes the enthalpy, entropy and melting temperature of nucleic acids.

167 thermal stability, up to more than half the melting temperature of one of the constituents.

168 There is a correlation in the apparent melting temperature of p53 with the body temperature of

169 , the same backbone heterogeneity lowers the melting temperature of RNA duplexes that would otherwise

170 nprecedented conditions and showing that the melting temperature of SiO2 rises to 8300 K at a pressur

171 The ability to increase the melting temperature of tertiary structure by strengtheni

172 reduced upon methionine oxidation, while the melting temperature of the C(H)3 domain was only affecte

173 length and in each case is close to the bulk melting temperature of the capping molecules.

174 n step, the solution can be heated above the melting temperature of the capture sequence to release t

175 The melting temperature of the ClU-G mispair is not experime

176 shows dependence on casting temperature and melting temperature of the crystalline segment.

177 These additional interactions increase the melting temperature of the DBD by up to 2 degrees C and

178 The melting temperature of the GAAA minihairpin is reduced t

179 two-phase approach is used to determine the melting temperature of the ice-VII phase in the range of

180 temperatures between 0.5 and 0.64 times the melting temperature of the matrix (1,356 kelvin) under a

181 ture stabilizers, BMVC and BMVC4, raises the melting temperature of the oligonucleotide formed by the

182 tween solid and L(o) phases occurs below the melting temperature of the phospholipid (T(m)).

183 Upon heated over the melting temperature of the polymer, the pores of the nan

184 alamide compound crystallizes just below the melting temperature of the polymer.

185 ntary-DNA-modified nanoparticles through the melting temperature of the system gives the thermodynami

186 iscriminatory power comes from the decreased melting temperature of the tL.C mismatched hybrid as com

187 e, cooperative unfolding transition having a melting temperature of Tm = 71 +/- 2 degrees C, in agree

188 om temperature, a temperature well below the melting temperature of type I collagen, by collagenase d

189 energies per basepair with the experimental melting temperatures of 60 oligonucleotides, yielding a

190 ion of type II amylose-lipid complexes, with melting temperatures of about 100-120 degrees C.

191 First, melting temperatures of all mismatched hybrids should be

192 ncorporated into the probes to normalize the melting temperatures of all target miRNA hybrids allowin

193 lexed with actinomycin D are stabilized with melting temperatures of approximately 79 degrees C.

194 Melting temperatures of duplexes containing cationic or

195 The observed melting temperatures of most oligomers correlated roughl

196 orithms were developed to accurately predict melting temperatures of nanoparticles of various composi

197 The melting temperatures of slightly hypostoichiometric TaC,

198 currently considerable uncertainty over the melting temperatures of the high-pressure mantle mineral

199 The melting temperatures of the hydrates are very similar to

200 mixtures is dominated by the intrinsic chain melting temperatures of the lipid components, rather tha

201 m) = 324 K), which is notably lower than the melting temperatures of the other four peptides (T(m) ap

202 of these interactions is reflected in higher melting temperatures of the protein-ligand complexes.

203 that of the t.C mismatched hybrid, while the melting temperatures of the tL-A, tL.G and tL.T hybrids

204 By calculating the melting temperatures of the TM strands, our method can a

205 The thermodynamic equilibrium melting temperatures of these phases differ as much as ~

206 nd subsequent cooling to a point between the melting temperatures of unnicked substrate and nicked pr

207 We provide evidence that the wide-ranging melting temperatures of zeolitic MOFs are related to the

208 Stabilization, measured as an increase in melting temperature, of approximately 20 degrees C and a

209 to maximize population coverage, matching of melting temperatures, optimizing de novo sequence length

210 itive specimens with an atypical PCR result (melting temperature outside of the expected range) by se

211 niqueness, probe length, uniformity of probe melting temperature, overlap with SNPs and common repeat

212 show this inference is incorrect for the low melting temperature phosphatidylcholines abundant in mam

213 hickness and the corresponding variations in melting temperature, polymer crystals allow for self-see

214 The optimal melting temperatures, positions and concentrations of bl

215 erall structure but displayed differences in melting temperatures possibly arising from C-terminal co

216 linked copolymer networks exhibiting a broad melting temperature range (DeltaT(m)) are presented, whi

217 hybridize to a siRNA within a user-specified melting temperature range.

218 re assessed; six unfolded cooperatively with melting temperatures ranging from <11 to >50 degrees C.

219 e crystal growth inhibition concomitant with melting temperature reduction.

220 hylene polymers possess essentially the same melting temperature, regardless of the size of the branc

221 in frozen medium at a temperature below the melting temperature; relaxation is monitored by periodic

222 A decrease in melting temperature resulted from the interesterificatio

223 ntrinsic lack of strength, ductility and low melting temperature severely restricts practical applica

224 idize, as evidenced by an unusually large MB melting temperature shift observed on bridge formation,

225 The calculated melting temperatures showed that the doubly acetylated p

226 ed 24-fold mutant to be stably folded with a melting temperature similar to that of the wild-type pro

227 -BG505 SOSIP.664 complex displayed increased melting temperature stability and reduced V3 recognition

228 r, even at temperatures close to the thermal melting temperature T(m).

229 The melting temperatures T(m) of the nanoparticles are not a

230 While the melting temperature ( T M approximately 59 degrees C) an

231 the doubly acetylated peptide has the lowest melting temperature (T(m) = 324 K), which is notably low

232 urves show that the double mutant exhibits a melting temperature (T(m)) 16 degrees C lower than that

233 symmetric PCR of the M. tuberculosis RRDR by melting temperature (T(m)) analysis.

234 rimination is the relationship between probe melting temperature (T(m)) and the temperature at which

235 cRNH) share similar structures but differ in melting temperature (T(m)) by 20 degrees C. ttRNH's grea

236 allows us to decouple the distinct gas phase melting temperature (T(m)) from the temperature at which

237 We find that melting temperature (T(m)) has the most significant effe

238 le, monomeric, and remarkably stable, with a melting temperature (T(m)) of 82.6 degrees C, which is a

239 The melting temperature (T(m)) of DNA is affected not only b

240 the DeltaG degrees (37), DeltaH degrees and melting temperature (T(m)) of duplexes containing these

241 an increase of more than 11 degrees C in the melting temperature (T(m)) of the antigen-binding fragme

242 ly stable closed-loop structure, raising the melting temperature (T(m)) of the hybrid by >30 degrees

243 n rates, even at temperatures well below the melting temperature (T(m)) of the hybridized duplex.

244 Mutations are detected by melting temperature (T(m)) shifts that occur when the SM

245 The moderately thermophilic protein has a melting temperature (T(m)) similar to that of the mesoph

246 ds provides a characteristic set of amplicon melting temperature (T(m)) values that identify which sp

247 lted in about a 30 degrees C increase in the melting temperature (T(m)), as compared to that obtained

248 g times that correspond well with the duplex melting temperature (T(m)).

249 e alpha-helicity (approximately 70%), median melting temperature (T(m)=58 degrees C), enthalpy (Delta

250 Based on the calculated melting temperatures (T(m) values), however, poly(A)/oli

251 containing U(2'F(ara)) have slightly higher melting temperatures (T(m)) than those containing U(2'F(

252 ntiate the four SNP alleles by four distinct melting temperatures (termed the "4Tm probe").

253 ts, alpha1alpha1alpha2 demonstrated a higher melting temperature than the other two.

254 porcine dermis materials exhibiting a higher melting temperature than their non-crosslinked counterpa

255 relative measure based on apparent simulated melting temperatures that is independent of simulation l

256 -methylamino phosphorodiamidate linkages had melting temperatures that were either comparable or redu

257 concentration tested, formed gel phases with melting temperatures that were equal to, or slightly hig

258 Below the melting temperature the threshold for Al44(-) is smaller

259 urs at a temperature that is higher than the melting temperature, the data at 1669 cm (-1) are still

260 When relaxation occurs at the melting temperature, the kinetics at both wavenumbers ar

261 Below the melting temperature, the ordered layer initiates crystal

262 s transition temperature Tg, and the crystal melting temperature, TL.

263 d iron (hcp-Fe) at 360 gigapascals up to its melting temperature Tm.

264 e at pH 8 but a ca. 50 degrees C drop in the melting temperature (Tm ) was observed at pH 2.5: DeltaD

265 Both methods have little effect on the melting temperature (Tm) although some differences were

266 Here, we demonstrate that both the melting temperature (Tm) in a subsection of siRNA non-se

267 We herein report the novel "melting temperature (Tm) mapping method" for rapidly ide

268 -Gly-Lys(Dnp)- Ser-(Gly-Pro-Hyp)4-NH2] had a melting temperature (Tm) of 36.2 degrees C and was hydro

269 Leishmania spp., followed by analysis of the melting temperature (Tm) of the amplicons on qPCR platfo

270 The melting temperature (Tm) of the C(H)2 domain of the huma

271 affinity can be measured as a change in the melting temperature (Tm) of the DNA-modified Au NP aggre

272 mplate walking mechanism using a pair of low-melting temperature (Tm) solid-surface homopolymer prime

273 a significant negative shift in NBD1 thermal melting temperature (Tm), pointing to direct VX-809 inte

274 ismatches and the overall sequence-dependent melting temperature (Tm).

275 ng a ssNMR-observed reduction in the lipids' melting temperature (Tm).

276 different temperatures, we obtained relative melting temperatures (Tm) for RNA structures in over 400

277 Amplifiable beta-globin (melting temperature [Tm], 87.2 degrees C +/- 0.2 degrees

278 lternation in exactly the same manner as the melting temperature, Tm.

279 trafast unfolding and folding protein at its melting temperature to observe, on an atom-by-atom basis

280 rection function was developed that predicts melting temperatures, transition enthalpies, entropies,

281 temperature of solid will not rise above the melting temperature unless all solid is molten, thus nan

282 rationally engineered antagonists exhibited melting temperatures up to approximately 64 degrees C, a

283 useful and very flexible tool for predicting melting temperatures using approximative formulae or Nea

284 s, allowing genotype discrimination based on melting temperature values.

285 However, the absolute melting temperatures vary with the selected thermodynami

286 temperature for the Al plane surface and on melting temperature versus particle radius.

287 LEDGF1-326 was 3.3 +/- 0.5 kcal mol(-1), and melting temperature was 44.8 +/- 0.2 degrees C.

288 hibited superheating, the enhancement of the melting temperature was far smaller than the depression

289 The DSC melting temperature was lowered by 6 degrees C and the c

290 This increase in melting temperature was more appreciable for hyperactive

291 in were also generated, and the experimental melting temperature was not significantly different from

292 o undergo an exceptionally steep increase in melting temperature when compressed.

293 tability of the duplex (as measured from the melting temperature), where a greater noise in the measu

294 be approximately 0.44 micros at the thermal melting temperature, which makes it one of the fastest f

295 kers are uniformly distributed above the DNA melting temperature, while visibly accumulating at the i

296 mino modified PMO was found to have a higher melting temperature with either complementary DNA or RNA

297 on properties by using accurate estimates of melting temperature with mismatches, computed based on t

298 ordered layer that forms well above the bulk melting temperature with thickness that increases on app

299 fected both the gelling rate and the network melting temperature, with the beta-glucan itself giving

300 both states of RC(L), increasing their half-melting temperature, without affecting enthalpy changes.