ライフサイエンスコーパス: memory retrieval

1 lations are reinstated to support successful memory retrieval.

2 ic levels of fear learning, or altering fear memory retrieval.

3 ng of AMPA receptors that takes place during memory retrieval.

4 f neural encoding patterns is beneficial for memory retrieval.

5 f a larger brain network supporting episodic memory retrieval.

6 licated in place memory and autobiographical memory retrieval.

7 play important roles in successful episodic memory retrieval.

8 ning and conditioned taste aversion, but not memory retrieval.

9 appears to act as a context for learning and memory retrieval.

10 ocampus (dHipp) beta-ARs for drug-associated memory retrieval.

11 en IGF-II treatment is given in concert with memory retrieval.

12 campal contribution to contextually mediated memory retrieval.

13 linked by the number of cue presentations at memory retrieval.

14 ons of multiple hubs characterize successful memory retrieval.

15 , as well as how these areas interact during memory retrieval.

16 red in vivo for reduction of the sAHP during memory retrieval.

17 representation that is then deployed during memory retrieval.

18 ergic modulation in the medial PFC (mPFC) in memory retrieval.

19 esses, corresponding to the specific type of memory retrieval.

20 cell activity was reinstated during episodic memory retrieval.

21 ement of DMN elements in discrete aspects of memory retrieval.

22 5-HT2AR) could have a role in the control of memory retrieval.

23 rtex (vmPFC) is a key mediator of extinction memory retrieval.

24 bout hippocampal activity during spontaneous memory retrieval.

25 al compression may be a universal feature of memory retrieval.

26 e involvement of the striatum in declarative memory retrieval.

27 wer (70-180 Hz) within PMC subregions during memory retrieval.

28 adult-born neurons essential in hippocampal memory retrieval.

29 atum primarily supports cognitive control of memory retrieval.

30 es in neural activity associated with source memory retrieval.

31 utative "default" processes such as episodic memory retrieval.

32 ate functional connectivity, during episodic memory retrieval.

33 al contribution of the hippocampus to remote memory retrieval.

34 n homogeneity within the DMN during episodic memory retrieval.

35 eplay, suggesting a role for awake replay in memory retrieval.

36 cortisol) administration on autobiographical memory retrieval.

37 scaled with behavioral expressions of target memory retrieval.

38 lude memory consolidation, or to deficits in memory retrieval.

39 al role in readying the brain for successful memory retrieval.

40 ution with which people exerted control over memory retrieval.

41 re necessary to exert cognitive control over memory retrieval.

42 s also indicate a potential role in episodic memory retrieval.

43 educed the probability of TGC and successful memory retrieval.

44 ted by state dependence nor had an effect on memory retrieval.

45 ccurate when people claimed to be unaware of memory retrieval.

46 about the functional architecture supporting memory retrieval.

47 whether cAMP is also required for contextual memory retrieval.

48 machinery similar to that used in long-term memory retrieval.

49 drenergic signaling in hippocampus-dependent memory retrieval.

50 ears to be mediated primarily by deficits in memory retrieval.

51 mission from MB neurons is only required for memory retrieval.

52 to problems with perception, attention, and memory retrieval.

53 om MB alphabeta neurons is only required for memory retrieval.

54 for the involvement of awake replay in fear memory retrieval.

55 fear conditioning and are reactivated during memory retrieval.

56 d block the impairing effects of high GCs on memory retrieval.

57 the BLA in fear memory consolidation but not memory retrieval.

58 itive odor memory, but is dispensable during memory retrieval.

59 erior region, subserving successful episodic memory retrieval.

60 ce is attributable to anterograde effects on memory retrieval.

61 uited during learning and reactivated during memory retrieval.

62 y be crucial to reinstatement for successful memory retrieval.

63 lations during retrieval supports successful memory retrieval.

64 tion and short-term memory tasks and enhance memory retrieval.

65 taste novelty processing and familiar taste memory retrieval.

66 thing phase enhances fear discrimination and memory retrieval.

67 ve value of elements during autobiographical memory retrieval.

68 ansport impaired memory acquisition, but not memory retrieval.

69 it is present during remote, but not recent, memory retrieval.

70 acetylcholine release in the cortex to allow memory retrieval.

71 rain glucose uptake at the time of attempted memory retrieval.

72 of stress-susceptible male mice after remote memory retrieval.

73 GABAergic systems during taste learning and memory retrieval.

74 idline structures that are involved in later memory retrieval.

75 mo- and optogenetic approaches impaired fear memory retrieval.

76 ted a robust consensus: Acute stress impairs memory retrieval.

77 our understanding of the network dynamics of memory retrieval.

78 neural strategies associated with successful memory retrieval.

79 ructures that were also engaged during later memory retrieval.

80 ed AC-CA) is capable of eliciting contextual memory retrieval.

81 player in mediating the impact of stress on memory retrieval.

82 oing protein synthesis is required to enable memory retrieval.

83 techniques, much because it fosters repeated memory retrieval.

84 king stress effects on HPA-axis activity and memory retrieval.

85 lly recruited by the AC-CA projection during memory retrieval.

86 ing context fear conditioning and subsequent memory retrieval 2 days later.

87 Memory retrieval activated posterior nodes of the DMN, p

88 However, nothing is known about its role in memory retrieval after self-administration of cocaine, a

89 is not clear whether the process of explicit memory retrieval also becomes more efficient with time.

90 ns between MTL and prefrontal regions during memory retrieval also develop into young adulthood.

91 recuneus were significantly activated during memory retrieval, an anterior DMN node in medial prefron

92 On episodic memory retrieval, an external stimulus (or an internal r

93 el-of PMC engagement during autobiographical memory retrieval and address how the same populations ar

94 ve ripples (SWRs) is thought to support both memory retrieval and consolidation in distributed hippoc

95 r cFos activity in dorsal hippocampus during memory retrieval and context generalization, whereas fem

96 and retrospective modes, possibly reflecting memory retrieval and encoding, respectively.

97 es, possibly to prevent interference between memory retrieval and encoding.

98 lmark explicit-memory features: awareness of memory retrieval and facilitation by attentive encoding.

99 in 2 tasks: hippocampus-dependent contextual memory retrieval and hippocampus-independent random fora

100 bjects, both in regions involved in episodic memory retrieval and in regions involved in olfactory pr

101 re, but not after, a CPP trial disrupted CPP memory retrieval and induced a persistent deficit in ret

102 between these structures occurs during fear memory retrieval and may facilitate synaptic plasticity,

103 le dissociation in the mechanisms underlying memory retrieval and memory destabilization, since AMPAR

104 In particular, memory retrieval and novelty encoding were considered in

105 dynamics of parietal cortex during episodic memory retrieval and provide clear neurophysiological co

106 n the PL-mPFC and BLA for cocaine-associated memory retrieval and reconsolidation in rats.

107 l mechanisms required for cocaine-associated memory retrieval and reconsolidation.

108 s, including visuo-spatial imagery, episodic memory retrieval and self-processing operations, namely

109 mpanzees involves emotionally laden episodic memory retrieval and some level of mental self-projectio

110 bition of competing memories during episodic memory retrieval and suggest that competitive retrieval

111 s that respond to the familiar mouse enabled memory retrieval and the association of these neurons wi

112 Memory retrieval and the molecular mechanisms that are s

113 network that supports the ability to control memory retrieval and to understand the neural basis of a

114 Reactivation was contingent on memory retrieval and was not observed when animals were

115 This pattern of results suggests that memory retrieval and ZIP-sensitive maintenance mechanism

116 describe a model for the interaction between memory retrieval and ZIP-sensitive mechanisms, showing t

117 of the fronto-parietal network: declarative memory retrievals and updating of working memory.

118 nd auditory perception, spatial orientation, memory retrieval, and olfaction may explain some of the

119 y in PL-mPFC may underlie cocaine-associated memory retrieval, and therefore disruption of this plast

120 genetic activation of these cells results in memory retrieval, and this correlates with retained engr

121 textual fear memory while sparing short-term memory, retrieval, and extinction.

122 than inducing vulnerability to interference, memory retrieval appeared to aid the preservation of exi

123 damentally distinct roles of context in fear memory retrieval are processed by distinct vHC output pa

124 Neurophysiological studies focus on memory retrieval as a reproduction of what was experienc

125 +colour representations respectively, during memory retrieval as assessed by repetition priming in an

126 d the cognitive and neural bases of episodic memory retrieval, as well as the extent to which differe

127 the neuronal circuitry participating in fear memory retrieval at both early and late time points foll

128 the 5 d delay, but there was no evidence for memory retrieval at the 25 d delay.

129 of this molecular change was evident only as memory retrieval became PKA-dependent over time.

130 re, this early novelty effect contributed to memory retrieval because neural reward responses, which

131 With the passage of time, memory retrieval becomes independent of alpha'/beta' and

132 on the track again and displayed an apparent memory retrieval behavior: avoidance of the shock zone.

133 l memory activation with impaired subsequent memory retrieval but have not provided an account of thi

134 lation (TGC) was prominent during successful memory retrieval but was weak when memory failed or was

135 that glucocorticoids not only decrease fear memory retrieval but, in addition, augment consolidation

136 brain regions have been linked with episodic memory retrieval, but limited progress has been made in

137 tal cortex (PPC) is thought to contribute to memory retrieval, but little is known about its specific

138 ergic receptor antagonist propranolol before memory retrieval, but not after (during memory reconsoli

139 eta-AR blockade had no effect on initial CPP memory retrieval, but prevented CPP expression during su

140 ce the discrimination threshold for unimodal memory retrieval by enhancing stimulus salience [4], and

141 examined the time course of item and source memory retrieval by recording event-related potentials (

142 induce long-term deficits in drug-associated memory retrieval by reducing neuronal excitability, prov

143 osed that this enhanced NE signaling impairs memory retrieval by stimulating beta(1)-adrenergic recep

144 enetic mechanisms during initial learning or memory retrieval can lead to persistent memory.

145 servation that mechanisms underlying cocaine memory retrieval change depending on the age of the memo

146 The meta-analysis showed that declarative memory retrievals correlated with activity in the inferi

147 Recollection is constructive, the product of memory retrieval cues, the information stored in memory,

148 d amygdala while neurosurgical patients made memory retrieval decisions together with a confidence ju

149 maze, produces an as large strategy shifting/memory retrieval deficit as mPFC or dHip inactivation in

150 s more affected in pure DLB than in AD while memory retrieval deficit was more affected in AD than in

151 lications for understanding visuospatial and memory-retrieval deficits in patients with parietal lobe

152 e left prefrontal cortex (PFC) that reflects memory retrieval demand.

153 as working memory, attention selection, and memory retrieval, depend critically on dopamine and NMDA

154 l on proteasome activity, relative to saline memory retrieval, depend on withdrawal time.

155 hippocampal endocannabinoid system modulates memory retrieval depending on the training-associated ar

156 erve to facilitate either memory encoding or memory retrieval, depending on which type of gamma rhyth

157 at the relationship between UPS activity and memory retrieval depends on training paradigm, brain reg

158 f hippocampal memory engram cells results in memory retrieval despite the fact that these mice are am

159 tant, the neural underpinnings of successful memory retrieval differ when remembering life events and

160 sses how the neural substrates of successful memory retrieval differed as a function of the targeted

161 s-context preexposure or interference during memory retrieval-differentially affected trace dominance

162 cating that dHipp beta-AR blockade induces a memory retrieval disruption.

163 of the adrenergic system that do not affect memory retrieval do not alter extinction.

164 f age, individuals who were able to suppress memory retrieval exhibited tighter coupling between key

165 lapse prevention characteristics than the CS memory retrieval-extinction procedure and could be a pro

166 ly reported that a conditioned stimulus (CS) memory retrieval-extinction procedure decreases reinstat

167 The UCS memory retrieval-extinction procedure has superior relap

168 Unlike the CS-based memory retrieval-extinction procedure, the UCS memory re

169 y assigned to receive either smoking-related memory retrieval followed by extinction training (the R-

170 These findings suggest that memory retrieval followed by new learning does not relia

171 o examine the neural correlates of emotional memory retrieval for a complex sporting event.

172 two subregions differentially contribute to memory retrieval for an association between temporally d

173 awake replay in learning from reward and in memory retrieval for decision making.

174 network of regions consistent with episodic memory retrieval for the A/B task while greater activati

175 h was evidenced through multiple measures of memory retrieval function.

176 enial cortex (RSC) in human autobiographical memory retrieval has been confirmed by functional brain

177 namic processes requiring protein synthesis, memory retrieval has long been considered a passive read

178 re recent functional neuroimaging studies of memory retrieval have reported greater activity in left

179 nhibitory peptide, ZIP) and those induced by memory retrieval (i.e., reconsolidation).

180 nction training following brief cue-elicited memory retrieval (ie, retrieval-extinction [R-E] trainin

181 h it is known that glucocorticoid effects on memory retrieval impairment depend on rapid interactions

182 h local infusions of propranolol blocked the memory retrieval impairment induced by the CB receptor a

183 Here we show that practising memory retrieval improves long-term retention in a nonhu

184 es have shown a negative correlation between memory retrieval in alpha and beta power, and a positive

185 ent of Context technique appears to scaffold memory retrieval in an age-appropriate manner during a p

186 s while stimulating AC-CA projections during memory retrieval in mice behaving in virtual-reality env

187 receptor antagonist pyrilamine disrupted IA memory retrieval in rats, thus strongly supporting an ac

188 CONCLUSION Failure of extinction memory retrieval in schizophrenia is associated with vmP

189 The results suggest that TGC accompanies memory retrieval in the hippocampus and that patterned b

190 tigating the molecular mechanisms underlying memory retrieval in the rat.

191 ich reduced performance without obliterating memory retrieval in the water maze, produces an as large

192 e mechanisms can be generalized to selective memory retrieval in which competing memories interfere w

193 circuit activity and context discrimination memory retrieval, in a within-subjects design, of male r

194 aged across trials, in regions implicated in memory retrieval, including the hippocampus and angular

195 , converging evidence suggests that episodic memory retrieval involves the reinstatement of neural ac

196 Memory retrieval is a dynamic aspect of memory formation

197 veryday lives, however, much of our episodic memory retrieval is accomplished by means of free recall

198 These results suggest that memory retrieval is associated with uncertain cue proces

199 Episodic memory retrieval is assumed to rely on the rapid reactiv

200 ]; however, it remains elusive whether human memory retrieval is driven by attractor dynamics and wha

201 ongoing protein synthesis is required before memory retrieval is engaged, and suggest that this prote

202 Thus, cocaine-associated memory retrieval is mediated by beta-AR activity within

203 xperiments confirmed that the role of RSC in memory retrieval is not time limited.

204 Episodic memory retrieval is reliant upon cognitive control syste

205 nt behavioural paths, at specific times when memory retrieval is required, and in a manner that could

206 Episodic memory retrieval is thought to involve reinstatement of

207 Detailed memory retrieval is thought to involve the reinstatement

208 Over time, memory retrieval is thought to transfer from the hippoca

209 ippocampus is critical for explicit episodic memory retrieval, it is controversial whether this regio

210 previous studies have suggested that verbal memory retrieval leads to the reinstatement of activity

211 s could not be attributed to changes in fear memory retrieval, learned safety, or memory interference

212 e possibility is that neural activity during memory retrieval, like replay of spiking neurons in the

213 mory retrieval-extinction procedure, the UCS memory retrieval manipulation decreases renewal and rein

214 esults suggest that the effects of stress on memory retrieval may be contingent on the strength of th

215 However, previous findings suggest that memory retrieval may be more dynamic than previously tho

216 We show here that memory retrieval may benefit from this non-specific plas

217 level processes that support imagination and memory retrieval may shape low-level sensory representat

218 These findings reveal a sparsely implemented memory retrieval mechanism in the hippocampus that opera

219 the immediate scene, whereas RSC may support memory retrieval mechanisms that allow the scene to be l

220 This study demonstrates that repeated memory retrieval might strengthen memory by inducing mor

221 ment effects within a posterior midline core memory retrieval network during all phases of the experi

222 ecently-experienced events throughout a core memory retrieval network.

223 AIY memory retrieval neurons sense tyramine via the SER-2 re

224 mpus independence, suggesting that long-term memory retrieval normally depends on the hippocampus but

225 impact of anisomycin in two conditions: when memory retrieval occurred in a reference memory task aft

226 es, with the most robust reactivation during memory retrieval occurring in mid-CA3 (CA3b), the region

227 fects on noradrenergic activity in impairing memory retrieval of emotionally arousing experiences.

228 nctional brain development during successful memory retrieval of scenes in children, adolescents, and

229 show the greatest developmental changes for memory retrieval of scenes.

230 role in the selective regulation of spatial memory retrieval of stressful experience, shedding light

231 Memory retrieval, often termed reconsolidation, can rend

232 n the neural correlates of successful source memory retrieval ("old-new effects") for objects encoded

233 ation prevented stress-induced impairment of memory retrieval on both the object-recognition and the

234 in regions confirmed that effects of cocaine memory retrieval on proteasome activity, relative to sal

235 ce is particularly important during episodic memory retrieval or when remembering specific events in

236 th a 7% increase in correct responses during memory retrieval (P = .01).

237 ons, such as introspection, autobiographical memory retrieval, planning the future, and predicting so

238 The cortical reinstatement hypothesis of memory retrieval posits that content-specific cortical a

239 thalamus, whereas metacognitive ability for memory retrieval predicted greater connectivity between

240 activation during episodic autobiographical memory retrieval predicted the degree of suppression dur

241 in these cells critically contribute to the memory retrieval process.

242 How do memory retrieval processes (i.e., familiarity and recoll

243 ck, which may echo an increased influence of memory retrieval processes in CA3 on firing in CA1.

244 ensitivity of event-related fields (ERFs) to memory retrieval processes is not well determined.

245 eported several modulations thought to index memory retrieval processes, but relatively limited work

246 Prospective coding is believed to reflect memory retrieval processes, whereas retrospective coding

247 induced by immutable bottlenecks in people's memory retrieval processes.

248 mploying ERFs in subsequent studies of human memory retrieval processing operations.

249 rk interactions as being central to episodic memory retrieval, providing insight into how multiple co

250 formed auditory Pavlovian fear memory; fear memory retrieval (reactivation) and postreactivation (PR

251 val.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT We show that cued memory retrieval reinstates neural activity on a faster

252 f LLPC based on the presence (or absence) of memory-retrieval-related activity, dissociations in the

253 regation-is markedly reduced during episodic memory retrieval relative to closely matched analogical

254 reduced when individuals engage in episodic memory retrieval, relative to other cognitive tasks, and

255 tional significance of LPC activation during memory retrieval remains a subject of active debate.

256 How these cells participate in memory retrieval remains unclear.

257 the contribution of striatum to declarative memory retrieval remains unknown.

258 rapid succession, to ensure that successful memory retrieval required them to disambiguate multiple

259 During memory retrieval, responses in DMN regions peaked sooner

260 Similar to aging patterns in memory retrieval, results also showed that older adults

261 Intentionally suppressing memory retrieval (retrieval stopping) reduces hippocampa

262 CBD3 was mildly anxiolytic without affecting memory retrieval, sensorimotor function or depression.

263 It is known that ZIP sensitivity and memory retrieval share at least some molecular targets (

264 ically and temporally with histamine-induced memory retrieval, showing the active involvement of hist

265 for the role of oscillatory reinstatement in memory retrieval.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Recent neurobiol

266 nt of cortical activity is a feature of cued memory retrieval.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT We show that cue

267 nto the hippocampus after either training or memory retrieval significantly enhance memory retention

268 indow after either fear conditioning or fear memory retrieval significantly impairs the consolidation

269 based on general cognitive processes such as memory retrieval, similarity-based partial matching, and

270 l to dissociate three components of episodic memory: retrieval success, precision, and vividness.

271 These findings suggest that weak memory retrieval supported by earlier ERP modulations, m

272 elated potentials (ERPs) were collected in a memory retrieval task that was designed to assess the re

273 Participants, ages 19-85, took part in a memory retrieval task with a protracted retrieval trial

274 ivity and poorer performance on a subsequent memory retrieval task, strongly implicating sex steroids

275 ajor deficits in a strategy shifting/spatial memory retrieval task.

276 ns between brain regions during a contextual memory retrieval task.

277 h right before the probe trial did not alter memory retrieval tested at the 5 d or 25 d delay.

278 for neurally inspired cognitive modeling of memory retrieval that has no biologically unconstrained

279 nd show that this substrate predicts working memory retrieval times on a trial-by-trial basis.

280 or anisomycin) in the amygdala 10 min before memory retrieval transiently impaired auditory fear memo

281 omycin administered following a context-only memory retrieval trial to impair conditioned locomotor s

282 increases in connectivity during successful memory retrieval typified network topology, with individ

283 als how brain regions implicated in emotion, memory retrieval, visuomotor imagery, and social cogniti

284 nses in which the participant's awareness of memory retrieval was absent.

285 Explicit memory retrieval was associated with later brain potenti

286 l activity during the period 1-hour prior to memory retrieval was associated with superior memory per

287 Successful memory retrieval was characterized by greater global con

288 In initial experiments, memory retrieval was elicited via a cue-induced seeking/

289 agged CA1 cells were silenced, we found that memory retrieval was impaired and representations in the

290 RSC-dependent context fear memory retrieval was mediated by NR2A, but not NR2B, sub

291 rrelates of the processes involved in cueing memory retrieval were investigated using ERPs to unstudi

292 heart rate and skin conductance level during memory retrieval were measured before, directly after, a

293 re, two levels of functional organization of memory retrieval were shown.

294 Off-line processing also occurs after memory retrieval when memories are destabilized and then

295 nced by motivational state during contextual memory retrieval, when motivational cues were required t

296 tween these two alternative outcomes of fear memory retrieval, when neither process is engaged.

297 that DMN parietal regions directly supported memory retrieval, whereas non-DMN parietal regions were

298 bilization, since AMPAR antagonism prevented memory retrieval while still allowing the destabilizatio

299 erm memory and reconcile current theories of memory retrieval with classic notions about the memory m

300 between these MTL regions during successful memory retrieval, with reversible signal flow from the c