ライフサイエンスコーパス: mesophile

1 re 20-25 deg.C higher than the corresponding mesophile.

2 Here, we addressed this issue in mesophiles.

3 egrees C, roughly the thermal death point of mesophiles.

4 arison with genes of other psychrophiles and mesophiles.

5 s of higher contact trace when compared with mesophiles.

6 rmophiles, and neither hyperthermophiles nor mesophiles.

7 s of Bacteria, including microbes related to mesophiles.

8 thermophiles when compared to proteins from mesophiles.

9 ratures which rapidly denature proteins from mesophiles.

10 done on the mechanism of protein splicing in mesophiles.

11 bial growth remained low at around 3-log for mesophiles, 4.5-log for yeasts and molds and 2-log for e

12 approximately 29 known to occur in bacterial mesophiles and 24 to 31 known to occur in the archaeal h

13 s in A. cellulolyticus orthologs compared to mesophiles and inverse preferences for G and A at the fi

14 led to significantly lower counts of aerobic mesophiles and psychrotrophic bacteria in anchovy muscle

15 ive from the cold-loving psychrophiles, from mesophiles, and from thermophiles.

16 f helix-rich proteins found in thermophiles, mesophiles, and organisms that flourish near 0 degrees C

17 Although the growth temperatures of the mesophiles are about 50 degrees C below that of M. janna

18 he psychrophile Bacillus globisporus and the mesophile Bacillus subtilis have been solved and compare

19 silico mutants of adenylate kinase from the mesophile Bacillus subtilis were generated, and their mo

20 ch a study with our model protein HPr from a mesophile, Bacillus subtilis, and a thermophile, Bacillu

21 Alternatively, organisms that evolved as mesophiles but later recolonized a hot environment (Ther

22 uantitatively compare hyperthermophiles with mesophiles by the rRNA method.

23 ein fragments that cooperatively function in mesophiles can be aided by the use of thermophilic enzym

24 logous domain of the cellulase CenA from the mesophile Cellulomonas fimi.

25 thermophile Pyrococcus furiosus (Pf) and the mesophile Clostridium pasteurianum (Cp) are monitored vi

26 ermophile Pyrococcus furiosus (RdPf) and the mesophile Clostridium pasteurianum (RdCp) has been studi

27 his structure with its counterparts from the mesophiles Clostridium symbiosum and Escherichia coli ha

28 r and more sensitive to antimycin A than the mesophile control, Chlamydomonas raudensis SAG 49.72.

29 primary difference between CYP175A1 and its mesophile counterparts is the investment of charged resi

30 dihydrouridine, on average, than that of the mesophile E. coli or the psychrotroph L. bavaricus.

31 lar or lower microbial counts (total aerobic mesophiles, enterobacteriaceae, and yeasts/moulds) while

32 olding for two ribonucleases H, one from the mesophile Escherichia coli and one from the thermophile

33 We show that the mesophile Escherichia coli and the extremophile Shewanel

34 For CheA proteins from the mesophile Escherichia coli and the thermophile Thermotog

35 rs was compared for RNA polymerases from the mesophile Escherichia coli and the thermophile Thermus a

36 hilic bacterium Thermus thermophilus and the mesophile Escherichia coli demonstrate a dramatic and su

37 e-adapted bacterial species such as SS9, the mesophile Escherichia coli did not regulate its fatty ac

38 RNA polymerase from the mesophile Escherichia coli exists in two forms, the core

39 the thermophile Thermus thermophilus and the mesophile Escherichia coli revealed that the thermostabi

40 opropylmalate dehydrogenase (IPMDH) from the mesophiles Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium h

41 important for understanding the evolution of mesophiles from thermophiles.

42 In contrast, genetic studies of the mesophiles in the archaeal genus Methanococcus have beco

43 the hyperthermophile is obtained even if the mesophile is more stable at room temperature.

44 The calculations indicate that the mesophile is stabilized by the presence of salt while th

45 e structure and result in a return to a more mesophile-like DeltaC degrees (P).

46 binant (r) archaeal histones (rHFoB from the mesophile Methanobacterium formicicum, and rHMfA, rHMfB,

47 recombinant archaeal histone rHFoB, from the mesophile Methanobacterium formicicum, has been determin

48 rthermophile Methanothermus fervidus and the mesophile Methanobacterium formicicum, respectively, hav

49 ed for three archael histones: hFoB from the mesophile Methanobacterium formicicum; hMfB from the the

50 A closely related homologue from the mesophile Methanococcus maripaludis (Mma) is nearly iner

51 ted methanogenic members of the Archaea: the mesophile Methanococcus voltae (Mv), the thermophile M.

52 ted methanogenic members of the Archaea (the mesophile Methanococcus voltae (MVO), the thermopile Met

53 e Methanococcus thermolithotrophicus and the mesophile Methanococcus voltae have been solved to resol

54 Characterization of SepRS from the mesophile Methanosarcina mazei by gel filtration and non

55 ent of class II xylose isomerases (XIs) from mesophiles, moderate thermophiles, and hyperthermophiles

56 results observed for other psychrophiles and mesophiles, only clpB and hsp33 were upregulated at low

57 Vent samples have also yielded new mesophiles (optimal growth near 30 degreesC) that produc

58 ed with those of the citrate synthase from a mesophile, pig heart (PCS).

59 It is similar to values reported for mesophile proteins of comparable size, indicating that t

60 lues are similar to those observed for small mesophile proteins.

61 e native hyperthermophile protein from small mesophile proteins.

62 two features which differ significantly from mesophile proteins; (1) an unusually large proportion of

63 bacteriophage Pf1, both of which grow in the mesophile Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

64 three dominant strategies within the vibrio: mesophiles, psychrophiles and apparently generalist broa

65 ly adapted to cold temperatures stressful to mesophiles since little differential gene expression was

66 In mesophiles, single-stranded DNA binding proteins (SSBs)

67 III have focused mainly on the enzymes from mesophiles such as Escherichia coli.

68 to a greater extent in thermophiles than in mesophiles, suggesting that helical interaction based on

69 arger than that of outer arm dynein from the mesophile Tetrahymena.

70 he loss in entropy upon folding is higher in mesophiles than in thermophiles.

71 previously reported for CPS from an enteric mesophile, the kinetic properties of the arginine-specif

72 to obtain recombinant proteins derived from mesophiles, the production of thermoacidophilic proteins

73 rved in all proteins, but in the case of the mesophile/thermophile comparison there is a directional

74 easing stability during the progression from mesophile to psychrophile, there is not a strict correla

75 iles use a mechanism similar to that used by mesophiles to deal with the large number of abasic sites

76 ferences in this measure of fluidity for the mesophile vs hyperthermophile protein interiors.

77 logenetic trees because they outcompeted the mesophiles when they adapted to lower temperatures, poss

78 pon folding is lower in thermophiles than in mesophiles, whereas the loss in entropy upon folding is

79 antly more favorable in thermophiles than in mesophiles, whereas the maximal stability temperature it

80 ty similar to that of histidine kinases from mesophiles, with maximum activity at 70 degreesC.