ライフサイエンスコーパス: metrics

1 ery (10 metrics) and macular degeneration (7 metrics).

2 (shape and first-, second-, and third-order metrics).

3 ranked using several classification quality metrics.

4 orly characterized by existing biomechanical metrics.

5 reviously established stable isotope bi-plot metrics.

6 red conservation objectives and biodiversity metrics.

7 n among the suite of environmental diversity metrics.

8 erogeneity was observed for all investigated metrics.

9 ed by principal components analysis of these metrics.

10 The mean CoV was </=4.5% across the DKI metrics.

11 vement in any of 4 primary composite quality metrics.

12 ise to sensitively modulate important device metrics.

13 exceeding national post-transplant survival metrics.

14 of 27 published models using standard graph metrics.

15 ly risk stratify patients using standardized metrics.

16 in PET and low-dose CT varied greatly among metrics.

17 ntation following current FDA bioequivalence metrics.

18 dicaid Services (CMS) as pay-for-performance metrics.

19 in comparing alternatives across a range of metrics.

20 ation of the clusters with existing clinical metrics.

21 and distal features that influence all three metrics.

22 tion and dilation are distinct from baseline metrics.

23 ted induction of EMT as assessed by multiple metrics.

24 e ranking capability of 7 individual scoring metrics.

25 comment period, the ACPC council approved 18 metrics.

26 e of different methodologies and statistical metrics.

27 me drugs, which is consistent with surrogacy metrics.

28 lpha diversity metrics, and 4 beta diversity metrics.

29 tructures, and experimental lattice cohesion metrics.

30 asculatures using vessel-based and FAZ-based metrics.

31 problems and provides novel cluster quality metrics.

32 strongly connected to the other right heart metrics.

33 ingle-cell contours and extract quantitative metrics.

34 American Journal of Pathology beyond normal metrics.

35 ) and asthma control using validated outcome metrics.

36 Of 10 potential predictors including 7 PET metrics, a BSL greater than 6,852 (P = 0.017) was chosen

37 Regression analysis showed that cerebellar metrics accounted for extra variance in both motor and c

38 ts resulted in guidelines for using these QC metrics across a wide range of sequencing depths and pro

39 d both nodal and global dynamic DMN-topology metrics across different brain states.

40 icantly impacted all three major demographic metrics (adult mortality, neonatal mortality and birthra

41 We used these metrics and 24 datasets to evaluate six widely used PA m

42 o significant correlations between somato-SG metrics and age.

43 ts models were used to analyze image quality metrics and diagnostic performance for lesion detection

44 were extracted from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Disease Expenditure 2013 project

45 of body weight changes, on energy-metabolism metrics and glycemic control.The study was a randomized,

46 en vascular density or foveal avascular zone metrics and hemoglobin A1C or duration of diabetes.

47 sion analyses were conducted between imaging metrics and PFS.

48 ally, QuickMIRSeq generates a rich set of QC metrics and publication-ready plots.

49 To examine the association between genomic metrics and the extent of immune infiltration in TNBCs.

50 CO2 had minimal effects on plant and soil N metrics and their responses to plant diversity, whereas

51 We assessed the correlation between these metrics and used spline models to test for the presence

52 nificant improvements over standard clinical metrics and visual interpretation for discriminating ben

53 While there are metrics and visualization techniques that allow analysts

54 sets are available for cataract surgery (10 metrics) and macular degeneration (7 metrics).

55 tive abundance of 3 phyla, 2 alpha diversity metrics, and 4 beta diversity metrics.

56 a city at the 25th percentile for those same metrics, and exhibiting sprawl-like suburban development

57 Hype-driven claims, not fully appropriate metrics, and negligence of key parameters are probably s

58 the 75th percentile for all three urban-form metrics, and with a network of buses, trams, and bicycle

59 These outstanding performance metrics are attributed to the large loading of active ma

60 getated marsh ratios (UVVR) suggesting these metrics are broadly applicable indicators of microtidal

61 Population-level disease metrics are critical to guide the distribution of resour

62 The routing metrics are derived from the characteristics of entangle

63 basis, empirically demonstrating that these metrics are not independent.

64 Accurate dose metrics are particularly important for in vitro cellular

65 Suggestions for standardized metrics are provided in this document.

66 Other metrics are therefore needed to understand the drivers o

67 The distributions of the observed metrics are used to empirically define boundaries of dru

68 s, Bragg peaks, and guided algorithm fitness metrics as a function of signal-to-noise ratio.

69 ch of investigating population-level smoking metrics as moderators.

70 he respective strengths of the two groups of metrics as tools for identification of potential macro-

71 The metrics assessed (unit energy, GHG emissions, and cost)

72 currence in the NEPTR may be predicted by FA metrics at baseline in patients with glioblastoma.

73 In particular, in subjects with >/=5 metrics at the ideal level (compared with those with </=

74 Only 5% of the participants had >/=5 metrics at the ideal level.

75 Angle metrics at the inferior corneal limbus, 6 o'clock positi

76 ds, as well as background activity-based PET metrics (background-subtracted lesion activity [BSL] and

77 of each FQ and compare efficacy by multiple metrics: bacterial load, sterilization rates, early bact

78 We suggest risk metrics be placed in a more concrete conceptual framewor

79 ), form an attractive platform to build risk metrics because they can easily incorporate disparate pi

80 nce and spatial autocorrelation, we compared metrics between sexes, between population types (histori

81 Across all metrics, both scenarios performed the same, but the opti

82 -traits was not significantly related to DTI metrics but inattention scores were related to AD in cor

83 Among these metrics, CA1-SRLM thickness was positively associated wi

84 Landscape and climate metrics calculated for each site demonstrated that imper

85 Alternately, coarse-resolution velocity metrics can be combined with fine-resolution diversity m

86 ecies model systems, we establish that these metrics capture complimentary aspects of interaction mod

87 s suggest that the introduced decision error metrics characterize signaling failures more accurately.

88 atitudinal gradient and estimated a suite of metrics characterizing phylogeographic history.

89 d to derive lipid-normalized bioaccumulation metrics Clip, Biota sediment accumulation factor (BSAF),

90 In this study, we devised two novel metrics, Cohort Coverage Sparseness (CCS) and Unevenness

91 ulation attributable risk for these Simple 7 metrics combined was 37.1%.

92 IPs according to specificity and selectivity metrics; commercial MIPs were characterized by quite bro

93 Pupil dilation metrics correlate with individual differences measured b

94 Volume-based PET metrics correlate with PFS and OS and could be used for

95 Density metrics correlated with age.

96 evolved and multiplied in number, the tumor metrics criteria used to characterize therapeutic respon

97 d outcomes sets for ophthalmic conditions to metrics currently reported by eye hospitals.

98 We built covariates using contact network metrics, demographic information and infection status, a

99 ia Our analyses using phylogenetic diversity metrics demonstrate a clear lack of geographic phylogene

100 PET stability metrics demonstrated that PET quantitation was not affec

101 provide a formulation which shows how these metrics depend on the signal transduction noise level.

102 ce amongst the three functional connectivity metrics depends primarily on the network correlation lev

103 The spectral-temporal metrics derived from 2009-2011 Landsat imagery (overall

104 o investigate the relationship between pupil metrics derived from this novel task and quantitative be

105 Anterior chamber angle metrics did not differ significantly from morning to aft

106 s based on different environmental diversity metrics differed substantially from each other and from

107 Changes in eastern Pacific ENSO SST metrics due to climate change are secondary to the model

108 Key correlative science metrics emerge for an upcoming clinical trial, testing e

109 Metrics evaluated included peak number, skewness, and ku

110 all, natural temporal variation in community metrics exceeded the effects of fishing in this highly d

111 to both mild hyperoxia and normoxia for all metrics except for the worst PaO2.

112 We found no major differences in these metrics, except for differential expression of a Y-chrom

113 ecosystem functions and ecosystem condition metrics exhibited thresholds in response to a gradient o

114 ts showed that the variation in phylogenetic metrics explained independently by environmental variabl

115 Metrics extracted from the automatically tracked spindle

116 nt influence of ASD diagnosis on several DTI metrics (FA, MD, RD, and AD), primarily in the corpus ca

117 Previous reciprocity metrics fall short of this goal on both empirical and th

118 Academic metrics for 3850 faculties at the top 55 NIH-funded univ

119 Standardized metrics for alert fatigue is needed to advance the field

120 cteristics of existing and newly constructed metrics for arterial hyperoxia were examined, and the as

121 ill help clinicians understand the available metrics for assessing discrimination, calibration, and t

122 modified Delphi approach to select relevant metrics for assessing patient-level interventions in acu

123 ncident with the collection of environmental metrics for eight sites located in the western basin of

124 Whole-lung and lobar quantitative CT-derived metrics for emphysema and bronchial wall thickness were

125 We propose observational metrics for evaluating whether life was initiated by pan

126 come pathways based on ecologically relevant metrics for exposure and effect can bring risk assessmen

127 ering depth-dependent behavior of similarity metrics for identical and unrelated samples.

128 Variability in the metrics for image acquisition at the total body, regiona

129 ndividuals with a view to obtain comparative metrics for lifelong LTL attrition and learn about the t

130 l results revealed that hospital performance metrics for mortality showed significant climate depende

131 n FIT application were developed and quality metrics for program implementation proposed.

132 ile, and the number of citations as suitable metrics for quality consideration.

133 Using metrics for quantifying the diversity of ecological comm

134 We introduce several new resilience metrics for quantifying the resilience of critical mater

135 We evaluate statistical metrics for temporal change in the frequency of individu

136 lute true rate, the most important and harsh metrics for the multi-label systems.

137 Citation metrics from 224 articles indicated that half of the pub

138 Annual clinical measures were linked to metrics from a geographic information system for each pa

139 ite of recent developments in ozone exposure metrics, from a concentration-based to a more physiologi

140 Interface fluid metrics, graft nonadherence.

141 Most process metrics had significantly greater changes in the ERAS ta

142 st applications, and lack of standardization metrics has hindered independent experimental comparison

143 Commonly used risk metrics have been based on logistic regression models th

144 Functional connectivity metrics have been widely used to infer the underlying st

145 ddress the former, we assess by a variety of metrics how accurately humans are able to predict influe

146 itive treatment effect was detected with all metrics; however, DeltaRnet showed a lower intersubject

147 ructure was quantified with six phylogenetic metrics (i.e., phylogenetic diversity, mean pairwise dis

148 sive report with several comparative quality metrics; (ii) constructs the most confident merged scaff

149 Life's Simple 7 ideal cardiovascular health metrics in 4195 blacks in the JHS.

150 ver, no studies have directly compared these metrics in a contemporary population that includes poten

151 rce for CMS to implement new OPO performance metrics in a standardized fashion.

152 mpact and to summarise the common themes and metrics in an impact matrix.

153 ous circadian clock, on specific performance metrics in Major League Baseball.

154 n be combined with fine-resolution diversity metrics in order to leverage the respective strengths of

155 onclusion:(18)F-FDG PET and MR ADC histogram metrics in pediatric DIPG demonstrate different characte

156 hould consider these alternative readmission metrics in strategies for risk reduction and cost saving

157 plings against other functional connectivity metrics in the microscopic scale of neuronal networks th

158 metagenes correlated separately with genomic metrics in the three major breast cancer subtypes.

159 her dental specialties for all measured Yelp metrics in this study.

160 We compared these metrics in undisturbed primary forest and intensively lo

161 The imaging-based metrics included a broader set of multiscale variables,

162 lowed observed values across a wide range of metrics including aboveground biomass, tree diameter gro

163 Dose metrics including volumetric CT dose index, dose-length

164 hold structure where known, and a variety of metrics including workforce participation and school enr

165 on the Yelp website for nearly all measured metrics, including average star ratings, number of revie

166 Global imaging metrics, including maximum standardized uptake value (SU

167 sess various volume-based PET quantification metrics, including metabolic tumor volume and total lesi

168 Metrics indicated that the 2-tissue model was superior t

169 QC, parsing results, and aggregating quality metrics into an interactive dashboard designed to richly

170 lso included covariates breaking the network metrics into subsets that differentiated between contact

171 Reporting both size and mass based metrics is common in atmospheric particle measurements,

172 ion models to determine which combination of metrics is most accurate in diagnosis.

173 ices that demonstrate comparable performance metrics is paradigm shifting, as these new materials off

174 It is unclear to what extent different metrics lead to consistent delineation of hotspot bounda

175 notations, estimates of nucleotide diversity metrics, linkage disequilibrium statistics, recombinatio

176 es and how the financial implications of HAI metrics may produce pressure to change diagnostic testin

177 The ACA metrics measured for each eye were: angle opening distan

178 Three tested metrics met all 4 Prentice criteria for surrogacy for th

179 ts of acceptability for multiple biophysical metrics of "developability." Amino acid sequences from 1

180 ical thickness, along with diffusion-derived metrics of 20 major white matter tracts were extracted f

181 aluate previously used and newly constructed metrics of arterial hyperoxia and systematically assess

182 Analytical metrics of arterial hyperoxia should be judiciously cons

183 uous monitoring of multiple behaviours, with metrics of behaviours that may be considered more intuit

184 se To determine if computed tomographic (CT) metrics of bone mineral density and muscle mass can impr

185 Purpose To compare three metrics of breast density on full-field digital mammogra

186 d as a global lung index for comparison with metrics of bronchodilator response measured by using spi

187 age (grey matter fraction, T2 lesion volume, metrics of cerebellar atrophy and cerebellar lesion volu

188 We show that pupil metrics of constriction and dilation are distinct from b

189 ; left ventricular hypertrophy; and worsened metrics of diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia.

190 olves developing and implementing meaningful metrics of different phases of quality of IBD care and m

191 mingham risk, and it provided improvement in metrics of discrimination and reclassification.

192 from photogrammetry quantified the following metrics of habitat quality: 1) visual exposure to predat

193 Metrics of heterogeneity, including median odds ratio (M

194 and performed graph theory to obtain network metrics of integration within (local efficiency) the DMS

195 ght stress, they can be unrelated to visible metrics of mortality, i.e. lack of meristematic activity

196 The influence ranking was compared to other metrics of network centrality.

197 We sought to assess potential metrics of organ procurement organizations (OPOs) utiliz

198 After 2, 7, 14, and 28 days, metrics of physiological performance including cardiores

199 Via this process, we documented 244 metrics of risk from 141 studies falling into at least 1

200 veral types of wire, and evaluate analytical metrics of single and arrayed ChIMES sensors against a s

201 , indicating that behavioral IIV can predict metrics of success that personality does not.

202 tween immune prognostic category and genomic metrics of the cancer.

203 (single scattering albedo, SSA), along with metrics of the structure of the spatial field of these p

204 r findings demonstrate that key quantitative metrics of these networks correlate with the continuum o

205 palm oil, as well as annual remotely sensed metrics of tree cover loss and fire occurrence, to evalu

206 ssion grade 1-3; imaging parameters included metrics of tumor avidity (SUVmax/mean/peak), composites

207 ar associations were also observed for other metrics of UV.

208 These were combined into metrics of vulnerability, including an overall index and

209 ermine the covariation between brain imaging metrics of WM-network activation and connectivity and no

210 An expert panel rated 90 candidate metrics on a 9-point Likert scale for association with 4

211 tic curve and the area under the curve (AUC) metrics on manually curated datasets confirmed the excel

212 rting associated sensitivity and specificity metrics on the receiver operating characteristic curve.

213 Conversely, traditional postural sway metrics or SPPB performance did not associate with futur

214 predicted pTR, and composite avidity/spatial metrics outperformed avidity alone.

215 Various global imaging metrics outperformed baseline clinical markers in predic

216 lucose (p=0.005) and hyperglycaemia (on four metrics: p=0.007 for >180 mg/dL [>10.0 mmol/L], p=0.02 f

217 For some metrics, particularly when truncation is less frequent f

218 ost widely cited tool underperforms for most metrics, particularly when using default settings.

219 Thirty-one metrics passed the RAND process and, after the open comm

220 ffect of treatment on body condition, immune metrics, plasma corticosterone concentrations, total ant

221 erception task with classical psychophysical metrics (precision and accuracy), principal component an

222 parent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram metrics, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall su

223 , and Gene-Gene Interaction analyses, with 4 metrics proposed and validated for each gene.

224 On their own, the metrics proposed here explain a larger proportion of var

225 The resulting metrics provide more and better information compared to

226 We describe key quality metrics, provide a freely available software package to

227 that an average of the 7 individual scoring metrics provided the most effective weighted average ran

228 CPC) Section had attempted to create quality metrics (QM) for ambulatory pediatric practice, but limi

229 Furthermore, different metrics quantifying different aspects of migration pheno

230 Fourteen metrics rated >6 in all criteria except feasibility were

231 ts need to be considered when using relative metrics, ratio analyses appear to be similarly sensitive

232 volves the use of two mutually complementary metrics, recall and discrimination.

233 ssing issues such as different repeatability metrics, relative units, log transformation, and asymmet

234 ease, but its impact on hospital performance metrics remains unstudied.

235 ce, and our suggestive findings for multiple metrics require further study in a population with highe

236 The Population Health Metrics Research Consortium shortened verbal autopsy que

237 tals with high performance on 3, 2, 1, and 0 metrics, respectively (log-rank, P < 0.001).

238 7 ideal metrics with those with 0 to 2 ideal metrics, respectively.

239 er varying MR conditions using the following metrics: sensitivity, scatter fraction, contrast recover

240 gical changes detected using only one or two metrics should consequently be interpreted cautiously be

241 Performance metrics show scalability into tens of thousands of seque

242 All log-transformed PET metrics showed a strong linear association, with a Pears

243 Three of the urban form metrics studied (contiguity, circularity, and vegetation

244 denatured protein preparation in all of the metrics studied, which underscores the utility of biomim

245 and from priorities based on spatiotemporal metrics such as climatic velocity.

246 ring drug interaction fingerprint similarity metrics such as correlation and Euclidean distance.

247 e generated and acquired images according to metrics such as overall correlation coefficients and dif

248 as used to evaluate prediction accuracy with metrics such as precision, recall, and F-score.

249 ple, paradigm can result in meaningful pupil metrics that correlate with individual differences in au

250 elp CP, it is important to define allocation metrics that enable CP to receive a better-matched kidne

251 predation per unit time); and (iii) use risk metrics that facilitate comparison among studies and the

252 eased-donor organs is compounded by donation metrics that fail to account for the total pool of possi

253 or providers; improvement of quality-of-care metrics that include sexual orientation and gender infor

254 l institutions as well as on the traditional metrics that our institutions use to evaluate faculty in

255 the ICCs were below 0.60 for 95% ethanol in metrics that were more sensitive to relative abundance.

256 mmediately, the ICCs were below 0.60 for the metrics that were sensitive to relative abundance; howev

257 As compared to traditional metrics, the degree of multi-scale complexity contained

258 th cardiovascular disease include optimizing metrics to assess quality, ameliorating disparities, enh

259 hould be carefully considered when selecting metrics to build multiparametric models.

260 mensions, we created n-dimensional plots and metrics to characterize any set of quantitative measurem

261 employing such data often lack standardized metrics to evaluate communities in niche space where mor

262 Many previous analyses have used flawed metrics to evaluate herbicide intensity and toxicity tre

263 Quantitative metrics to evaluate the results of image fusion are also

264 By extending the original metrics to multiple dimensions, we created n-dimensional

265 ctors are compared using several statistical metrics to quantify similarity/overlap of high dimension

266 community ecology, and it offers accessible metrics to quantitatively analyze the structure of commu

267 aring policies with respect to the following metrics: total mortalities, DSA-average model for end-st

268 primary analyses, including quality control metrics, transcript alignment, count generation, transcr

269 dy shows that using population-level smoking metrics uncovers significant relationships between mater

270 The assessment metrics used in RNA-Puzzles are briefly described.

271 and theory, ranging from charting the design metrics useful for developing the next generation of MV-

272 to consider in defining quantitative imaging metrics using (18)F-FLT to assess tumor proliferation.

273 on (ISIC) on standards for image acquisition metrics using a hybrid Delphi method.

274 We demonstrate the utility of these metrics using stable isotope data; however, the approach

275 ply chains to disruptions and validate these metrics using the 2010 rare earth element (REE) crisis a

276 Performance metrics varied widely across diagnostic indications, wit

277 ormal eyes and correlations among blood flow metrics, VF thresholds, and clinical optical coherence t

278 st majority of the variation in phylogenetic metrics was explained by spatially structured environmen

279 Employing these metrics we revealed non-uniformity of coverage and low c

280 From these metrics, we developed a mathematical model of cancer bio

281 ining 2 alpha diversity and 3 beta diversity metrics were all relatively accurate, with ICCs above 0.

282 lus were reconstructed, and scalar diffusion metrics were calculated along the length of each tract.

283 Objective image quality metrics were compared in the phantom experiment by using

284 Nucleic acid yield and quality metrics were evaluated in relation to FFPET specimen age

285 All ratio metrics were highly cross-correlated, but generally were

286 Numerous metrics were identified as poorly or moderately reliable

287 ons underlying correlations among allocation metrics were mapped, and loci related to nitrogen uptake

288 Refugia identified by diversity or velocity metrics were not strongly associated with the current pr

289 Six metrics were rated >6 in all criteria: 2 measures of Clo

290 All investigated metrics were reproducible when calculated from a truncat

291 ther than SD or variance), but distinct best metrics were seen for individual brain regions.

292 The topological metrics were then evaluated.

293 ir trapping, have been found to be important metrics when differentiating patients with severe asthma

294 the standardized effect sizes of these three metrics), which emphasize on different depths of evoluti

295 Climate landscape metrics, which signal the spatial magnitude and directio

296 pontine glioma (DIPG) and to correlate these metrics with baseline MRI apparent diffusion coefficient

297 We evaluated the association of Simple 7 metrics with incident HF and left ventricular structure

298 ample to compare traditional DRS performance metrics with the dry-run validation.

299 s with 3 to 4 and subjects with 5 to 7 ideal metrics with those with 0 to 2 ideal metrics, respective

300 ose adjustment over current standard-of-care metrics without such monitoring remains unproven.