ライフサイエンスコーパス: microbial interaction

1 TRAM, and TRIF) to mediate signaling of host-microbial interaction.

2 nd animals is characterized by aberrant host-microbial interactions.

3 e a new perspective on the evolution of host-microbial interactions.

4 origins and the role they play in mediating microbial interactions.

5 ve signaling capability was suggested by its microbial interactions.

6 seful in understanding other persistent host-microbial interactions.

7 abolic exchange in the laboratory is through microbial interactions.

8 grams of the other three lineages or on host-microbial interactions.

9 n microbes and can play an important role in microbial interactions.

10 uppressive (IS) therapies, which impact host-microbial interactions.

11 kely play an important role in long-distance microbial interactions.

12 ing of specific niches and potentially novel microbial interactions.

13 n regulating activity, including the role of microbial interactions.

14 etabolic flow and cooperative or competitive microbial interactions.

15 plore the role of metabolism in the observed microbial interactions.

16 ions to identify metabolic underpinnings for microbial interactions.

17 nd (iv) multi-dimensional (rotating 3D) host-microbial interactions.

18 well-conserved from recently developed host-microbial interactions.

19 microvillus-derived LVs modulate epithelial-microbial interactions.

20 the bacterial densities and the strength of microbial interactions.

21 s a function of environmental parameters and microbial interactions.

22 ls to qualitatively capture diverse pairwise microbial interactions.

23 istinct roles in cooperative and competitive microbial interactions.

24 ores the breadth and sophistication of plant-microbial interactions.

25 ms to collect and provide all known physical microbial interactions.

26 assessing the impact of these genes on host-microbial interactions.

27 ial factors mediate mutually beneficial host-microbial interactions.

28 olutionary and ecological theory relevant to microbial interactions across all phylogenetic scales.

29 Interspecies microbial interactions, analogous to those mediated by H

30 (IBD) is characterized by dysregulated host:microbial interactions and cytokine production.

31 nally, recent results show the importance of microbial interactions and host genetics in determining

32 tes and proteins in tissues to investigating microbial interactions, and as a result is perhaps the f

33 Dysregulated host/microbial interactions appear to play a central role in

34 To what extent these microbial interactions are context-dependent in performi

35 Because antagonistic microbial interactions are especially important to disea

36 Increasing evidence suggests that microbial interactions are important determinants of pla

37 Here we discuss how host-gene-microbial interactions are major determinants for the de

38 antial arsenal of small molecules induced by microbial interactions, as we begin to unravel the compl

39 lant species, we can better assess how plant-microbial interactions associated with ecosystem-level p

40 ns, as we begin to unravel the complexity of microbial interactions associated with endophytic system

41 in OM have focused on understanding the host-microbial interactions, because current pathways have sh

42 tion is a promising theory for understanding microbial interactions, because microparasites require n

43 We have discovered a microbial interaction between yeast, bacteria, and nemat

44 To understand microbial interactions between biofilms, it is necessary

45 The fact that microbial interactions can be manipulated in ways that a

46 Characterizing microbial interactions can give us insights into how the

47 ith the gut microbiota and dysregulated host-microbial interactions can result in intestinal inflamma

48 combined with the spatial structure of host-microbial interactions, can have a constructive rather t

49 difficile infection is analyzed to quantify microbial interactions, commensal-pathogen interactions,

50 lipid absorption, emphasizing the many host-microbial interactions contributing to adiposity.

51 tion, and immunity selected by past toxin or microbial interactions could underlie aberrant responses

52 ity, we compared our dataset with a union of microbial interaction data from IntAct, DIP, BIND and MI

53 microbial interactions due to the wealth of microbial interactions described, and the lack of inform

54 is an ideal system to study chemistry-based microbial interactions due to the wealth of microbial in

55 These studies clearly demonstrated that the microbial interaction during fermentation of rice makes

56 ilizes the host's resources to maintain host-microbial interactions during pathogen-induced stress.

57 s underlying the patterns and functioning of microbial interactions for successful development of mic

58 demonstrate how the understanding of complex microbial interactions found in nature can be exploited

59 In the gut, a symbiotic host-microbial interaction has coevolved as bacteria make ess

60 soil-like porous environments, the study of microbial interactions has largely focused on biofilms g

61 These microbial interactions have been manually curated from t

62 Although microbial interactions have been suggested as a selectiv

63 To explore the host immune response and microbial interaction in IPF as they relate to progressi

64 risk of CAUTI, signifying the involvement of microbial interactions in CAUTI pathogenesis.

65 To explore the host-microbial interactions in IPF.

66 These results support the complex role of microbial interactions in mediating carbon budget change

67 has been considerable investigation of host-microbial interactions in patients with chronic rhinosin

68 nstrate a central role of a redox balance in microbial interactions in the fruit fly gut.

69 Although mucus-microbial interactions in the GIT play a crucial role in

70 E(2) immunomodulation in the context of host-microbial interactions in the lung.

71 te of knowledge regarding the impact of host-microbial interactions in the process.

72 dissecting the molecular foundations of host-microbial interactions in the vertebrate digestive tract

73 olecular networking to study chemistry-based microbial interactions in this system.

74 kin microbial interactions versus pathogenic microbial interactions in wound repair is important.

75 e specific and interesting predictions about microbial interactions, including the evolution of partn

76 Dysregulated host/microbial interactions induce the development of colitis

77 Microbial interactions influence the productivity and bi

78 for penetration into the brain, but the host-microbial interactions involved in E. coli entry of the

79 e factors that influence the outcome of host-microbial interactions is critical to protecting biodive

80 Deeper exploration of microbial interactions is now possible via molecular pro

81 e effect of nutrient supplies on within-host microbial interactions is poorly understood.

82 However, the study of microbial interactions is still at an early stage.

83 role of altered microflora and altered host microbial interactions may provide new treatment targets

84 s, mice deficient for genes relevant to host-microbial interactions (MyD88(-/-), NOD2(-/-), ob/ob, an

85 However, substantial alterations in microbial interaction networks were observed at age 0.5

86 ations is likely associated with the diverse microbial interactions occurring within the Trichodesmiu

87 However, mutualistic host-microbial interactions prevent disease by opportunistic

88 Capturing the breadth of microbial interactions requires a detailed description o

89 Validation of two predicted host-microbial interactions reveal that TNFalpha and IFNgamma

90 gs suggest that an ecological patterned root-microbial interaction strategy has been adopted in S. sa

91 that benefits the partner is a paradigm for microbial interactions that cannot be observed in studie

92 is effective for investigating discrete host-microbial interactions that culminate in gastric cancer

93 Our findings indicate that host-microbial interactions that impact host metabolism can o

94 is led to a better understanding of host and microbial interactions, thereby aiding therapeutic desig

95 everal natural products are known to mediate microbial interactions through metabolic exchange.

96 ensors to study host-microbial and microbial-microbial interactions through small molecule signals.

97 New tools from synthetic biology allow microbial interactions to be designed and tightly contro

98 ive prior work using inclusive fitness, from microbial interactions to human evolution, should be con

99 Thus, the interplay between normal skin microbial interactions versus pathogenic microbial inter

100 of Lyngbya and gain insights into potential microbial interactions, we sequenced the genome of Lyngb

101 iven the contribution of glycolipids to host-microbial interactions, we sought to determine why human

102 In the course of our studies of HMO-microbial interactions, we unexpectedly uncovered a nove

103 of fucosylation may control intestinal host-microbial interaction which could influence B12 concentr

104 tro data demonstrate a molecular basis for a microbial interaction, which could result in increased s

105 nts respond to promote beneficial, symbiotic microbial interactions while suppressing those that are

106 dietary polysaccharide digestion, including microbial interactions with endogenous host glycans and

107 al that mammalian hosts monitor and regulate microbial interactions with intestinal epithelial surfac

108 pabilities available for characterization of microbial interactions with mass spectrometry.

109 However, little is known of microbial interactions with metallic lead.

110 to create complex colony geometries to probe microbial interactions with NIMS imaging.

111 our concepts of the role of carbohydrates in microbial interactions with the adaptive immune system.

112 anding of key aspects of immune function and microbial interactions with the host.