ライフサイエンスコーパス: microevolution

1 oevolution and subsequent modifications with microevolution.

2 , and a laboratory for the study of rates of microevolution.

3 c material are essential forces in bacterial microevolution.

4 cted individuals drive rapid intrahost virus microevolution.

5 is a resource for research into prokaryotic microevolution.

6 riable in vivo, suggesting in vivo-dependent microevolution.

7 at reason proved most effective in assessing microevolution.

8 f the current literature focuses on cultural microevolution.

9 ought to understand the relationship between microevolution (adaptation), which can be observed both

10 gical time, direction, macroevolution verses microevolution, ageing and the extent of internal as opp

11 from Malawi and Kenya provided evidence for microevolution and clonal replacement in the field.

12 onally, we demonstrate mechanisms of in-host microevolution and exhibit their potential to shape Salm

13 ary thinking can be applied to both cultural microevolution and macroevolution.

14 population-genetic style models of cultural microevolution, and the use of phylogenetic methods to r

15 ariants at the hotspots arose via convergent microevolution, appear to be immune-escape variants, and

16 Tumors may follow gradualist paths (microevolution) as well as major shifts in evolutionary

17 sticity in shaping evolutionary patterns: in microevolution, as one of mechanism for maintaining gene

18 for a more in-depth analysis of the scale of microevolution both at the intrapatient and interpatient

19 rstrain single-nucleotide-polymorphism-based microevolution, contrasting with a rampant within-patien

20 The emergence of clonal variants caused by microevolution events leading to population heterogeneit

21 Here, a 10 week microevolution experiment was conducted with a genetical

22 ain the complete process of (i) interpatient microevolution, (ii) intrapatient respiratory variation,

23 e our understanding of MRSA transmission and microevolution in congregate settings.

24 not all, hospitals in the study and undergo microevolution in hospital settings.

25 alid groups in a dendrogram, (iv) identifies microevolution in infecting populations, and (v) is amen

26 he study of natural selection and phenotypic microevolution in prokaryotes.

27 understanding the patterns and processes of microevolution in RNA viruses, little is known about the

28 IV since its emergence, and particularly its microevolution in spatially restricted populations, we e

29 d by in vitro culture and (ii) is capable of microevolution in vitro with the emergence of variants e

30 Cd24, which did not exhibit microevolution in vitro, was highly variable in vivo, su

31 eneous population structure with evidence of microevolution locally in swine production systems, whil

32 Here, I will discuss why microevolution, macroevolution and developmental biology

33 Microevolution may therefore be as important as species

34 have been used to investigate the macro- and microevolution of a broad range of organisms, including

35 high-resolution view of the epidemiology and microevolution of a dominant strain of methicillin-resis

36 s a unique, high-resolution insight into the microevolution of a pioneering human pathogen during its

37 By investigating microevolution of a subcellular process, we identify new

38 These observations suggest microevolution of C. neoformans during human infection.

39 n the regulation of upd-like are involved in microevolution of morphological and sex-specific differe

40 ur results showed clear evidence of branched microevolution of MTB in vivo, which led to a diverse ba

41 rapid analysis of genetic variations during microevolution of RNA viruses.

42 To examine the microevolution of S. aureus colonization, we deep sequen

43 (M.) onukii and improve understanding of the microevolution of this species.

44 n, yet direct evidence that feeding controls microevolution over extended evolutionary time scales, a

45 From a microevolution standpoint, these are subject to positive

46 These findings illustrate a novel model of microevolution that transpires during the span of a sing

47 vide a framework to relate the parameters of microevolution to properties of populations.

48 efore a more effective probe for determining microevolution within a clonal population and substrain

49 were also demonstrated to be able to resolve microevolution within a strain, with the Ca3 probe exhib

50 te between unrelated isolates, and to assess microevolution within a strain.

51 ns support Darwinian and Simpsonian ideas of microevolution within adaptive zones and accelerated evo

52 lection at the genomic level recently driven microevolution within bacterial pathogens of humans?

53 Yet, selection pressures driving DENV microevolution within human hosts (intrahost) remain unk

54 DNA is consistent with a model of continuous microevolution within its cognate host.

55 Whole-genome sequencing can detect microevolution within Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains

56 e of substantial diversity and ward-specific microevolution within the population.