1          A higher prevalence of auscultatory midsystolic click (26 [72%] versus 6 [38%]; P=0.018) was

2 us abnormalities, together with auscultatory midsystolic click, may identify MVP patients who would n

3        It reproduced the clinically observed midsystolic decrease in regurgitant flow and orifice are

4 , with peaks in early and late systole and a midsystolic decrease.

5                             All patients had midsystolic decreases in regurgitant orifice area that m

6             We investigated the cause of the midsystolic drop (MSD) in left ventricular (LV) ejection

7                                          The midsystolic drop in left ventricular ejection velocities

8                                            A midsystolic frame was selected for the initiation of ann

9 hods: 1) PISA-velocity-time integral (VTI) = midsystolic MRFR by PISA x regurgitant flow VTI/peak vel

10 flow VTI/peak velocity; 2) simplified PISA = midsystolic MRFR/3.25; 3) serial PISA = sum of instantan

11 losystolic MR caused similar color jet area, midsystolic regurgitant flow, and peak velocity (P>0.40)

12 f annular contraction that could also reduce midsystolic regurgitation.

13 e presence of normal LV ejection fraction, a midsystolic shift in the pressure-stress relationship pr

14 liseconds of ejection), followed by a marked midsystolic shift in the pressure-stress relationship, w

15                   The mean magnitude of this midsystolic shift was quantitatively important in all 3