戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 he associated benefits were smaller than the minimal clinically important difference.
2 nd evaluated for availability of a published minimal clinically important difference.
3         Neither measure met the prespecified minimal clinically important difference.
4  status, and a change of >/=4 was deemed the minimal clinically important difference.
5  (HADS; score range, 0 [best] to 42 [worst]; minimal clinically important difference, 1.5) obtained d
6 [not affected] to 6 [as bad as it could be]; minimal clinically important difference, 1.66 units).
7 inician Rated (QIDS-C16) (score range, 0-27; minimal clinically important difference, 2 points).
8 moderately bad or worse cough (0 to 28 days; minimal clinically important difference, 3.79 days) and
9 rected age (standardized mean, 100 [SD, 15]; minimal clinically important difference, 5 points).
10 0; higher ratings indicate lower impairment; minimal clinically important difference, 5 score points]
11  In uncontrolled patients, ESS resulted in a minimal clinically important difference 57% of the time
12 nge of change in letters read, -121 to +101; minimal clinically important difference, 7 letters), ana
13                 Seven of these had published minimal clinically important differences and were recomm
14 p < 0.001), higher likelihood of reporting a minimal clinically important difference (aPR = 1.42; 95%
15 verity; reduction of 10 or more considered a minimal clinically important difference) at baseline and
16                                          The minimal clinically important difference between groups w
17                                            A minimal clinically important difference cutoff determine
18 post-treatment (P = .005), exceeding the 0.5 minimal clinically important difference for FAQLQ-PF.
19                             Estimates of the minimal clinically important difference for the 6-minute
20 ontinued to increase to 6 months, reaching a minimal clinically important difference for this scale.
21 her scores indicating worse quality of life; minimal clinically important difference &gt;/=8.90), sense
22 est and 100 being the worst quality of life; minimal clinically important difference, &gt;/=4), morbidit
23                                            A minimal clinically important difference has been establi
24                                              Minimal clinically important differences have not been e
25 Asthma Control Questionnaire 5 (in which the minimal clinically important difference is 0.5 points).
26     As of yet, its sensitivity to change and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) have not
27                             The concept of a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is well e
28 e responsiveness to change and determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the PO
29  (synonymous with sensitivity to change) and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) should be
30            To assess the reliability and the minimal clinically important differences (MCID) for FVC%
31 ary outcomes were change in WMFT time score (minimal clinically important difference [MCID] = 19 seco
32 le, 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst pain possible]; minimal clinically important difference [MCID], 1.8 unit
33 alk distance between baseline and 12 months (minimal clinically important difference [MCID], 25 m).
34 -Pal) instrument (range, 0-184 [worst-best]; minimal clinically important difference [MCID], 9 points
35 quantitative evaluation of cartilage volume (minimal clinically important difference not yet defined)
36 ercentage of participants with more than the minimal clinically important difference of -4 units was
37 nges from 0 (worst) to 100 (best), and has a minimal clinically important difference of 23 points.
38                   Sample size was based on a minimal clinically important difference of 5 points for
39 ranges from 0 (worst) to 48 (best) and has a minimal clinically important difference of 5 points; and
40 nths was the primary outcome measure, with a minimal clinically important difference of 8 points.
41  advantages include the determination of the minimal clinically important difference of Child Health
42                                          The minimal clinically important difference on the global de
43 ent, psychometric properties, and ability of minimal clinically important difference to capture gains
44                             The prespecified minimal clinically important difference was defined as 2
45                                          The minimal clinically important difference was defined as a

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。