ライフサイエンスコーパス: minimally invasive

1 biomarker assays have an advantage in being minimally invasive.

2 recurrent pilonidal sinus were randomized to minimally invasive (76 patients) or conventional (69 pat

3 Advances in minimally invasive ablative surgical approaches have led

4 progression to adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) and fully invasi

5 noma (LPA), and adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS)/minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA).

6 asive disease with prominent lepidic growth (minimally invasive adenocarcinoma, MIA), then to fully i

7 he clinical potential of this technology for minimally invasive administration of CNS-targeted therap

8 vena cava time-activity curve is therefore a minimally invasive alternative for the measurement of th

9 ss hostile transplantation site that is both minimally invasive and able to support a large transplan

10 Their measurement is minimally invasive and cost effective using established

11 medication adherence assessment) since it is minimally invasive and easy to perform, potentially allo

12 POEM and STER offer minimally invasive and effective treatment alternatives

13 Here, we demonstrate minimally invasive and remote neural excitation through

14 atic investigation of photoillumination as a minimally invasive and remotely applied means to trigger

15 a cellular substrate to develop and optimize minimally invasive and safe cellular transplantation par

16 uggest that HAS angioplasty and stenting are minimally invasive and safe endovascular procedures that

17 s on readmission rates was observed for both minimally invasive and thoracotomy approaches.

18 nce endomicroscopy imaging is a powerful new minimally invasive and translatable tool that can be use

19 Acupuncture is a minimally-invasive and conservative therapeutic option,

20 oronary artery bypass surgery (most commonly minimally invasive) and percutaneous coronary interventi

21 than 66 years with a breast biopsy (open or minimally invasive) and subsequent breast cancer diagnos

22 With this advancement, rapid, minimally invasive, and easily executed in vivo SPME is

23 The VPE is a new, minimally invasive, and efficient technique to prepare t

24 These soft, thin devices are minimally invasive, and histological tests suggest they

25 reby enabling a broad range of non-invasive, minimally invasive, and implantable systems to address c

26 Laser ablation is a rapid and minimally invasive approach for the treatment of superfi

27 more recently, robotic approach have allowed minimally invasive approach in selected patients undergo

28 when very little sample is available, and a minimally invasive approach is required.

29 However, the oncological impacts of a minimally invasive approach to rectal cancer have yet to

30 This minimally invasive approach yielded outcomes similar to

31 nty-seven cases (88.5%) were completed via a minimally invasive approach.

32 bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, often using minimally invasive approaches (laparoscopic or robotic).

33 In this nationwide comparison of minimally invasive approaches for colon resection, LC de

34 gel systems addresses the growing demand for minimally invasive approaches for local and sustained de

35 carbohydrate drinks 2 hours before surgery, minimally invasive approaches instead of large incisions

36 ssue responses, necessitating development of minimally invasive approaches that avoid brain trauma.

37 Minimally invasive approaches to kidney transplantation

38 Large comparative studies comparing minimally invasive approaches to open technique are lack

39 In experienced hands, minimally invasive approaches to ureteral reconstruction

40 Alternative minimally invasive approaches using bronchoscopic techni

41 are a valuable source for the development of minimally invasive assays.

42 st that the MYOM3 fragments hold promise for minimally invasive assessment of experimental therapies

43 easy transportation, cost-effectiveness, and minimally invasive biological sampling.

44 sa-miR-483-5p thus appears to be a promising minimally invasive biomarker in the preoperative diagnos

45 Our goal is to develop minimally invasive biomarkers for predicting radiation-i

46 Sequencing (NGS) offer themselves as future minimally invasive biomarkers for various human diseases

47 as spiked interest in their potential use as minimally-invasive biomarkers.

48 itive for the CT diagnosis were obtained via minimally invasive biopsy, but the results were negative

49 Today's minimally invasive biosensors are often based on chemica

50 ly stage is a challenge because an accurate, minimally invasive blood test is lacking.

51 Minimally invasive breast biopsy (MIBB) rates remain wel

52 Flexible porous graphene array offers a minimally invasive but high efficiency neuromodulation s

53 filing of individual lung cancer CTCs toward minimally invasive cancer therapy prediction and disease

54 ical procedures and functional decline after minimally invasive cardiac surgery.

55 s aged 60 years or older undergoing major or minimally invasive cardiac surgical procedures.

56 excellent, with a safety profile expected of minimally invasive cataract procedures performed in ASCs

57 Whether minimally invasive catheter evacuation followed by throm

58 o determine whether a novel approach using a minimally invasive cell sampling device, the Cytosponge,

59 escribe the concept and in vivo results of a minimally invasive, chip-based near infrared (NIR) senso

60 latform has potential applications in rapid, minimally invasive clinical diagnostic assays.

61 continues to emphasize the need for non- or minimally invasive clinical tools capable of establishin

62 idal volume with lower respiratory rates and minimally invasive CO2 removal.

63 Minimally invasive colectomies are increasingly popular

64 Minimally invasive colectomy (MIC) is an increasingly co

65 TERS as an additional spectroscopic tool for minimally invasive compositional characterization of art

66 Common noninvasive to minimally invasive cosmetic dermatologic procedures are

67 Noninvasive to minimally invasive cosmetic dermatologic procedures, inc

68 iprocedural safety and long-term efficacy of minimally invasive Cox maze procedures should be noted.

69 Overall, MNs-CIT represents a novel minimally invasive cutaneous immunotherapy to prevent th

70 eal are increasingly utilized as they afford minimally invasive delivery and conformal application.

71 Microneedle devices have been proposed as a minimally invasive delivery system for the intradermal a

72 croneedles (MNs) have been investigated as a minimally-invasive delivery technology for a range of ac

73 Minimally invasive detection of cell death could prove a

74 plant (XEN gel stent, Aquesys, Inc) is a new minimally invasive device approved for the treatment of

75 A minimally invasive device has been developed to assess e

76 This is a novel, minimally invasive, device-based therapy, specifically t

77 ducting polymer microwires will be useful as minimally invasive devices to control the electrical pro

78 urate, but at the same time, inexpensive and minimally invasive, diagnostic test is urgently required

79 tensively studied for their promising use as minimally invasive disease biomarkers.

80 itu disease (adenocarcinoma in situ, AIS) to minimally invasive disease with prominent lepidic growth

81 urrent nationwide case selection factors for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) and iden

82 Interest in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) has grow

83 ll of the patients with IDH-1 mutation had a minimally invasive DT imaging phenotype.

84 CT guided RA therapy of OO is minimally invasive, effective and secure procedure.

85 skin-worn microneedle sensing device for the minimally invasive electrochemical monitoring of subcuta

86 e (transrectal), and ovaries (transvaginal); minimally invasive endoscopic imaging of gastrointestina

87 In the past several decades, minimally invasive endovascular interventions have been

88 Minimally invasive endovascular methods provide safe and

89 ed that resection of the pericardium using a minimally invasive epicardial approach would mitigate th

90 Research on minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has shown faster

91 this trial was to assess the feasibility of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) in a multi-instit

92 was to compare open esophagectomy (OE) with minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) in a population-b

93 emonstrate any significant benefit of hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy on POM, potentially due

94 y of the TIME-trial (traditional invasive vs minimally invasive esophagectomy, a multicenter, randomi

95 The strategy of lower respiratory rate plus minimally invasive extracorporeal CO2 removal was feasib

96 nly 10% of distal pancreatectomies were in a minimally invasive fashion and 85% of surgeons welcomed

97 pass the skin's stratum corneum barrier in a minimally-invasive fashion and achieve enhanced transder

98 the clinical outcomes of open-flap (OF) and minimally invasive flapless (FL) esthetic crown lengthen

99 the plasma membrane of living cells using a minimally invasive, fluorescent dye labelled lipid analo

100 sine 5'-triphosphate turnover as a potential minimally invasive functional malignant hyperthermia ass

101 To compare postoperative outcomes of minimally invasive gastrectomy (MIG) to open gastrectomy

102 t, Allergan plc, Irvine, California, USA), a minimally invasive glaucoma surgery device, in refractor

103 Minimally invasive glaucoma surgical (MIGS) devices are

104 an overall reduction in sensor size to allow minimally invasive glucose monitoring in the interstitia

105 n the open group versus 50.5% (SD 8%) in the minimally invasive group (P = 0.207).

106 o confer an aggressive invasive phenotype on minimally invasive HeLa and MCF-7 cell lines.

107 enzyme specificity and introduces a tool for minimally invasive, highly specific imaging of cellular

108 ysterectomy were compared with those who had minimally invasive hysterectomy (laparoscopic and robot-

109 There was no association between the use of minimally invasive hysterectomy and either overall (HR,

110 Minimally invasive hysterectomy does not appear to compr

111 Despite the potential benefits of minimally invasive hysterectomy for uterine cancer, popu

112 imally invasive hysterectomy; performance of minimally invasive hysterectomy increased from 9.3% in 2

113 women who underwent abdominal hysterectomy, minimally invasive hysterectomy was associated with a lo

114 hysterectomy and 2,165 (34.3%) who underwent minimally invasive hysterectomy; performance of minimall

115 a specific flowchart designed to enable the minimally invasive identification of unknown blue (i.e.,

116 We show how this enables minimally invasive imaging and monitoring of nanotopolog

117 Procedures for noninvasive and minimally invasive imaging of cardiac neurons and neuron

118 We tested the potential for minimally invasive imaging of hypoxia in pancreatic canc

119 We also developed minimally invasive imaging techniques for real-time moni

120 ew existing and developing technologies, new minimally invasive imaging techniques, nonendoscopic dev

121 The small size of the cannula enables minimally invasive imaging, while the long length (>2 mm

122 ues, which is still a clinical challenge for minimally-invasive in vivo medical diagnosis.

123 e frequently, even after performing a single minimally invasive incision to harvest the FHL tendon, d

124 lderly women by using the recently developed minimally invasive indicator amino acid oxidation (IAAO)

125 Minimally invasive inguinal lymph node dissection (MILND

126 It is difficult to achieve minimally invasive injectable cell delivery while mainta

127 Conclusion A simple, integrated, minimally invasive interventional probe that provides im

128 nue to benefit from an exponential growth in minimally invasive interventions and technology.

129 ified by intent-to-treat into open (OLAR) or minimally invasive LAR (MI-LAR).

130 Minimally invasive LAR for rectal cancer is associated w

131 the feasibility, safety and efficiency of a minimally invasive, lentiviral based approach for the su

132 We demonstrate a new platform for minimally invasive, light delivery probes leveraging the

133 field-test sample) and a clinical trial of a minimally invasive lip treatment in the United Kingdom a

134 Progress toward the development of minimally invasive liquid biopsies of disease is being b

135 agnostics as EV analysis can be performed in minimally invasive liquid biopsies.

136 The used techniques for minimally invasive live donor nephrectomy are safe and a

137 Minimally invasive live donor nephrectomy has become a f

138 es discussing short-term complications after minimally invasive live donor nephrectomy were included.

139 ery, separation surgery, vertebroplasty, and minimally invasive local ablative approaches.

140 ord much longer intracellular access and are minimally invasive, making it possible to achieve stable

141 to provide single cell/axon resolution in a minimally invasive manner by optical interrogation of li

142 These cryogels can be delivered in a minimally invasive manner, bypass the need for genetic m

143 of robotic cases were completed in a totally minimally invasive manner, there were no significant ben

144 unction to be measured repeatedly in a safe, minimally invasive manner.

145 ctures inaccessible by existing methods in a minimally invasive manner.

146 changes in the tumour in an inexpensive and minimally invasive manner.

147 -specific sequence alterations may provide a minimally invasive means to dynamically assess tumour bu

148 ertilization, and can be predicted through a minimally invasive mechanical measurement at the zygote

149 e percutaneous needle biopsies and provide a minimally invasive method for axillary staging of breast

150 NF1-associated MPNSTs, while PTT serves as a minimally invasive method to ablate cancer cells.

151 l-free DNA (cfDNA) has recently emerged as a minimally invasive method to explore tumor characteristi

152 We describe a general, versatile and minimally invasive method to image single molecules near

153 ilation; however, the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive methods have not been reviewed.

154 However, efficient and minimally invasive methods of MSCs delivery to the brain

155 Surfactant administration by minimally invasive methods that allow for spontaneous br

156 In the past few decades, minimally invasive methods that approach aneurysms endov

157 However, minimally invasive methods to measure the spatial distri

158 This level of sensitivity, using minimally invasive methods, offers novel opportunities f

159 factant for respiratory distress syndrome by minimally invasive methods.

160 This study developed a minimally-invasive microneedle (MN) patch for skin vacci

161 Minimally-invasive microsurgery has resulted in improved

162 e the impact of race and insurance on use of minimally invasive (MIS) compared with open techniques f

163 s towards the potential for utilisation of a minimally-invasive MN delivery strategy in controlled ta

164 These data highlight the role of ctDNA as a minimally invasive molecular disease monitoring strategy

165 ion with the topical deposition of GNRs, the minimally invasive nature of DS-OCT makes this a promisi

166 portant cancer treatment modality due to its minimally invasive nature.

167 icroscope equipped with a microendoscope for minimally invasive observation of sarcomere lengths and

168 The minimally invasive operation of these probes forecasts u

169 ble modes of soft, conformal integration and minimally invasive operation that would be difficult or

170 sisted procedures accounted for 62.3% of the minimally invasive operations.

171 and 27 women, with 25 open operations and 16 minimally invasive operations.

172 e locally invasive, and five of 61 (8%) were minimally invasive (P < .001).

173 e is increasing interest in expanding use of minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD).

174 aise and to evaluate the current evidence on minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) versus o

175 Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy is not routinely re

176 Both focused, image-guided surgery (minimally invasive parathyroidectomy) and bilateral expl

177 For minimally invasive parathyroidectomy, intraoperative par

178 strates that pericardial resection through a minimally invasive percutaneous approach mitigates the e

179 Here we describe a minimally invasive, permanently implantable window for h

180 physiologic recording after percutaneous or minimally invasive placement of vascular, cardiac, ortho

181 o the chip for the potential applications in minimally invasive, portable clinical diagnostic equipme

182 demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive, potentially lifelong TES treatment o

183 Nanoscale endoscopes allow minimally invasive probing of individual cell interiors.

184 Sentinel-node biopsy, a minimally invasive procedure for regional melanoma stagi

185 Radioembolization is a minimally invasive procedure that involves implantation

186 Tumor embolization was proceeded as a minimally invasive procedure.

187 In patients undergoing minimally invasive procedures (n = 5177; 17 studies), 13

188 as they can be introduced into the body with minimally invasive procedures and are often applied in t

189 s large area and accessibility, which allows minimally invasive procedures for transplantation, graft

190 -bioadhesive to be used as tissue sealant in minimally invasive procedures is reported.

191 Ultrasound is well suited for guiding many minimally invasive procedures, but its use is often prec

192 artery use; intraoperative graft assessment; minimally invasive procedures, including robotic-assiste

193 Along with a trend for minimally invasive procedures, these forces have challen

194 egarding surgical safety for currently used, minimally invasive procedures.

195 The role of minimally invasive proctectomy in rectal cancer is contr

196 .37 (95% confidence interval: 2.95-3.87) for minimally invasive prostatectomy, and HR: 1.84 (95% conf

197 surgery have been refined with evidence, and minimally invasive pyeloplasty is now standard.

198 CNB) sampling is known to be inexpensive and minimally invasive relative to traditional tissue resect

199 The midterm quality outcomes of minimally invasive repair for complex disease are unknow

200 Therefore, a minimally invasive, repeatable quantification of VEGF le

201 0.79, P < 0.01) were less likely to receive minimally invasive resections.

202 All patients, undergoing minimally invasive restorative proctocolectomy in 1, 2,

203 ed for the test is 0.5 muL, which allows for minimally invasive sample collection such as using a fin

204 The combination of minimally invasive sample collection with a highly speci

205 ential for skin mucus-based metabolomics for minimally invasive sampling of the fathead minnow (FHM;

206 cessful analyte quantification by means of a minimally invasive sensor in vivo, which does not use ch

207 t CD55 mutations changed E. coli to either a minimally invasive (Ser165Ala) or a hypervirulent pathog

208 monstrate here a versatile method based on a minimally invasive single implantation in the rat brain.

209 CTCs are a minimally invasive source of clinical information that c

210 nence of safety and success for the on-pump, minimally invasive, stand-alone Cox maze procedure 5 yea

211 evaluated with these animal models, but more minimally invasive strategies for delivery could improve

212 In this review, we focus on minimally invasive strategies for the delivery of ES and

213 risk should be targeted with preventive and minimally invasive strategies.

214 Here, we report a minimally invasive strategy for enzyme stabilization tha

215 Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has created a shift in

216 e plasminogen activator, in combination with minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in patients with intrac

217 Clinical outcomes from videoscope assisted minimally invasive surgery (VMIS) at 36 to 58 months are

218 With the current healthcare climate of minimally invasive surgery and cost control, FNAB should

219 We examined the use of minimally invasive surgery and the association between t

220 al applications, particularly as devices for minimally invasive surgery and the delivery of therapeut

221 The benefits of minimally invasive surgery for common disorders like app

222 Minimally invasive surgery has an increasingly prominent

223 Although minimally invasive surgery has been extended to neonatal

224 Advances in minimally invasive surgery have demonstrated the safety

225 The combined procedure using minimally invasive surgery is safe, with the additional

226 Trainees undergoing a minimally invasive surgery rotation were randomized to e

227 We have applied minimally invasive surgery to perform kidney transplant

228 tasks where classic robots fail, such as in minimally invasive surgery, active prosthetics, and auto

229 ric gastrointestinal surgery have focused on minimally invasive surgery, the accumulation of high-qua

230 ine leiomyoma, is now commonly performed via minimally invasive surgery.

231 ropriate expertise in open esophagectomy and minimally invasive surgery.

232 nition is important to ensure success during minimally invasive surgery.

233 thus the selection of patients suitable for minimally invasive surgery.

234 r (MSD) prevalence among surgeons performing minimally invasive surgery.

235 ectal operations of which 5291 (62.9%) had a minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approach.

236 was to examine regional variation in use of minimally invasive surgical (MIS) operations.

237 was to examine regional variation in use of minimally invasive surgical (MIS) operations.

238 Minimally invasive surgical ablation techniques have bee

239 s utilizing both catheter-based ablation and minimally invasive surgical approaches have been develop

240 The development of minimally invasive surgical approaches to donor nephrect

241 We devised a minimally invasive surgical bladder inoculation techniqu

242 id coronary revascularization (HCR) combines minimally invasive surgical coronary artery bypass graft

243 ising unexpected safety concerns, offering a minimally invasive surgical option for refractory glauco

244 c targeting with high spatial resolution but minimally invasive surgical procedures.

245 Minimally invasive surgical techniques are also being ev

246 ort-term results, further support the use of minimally invasive surgical techniques in the treatment

247 ey do not account for remarkable advances in minimally invasive surgical techniques or the developmen

248 , surgeons gain access through the mouth via minimally invasive technique and thus have improved visu

249 order to develop this idea in the clinic, a minimally invasive technique for measuring the oxygenati

250 This rapid, minimally invasive technique shows potential to replace

251 Therefore, we suggest that a minimally invasive technique such as the one described i

252 cutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimally invasive technique that destroys cancer cells

253 steromedial hindfoot incision using a single minimally invasive technique, and the medial and lateral

254 onclusions regarding comparisons of open and minimally invasive technique.

255 ever, there are no accurate, cost-effective, minimally invasive techniques available to screen for BE

256 not race, is associated with utilization of minimally invasive techniques for oncologic rectal resec

257 Our findings support the ongoing adoption of minimally invasive techniques for rectal adenocarcinoma.

258 a clear trend toward less-aggressive, often minimally invasive techniques has been observed.

259 mesenteric artery (SMA) can be managed using minimally invasive techniques initially developed for ba

260 We have shown the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive techniques such as PN and RFA in a va

261 Here, we applied two novel minimally invasive techniques to measure kidney function

262 All minimally invasive techniques were comparable with regar

263 hort-term benefits and cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive techniques, hospitals may need to imp

264 variants, using smaller samples obtained via minimally invasive techniques, is a huge challenge.

265 utionary approach to aneurysm repair through minimally invasive techniques.

266 he technological advances to manage CLI with minimally invasive technologies, this condition often re

267 The adoption of minimally invasive technology can improve safety among s

268 Minimally invasive therapeutic modalities have become th

269 lized PC can be considered as an alternative minimally invasive therapeutic modality for patients who

270 various complications, requiring alternative minimally invasive therapeutics.

271 cal advancements have made this percutaneous minimally invasive therapy a first-line treatment for ma

272 ized tumors by focused ultrasound (FUS) is a minimally invasive therapy that uses a range of input en

273 Seamless and minimally invasive three-dimensional interpenetration of

274 Over the past 15 years, minimally invasive thrombectomy has been reported in 78

275 of a vast range of substrates, whilst being minimally invasive to the cells or tissues of interest.

276 ogenesis and investigate the Cytosponge as a minimally invasive tool for sampling the oesophageal mic

277 TaTME is the latest minimally invasive transanal technique pioneered to faci

278 d in the management of these disease states, minimally invasive transcatheter portal venous intervent

279 To define "best possible" outcomes in total minimally invasive transthoracic esophagectomy (ttMIE).

280 ablation of pilonidal sinus (VAAPS) is a new minimally invasive treatment based on the complete remov

281 tion gammaPNAs and SCF treatment may offer a minimally invasive treatment for genetic disorders of th

282 erative time was significantly longer in the minimally invasive treatment group (42.9 [9.8] minutes)

283 of the patients was 25.5 (5.9) years in the minimally invasive treatment group and 25.7 (5.3) in the

284 Similarly, patients enrolled in the minimally invasive treatment group expressed significant

285 were male and 16 (21.1%) were female in the minimally invasive treatment group, and 54 (78.3%) were

286 In the minimally invasive treatment group, mean (SD) time off w

287 [1.3%] vs 5 [7.2%]; P = .10) recorded in the minimally invasive treatment group.

288 In the new era of minimally invasive treatment surgery, pilonidal sinus co

289 Photochemical internalisation, a novel minimally invasive treatment, has shown promising precli

290 the-art technologies for early diagnosis and minimally invasive treatment, which together could reduc

291 d functional information and enable focused, minimally invasive treatments, are key elements in the i

292 yable quarter-inch audio tapes, allowing the minimally invasive triage of tape collections.

293 We applied a minimally invasive two-channel fluorescence fiber imagin

294 We have applied minimally invasive ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirat

295 r optics for optogenetics, are not ideal for minimally invasive, untethered studies on freely behavin

296 endoscopic injection of a bulking agent and minimally invasive ureteric reimplantation.

297 ) or intra-operative hand reflexology during minimally invasive varicose vein surgery under local ana

298 d from any cell type in the body, offering a minimally invasive window for diagnosing and monitoring

299 wing a randomized controlled trial comparing minimally invasive with open esophagectomy in patients w

300 SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Trials comparing minimally invasive with open transthoracic esophagectomy