ライフサイエンスコーパス: minimally invasive surgery

1 nition is important to ensure success during minimally invasive surgery.

2 ine leiomyoma, is now commonly performed via minimally invasive surgery.

3 ropriate expertise in open esophagectomy and minimally invasive surgery.

4 technology cluster of the last 30 years was minimally invasive surgery.

5 as increased magnification and dexterity for minimally invasive surgery.

6 thus the selection of patients suitable for minimally invasive surgery.

7 ely improve participants' ability to perform minimally invasive surgery.

8 r (MSD) prevalence among surgeons performing minimally invasive surgery.

9 ing or exceeding that of other modalities of minimally invasive surgery.

10 ot represent an absolute contraindication to minimally invasive surgery.

11 safety and with the benefits associated with minimally invasive surgery.

12 anterior leaflet repair, 91%, 92%, 91%; for minimally invasive surgery, 97%, 89%, 93%; and for conve

13 ndings as well as the advantages afforded by minimally invasive surgery, a laparoscopic approach may

14 tasks where classic robots fail, such as in minimally invasive surgery, active prosthetics, and auto

15 ings indicate that late results of MVR after minimally invasive surgery and after anterior leaflet re

16 With the current healthcare climate of minimally invasive surgery and cost control, FNAB should

17 It is particularly valuable in minimally invasive surgery and in heart surgery to corre

18 , but in response to the growing interest in minimally invasive surgery and its success.

19 We examined the use of minimally invasive surgery and the association between t

20 al applications, particularly as devices for minimally invasive surgery and the delivery of therapeut

21 his review first addresses the definition of minimally invasive surgery and then analyzes the possibl

22 tcomes of an open procedure, the benefits of minimally invasive surgery, and easy adoptability will o

23 With the avenue of minimally invasive surgery, and more recently the availa

24 The indications for minimally invasive surgery are explained.

25 The indications for fertility-sparing and minimally invasive surgery as well as the current guidel

26 Respondents spanned minimally invasive surgery, bariatric, colorectal, hepat

27 largely restricted to high-volume reference minimally invasive surgery centers.

28 We hypothesized that minimally invasive surgery could be done safely and cost

29 Data concerning new techniques, such as minimally invasive surgery, document promising results b

30 improve outcome in spinal epidural abscess: minimally invasive surgery early versus medical manageme

31 o bring order to this chaotic situation, the Minimally Invasive Surgery Fellowship Council (MISFC) wa

32 The benefits of minimally invasive surgery for common disorders like app

33 ent, mean health plan spending was lower for minimally invasive surgery for coronary revascularizatio

34 and is expected to drive several aspects of minimally invasive surgery forward in the near future wi

35 Minimally invasive surgery has an expanding role in the

36 Minimally invasive surgery has an increasingly prominent

37 Although minimally invasive surgery has been extended to neonatal

38 Over the past decade, minimally invasive surgery has been introduced as a mean

39 In the last few decades minimally invasive surgery has evolved to complement mor

40 The increasing popularity of minimally invasive surgery has grown concurrently with t

41 Minimally invasive surgeries have been shown to have adv

42 Recent advances in minimally invasive surgery have clearly benefited childr

43 Advances in minimally invasive surgery have demonstrated the safety

44 Recent innovations in minimally invasive surgery, however, have decreased morb

45 ntional sternotomy was used in 843 patients, minimally invasive surgery in 352 (since June 1996).

46 A systematic approach of minimally invasive surgery in patients with prior corona

47 With ongoing advances of minimally invasive surgery in the face of the limitation

48 Vaginal surgery is the true minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of pelvic or

49 nters worldwide have instituted some form of minimally invasive surgery into their operative armament

50 Minimally invasive surgery involving the thoracic cavity

51 Minimally invasive surgery is associated with better pre

52 In fact, as minimally invasive surgery is being applied to treat mor

53 The nomenclature for minimally invasive surgery is ill defined.

54 Minimally invasive surgery is increasingly used and appe

55 The combined procedure using minimally invasive surgery is safe, with the additional

56 Minimally invasive surgery is significantly associated w

57 authors' center with extensive experience in minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic repair of giant

58 Minimally invasive surgery limits soft-tissue damage and

59 The benefits seen with minimally invasive surgery make it more acceptable.

60 one in the past 2 decades, the diffusion of minimally invasive surgery may have had sizeable but ove

61 The bond between surgeons practicing minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and the high-tech indus

62 Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has created a shift in

63 e plasminogen activator, in combination with minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in patients with intrac

64 Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is a surgical technique

65 Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is a surgical technique

66 In recent years, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is considered in carefu

67 The learning and practice of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) makes unique demands on

68 Racial disparities in receipt of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) persist in the United S

69 nths, and to understand the emerging role of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques in nephron-s

70 g recent advances with respect to urological minimally invasive surgery (MIS).

71 ct of the surgical approach (open surgery vs minimally invasive surgery [MIS]) on the risk for SSIs.

72 Minimally invasive surgery modalities are associated wit

73 y are occurring in improved anesthetic care, minimally invasive surgery, nonoperative therapies, risk

74 ations by 17 surgeons performing their first minimally invasive surgery of the mitral valve operation

75 rning process involved in the performance of minimally invasive surgery of the mitral valve using dat

76 A true learning curve exists for minimally invasive surgery of the mitral valve.

77 pite the radically novel skills required for minimally invasive surgery or interventional cardiology,

78 nd latent qualities of robotic assistance in minimally invasive surgery over conventional surgery, ro

79 Robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery (RMIS) holds great promise fo

80 Given the inherent advantages of minimally invasive surgery, robotic or laparoscopic abdo

81 Trainees undergoing a minimally invasive surgery rotation were randomized to e

82 re flexibility and breadth in residency, (3) minimally invasive surgery should largely return to GS,

83 PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Minimally invasive surgeries such as conventional laparo

84 The success of elective minimally invasive surgery suggested that this concept c

85 With the profound public stress for minimally invasive surgery that guided General Surgery,

86 ric gastrointestinal surgery have focused on minimally invasive surgery, the accumulation of high-qua

87 ng established the safety and feasibility of minimally invasive surgery, the focus moved to assuring

88 s have been developed, including advances in minimally invasive surgery, the increasing use of osteoi

89 We have applied minimally invasive surgery to perform kidney transplant

90 In order for ambulatory minimally invasive surgery to succeed, patient selection

91 ers quoted will show that the application of minimally invasive surgery to the treatment of common pr

92 Clinical outcomes from videoscope assisted minimally invasive surgery (VMIS) at 36 to 58 months are

93 overall and 1.4% for isolated MVR (1.1% for minimally invasive surgery vs. 1.6% for conventional ste

94 Undergoing minimally invasive surgery was associated with missing s

95 Since 1993, when minimally invasive surgery was first recorded in ACGME d

96 olpopexy, surgeons can offer the benefits of minimally invasive surgery while avoiding risks of vagin

97 regional hypothermia, laser technology, and minimally invasive surgery, will influence future tumor