ライフサイエンスコーパス: minimum inhibitory concentration

1 ted by combination with ciprofloxacin (2.5 x minimum inhibitory concentration).

2 y be associated with an increased vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration.

3 icrog/ml, well below the clinically relevant minimum inhibitory concentration.

4 onsistently below or close to the vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration.

5 red at combined PNU levels > or =2 times the minimum inhibitory concentration.

6 ionship best characterized by time above the minimum inhibitory concentration.

7 y to discern the molecular mechanism and the minimum inhibitory concentration.

8 GroEL/GroES overexpression did not increase minimum inhibitory concentrations.

9 rial growth media at lower levels than their minimum inhibitory concentrations.

10 patterns at concentrations well below their minimum inhibitory concentrations.

11 MR phenotypes, as well as metadata including minimum inhibitory concentrations.

12 was equivalent to unencapsulated tobramycin (minimum inhibitory concentration 0.625mg/L).

13 ng growth of a variety of bacterial strains (minimum inhibitory concentrations 0.5-8.0 microM) and by

14 d by a DAP-susceptible Enterococcus faecium (minimum inhibitory concentration, 3 microg/mL) harboring

15 to the oxyimino-cephalosporin, ceftazidime (minimum inhibitory concentration; 32-->128 mg/liter) whe

16 of NSC319726 was 35-800-fold higher than the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration 50% (MIC50 values), whi

17 e use at presentation had a 2.01-fold-higher minimum inhibitory concentration (95% CI, 1.39-fold to 2

18 well-turbidity detection accuracy of 98.21%, minimum-inhibitory-concentration accuracy of 95.12%, and

19 t H. pylori DHODase, sub-microg/mL H. pylori minimum inhibitory concentration activity, low molecular

20 antibacterial activity was determined as the minimum inhibitory concentration against a range of Gram

21 compare antibiotic use at presentation with minimum inhibitory concentration against moxifloxacin fo

22 Minimum inhibitory concentrations against B237 were 20-f

23 These inhibitors show potent minimum inhibitory concentrations against fluoroquinolon

24 from AMP disruption corresponded with lower minimum inhibitory concentrations against the Gram-posit

25 Minimum inhibitory concentration analysis of the 20 posi

26 Vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration and in vitro killing, a

27 ignificant association between antimicrobial minimum inhibitory concentration and outcome among bacte

28 724A-resistant mutants increase the in vitro minimum inhibitory concentration and the in vivo 99% eff

29 THPP-binding and increased both the in vitro minimum inhibitory concentration and the in vivo effecti

30 mulsions (coarse and nano) was tested by the minimum inhibitory concentration and time kill assay.

31 l substitutions, and unanticipated increased minimum inhibitory concentrations and hydrolytic activit

32 Minimum inhibitory concentrations and minimum microbicid

33 at both agr functional status and vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration are determinants associ

34 ynthesis, DNA-damage response, and increased minimum inhibitory concentration as a result of an incre

35 icillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus with minimum inhibitory concentration as low as 0.39 mug/mL.

36 proach will be used, along with the existing minimum inhibitory concentration, as a standard for the

37 , including circular dichroism spectroscopy, minimum inhibitory concentration assays, hemolysis and m

38 ncentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h to the minimum inhibitory concentration associated with complet

39 t active antibiotic against S. constellatus (minimum inhibitory concentration at 90% [MIC90] 0.25 mg/

40 under the concentration/time curve for 24 h:minimum inhibitory concentration [AUC24:MIC] ratio) and

41 eae treated with quinolones suggest that the minimum inhibitory concentration break point for resista

42 as reasonable in vitro and urinary activity (minimum inhibitory concentration breakpoint </=64 microg

43 ittee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, and minimum inhibitory concentration breakpoints to standard

44 activity also occurred at > or =2 times the minimum inhibitory concentration, but it was only -0.16

45 ng MRSA and strains with elevated vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations, but clinicians should

46 Concentrations exceeding 10 times the minimum inhibitory concentration completely inhibited th

47 Minimum inhibitory concentration data suggest that this

48 The mean levels were at or above the minimum inhibitory concentration determined in vitro.

49 Although the minimum inhibitory concentrations determined were relati

50 the 24-hour concentration-time curve to the minimum inhibitory concentration (fAUC/MIC) was found to

51 Evaluation of the minimum inhibitory concentrations, followed by whole gen

52 y against methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (minimum inhibitory concentration for 50% [MIC(50)] and 9

53 resulting in heterogeneous increases in the minimum inhibitory concentration for a range of antibiot

54 micin mean fecal levels were >5000 times the minimum inhibitory concentration for C. difficile of 0.2

55 The minimum inhibitory concentration for capsidiol (3-10 ng)

56 , clone 3D.5 (E104K:M182T:G238S) exhibited a minimum inhibitory concentration for cefotaxime 20,000-f

57 d sufficient antibiotic concentration (above minimum inhibitory concentration for most common bacteri

58 A decrease of >3 doubling dilutions in the minimum inhibitory concentration for third-generation ce

59 the D-Ala-D-Ala ligase enzyme we reduced the minimum inhibitory concentration for vancomycin from >25

60 Fungal minimum inhibitory concentration for voriconazole was 4

61 Only Al derived from the clay exceeded the minimum inhibitory concentrations for E. coli under acid

62 performing susceptibility tests to determine minimum inhibitory concentrations for M. genitalium.

63 Minimum inhibitory concentrations for various antibiotic

64 tion (called the lethal concentration or the minimum inhibitory concentration) for activity, below wh

65 ivitiy (selecitviy = hemolytic concentration/minimum inhibitory concentration) for bacteria over mamm

66 ored colistin susceptibility by reducing the minimum inhibitory concentration from 8 to 0.5 mug/ml, 4

67 higher positive predictive value compared to minimum inhibitory concentrations generated by commercia

68 listin-tigecycline therapy given tigecycline minimum inhibitory concentration greater than 2 mg/L com

69 tigecycline in the subgroup with tigecycline minimum inhibitory concentration greater than 2 mg/L com

70 rall prevalence of ciprofloxacin resistance (minimum inhibitory concentration > or =1 mg/L) was 9.8%,

71 Isolates with ceftriaxone minimum inhibitory concentration >/= 1 microg/mL decreas

72 lates were highly resistant to voriconazole (minimum inhibitory concentration >/=16 mg/L).

73 ion of isolates clinically resistant to AZM (minimum inhibitory concentration >/=16 microg/mL) was al

74 sole pathogen or S. aureus with a vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration >1 microg/mL, however,

75 Isolates with ceftriaxone minimum inhibitory concentrations >/=2 microg/mL underwe

76 1999, 93% of the mefE-containing strains had minimum inhibitory concentrations >/=8 microgram/mL.

77 isolates demonstrated ceftolozane-tazobactam minimum inhibitory concentrations >/=8 mug/mL.

78 inst DAP-susceptible E. faecium strains with minimum inhibitory concentrations >2 microg/mL.

79 heteroresistance in MRSA and increase in the minimum inhibitory concentrations (>1 or 2 microg/mL); h

80 patients colonized with FQREC (levofloxacin minimum inhibitory concentration, >/=8 mug/mL) were incl

81 solates with high but susceptible vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations have been associated w

82 including antibiotic-resistant strains, with minimum inhibitory concentrations in the range of 0.4-2.

83 methyl and ethyl ester prodrug forms showed minimum inhibitory concentrations in the range of 21-43

84 e-substituted dipyrrole derivatives have the minimum inhibitory concentrations in the submicromolar r

85 nals from ROS are greatly diminished and the minimum inhibitory concentration increases 20-fold.

86 susceptibility testing, and determination of minimum inhibitory concentration is conventionally perfo

87 However, in our studies RA did not attain minimum inhibitory concentration levels in sweet basil's

88 nstitute susceptible breakpoint of cefepime (minimum inhibitory concentration </= 8 mug/mL), cefepime

89 All isolates had minimum inhibitory concentration </=0.50 microg/mL.

90 from resistance, which is measured using the minimum inhibitory concentration metric, tolerance and p

91 ory strains of M. tuberculosis was observed [minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC(meropenem)) less t

92 tal isolates, there were 10 with ceftriaxone minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) >/=0.06 mg/L and

93 oup A) and 11.8% (group B) of patients had a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) >2 mug/mL to peni

94 erred resistance to kanamycin [5 microg/mL < minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) <or=40 microg/mL]

95 e even more potent antimicrobial agents [VRE minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) = 0.01-0.005 mug/

96 The significant modulation of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) against a Mtb str

97 Biological tests of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and hemolytic con

98 ial activity was determined by measuring the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bacte

99 The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bacte

100 The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum fungi

101 TEO reached minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum fungi

102 The vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and staphylococca

103 tween the ratio of drug exposure to organism minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and therapeutic r

104 PPMOs were evaluated in vitro using minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and viability ass

105 anced antibacterial activities, lowering the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) by more than one

106 The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) can be determined

107 testing method for telavancin, resulting in minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determinations th

108 ogistic models to end points calculated from minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distributions bas

109 population pharmacokinetics, target organism minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distributions, an

110 The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) does not provide

111 berculosis in vitro, revealing 143 hits with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) equal to or less

112 Furthermore, sulphated PEPS had the lowest minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for E. coli ATCC

113 rain Pen6 showed reduction of the penicillin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) from 6 to 0.75 mi

114 outcomes in vivo, although the importance of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) has been debated.

115 Vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) has been shown to

116 with Staphylococcus aureus to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) have revealed com

117 ureus bacteremia (MRSAB) when the vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) is >1 microg/mL.

118 It is unclear whether higher-vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) is associated wit

119 ity of isolated bacteria was assessed by: 1) minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) levels (studies 1

120 ftaroline and comparator agents by reference minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) methods.

121 rved only for VGS isolates with a penicillin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of >/= 2 microg/m

122 able and more potent than compound 3, with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 0.2 microM and

123 ary BV pathogen Gardnerella vaginalis with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 3.6 mg/ml.

124 ](m- tolyl)methanone (16), which displayed a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 36.6 microM vs

125 tuberculosis; the most potent compound had a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 52 nM and was

126 The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of an antimicrobi

127 The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of GEO was determ

128 face proteins for the ability to survive 10x minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of penicillin rev

129 tant selection window) that extends from the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of susceptible ce

130 n; in addition, we determined the gentamicin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the E. coli is

131 ere free antibiotic concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the pathogen a

132 as plasma antibiotic concentration above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) on days 3 and 4.

133 either voriconazole at 1x, 10x, 25x, or 50x minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) or amphotericin B

134 terial cells in 60 min and susceptibility at minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) range of 6.25-12.

135 ies of 1323 C. difficile isolates showed the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) range of fidaxomi

136 ezolid efficacy was linked to the AUC0-24 to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio (r(2) = 0.9

137 to achieve an area under the curve (AUC) to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio of >/=400.

138 -2010) and correlated treatment outcome with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) results and the p

139 FC procedure using acridine orange provided minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) results within 7

140 Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) tests and growth

141 The lowest minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value (0.13mg gal

142 A remarkable 1000-fold decrease in minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value is observed

143 st all tested fungal strains, with excellent minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values against no

144 Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values at the hig

145 ted drug concentrations are greater than the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for inhibi

146 porphyrins had approximately 100-fold higher minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for these

147 eplicating Mycobacterium tuberculosis , with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values lower than

148 This covers the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of the mos

149 SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Study, and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values were obtai

150 The daptomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was 4 mg/L in 78

151 The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined fo

152 The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was much lower fo

153 The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was set as the lo

154 yr period with clarithromycin-resistant MAC (minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)>or=32 microg/ml)

155 metric sigma correlates not with a peptide's minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), but rather its a

156 nt activity, antimicrobial activity (AA) and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC).

157 n at a concentration 8 times higher than the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC).

158 ssociation between exposure and azithromycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC).

159 ssociation between exposure and azithromycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC).

160 Several compounds had submicromolar minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) against R-TB and

161 Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) and fractional i

162 e broad spectrum antibacterial activity with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) in the low micro

163 lyses based on 735 literature data points of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of Plantae, Bact

164 Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of their MAC iso

165 whole-cell Mtb activity varied greatly with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) ranging from 0.7

166 Although the drugs have minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) that differ by a

167 vatives of zingerone (2b-2e) exhibited lower minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) values than zing

168 Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were determined

169 ptible breakpoint of </= 0.25 microg/mL (50% minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC(50)], 0.01 microg/

170 rated potent activity against staphylococci (minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] for which 90% of

171 reduced susceptibility to fluoroquinolones (minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] to levofloxacin,

172 -lactamases studied: significantly increased minimum inhibitory concentrations (microg/ml) and IC(50)

173 isolates were more likely to have meropenem minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) >/=16 microg/mL

174 All demonstrated elevated azithromycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) >256 mug/mL and

175 However, we additionally found that the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) against fluoroq

176 Macrolides show high minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) against Pseudom

177 Although polyamine minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) decreased 4-fol

178 s were itraconazole susceptible, whereas the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for 15 MB isola

179 examined to see whether they were above the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for pathogens t

180 Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) from some conte

181 Time-kill kinetic assay was performed at minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) in all plankton

182 owed that E. faecium strains with daptomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) in the higher e

183 -disubstituted quinazoline-2,4-diamines with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) in the low micr

184 nical outcomes of children with piperacillin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of </=16 microg

185 tion at concentrations of <5 microM and have minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of <8 microg/mL

186 gainst the replicating bacteria (R-TB), with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 0.77 and 0.9

187 acterium tuberculosis (R-TB) phenotype, with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 1.7, 1.9, an

188 alian cells and is moderately cytotoxic with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 2 and 4.5 mi

189 n strains of pathogenic yeasts for which the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of amphotericin

190 logue lowered the ceftazidime and cefotaxime minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of Escherichia

191 entrations nontoxic to mammalian cells), the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of imipenem aga

192 However, we observed that the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of penicillin,

193 n chlorophyte, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, to minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of single-herbi

194 were done in the presence or absence of sub-minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of vancomycin.

195 vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) ranging from 0.

196 Isolates with higher minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) required higher

197 Increased minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) to cefixime hav

198 Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined

199 Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined

200 Amphotericin B minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined

201 tatin, atorvastatin, and simvastatin and the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined

202 Daptomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were inversely

203 ream infections (BSIs) and higher vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), despite MICs b

204 erculosis isolates with different antibiotic minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs).

205 daxomicin treatment had elevated fidaxomicin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs; MIC(90), 256 mi

206 e compounds was significantly lower than the minimum inhibitory concentration needed to prevent the g

207 in resistance was defined as a ciprofloxacin minimum inhibitory concentration of > or =4 microg/mL.

208 howed potent activity against E. coli with a minimum inhibitory concentration of 0.41 microM.

209 alogue with a KD of 76 nM against BioA and a minimum inhibitory concentration of 1.7 muM (0.6 mug/mL)

210 inst Listeria monocytogenes: cIsf pool had a minimum inhibitory concentration of 10microg/ml prenylat

211 was higher among isolates with a vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration of 2 mg/L (P = .026).

212 hibits the growth of Escherichia coli with a minimum inhibitory concentration of 2 microm.

213 c cells of both P. aeruginosa strains with a minimum inhibitory concentration of 3 microg mL(-1).

214 Minimum inhibitory concentration of AgNPs needed to inhi

215 Normally, the minimum inhibitory concentration of an antibiotic, the d

216 this library that is capable of lowering the minimum inhibitory concentration of beta-lactam antibiot

217 The minimum inhibitory concentration of cationic antimicrobi

218 on level of efflux pump (MexAB-OprM) and the minimum inhibitory concentration of chloramphenicol.

219 The median minimum inhibitory concentration of DSM265 in blood was

220 The minimum inhibitory concentration of each plasma preparat

221 eased in association with an increase in the minimum inhibitory concentration of linezolid.

222 etermined alone or in combination changes in minimum inhibitory concentration of mutants.

223 d amphotericin B concentrations in ELF above minimum inhibitory concentration of the Aspergillus near

224 The minimum inhibitory concentration of the obtained hydroly

225 Minimum inhibitory concentration of voriconazole and nat

226 Comparing the structures and minimum inhibitory concentrations of 1-4, the alpha,beta

227 the 15 Salmonella isolates with ceftriaxone minimum inhibitory concentrations of 16 microg/mL or hig

228 ial activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (minimum inhibitory concentrations of 4-32 muM).

229 Antibacterial susceptibility testing shows minimum inhibitory concentrations of 80 mg/mL against a

230 Isolates had low minimum inhibitory concentrations of an investigational

231 so that the concentration will persist above minimum inhibitory concentrations of Candida species for

232 Minimum inhibitory concentrations of relevant antibiotic

233 Minimum inhibitory concentrations of sulphamethoxazole a

234 erum and dialysate concentrations were above minimum inhibitory concentrations of susceptible organis

235 Furthermore, the minimum inhibitory concentrations of these compounds inc

236 sistance of bacteria to ampicillin, reducing minimum inhibitory concentrations of this penicillin by

237 tivity through the estimation of amoxicillin minimum inhibitory concentration on a subset of 990 muta

238 um tuberculosis was demonstrated by 6 and 7 (minimum inhibitory concentrations or MIC's < or = 0.125

239 f area under the concentration-time curve to minimum inhibitory concentration (r2 = 0.90).

240 reciable inhibitory effect of the compounds (minimum inhibitory concentration ranging from 1 to 40 mi

241 S. aureus and permeable E. coli strains with minimum inhibitory concentrations ranging from 0.2 to 0.

242 M-1 variants possessed a distinct ampicillin minimum inhibitory concentration, ranging from 500 to >1

243 the achievement of an area under the curve: minimum inhibitory concentration ratio of > or =87 had a

244 4-5 (area under the concentration-time curve/minimum inhibitory concentration ratio, 100).

245 24h) of 132 and 1,782 h.mg/L, and AUC(0-24h)/minimum inhibitory concentration ratios of 528 and 7129,

246 .1% in 2010), with a bimodal distribution of minimum inhibitory concentration recorded between 2009 a

247 f the lowest concentration (microg/mL) (MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration) required to produce a

248 ults of culture-based antibiotic sensitivity minimum inhibitory concentration, sociodemographic and b

249 is a potent small molecule (1) that, at sub-minimum inhibitory concentration (sub-MIC) levels, lower

250 ones were associated with a 3.48-fold-higher minimum inhibitory concentration than those isolates tha

251 Minocycline (minimum inhibitory concentration that inhibits 50% and 9

252 ntage of time that faropenem persisted above minimum inhibitory concentration (TMIC) on the moxifloxa

253 in the disk-diffusion test and had elevated minimum inhibitory concentrations to other fluoroquinolo

254 Reassessment of the carbapenem minimum inhibitory concentrations using revised 2011 Cli

255 ports on the impact of increasing vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (V-MICs) and MRSA clon

256 ly isolated strains of M. tuberculosis, with minimum inhibitory concentration values as low as 0.03 m

257 Minimum inhibitory concentration values for azole drugs

258 The minimum inhibitory concentration values measured after 2

259 ivity of enzyme to drug, resulting in higher minimum inhibitory concentration values.

260 Treatment response and echinocandin minimum inhibitory concentrations varied among specific

261 For the consistently infected, the average minimum inhibitory concentration was 0.26 microg/mL for

262 The minimum inhibitory concentration was 0.57 mg/ml for E. f

263 dilution method to accurately determine the minimum inhibitory concentration was developed herein.

264 Minimum inhibitory concentrations were interpreted as su

265 asamycins, mutants with elevated fasamycin A minimum inhibitory concentrations were selected from a w

266 oncentration was 19-fold above the linezolid minimum inhibitory concentration, whereas biofilm vancom

267 ia to aminoglycosides as measured by reduced minimum inhibitory concentrations, whereas GroEL/GroES o