ライフサイエンスコーパス: mismatch negativity

1 s in the broad-band event-related potential (mismatch negativity).

2 ollowed by P300 amplitude, P300 latency, and mismatch negativity.

3 nt-related potentials (LF-ERPs), such as the mismatch negativity.

4 The mismatch negativity, a negative component in the auditor

5 similar cortical processing to the auditory mismatch negativity (aMMN), with the posterior sMMR refl

6 Mismatch negativity amplitude (F = 4.39, P = .04) and gl

7 There were correlations between mismatch negativity amplitude and hallucinations at left

8 Mismatch negativity amplitude and Heschl gyrus and planu

9 tions at left frontal electrodes and between mismatch negativity amplitude and passive-apathetic soci

10 enic patients showed significantly decreased mismatch negativity amplitude but normal latency and top

11 Mismatch negativity amplitude was reduced in the patient

12 The mismatch stimuli are used to elicit the mismatch negativity, an early auditory event-related pot

13 The well characterized mismatch negativity, an electrophysiological response th

14 The visual mismatch negativity, an index of automatic and preattent

15 The mismatch negativity and P300 components of the auditory

16 Mismatch negativity and P3a were measured in 30 UHR indi

17 rated mainly in frontal regions, an auditory mismatch negativity, and a visual mismatch response.

18 picture N300, the word P2, the phonological mismatch negativity, and the word midline frontal negati

19 igned to assess prefrontal function, whereas mismatch negativity assesses functioning of the auditory

20 Mismatch negativity did not significantly differentiate

21 ng magnetoencephalographic recordings of the mismatch negativity elicited in a large cohort of human

22 This result is consistent with those of mismatch negativity event-related potential studies and

23 eviance detection (the latter indexed by the mismatch negativity event-related potential) relies on p

24 a human auditory-evoked potential (AEP), the mismatch negativity, generated in the auditory cortex 10

25 uditory sensory measures, including impaired mismatch negativity generation (r=0.62, N=51, p=0.0002).

26 eta-frequency response (P < 0.05); and (iii) mismatch negativity generation to trained versus untrain

27 suppression, P300 amplitude and latency, and mismatch negativity--have been proposed as potential end

28 f ERPs was unaffected in Nrg1(+/-) mice, but mismatch negativity in response to novel stimuli was att

29 dy was to examine the topography of auditory mismatch negativity in schizophrenia with a high-density

30 The mismatch negativity is a potential biomarker of schizoph

31 Mismatch negativity may be a simple, sensitive, and inex

32 ed in event-related potential studies as the mismatch negativity (MMN) and has been observed in sever

33 Auditory mismatch negativity (MMN) and P300 event-related potenti

34 Herein, the focus is on sensory gating, mismatch negativity (MMN) and P300, thereby discussing w

35 ain using the event-related brain potentials mismatch negativity (MMN) and P300.

36 For example, the mismatch negativity (MMN) and P3a event-related potentia

37 iant-evoked event-related potential known as mismatch negativity (MMN) and provides a potential link

38 Mismatch negativity (MMN) and visual P1 are established

39 phonetic change responses, as indexed by the mismatch negativity (MMN) component of the auditory even

40 Here, we examined the mismatch negativity (MMN) component of the event-related

41 The mismatch negativity (MMN) component of the human event-r

42 This response resembled the mismatch negativity (MMN) evoked by surprising or unlike

43 A cross-language study utilizing the mismatch negativity (MMN) evoked response was conducted

44 Deficits in the generation of auditory mismatch negativity (MMN) generation are among the most

45 The low falling tone deviant elicited a Mismatch Negativity (MMN) in all participant groups befo

46 ormation processing: prepulse inhibition and mismatch negativity (MMN) in SZ patients and healthy sub

47 Mismatch negativity (MMN) indexes pre-attentive informat

48 Auditory mismatch negativity (MMN) is a biomarker for schizophren

49 The mismatch negativity (MMN) is a brain event-related poten

50 The mismatch negativity (MMN) is a preattentive component of

51 Mismatch negativity (MMN) is an auditory event-related p

52 The mismatch negativity (MMN) is an event related potential

53 Mismatch negativity (MMN) is an event-related brain pote

54 Mismatch negativity (MMN) is an event-related potential

55 The observation that mismatch negativity (MMN) is consistently impaired in sc

56 Mismatch negativity (MMN) is reduced in chronic but not

57 The mismatch negativity (MMN) is thought to index the activa

58 We compared auditory event-related mismatch negativity (MMN) potentials to frequency modula

59 sented with Mandarin Chinese tones while the mismatch negativity (MMN) response was elicited using a

60 radigm can elicit an electroencephalographic mismatch negativity (MMN) response.

61 approximately 200 ms, with the multisensory mismatch negativity (MMN) significantly different from t

62 We used mismatch negativity (MMN) to examine structural encoding

63 Mismatch negativity (MMN) to FM tones was assessed in 43

64 Mismatch negativity (MMN) was used to index discriminati

65 independent auditory brain potential, termed mismatch negativity (MMN) while subjects performed a vis

66 The mismatch negativity (MMN), a component of event-related

67 We dissociated the two systems using the mismatch negativity (MMN), a well studied EEG effect evo

68 ept study was conducted to determine whether mismatch negativity (MMN), an event-related potential in

69 The significance of the mismatch negativity (MMN), an event-related potential me

70 Mismatch negativity (MMN), an evoked potential calculate

71 showed no difference between groups for the mismatch negativity (MMN), but the late discriminative n

72 ients who had developed PTSD showed enhanced mismatch negativity (MMN), increased theta power (5-7 Hz

73 entive measure of auditory change detection, mismatch negativity (MMN), is one of the most consistent

74 ological signatures of neurodynamics, namely mismatch negativity (MMN), P300, and contingent negative

75 In this EEG/ERP study, using the mismatch negativity (MMN), P3a, and late negativity (LN)

76 e measured an automatic brain potential, the mismatch negativity (MMN), when listeners did not attend

77 d oddball paradigms were presented to derive mismatch negativity (MMN), which reflects the ability to

78 well-defined event-related potential, termed mismatch negativity (MMN).

79 by prepulse inhibition (PPI) of startle) and mismatch negativity (MMN).

80 g attenuates evoked responses--including the mismatch negativity (MMN).

81 d by whole-head electrical recordings of the mismatch negativity (MMN).

82 mized electroencephalogram (EEG) paradigm of mismatch negativity (MMN).

83 and cortical sensitivity to acoustic change [mismatch negativity (MMN)] were measured in a group of c

84 index of cortical auditory change detection (mismatch negativity [MMN]) was used to assess whether se

85 est that this is probably equivalent to the 'mismatch negativity' (MMN), reflecting a pre-perceptual,

86 We recorded the magnetic mismatch negativity (MMNm) to infrequent tone omissions

87 The mismatch negativity of event-related potentials was empl

88 The authors measured mismatch negativity, P300, and P50 suppression in 16 mon

89 Main Outcome and Measures: Mismatch negativity, P3a, and reorienting negativity wer

90 Simulations of a mismatch negativity paradigm predicted a rapid trial-by-

91 o duration- and pitch-deviant stimuli in the mismatch negativity paradigm.

92 saw a letter A followed by a letter X, and a mismatch negativity paradigm.

93 relatively rare (e.g., in oddball blocks of mismatch negativity paradigms, or in repetition suppress

94 of speech, which was termed the phonological mismatch negativity (PMN).

95 Training also elevated the mismatch negativity, possibly due to the strengthening o

96 f sensory stimulation eliciting the cortical mismatch negativity potential demonstrate deficits in ea

97 he hypothesis that the system upon which the mismatch negativity relies processes stimuli in an holis

98 peated stimulation and (ii) elicitation of a mismatch negativity response (MMN) by changes in repetit

99 Patients showed impaired mismatch negativity response to emotionally relevant fre

100 stablished index of auditory perception, the mismatch negativity response, tested whether the therapi

101 EEG recordings revealed that mismatch negativity responses were larger for timing dev

102 tudied using sequences of unmodulated tones (mismatch negativity; stimulus-specific adaptation).

103 Mismatch negativity to auditory deviants (duration, freq

104 Mismatch negativity topography was evaluated in 23 right

105 The mismatch negativity was found to be elicited by a tone t

106 Mismatch negativity was reduced in schizophrenia, especi

107 Mismatch negativity was reduced to both duration deviant

108 Mismatch negativity was used as a functional read-out of