戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  Neanderthal but belonged to an anatomically modern human.
2 ter group of Denisovans after diverging from modern humans.
3 iting our knowledge of these predecessors of modern humans.
4 al selection against Neanderthal variants in modern humans.
5 ese inhibitors predispose to two scourges of modern humans.
6 ity (bone strength relative to body size) in modern humans.
7 portant for the study of dispersal routes of modern humans.
8 nd lacking traits typical of Neandertals and modern humans.
9 ted that D. folliculorum origins may predate modern humans.
10 ing the evolutionary history of anatomically modern humans.
11 ing it was amplified during the evolution of modern humans.
12 le from those of Late Pleistocene and recent modern humans.
13 elationship between Pleistocene hominins and modern humans.
14  history took place before the appearance of modern humans.
15 t apes and humans, long before the advent of modern humans.
16 sence of fully behaviorally and anatomically modern humans.
17 eloped before or as a result of contact with modern humans.
18 he same configuration that occurs modally in modern humans.
19 ogression of Y chromosomes into anatomically modern humans.
20 ol, lissoir, previously only associated with modern humans.
21 o the generation of adaptive variation among modern humans.
22 e for cultural diffusion from Neandertals to modern humans.
23  hominins (human ancestors) and anatomically modern humans.
24 e evidence for the symbolic culture of early modern humans.
25 hat might have followed FOXP2 adaptations in modern humans.
26 wth spurt no longer confers any advantage in modern humans.
27 es in these early hominin taxa compared with modern humans.
28 tter is most likely produced by anatomically modern humans.
29 d materials required to sustain hyper-dense, modern humans.
30 still limited in their endurance compared to modern humans.
31 otion that East Africa was the birthplace of modern humans.
32 r functional or structural traits typical of modern humans.
33 haping genotypic and phenotypic variation in modern humans.
34 dispersal, i.e., a single major diffusion of modern humans across Eurasia and Australasia [3-5]; and
35                                The spread of modern humans across the globe has led to genetic adapta
36 act of large herbivores on ecosystems before modern human activities is an open question in ecology a
37 icrobial communities that interact most with modern human activities.
38 biotic resistance genes has been enhanced by modern human activity and its influence on the environme
39     In particular, at least some Neanderthal-modern human admixture must postdate the separation of t
40                               Neandertal and modern human adults differ in skeletal features of the c
41 e list of substitutions that became fixed in modern humans after their separation from the ancestors
42 pression differences between Neanderthal and modern human alleles, indicating pervasive cis-regulator
43 , fossil evidence suggests that anatomically modern humans (AMH) and various archaic forms coexisted
44            Genetic evidence for anatomically modern humans (AMH) out of Africa before 75 thousand yea
45 ic event since the emergence of anatomically modern humans (AMH).
46 mains generally associated with anatomically modern humans (AMHs) and evidence of a probable Neandert
47 pped with the earliest incoming anatomically modern humans (AMHs) in Eurasia are key questions in pal
48 nd largely extinct expansion of anatomically modern humans (AMHs) out of Africa.
49 tinctly different from those of anatomically modern humans (AMHs), despite the close relationship bet
50 f Neandertals and the spread of anatomically modern humans (AMHs).
51 the population divergence of Neandertals and modern human ancestors, and it refutes alternative scena
52 y dispersal of modern humans; instead, their modern human ancestry is consistent with coming from the
53 on of a key shared derived characteristic of modern human and Neandertal hand morphology and suggests
54 limb epiphyses (long bone articular ends) in modern humans and chimpanzees and in fossil hominins att
55 covery of interbreeding between anatomically modern humans and extinct hominins; the development of a
56  clavicle lengths, along with those of early modern humans and latitudinally diverse recent humans, w
57 not remained stable even since the origin of modern humans and might have changed numerous times duri
58 d material with early or recent anatomically modern humans and more primitive neurocranial and endocr
59       Thus, the history of admixture between modern humans and Neandertals is most likely more comple
60 Middle to Upper Palaeolithic interface, both modern humans and Neanderthals contemporaneously inhabit
61  spanning chimpanzees, ancient hominids, and modern humans and reveals new aspects of MEI biology in
62 gressed fragments in the genome sequences of modern humans and to determine whether positive selectio
63 rphology that is shared with Neandertals and modern humans, and considered adaptive for intensified m
64 h before and after divergence of non-African modern humans, and Neandertals were a source of adaptive
65  have shown that Neanderthals interbred with modern humans, and that non-Africans today are the produ
66 genetically diverged from other anatomically modern humans, and they likely experienced strong select
67 he large brain and small postcanine teeth of modern humans are among our most distinctive features, a
68                                              Modern humans are characterized by a highly specialized
69                                              Modern humans are characterized by specialized hand morp
70 skeletal differences between Neandertals and modern humans are largely established by the time of bir
71 s of the divergence between Neanderthals and modern humans are underestimated; or (iii) phenotypic di
72 haracteristics and cognitive capabilities of modern humans are well-documented, less is known about h
73 urignacian assemblages--demonstrably made by modern humans--are commonly used as proxies for the pres
74 Interglacial (132,000-110,000 y B.P., before modern human arrival) than in the early Holocene (10,000
75                                              Modern humans arrived in Europe ~45,000 years ago, but l
76                    There is a consensus that modern humans arrived in the Americas 15,000-20,000 y ag
77 rtals show behaviors similar to those of the modern humans arriving into Europe, including the use of
78 stage for later refinements that manifest in modern humans as language-based conversational turn-taki
79 il hominins and highlight the value of using modern humans as models for inferring the limits of homi
80 n addition to using MELT to discover MEIs in modern humans as part of the 1000 Genomes Project, we al
81  sites and demonstrates that the presence of modern humans associated with Upper Paleolithic toolkits
82                               K222 exists in modern humans at multiple loci spread across the pericen
83 ome have speculated that the demise of early modern humans at that time was due in part to a dramatic
84 t elements fell within the expected range of modern humans at this age.
85 er deciduous incisor from Riparo Bombrini is modern human, based on its morphology.
86 by 41,000 calendar years before the present, modern humans bearing Protoaurignacian culture spread in
87  sophisticated manual abilities, yet much of modern human behavior evolved very recently.
88 ly implies that innovational pulses of early modern human behaviour were climatically influenced and
89 therosclerosis is thought to be a disease of modern human beings and related to contemporary lifestyl
90                       The latter assume that modern humans benefited from some selective advantage ov
91 eference genome is part of the foundation of modern human biology and a monumental scientific achieve
92 ousand years old, therefore the emergence of modern human biology is commonly placed at around 200 th
93  Nevertheless, natural selection persists in modern humans, both as differential mortality and as dif
94 s the possibility that phenotypic changes in modern human brains and behavior may have been mediated
95                               Comparisons of modern human brains with those of chimpanzees provide an
96 ltiple interactions between Neanderthals and modern humans, but there is currently little genetic evi
97 e European population, it may have arisen in modern humans by admixture with Neanderthals in Europe.
98 have discovered that HK2 viruses produced in modern humans can package HK2 sequences and transmit the
99 ruda fossil is significant for the spread of modern humans carrying the IUP into Europe and suggests
100 ns of development, implying that a prolonged modern human childhood evolved quite recently.
101                                However, some modern humans climb tall trees routinely in pursuit of h
102 Southern Italy, have demonstrated that early modern humans collected and processed various plants.
103 e Neanderthal genome with genomes of several modern humans concluded that Neanderthals made a small (
104 n Siberia to isolate its endogenous DNA from modern human contaminants and show that the reconstructe
105                                           As modern humans continue to live under extended periods of
106 t into the complexity and diversification of modern human culture during a key period in the global d
107                                              Modern human dispersal into Europe is thought to have oc
108                                           As modern humans dispersed from Africa throughout the world
109                                          How modern humans dispersed into Eurasia and Australasia, in
110 n important for understanding the origins of modern human diversity.
111 n skeletons is the presence of contaminating modern human DNA molecules in many fossil samples and la
112 Neanderthal-derived variants that survive in modern human DNA; however, the neural implications of th
113                      During bipedal walking, modern humans dorsiflex their forefoot at the metatarsop
114        Many Neanderthal sequences survive in modern humans due to ancient hybridization, providing an
115                          They coexisted with modern humans during part of this time.
116 aracterized by a series of founder events as modern humans expanded into multiple continents.
117 g in favourable environmental conditions for modern human expansion.
118 tantially to later people or represent early modern human expansions into Eurasia that left no surviv
119  between growth in tooth root length and the modern human extended period of childhood.
120 , show extensive bone deposition, whereas in modern humans extensive osteoclastic bone resorption is
121 t not with modern humans suggesting that the modern human face is developmentally derived.
122 Huesos (SH) and different from the retracted modern human face.
123                                              Modern human faces are distinct from those of the Neande
124         It is relevant to debates about when modern humans first dispersed out of Africa and when the
125 ens of thousands of years after anatomically modern humans first left Africa and thousands of years a
126 eolithic toolkits in the Levant predates all modern human fossils from Europe.
127  those of the age of the oldest anatomically modern human fossils.
128 we analyse DNA from a 37,000-42,000-year-old modern human from Pestera cu Oase, Romania.
129            We investigated ancestry of 3,528 modern humans from 163 samples.
130  was determined by the repeated migration of modern humans from Africa into Eurasia.
131  Levantine corridor hypothesis suggests that modern humans from Africa spread into Europe via the Lev
132 y that the initial dispersal of anatomically modern humans from Africa to southern Asia occurred befo
133 ta support a coastally oriented dispersal of modern humans from eastern Africa to southern Asia appro
134        The timing of a migration reversal of modern humans from Eurasia into North Africa is suggeste
135 o, one of the oldest fossils of anatomically modern humans from Europe.
136 patterns of social behavior that distinguish modern humans from other living primates likely played s
137 iological characteristics that differentiate modern humans from other primates.
138                          In such a scenario, modern human genetic and phenotypic variation was primar
139 nderthal ancestry, has been deleterious on a modern human genetic background, as reflected by its dep
140 decreased fertility in males when moved to a modern human genetic background.
141 ur knowledge this is the oldest anatomically modern human genome reported to date.
142  genome and an expanded set of high-coverage modern human genome sequences.
143 s the persistence of its risk alleles in the modern human genome.
144  with the evolution of RV-C and helped shape modern human genomes against the virus-susceptible, albe
145 ed archaic hominin sequence that survives in modern human genomes and what these genomic excavations
146                                         Many modern human genomes retain DNA inherited from interbree
147 d (3) the introgression of ancient MEIs into modern human genomes.
148 make a direct comparison between archaic and modern human genomes.
149  and Bacteroides, the dominant genera in the modern human gut microbiome.
150 st 45,000 years before present, anatomically modern humans had spread across Eurasia [1-3], but it is
151  the possible relationship with anatomically modern humans has captured our imagination and stimulate
152   Throughout history, the population size of modern humans has varied considerably due to changes in
153 the extinct Neanderthal and Denisovan, while modern humans have at least 100 K111 proviruses spread a
154 tal sequences that persist in the genomes of modern humans have been identified in Eurasians, compara
155 Here, we test the hypotheses that (i) recent modern humans have low trabecular density throughout the
156                Results show that only recent modern humans have low trabecular density throughout the
157  Recent analyses of de novo DNA mutations in modern humans have suggested a nuclear substitution rate
158 ebate about the Neanderthals' replacement by modern humans highlight the role of environmental pressu
159 nvestigated genetic differentiation of early modern humans, human admixture and migration events, and
160 ibular shape variation in fossil Homo and in modern human hunter-gatherer populations.
161 as related to the colonization of Eurasia by modern human hunter-gatherers, who competed with wolves
162 n spite of this, however, there have been no modern human imaging studies of its acute effects on the
163 strating an early appearance of behaviorally modern humans in a medium-cold steppe-type environment w
164  a population that diverged early from other modern humans in Africa contributed genetically to the a
165 probably predate the arrival of anatomically modern humans in Eastern Europe.
166 ity of interbreeding between Neandertals and modern humans in Eurasia.
167 Whereas there is no evidence of the earliest modern humans in Europe contributing to the genetic comp
168             Hence, the behavior of the first modern humans in Europe is still unknown.
169 ed the relationship between Neanderthals and modern humans in greater detail by applying two compleme
170     However, the H. naledi foot differs from modern humans in having more curved proximal pedal phala
171 ges in the genetic structure of anatomically modern humans in recent millennia.
172 n resonance dating of mammalian teeth, place modern humans in Sumatra between 73 and 63 ka.
173 different from most other early anatomically modern humans in the Levant.
174                            Given the role of modern humans in the world-wide decimations of megafauna
175 he debate about the timing of the arrival of modern humans in western Europe and the demise of Neande
176                                         Most modern humans, in contrast, concentrate in large cities
177 andertal lineages that persist in the DNA of modern humans, in whole-genome sequences from 379 Europe
178 ples from 51 deciduous teeth of 12 different modern human individuals of known dietary histories, as
179 he present, containing multiple anatomically modern human individuals.
180 stantial ancestry from an early dispersal of modern humans; instead, their modern human ancestry is c
181 om body parts of endemic animals, suggesting modern humans integrated exotic faunas and other novel r
182 ient hominin lineage most closely related to modern humans, interbred with ancestors of present-day h
183   Based on genetic evidence the dispersal of modern humans into Eurasia started less than 55 ka ago.
184  shortly after the expansion of anatomically modern humans into Europe and from the ancestors of Neol
185 tween HBV phylogeny and genetic diversity of modern humans, investigated the timescale of global HBV
186 tions has been used to distinguish them from modern humans, invoked to account for other aspects of t
187  model of admixture between Neanderthals and modern humans is necessary to account for the different
188            The first settlement of Europe by modern humans is thought to have occurred between 50,000
189    After these losses and in the presence of modern humans, large herbivores generally were less abun
190 e possible cause-effect relationship of this modern human-like (MHL) hand anatomy, its associated gri
191 dually along a single morphocline, achieving modern human-like configuration and function within the
192          The H. naledi foot is predominantly modern human-like in morphology and inferred function, w
193 rints provide the oldest direct evidence for modern human-like weight transfer and confirm the presen
194 or and pigmentation have changed more on the modern human lineage.
195                                              Modern humans live in an "exploded" network with unusual
196  erectus, consistent with the shift toward a modern human locomotor anatomy, or more recently in conc
197  sequence of a approximately 45,000-year-old modern human male from Siberia.
198 0 and 42,900 cal B.P. and the IUP-associated modern human maxilla known as "Ethelruda" before approxi
199 zation is not easy for physical reasons, and modern humans may be exceptional.
200 pact on our ancestors, and furthermore, that modern humans may have already expanded beyond Africa by
201 , for example the appearance of behaviorally modern humans, may be unwarranted.
202  The antiquity of Neanderthal gene flow into modern humans means that genomic regions that derive fro
203 nderthals from the Altai Mountains and early modern humans met and interbred, possibly in the Near Ea
204                                         Both modern humans (MHs) and Neanderthals successfully settle
205 obiota and converge along an axis toward the modern human microbiome.
206                                           As modern humans migrated out of Africa, they encountered m
207 es are consistent with the major prehistoric modern human migrations.
208 in human ancient DNA suggested that an early modern human mitochondrial lineage emerged in Asia and t
209 the temporal and spatial complexity of early modern human morphological variability.
210                                              Modern humans moving into Asia met Neandertals, Denisova
211 the last common ancestor of Neanderthals and modern humans ([N-MH]LCA).
212 years after documented interbreeding between modern humans, Neandertals and Denisovans, that we see m
213  Analyses of the genetic relationships among modern humans, Neanderthals and Denisovans have suggeste
214 ed a rich history of admixture between early modern humans, Neanderthals, and Denisovans, and has all
215 However, the timing of peak root velocity in modern humans occurs earlier than expected and coincides
216 event in human evolution is the expansion of modern humans of African origin across Eurasia between 6
217 verlap between Neanderthals and anatomically modern humans of more than 5,000 years.
218 d after 50 kyr ago--potentially encountering modern humans on Flores or other hominins dispersing thr
219 ecreate the evolutionary pathway between two modern human oncogenes, Src and Abl, by reconstructing t
220       Here we studied three ORF1 proteins: a modern human one (111p), its resuscitated primate ancest
221 d nonsynonymous mutations faster than either modern humans or Neanderthals.
222 nd whether they have the potential to infect modern humans or other primates.
223               Previously, only large-brained modern humans or their close relatives had been demonstr
224 y a significant role in language function in modern humans, originally evolved to support domain-gene
225                                              Modern humans originated in Africa, but where exactly?
226 neage emerged in Asia and that the theory of modern human origins could no longer be considered solel
227                  The serial founder model of modern human origins predicts that the phylogeny of ance
228 t hominids has reshaped our understanding of modern human origins.
229 iled description of the complex dispersal of modern humans out of Africa and their population expansi
230 played an important role in the dispersal of modern humans out of Africa but the Karnataka state, whi
231 val of humans in Australia, the dispersal of modern humans out of Africa, and the subsequent interact
232 archaeological evidence for the expansion of modern humans out of Africa, with initial occupation at
233 nd environmental context of the dispersal of modern humans out of Africa.
234 that Neanderthals contributed genetically to modern humans outside Africa 47,000-65,000 years ago.
235                                 Anatomically modern humans overlapped and mated with Neandertals such
236                                              Modern humans overlapped in time and space with other ho
237 ent and modern viruses have implications for modern human pandemics from viral reservoirs and for hum
238 d different bipedal push-off kinematics than modern humans, perhaps resulting in a less efficient for
239 e expression that contribute to variation in modern human phenotypes.
240 ysis is of several genomic samples from each modern human population considered, we are able to docum
241 polymorphisms and cranial shape variables of modern human populations from Africa and Asia.
242 ent of "archaic" Neanderthal by anatomically modern human populations in other regions of western Eur
243 stant parental relatedness that is common in modern human populations is less well understood.
244      The predominantly African origin of all modern human populations is well established, but the ro
245  from Neanderthals/Denisovans to non-African modern human populations through gene flow.
246 n of biological affinities between worldwide modern human populations, derived independently from den
247 ntly different mean values in various recent modern human populations, favoring a scenario of fast ev
248 nd evolved over thousands of years alongside modern human populations.
249 red among Neanderthals, Denisovans and early modern humans, possibly including gene flow into Denisov
250 hal remains, suggesting that Neanderthal and modern human presence overlapped in Europe for some mill
251 archaic admixture influences disease risk in modern humans, provide hypotheses about the effects of h
252 at H. floresiensis survived until long after modern humans reached Australia by ~50 kyr ago.
253 gastropod Phorcus turbinatus associated with modern human remains and IUP and EUP stone tools from Ks
254                                   In Europe, modern human remains of this time period are scarce and
255  (EUP) Upper Paleolithic sequence containing modern human remains, has played an important part in th
256                                              Modern humans replaced Neandertals approximately 40,000
257                                 Anatomically modern humans replaced Neanderthals in Europe around 40,
258          The Pleistocene global dispersal of modern humans required the transit of arid and semiarid
259  is more derived than any other anatomically modern humans, resembling middle-to-late Late Pleistocen
260 a subfamily acts as an endogenous mutagen in modern humans, reshaping both somatic and germline genom
261 rived from Neanderthals, more than any other modern human sequenced to date.
262 s divergence from orthologous chimpanzee and modern human sequences and find strong support for a mod
263 us, the low trabecular density of the recent modern human skeleton evolved late in our evolutionary h
264                         Many interactions in modern human societies are among strangers.
265 have a profound impact on the functioning of modern human societies, but effects on economic activity
266 distant strangers that are characteristic of modern human societies.
267 me sequences from ten securely dated ancient modern humans spanning 40,000 years as calibration point
268 d intrinsic causes, with research focused on modern human-specific models to understand disease pathw
269    Moreover, at present, Manot 1 is the only modern human specimen to provide evidence that during th
270 different conclusions regarding how and when modern humans spread out of Africa and into the rest of
271 vention by Neandertals or an indication that modern humans started influencing European Neandertals m
272 Australopithecus and early Homo but not with modern humans suggesting that the modern human face is d
273 tal Y we describe has never been observed in modern humans suggests that the lineage is most likely e
274 the Neanderthal mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) to modern humans than Denisovans has recently been suggeste
275                                     Fixed in modern humans, the deletion is also in archaic human gen
276 e inter-species dynamics of Neanderthals and modern humans, the eventual replacement of the Neanderth
277 as the main place of origin for anatomically modern humans, their dispersal pattern out of the contin
278       However, in species of Homo, including modern humans, there is a tight link between tooth propo
279 of similar objects in Europe by anatomically modern humans, they could also be evidence for cultural
280                      Considered exclusive to modern humans, this behavior has been used to argue in f
281 ing that Neanderthal alleles may have helped modern humans to adapt to non-African environments.
282 ed that in at least a few anatomical regions modern humans today appear to have relatively low trabec
283 mane contains ancient mitochondrial DNA of a modern human type.
284 Here we infer early demographic histories of modern humans using whole-genome sequences of five Khois
285 mixture between Neandertals and anatomically modern humans, we analyzed patterns of introgressed sequ
286  Using the opponens muscles from a sample of modern humans, we tested the hypothesis that aspects of
287                      Notably, although fully modern humans were already present in southern China at
288  the ancestral lineage common to archaic and modern humans, whereas genes involved in behavior and pi
289 r and subsequent mixture of Neanderthals and modern humans - which, on genetic evidence, is considere
290 people could be closely related to the first modern humans who later successfully colonized Europe.
291           The genetic diversity of the first modern humans who spread into Europe during the Late Ple
292  indeed an additional ecological barrier for modern humans, who could only enter Europe when the demi
293 the Neanderthals' demise to competition with modern humans, who occupied the same ecological niche.
294 f Africa, and the subsequent interactions of modern humans with Neanderthals and Denisovans.
295  sub-Saharan African origin for anatomically modern humans with subsequent migrations out of Africa.
296 ions outside Africa to be colonized by fully modern humans, with archaeological evidence for human pr
297 nt common ancestor (TMRCA) of Neandertal and modern human Y chromosomes is approximately 588 thousand
298 in-coding differences between Neandertal and modern human Y chromosomes, including potentially damagi
299 ces the Neandertal lineage as an outgroup to modern human Y chromosomes-including A00, the highly div
300 onger than the TMRCA of A00 and other extant modern human Y-chromosome lineages.

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top