ライフサイエンスコーパス: molarity

1 concentrated, resulting in a high effective molarity.

2 folds exhibiting notable values of effective molarity.

3 ressed in the large differences in effective molarity.

4 correlated well with the reduction of buffer molarity.

5 ding the helix, are allowed to vary with TFE molarity.

6 The inputs to SPT are the solvent radii and molarities.

7 stigating various parameters, such as buffer molarity (0.1-1 M), temperature (25 degrees C-90 degrees

8 ither 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) or low-molarity (100, 50, 20, and 5 mM) ethylenediaminetetraace

9 strate guests, leading to a larger effective molarity (amplification), and an increase in the rate ac

10 The relationship between effective molarity and intervening nucleic acid secondary structur

11 l relationship interconverting the scales of molarity and molality without requiring the density of t

12 e, tetrabutylammonium bromide concentration, molarity, and solvent polarity on the resolution rate, p

13 structure is required to maximize effective molarities between reactants, possibly by compacting int

14 Reduction of buffer molarity by dilution also resulted in exposure of the fu

15 A, we determine the dependence of the solute molarity (C3) on that of BSA (C2) at fixed temperature (

16 inear dependence of ln <w> and DeltaH on TFE molarity can be used to extrapolate the results from 25%

17 ly, we found that IdU and CldU, when used at molarities comparable to those that label the maximal nu

18 Recently, we developed low-molarity conductive media to mitigate this positive feed

19 ection in a dose-dependent manner and at low molarity despite absence of sequence similarity to filov

20 DMCs were used to determine effective molarities (EM) for the formation of intramolecular phen

21 tions allowed determination of the effective molarities (EM) for the intramolecular interactions.

22 pectively), reveals that while the effective molarities (EM)s are almost identical (EM(2m)) 26 M; EM(

23 Effective molarity (EM) is a key parameter that determines the eff

24 this mechanism, with an estimated effective molarity (EM) of the general base of >15 M, consistent w

25 ally bound states to determine the effective molarities for the intramolecular interactions by compar

26 Effective molarities for the subsequent unimolecular N-alkylation

27 Surprisingly, the mean effective molarity for binding the flexible alpha-cyclodextrin-bas

28 The monolayer provides an effective molarity for the reaction of approximately 500 M as comp

29 An alternate, high-molarity, high-temperature ('HighMT') protocol has been

30 ed to the later value, dehydratase effective molarity is 11 M.

31 The effective molarity is calculated to be 230 M by comparison of k(u)

32 A higher electrolyte molarity is found to enhance the capacity utilization dr

33 Our analysis reveals that the effective molarity is the critical parameter in optimizing the bro

34 cular association constant and the effective molarity KEM > 1, there is a linear increase in the free

35 ide in the presence of cysteine at the micro-molarity level.

36 treatment requires hours of exposure to low-molarity, low-temperature bisulfite ('LowMT') and, somet

37 ain association, represented by an effective molarity (M(eff)), is maximal for a linker extended by o

38 eports dissociation constants and "effective molarities" (M(eff)) for the intramolecular binding of a

39 In principle, effective molarity measurements, in which exogenous acids/bases re

40 uimolar mixtures, and two-component variable molarity mixtures.

41 We obtained consensus effective molarities of approximately 5 x 10(4) M for KSI from Com

42 ) groups) gave quantitative estimates of the molarities of interfacial bromide (Br(m)) and water (H(2

43 on-Crick base pairing controls the effective molarities of substrates tethered to DNA strands; bond-f

44 or of the antibody complex with an effective molarity of 76.7 M, revealing a significant catalytic be

45 We developed an approach to obtain the molarity of any structurally enriched semiconducting sin

46 t higher oil and surfactant contents, higher molarity of CaCl2 and lower alginate concentrations.

47 sts in 3.5-fold molar excess relative to the molarity of ExbD in E. coli suggests the possibility of

48 n of the recovered oil bodies depends on the molarity of medium used; the use of a sodium bicarbonate

49 lease rate were identified, including pH and molarity of quench buffer.

50 culated based on particle size, density, and molarity of the analyte within solution.

51 n seed and mass of media during grinding and molarity of the medium used on oil body integrity, purit

52 The "effective molarity" of the cationic side chain of Arg-235 at the w

53 Here we addressed this problem using low-molarity solutions of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (E

54 Thus, the high effective molarities suggest a large catalytic contribution associ

55 no effect on artifact MMHg for each leachate molarity tested.

56 positioning effects and determine effective molarities that estimate catalytic contributions.

57 cyc-CxC*AyA) dimers, thus enabling effective molarities to be estimated for the various systems.

58 under alkaline conditions, with an effective molarity up to 2900 M for the imidazolyl group, ruling o

59 ty was maximized close to physiological salt molarities while processivity was midrange at physiologi

60 ble over a range of buffer concentration and molarity, with no evidence of temporal degradation over