ライフサイエンスコーパス: monaural

1 al mechanisms that create DTNs in the IC are monaural.

2 s reported perceived distance in response to monaural 1 octave 4 kHz noise source sounds presented at

3 between the binaural ABR and the sum of the monaural ABRs (i.e., binaural - (left + right)).

4 Unlike monaural AM coding, temporal factors, such as the coinci

5 puts had only minor effects on LSO output to monaural AM inputs.

6 ngs in vivo found considerable variations in monaural AM-tuning across neurons.

7 fected only the low-frequency portion of the monaural AM-tuning curve.

8 of single and multiple units in response to monaural and binaural acoustic stimulation.

9 c parameters of coincidence detection affect monaural and binaural AM coding.

10 is essential for LSO neurons to encode both monaural and binaural AM sounds.

11 These models, calibrated to reproduce known monaural and binaural characteristics of LSO, generate l

12 Distinct pathways carry monaural and binaural information from the lower auditor

13 Thus, both monaural and binaural interactions can occur at single i

14 site of convergence for nearly all ascending monaural and binaural projections.

15 alization relies on the neural processing of monaural and binaural spatial cues that arise from the w

16 e rate of nucleus laminaris neurons for both monaural and binaural stimulation increased with sound i

17 MGV) were characterized extracellularly with monaural and binaural tone and noise bursts (100- to 250

18 hat low-frequency LSO neurons of cat are not monaural and can exhibit contralateral inhibition like t

19 data under typical experimental conditions: monaural and diotic stimulation; and whole-head beamform

20 f interaural time differences is composed of monaural cells in the cochlear nucleus (CN; nucleus magn

21 frequency-sensitive neurons report primarily monaural cells with no contralateral inhibition.

22 d to binaural signals as weakly inhibited or monaural cells.

23 e of stimulus levels under binaural, but not monaural, conditions.

24 re, we show in young adult rats that 10 d of monaural conductive hearing loss (i.e., earplugging) lea

25 Here, we show that 10 d of monaural conductive hearing loss leads to an increase in

26 oth of these tasks likely involve the use of monaural cues due to the absence of any relevant binaura

27 ry spatial planes, such that learning to use monaural cues for the horizontal plane comes at the expe

28 mporal analysis of the waveform at each ear (monaural cues).

29 ng total signal magnitude either by doubling monaural current or by binaural stimulation produced equ

30 underlie "amblyaudio" by inducing reversible monaural deprivation (MD) in infant, juvenile, and adult

31 Adaptation to monaural deprivation in adulthood is also possible, but

32 hypothesis that a novel mechanism can create monaural distance sensitivity: a combination of auditory

33 Summation of the monaural EPSCs predicted the binaural excitatory respons

34 binaural convergence in the brainstem where monaural excitatory and inhibitory inputs converge.

35 a glass recording pipette during a constant monaural excitatory stimulus.

36 Monaural frequency-tuning curves of nucleus laminaris ne

37 ght to perform a coincidence analysis on its monaural inputs.

38 response but less well than the summation of monaural IPSCs.

39 ividuals have been shown to possess superior monaural localization abilities in the horizontal plane,

40 the tympanum deflections and suggestive of a monaural mechanism of auditory tracking.

41 article reviews our studies of the effect of monaural middle ear destruction on midbrain auditory res

42 Monaural middle ear destruction was performed on juvenil

43 s are discussed in relation to the effect of monaural middle ear destruction.

44 Monaural neurons early in the interaural time difference

45 We studied two classes of predominantly monaural neurons: those that displayed a sustained respo

46 ons of the anteroventral cochlear nucleus or monaural nuclei of the lateral lemniscus may provide the

47 The monaural nuclei of the lateral lemniscus, whose roles ar

48 auditory midbrain and a functional role for monaural nuclei of the lateral lemniscus.

49 tional excitatory and inhibitory inputs from monaural nuclei.

50 An example of this plasticity is provided by monaural occlusion during infancy, which leads to compen

51 sound localization behavior after long-term monaural occlusion.

52 thms that separate target speech from either monaural or binaural mixtures, as well as microphone-arr

53 Using this technique and monaural or binaural stimulation, responses in the IC th

54 curring within a submillisecond epoch and on monaural pathways that transmit level and timing cues wi

55 tory nerve fibers and transmit signals along monaural pathways, and bushy cells sharpen the encoding

56 tion attempts to increase performance over a monaural prosthesis by harnessing the binaural processin

57 tures of the in vivo neurophonic response to monaural pure tones: large oscillations (hundreds of mic

58 We found monaural response properties to be unaffected by this me

59 ected neither the ratio between binaural and monaural responses nor the interaural time difference fo

60 The temporal properties of monaural responses were well matched, suggesting connect

61 d these injection sites were correlated with monaural responses.

62 with vector summation of the left and right monaural responses.

63 Stimulation of one side at a time (monaural) showed that individual leg muscles receive equ

64 distance could be discriminated only if the monaural sound in reverberation had AM.

65 h the angle of incidence, producing cues for monaural sound localization in the spectra of the stimul

66 A new approach for the segregation of monaural sound mixtures is presented based on the princi

67 nal processing problems, using as an example monaural source separation using solely the cues provide

68 ch became relatively more sensitive to these monaural spatial cues.

69 these adjustments may involve greater use of monaural spectral cues provided by the other ear.

70 Monaural stimulation in either ear produced EPSCs and IP

71 sing an interrupted, single-event design and monaural stimulation with random spectrographic sounds.

72 predicted to change substantially when using monaural stimuli compared to binaural stimuli.

73 able to detect stimulus omission when either monaural stimuli or those in different frequencies were

74 Furthermore, monaural stimuli that were ineffective in eliciting spik

75 s (binaural) were compared with responses to monaural stimuli.

76 wever, was only 64-74% that predicted by the monaural sum.

77 In the monaural system, another large somatic synapse targets n

78 trol mediates the linear transformation from monaural to binaural spike responses.

79 e-like Ve patterns in sustained responses to monaural tones with frequencies > approximately 1000 Hz.

80 e and non-dipole features of Ve responses to monaural tones with frequencies ranging from 600 to 1800

81 y ranges which are not consistent with their monaural tuning.