ライフサイエンスコーパス: monocot

1 m, Chloranthaceae, eudicots, magnoliids, and monocots).

2 e been studied in Oryza sativa, a cultivated monocot.

3 ns as a nucleation site for lignification in monocots.

4 ut cloning and high expression of amiRNAs in monocots.

5 in rice (Oryza sativa), a model organism for monocots.

6 ed species belonging to Asterids, Rosids and monocots.

7 he most recent common ancestor of dicots and monocots.

8 rtant for seasonal flowering in eudicots and monocots.

9 ids being the next sister group, followed by monocots.

10 AP1 clade MADS-box transcription factor) in monocots.

11 et genes revealed that many are conserved in monocots.

12 aceae but not in other families of dicots or monocots.

13 dence for purifying selection in contrast to monocots.

14 eveloped a method of transgene delivery into monocots.

15 e composition distinct from dicots and other monocots.

16 en of which are conserved in closely related monocots.

17 CR pre-dates the bifurcation of eudicots and monocots.

18 rms and expression in second whorl organs in monocots.

19 s and particle bombardment transformation of monocots.

20 y reproductive development in rice and other monocots.

21 ves have adopted novel meristem functions in monocots.

22 t remains equivocal whether it also affected monocots.

23 should be of utility more generally to other monocots.

24 f lodicules and second whorl tepal/petals of monocots.

25 ype I and Type II cell walls in eudicots and monocots.

26 utilization of dicot tRNAs also function in monocots.

27 ns was proposed to enable the loss of RGS in monocots.

28 l activation applications in both dicots and monocots.

29 he family Bromeliaceae and more widely among monocots.

30 placement of the palms among the commelinid monocots.

31 nt progressing from gymnosperms to dicots to monocots.

32 nctional genomics studies in maize and other monocots.

33 ttern of TS and CYP assembly in eudicots and monocots.

34 within growing organs and between dicots and monocots.

35 We thus established, in monocots, a mechanistic connection between phosphorylati

36 investigating global diversity gradients in monocots, a morphologically and functionally diverse cla

37 alifornia poppy: Papaveraceae) and the basal monocot Acorus americanus (Acoraceae), both of which wer

38 t have been identified to date in dicots and monocots along with their putative orthologs in higher p

39 HYH (HY5 homolog) homologs are absent in the monocots analyzed.

40 ement for RFOs in modulating seed vigor in a monocot and a dicot.

41 Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is an important model monocot and cereal crop.

42 l dicot, Arabidopsis thaliana, and the model monocot and crop species, Oryza sativa (rice).

43 cides, including 2,4-D, with utility in both monocot and dicot crops.

44 t enables targeted, specific modification of monocot and dicot genomes using a variety of genome engi

45 ins is required for cell-to-cell movement in monocot and dicot hosts.

46 and broad host range isolate infecting both monocot and dicot hosts.

47 may be conserved in simple leafed species of monocot and dicot lineages and constitutes a potential k

48 tron elements, predate the divergence of the monocot and dicot lineages, suggesting that they were a

49 the nutritional status of a wide variety of monocot and dicot plant species and helps them, whether

50 Most monocot and dicot plant species preferentially expressed

51 l types and has been used on tissues of both monocot and dicot plant species.

52 biotic functions preserved, at least between monocot and dicot plants(6,7).

53 These results demonstrate a role, in both monocot and dicot plants, of hemicellulose and pectin ac

54 een protein-facilitated group II splicing in monocot and dicot plants, we examined the mutant phenoty

55 ally induced architectural variation of both monocot and dicot plants.

56 OX families of transcription factors in both monocot and dicot plants.

57 caffeyl alcohol in the seed coats of several monocot and dicot plants.

58 of caffeyl alcohol in the seed coats of both monocot and dicot plants.

59 group II introns prior to the divergence of monocot and dicot plants.

60 astid and mitochondrial response across both monocot and dicot species indicate that the dual-functio

61 d peptide (CPuORF) that is present in varied monocot and dicot species.

62 unctional genomics and proteomic research in monocot and dicot species.

63 abidopsis; one from a clade composed of both monocot and dicot type-B OsRRs complemented an Arabidops

64 ntron losses are limited to the more derived monocot and eudicot clades.

65 e clades, however, clear differences between monocot and eudicot family members exist, and these are

66 a robust evolutionary scenario of the modern monocot and eudicot karyotypes from their diploid ancest

67 and that distinct mechanisms may operate in monocot and eudicot leaves to coordinate stomatal patter

68 l organs, whereas the evolutionarily derived monocot and eudicot lineages share a far more uniform fl

69 rsity, and then assessing congruence between monocot and vertebrate diversity patterns.

70 ccelerated rates of change relative to other monocots and angiosperms.

71 eration transcriptome sequences of non-grass monocots and basal eudicots.

72 equence and reverse genetics tools for model monocots and basal land plants allows for the examinatio

73 elements in mediating cytokinin signaling in monocots and dicots and reveal how phytohormones can imp

74 MUTE-FAMA predates the evolutionary split of monocots and dicots and that these proteins show conserv

75 insights into AS landscapes conserved among monocots and dicots and uncovered AS events in plant def

76 of TaZIPs indicates a conserved mechanism in monocots and dicots in responding to Zn deficiency.

77 hysiology or evolutionary divergence between monocots and dicots is responsible for distinctions in I

78 nstrate that evolutionary divergence between monocots and dicots is responsible for the distinctions

79 Evolutionary divergence between monocots and dicots probably explains the ability of ISA

80 the tomato resistance gene Bs4 suggests that monocots and dicots share an ancient or convergently evo

81 of genes have diverged in expression between monocots and dicots since their divergence.

82 the natural variation in seed carotenoids in monocots and dicots suggests a surprising overlap in the

83 ence that FAMA function is conserved between monocots and dicots, despite their different stomatal mo

84 t sequence comparison of NAC genes from both monocots and dicots.

85 s protein family following the divergence of monocots and dicots.

86 th simple and compound leafed species across monocots and dicots.

87 and a range of other plants, including both monocots and dicots.

88 o two subfamilies, similar to those found in monocots and dicots.

89 led conserved ratios of the AS types between monocots and dicots.

90 calculate overlap of diversity hotspots for monocots and each vertebrate taxon.

91 ed genome conservation patterns of miRNAs in monocots and eudicots after whole-genome duplication (WG

92 tional and/or anatomical differences between monocots and eudicots or between herbaceous and woody pl

93 me duplications pre-dating the divergence of monocots and eudicots remains equivocal in analyses of c

94 In monocots and eudicots, B class function specifies second

95 l, long styles, multiseeded ovaries, and, in monocots and eudicots, much faster pollen tube growth ra

96 After evolutionary divergence of monocots and eudicots, PR5 genes increased asymmetricall

97 f rosids and asterids and after the split of monocots and eudicots, providing strong evidence that th

98 been independent expansions of the family in monocots and eudicots.

99 es of plants, including mosses, gymnosperms, monocots and eudicots.

100 rising from 10 genes in a common ancestor to monocots and eudicots.

101 showing similar evolutionary pattern between monocots and eudicots.

102 arboxyl methyltransferase-like proteins from monocots and lower plants.

103 We use the ages of other fossil monocots and M. caribea to calibrate a molecular phyloge

104 CMT1, 2, and 3 in eudicots, CMT2 and ZMET in monocots and monocots/commelinids, variation in copy num

105 nly -0.4% per year for the 28 populations of monocots and pteridophytes.

106 in 12 plant species, including 6 eudicots, 5 monocots and the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.

107 tanding of the early evolutionary history of monocots and the origins and expansions of gene families

108 the bombardment technique currently used for monocots and will be highly valuable for plant biology a

109 e termini of mitochondrial mRNAs in wheat, a monocot, and compared them to the known positions for co

110 different members of the YUC family in moss, monocot, and eudicot species shows that there have been

111 und between the Copia25 sequences of Musa, a monocot, and Ixora, a dicot species (Rubiaceae).

112 aling also influences arbuscule formation in monocots, and a Green Revolution wheat variety carrying

113 diverse vascular plants, including eudicots, monocots, and a lycophyte.

114 ae, lowland plants (a moss and a lycophyte), monocots, and eudicots.

115 in flowering plants outside the eudicots and monocots, and it is often unclear how to interpret genet

116 ealed CPT gene families in both eudicots and monocots, and showed that all the short-chain CPT genes

117 r a sister relationship between eudicots and monocots, and this group is sister to a clade that inclu

118 rs to be well conserved between eudicots and monocots, and to a lesser degree between the higher plan

119 a P. syringae isolate that is a pathogen of monocots, and, as might be predicted, its complement of

120 le support for phylogenetic relationships of monocot angiosperms, and lays the phylogenetic groundwor

121 ly sampled matrix of plastomes assembled for monocot angiosperms, providing genome-scale support for

122 ified distinctly altered immune responses in monocot antiviral defenses and provide insights into mon

123 Monocot AP1/FUL-like genes duplicated at the base of Poa

124 lant biologists and biotechnologists because monocots are difficult to transform with Agrobacterium t

125 d that the majority of genes in large-genome monocots are located toward the ends of chromosomes in g

126 used to clarify the genetics of apomixis in monocots as well as dicots during the past 15 years.

127 29 phosphorylation was specifically found in monocots, both C3 and C4, which include the large majori

128 ocessing proteases of higher plants (dicots, monocots) but not present in orthologs of animals or cel

129 o are associated with C(4) photosynthesis in monocots, but it is not known whether selection has acte

130 This first crystal structure of a monocot CAD combined with enzyme kinetic data and a cata

131 liids as sister to a well supported clade of monocots + (Ceratophyllum + eudicots).

132 3 in eudicots, CMT2 and ZMET in monocots and monocots/commelinids, variation in copy number, and non-

133 of plant hormone pathways in defense of this monocot crop against root nematodes, where jasmonate see

134 nt species, Arabidopsis and tobacco, and two monocot crop species, rice and sorghum.

135 While transformation of the major monocot crops is currently possible, the process typical

136 Although extensively studied in monocot crops such as maize (Zea mays) and rice (Oryza s

137 first functionally characterized BOP gene in monocots, Cul4 suggests the partial conservation of BOP

138 teins in cereals among the 45 sequences from monocot databases that could be classified as unique CTI

139 As opposed to the classically assumed dicot/monocot dichotomy, we found continuous variations in GC

140 e and have often been generalized as a dicot/monocot dichotomy.

141 h a signal must have been evolved before the monocot-dicot split took place approximately 150 million

142 ication within the nsLTP family predated the monocot/dicot divergence.

143 monocots that likely occurred following the monocot/dicot split.

144 n major high plant lineages (eudicots versus monocots) differed significantly under the same environm

145 Our dataset of monocot distributions will aid in this endeavour.

146 t with the evolution of TAS4 since the dicot-monocot divergence.

147 Monocot diversity explains marginal amounts of variance

148 Monocot diversity is positively associated with vertebra

149 ), from streptophyte green algae, and from a monocot (duckweed).

150 lants, including basal dicots, eudicots, and monocots, emit (E,E)-4,8,12-trimethyltrideca-1,3,7,11-te

151 ISA2 for normal starch biosynthesis, whereas monocot endosperm and leaf exhibit nearly normal starch

152 nosperms whereas the last emerged before the monocot-eudicot split.

153 Most clusters contain sequences from monocots, eudicots and Amborella trichopoda, with sequen

154 ntents for 239 species representing 70 of 78 monocot families and compare them with genomic character

155 ed, whereas basal eudicot families and basal monocot families more commonly have wind and specialized

156 (creep) response of cell walls from diverse monocot families to EXPA and EXPB treatments.

157 tionary and functional studies of this basal monocot family.

158 their true homology to eudicot and nongrass monocot floral organs has been a topic of debate.

159 Joinvillea and Elegia, which have a typical monocot floral plan.

160 Monocots follow a latitudinal gradient although with poc

161 that merges biome-level associations for all monocot genera with country-level associations for almos

162 , (2) an ancestral miRNA founder pool in the monocot genomes dating back to 100 million years ago, (3

163 Using examples from several dicot and monocot genomes, we outline some pitfalls and recommenda

164 me duplications in cereals and perhaps other monocots has been hinted at, but remain unclear.

165 Despite the close structural relationship of monocot HGGT and HPT, these enzymes were found to have d

166 Overall, we show that monocot HGGT is biochemically distinct from HPT, but can

167 Here we show that monocot HGGT is localized in the plastid and expressed p

168 onfers heat tolerance not only to its native monocot host but also to a eudicot host, which suggests

169 eins attempting to avoid inactivation by the monocot host.

170 as contemporary, intimate associations with monocot hosts.

171 is, we identified three homologs of AtHY5 in monocots; however, AtHYH (HY5 homolog) homologs are abse

172 ted in other C(4) plant groups, such as C(4) monocots, illustrating a striking parallelism in molecul

173 some early and basal angiosperm species and monocots in general, it is the only subfamily 1 receptor

174 chanisms of pathway assembly in eudicots and monocots; in the former, microsyntenic blocks of TS/CYP

175 Walls from more distant monocots, including some species that share with grasses

176 ontent, consistent with lower UA content for monocot introns and potentially reflecting evolved diffe

177 tantial component of the coding sequences in monocots is localized proximally in regions of very low

178 Another limitation for many monocots is the intensive labor and greenhouse space req

179 centrating mechanism of C4 plants, and in C4 monocots it has been suggested that CA activity is near

180 DSOC2, a recently identified FLC ortholog in monocots, knowing that it belongs to the FLC lineage.

181 Monocot leaf matures in a basipetal manner, and has a we

182 ental transcripts to analyze the ontogeny of monocot leaf morphology in maize (Zea mays).

183 nate the positioning of veins and stomata in monocot leaves and that distinct mechanisms may operate

184 Unlike eudicots, most monocot leaves display parallel venation and sheathing b

185 In monocot leaves, stomatal cell files are positioned at th

186 cated ta-siARF in dorsiventral patterning of monocot leaves.

187 e helps resolve a long-standing dilemma that monocot lignin chains do not appear to be initiated by m

188 Monocot lignins are decorated with p-coumarates by the p

189 r data suggest that it occurred early in the monocot lineage after its divergence from the eudicot cl

190 t RGS proteins are widely distributed in the monocot lineage, despite their frequent loss.

191 s of Spirodela and its basal position in the monocot lineage, understanding its genome architecture c

192 been reported to be missing from the entire monocot lineage, with two exceptions.

193 ent in diverse plant taxa, including dicots, monocots, lycophytes, and microalgae.

194 d the evolutionary history of two paralogous monocot MADS-box transcription factors, FUL1 and FUL2, a

195 resenting each of the five groups: eudicots, monocots, magnoliids, Chloranthaceae and Ceratophyllacea

196 Only in the monocot maize (Zea mays) was there little or no evident

197 protection against a foliar pathogen in the monocot maize (Zea mays), and we further demonstrated th

198 id eudicots monkey flower and columbine, the monocots maize and rice, as well as spikemoss and moss i

199 xylase kinase (PPCK) gene family in the C(4) monocots maize and sorghum.

200 In monocots, many genes demonstrate a significant negative

201 ins RbcS from at least 33 species, including monocots, many of which are known to possess glandular t

202 hat the substrate recognition module in many monocot MATH-BTB E3s are diversifying to ubiquitinate a

203 Here, we establish the emerging monocot model Brachypodium (Brachypodium distachyon) as

204 nd well-annotated genome, making it an ideal monocot model for addressing vascularization and biomass

205 ally facilitates translational research in a monocot model plant.

206 ion and development among higher eudicot and monocot model plants and provide new opportunities for c

207 nt organelle marker lines are lacking in the monocot model rice.

208 half the world's population and an important monocot model system.

209 success for Setaria viridis, an emerging C4 monocot model.

210 ly intermediate between the core eudicot and monocot models, Arabidopsis and Oryza.

211 ing sites for 501 genes conserved in dicots, monocots, mosses, and green algae.

212 taxonomic range, including 13 eudicots, five monocots, one lycopod, one moss, and five algae.

213 Monocots only carry catalytic PDX1 homologs that do not

214 show that the cross-species ESTs from within monocot or dicot class are a valuable source of evidence

215 resentative sequences have yet been found in monocot or nonangiospermous plants.

216 omes, the dicot Arabidopsis thaliana and the monocot Oryza sativa, we show that the cross-species EST

217 tip growth cell types, still observed in the monocot Oryza sativa.

218 the eudicots (Arabidoposis thaliana) and the monocots (Oryza sativa)-and from the Caenorhabditis nema

219 arabinose residues, typical of graminaceous monocots, over the O-2 position of arabinose or the O-6

220 In monocots, PAL also displays tyrosine ammonia lyase (TAL)

221 tion of splice junctions using the reference monocot plant Brachypodium distachyon.

222 ur findings are that during domestication of monocot plant species selection has concentrated on gene

223 h analysis of genome organization in a model monocot plant species.

224 Sugarcane is a monocot plant that accumulates sucrose to levels of up t

225 foods in the world, and an interesting model monocot plant, rice (Oryza sativa L.) has recently recei

226 linear cyclotides at the protein level in a monocot plant.

227 This review focuses on HKT transporters in monocot plants and in Arabidopsis as a dicot plant, as a

228 Insensitivity to NLP cytolysins of monocot plants may be explained by the length of the GIP

229 achypodium distachyon is a model species for monocot plants such as wheat, barley and several potenti

230 complete inventories for mammals, birds and monocot plants, suggesting massive under-description of

231 expected to enhance transgene expression in monocot plants.

232 e microbial infection of eudicot, but not of monocot plants.

233 pe 1 RIPs were similar to that of the actual monocots (Poaceae and Asparagaceae).

234 icaceae), and switchgrass (Panicum virgatum, monocot, Poaceae).

235 F) genes; however, the function of miR160 in monocots remains elusive.

236 m tagged specific cell types (INTACT) to the monocot rice (Oryza sativa L.).

237 Loss of DELLA activity in the monocot rice (Oryza sativa) causes complete male sterili

238 haracterized two-component elements from the monocot rice (Oryza sativa) using several complementary

239 Endosperm DNA in the distantly related monocots rice and maize is likewise locally hypomethylat

240 larities in putatively homologous regions of monocots (rice) and eudicots (grapevine).

241 EMs apparently reveal some direct effects of monocot richness.

242 de traits that more comprehensively describe monocot RSA but that are difficult to measure with tradi

243 tructures revealed many features shared with monocot ryegrass (Lolium perenne) and dicot alfalfa (Med

244 icum aestivum) straw and subsequently in all monocot samples examined.

245 n that tocotrienol synthesis is initiated in monocot seeds by homogentisate geranylgeranyl transferas

246 ssion of sRNA also remains uninvestigated in monocot seeds.

247 from diverse taxa including lower plants and monocots showed that the RRM and ZnK domains are evoluti

248 iRNA constructs for silencing transcripts in monocot species are not suitable for simple, cost-effect

249 Studies in both eudicot and monocot species have defined a central role for phytochr

250 ructural characterization of cell walls from monocot species showed that the flavone tricin is part o

251 -genome unsequenced agriculturally important monocot species such as wheat, barley, rye, Lolium, etc.

252 egulation of biosynthesis across eudicot and monocot species under heat stress.

253 tes has been identified in a number of model monocot species, but the effect of monolignol p-coumarat

254 present before the divergence of eudicot and monocot species, but the scales and timeframes within wh

255 an be transferred successfully from dicot to monocot species, further revealing that immune signallin

256 ional structure information for a CCR from a monocot species.

257 pathway in switchgrass, as well as other C4 monocot species.

258 udied, especially in important agro-economic monocot species.

259 ng RNAs (ta-siRNAs) conserved in eudicot and monocot species.

260 nd C4 (maize [Zea mays] and Setaria viridis) monocot species.

261 tic analyses revealed that RTH6 is part of a monocot specific clade of D-type cellulose synthases.

262 Through the identification of eudicot and monocot specific clades, these analyses contribute to ou

263 a combined secretome was constructed from a monocot specific isolate, a dicot specific isolate and b

264 ps: Viridiplantae wide, angiosperm specific, monocot specific, dicot specific, and those that were sp

265 spi1 belongs to a monocot-specific clade, within which the role of individ

266 One of the genes in class 3 defines a novel monocot-specific family.

267 triggered phosphorylation of maize SGT1 at a monocot-specific phosphorylation site.

268 MicroRNA528 (miR528) is a conserved monocot-specific small RNA that has the potential of med

269 e regulator mutant, but a type-B OsRR from a monocot-specific subfamily generally did not.

270 ion of MYB31 and MYB42 is conserved in other monocots, specifically in sorghum and rice.

271 tral chromosome dating to before the eudicot/monocot split.

272 sporters (SUTs) regulate phloem unloading in monocot stems is poorly understood and particularly so f

273 olutionarily adapted (or is not required) by monocots such as grasses.

274 the challenges of global food supply and the monocots such as the forage grasses and cereals, togethe

275 ence of linear cyclotides in both dicots and monocots suggests their ancient origin and existence bef

276 sbZIP48 performs more diverse functions in a monocot system like rice in comparison with its Arabidop

277 In monocots, TAC1 is known to lead to less compact growth b

278 icitation and functional characterization of monocot terpenoid phytoalexins.

279 , Aponogeton madagascariensis, is an aquatic monocot that forms perforations in its leaves as part of

280 ognition sites was evident in rice and other monocots that likely occurred following the monocot/dico

281 ition is highly conserved within eudicots or monocots, there is a significant difference between thes

282 necessity is conserved across diverse taxa (monocots to dicots), unlike tomato, banana ripening requ

283 synthesizing organisms, from angiosperms and monocots to green algae.

284 GC content of monocots varied between 33.6% and 48.9%, with several gr

285 antiviral defenses and provide insights into monocot viral synergism.

286 t plants, little information is available on monocot-virus defense systems.

287 les to the sterile floral organs of nongrass monocots we have isolated and observed the expression of

288 st introgression programme undertaken in the monocots, we describe the transfer of the entire genome

289 ue class of type 2 O-methyltransferases from monocots, we have characterized CCoAOMT from sorghum (So

290 Ps) in a sludge-amended soil cultivated with monocot (Wheat) and dicot (Rape) crop species.

291 ary cell walls of dicots and nongraminaceous monocots, where they are thought to interact with cellul

292 icots and gymnosperms, but only in one basal monocot, whereas TAS4 is only found in dicots.

293 RcCDI1, recognized by Solanaceae but not by monocots, which activates cell death through a pathway t

294 is system has the potential to be applied to monocots, which are typically not amenable to traditiona

295 nces among PAL isozymes in sorghum and other monocots, which can serve as the basis for the engineeri

296 tion of BOP gene function between dicots and monocots, while phylogenetic analyses highlight distinct

297 study of four divergent taxa, in dicots and monocots, whose genomes have already been completely seq

298 via genome skimming and integrated within a monocot-wide matrix for phylogenetic and molecular evolu

299 pirodela polyrhiza is a fast-growing aquatic monocot with highly reduced morphology, genome size and

300 more distantly related gene, ZmSUT1 from the monocot Zea mays, did restore phloem loading.