ライフサイエンスコーパス: monocotyledonous

1 Orthologous genes from monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous C(3) species also co

2 accumulates during early seed development in monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous flowering plants.

3 istant APs, variation potentials, and SPs in monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plant species (Horde

4 ting anther-specific gene expression in both monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants, pointing to

5 ion with endogenous proteins in a variety of monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants, suggesting b

6 port that an NLR immune receptor (MLA1) from monocotyledonous barley is fully functional in partially

7 erimental analysis of the MRP subfamily in a monocotyledonous crop plant.

8 g mechanisms is still limited, especially in monocotyledonous crop plants.

9 than 400 homologs, representing 26 genera of monocotyledonous, dicotyle-donous and one coniferous spe

10 dicotyledonous species yet distinct from the monocotyledonous grass species, Oryza sativa.

11 based on barley stripe mosaic virus, in the monocotyledonous host barley.

12 An oleosin gene from the monocotyledonous maize (Zea mays L.) was transferred int

13 The results show that a monocotyledonous oleosin possesses sufficient targeting

14 This first crystal structure of a monocotyledonous PAL displayed a unique conformation in

15 Sequence comparison of CCaMK from monocotyledonous plant (lily) and dicotyledonous plant (

16 ginal alc gene switch was ineffective in the monocotyledonous plant sugar cane, and describe a modifi

17 resents the first DHFR-TS gene cloned from a monocotyledonous plant.

18 ased on the analysis of related sequences in monocotyledonous plants an alternative classification of

19 important superfamily of regulatory genes in monocotyledonous plants and reveals a novel function for

20 Duckweeds are aquatic monocotyledonous plants of potential economic interest w

21 Genetic transformation of monocotyledonous plants still presents a challenge for p

22 petitive sequences, of which the bulbous and monocotyledonous plants tulip and lily are examples.

23 orthologs of HQT in switchgrass or in other monocotyledonous plants with complete genome sequences.

24 r the purposes of gene expression or VIGS in monocotyledonous plants, and among these, the tripartite

25 ins are found in all dicotyledonous and some monocotyledonous plants, but additional crystalloid P-pr

26 Rice (Oryza sativa) is a model species for monocotyledonous plants, especially for members in the g

27 widely applicable to both dicotyledonous and monocotyledonous plants, especially those varieties that

28 In the developing endosperm of monocotyledonous plants, starch granules are synthesized

29 tile gene switch is functional in transgenic monocotyledonous plants, which include some of the most

30 acquired resistance is poorly understood in monocotyledonous plants.

31 tant model species for the Poaceae and other monocotyledonous plants.

32 rted from rice, which is a model species for monocotyledonous plants.

33 s for a major group of flowering plants, the monocotyledonous plants.

34 onent in dicotyledonous and non-graminaceous monocotyledonous plants.

35 of hosts, including both dicotyledonous and monocotyledonous plants.

36 sm both in dicotyledonous tobacco plants and monocotyledonous rice cells.

37 However, the capacity of monocotyledonous rice to recognize flagellins of key ric

38 onous Arabidopsis thaliana and 50% less than monocotyledonous rice.

39 rate assimilation in both dicotyledonous and monocotyledonous species depends on photorespiration.

40 milies together with the GS genes from other monocotyledonous species form four distinct clades.

41 nsgene expression in all organs of the model monocotyledonous species rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Nippo

42 deae belongs to a different order than other monocotyledonous species that have been sequenced and co

43 ic module seems to be conserved in dicot and monocotyledonous species to prevent branching under ligh

44 ily of genes has functionally evolved in the monocotyledonous species wheat (Triticum aestivum).

45 le, with an average of -140 per thousand for monocotyledonous species, -107 per thousand for dicotyle

46 for the use of negative selection markers in monocotyledonous species.