ライフサイエンスコーパス: monoculture

1 eassembled from isolates that had evolved in monoculture.

2 ility reduced from 22% to 13%) compared with monoculture.

3 hey formed 2D sheet-like structures in rMVEC monoculture.

4 nded resources than is caught by any species monoculture.

5 higher-diversity plots outperformed the best monoculture.

6 ample that contained essentially an archaeal monoculture.

7 over twice than that in Castanopsis hystrix monoculture.

8 robial swarm propagation has been studied in monoculture.

9 s were both observed in Eucalyptus urophylla monoculture.

10 plantations were similar as that of N-fixing monoculture.

11 her resistance to antibiotics than in either monoculture.

12 h H(2)/formate levels during fermentation in monoculture.

13 e C. jejuni but is dispensable for growth in monoculture.

14 h the sums of these activities in PMN and MC monocultures.

15 rongly self-limited because they attack crop monocultures.

16 evolved more in communities than they did in monocultures.

17 mixed culture surpassed the mean of the two monocultures.

18 ure compared with P. gingivalis or F. alocis monocultures.

19 ied out in as little as 5h when working with monocultures.

20 elds through agrochemical intensification of monocultures.

21 red with their expression in sulfate-limited monocultures.

22 by addition of recombinant NRG-1beta to ARVM monocultures.

23 enhanced the TRAP activity of preosteoclast monocultures.

24 d intracellular cAMP levels of preosteoclast monocultures.

25 ots attaining 2.7 times greater biomass than monocultures.

26 ly relevant therapeutic response compared to monocultures.

27 reater predictive power, in mixtures than in monocultures.

28 ixtures and negative plant-soil feedbacks in monocultures.

29 r 8 years in species mixtures rather than in monocultures.

30 prisingly fail to activate trigeminal neuron monocultures.

31 high-diversity plots than expected based on monocultures.

32 ersified agricultural systems, and intensive monocultures.

33 NF-alpha (100 U/ml), when compared with GEnC monocultures.

34 smooth muscle cell protein expression in ASC monocultures.

35 -culture with HCC hepatocytes as compared to monocultures.

36 formed 24 h, 48 h and 72 h in co-culture and monocultures.

37 timizing all three functions than any of the monocultures.

38 il depths in the three species when grown in monocultures.

39 In wheat monoculture, Adalia and Chrysoperla mixed treatments cau

40 10- to 100-fold) up-regulated in S. gordonii monocultures after 3 h of growth when exogenous arginine

41 actices that may offset impacts of intensive monoculture agriculture.

42 In monoculture, all species produced more above-ground biom

43 cks for two grassland plant species grown in monoculture and competition in soils that had or had not

44 he in vivo transcriptome of P. aeruginosa in monoculture and in coculture with Staphylococcus aureus.

45 s in the rat granuloma pouch model system in monoculture and is completely outcompeted by the wild-ty

46 nities on four plant species' performance in monoculture and outcomes of interspecific competition.

47 looding responses of 60 grassland species in monocultures and 16-species mixtures.

48 erage of 1.7 times more biomass than species monocultures and are more productive than the average mo

49 nt diversity and was greater with warming in monocultures and at intermediate diversity, but at high

50 resources compared with the same species in monocultures and evolved to use waste products generated

51 enhanced wound closure rates in keratinocyte monocultures and in the living skin equivalent system, e

52 We measured how monocultures and mixtures of grassland plant species wit

53 lonized by different ECM fungal isolates, in monocultures and mixtures, enabled us to test for both i

54 Growing 12 grassland species in test monocultures and mixtures, we found character displaceme

55 lly related to the growth rates of clones in monocultures and varied strongly with the food.

56 c species have included fungal and bacterial monocultures and, to a lesser extent, microbial communit

57 tailored to kill 92% of bacterial cells in a monoculture, and in a co-culture of E. coli and HEK 293T

58 to 60 years old, which were first tested in monocultures, and then exposed for 10 weeks as mixed pop

59 . maritima cell densities when compared with monoculture as well as concomitant formation of exopolys

60 is conditionally auxotrophic for arginine in monoculture but biosynthesises arginine when coaggregate

61 egion beta chain are nonresponsive to SEA in monoculture but display strong STAT3 activation and IL-1

62 years of evolutionary history than intensive monocultures but 300 million fewer years than forests.

63 tivity from the averages of their respective monocultures, but some did overyield significantly.

64 N and P nutrient-use efficiency compared to monocultures by balancing trade-offs in nutrient-use eff

65 and endure more changeable environments than monocultures can, they represent an important new fronti

66 these ecosystems, that even the best-chosen monocultures cannot achieve greater productivity or carb

67 re species had higher total biomass than did monoculture communities, but native and nonnative commun

68 d whether the members of Andropogon gerardii monocultures compete via common mycorrhizal networks.

69 survival in the wild, this is suboptimal in monoculture crop fields for maximizing productivity and

70 Cultivation of monocultures derived from limited genetic diversity, env

71 Monoculture-derived multispecific CTL infusion could pro

72 nd nitrate concentrations, such that not all monocultures differed from diverse subplots in the same

73 ersity gains by promoting mixed forests over monocultures; doing so is unlikely to entail major oppor

74 f SMCs with conditioned media from static EC monoculture (EC-CM) increased SMC miR-126 level and SMC

75 Notably, compared with monoculture ECM proteomes, the coculture ECM proteome be

76 sition and organization of ECM compared with monoculture ECMs, and electron microscopy revealed basem

77 The underlying idea, known as the 'monoculture effect,' is well documented in agricultural

78 populations could be recaptured in intensive monocultures engineered to be functionally diverse.

79 strains, which we calibrated using separate monoculture experiments.

80 ince laminin alpha1 chain is not detected in monocultures exposed to coculture-conditioned medium or

81 The undifferentiated astrocyte monocultures expressed only the GLAST subtype.

82 on lambsquarters in mixed-cropping farms and monoculture fields in New York and Hawaii, USA, were gen

83 may be contributing to CLS epidemics in the monoculture fields in New York.

84 The model can be used either in monoculture, for studies of molecular flux including per

85 with higher AGS cell densities than those in monoculture frequently observed.

86 In myocyte monoculture, H2O2 induced erbB4-dependent, but NRG-indep

87 N-fixing Acacia crassicarpa monoculture had the highest DON, and 10-mixed species pl

88 Rapid spread of dense Phragmites monocultures has prompted efforts to limit its expansion

89 in hepatocytes and hepatic stellate cells in monoculture; however, they do not account for cellular c

90 higher levels simultaneously than any of the monocultures (i.e., >67th percentile).

91 res and are more productive than the average monoculture in 79% of all experiments.

92 s were in coculture with stromal cells or in monoculture in the presence of receptor-activated NFkapp

93 ic mixtures outperformed the most productive monocultures in only 10% of the cases, compared with 42%

94 n why S. fumaroxidans does not produce H2 in monoculture, indicating that current methods might not a

95 % in coculture without affecting myotubes in monoculture, indicating the cardiomyocytes were the pace

96 . aureus coinfections are more virulent than monoculture infection with either species; however, diff

97 est that when the most productive and stable monoculture is unknown, inoculating raceway ponds with a

98 e this mechanism has been well documented in monocultures, its relevance for mixed stands of varying

99 r the model will be applicable to commercial monocultures like maize, wheat, etc.

100 derived from it, epithelial and mesenchymal monocultures lose their ability to synthesize the lamini

101 Spatial and temporal treatments compared monoculture maize with legume-diversified maize that inc

102 sification doubled grain yield compared with monoculture maize.

103 Switchgrass monocultures managed for high yield produced 93% more bi

104 arameterized with data from species grown in monoculture may be underestimating the belowground respo

105 iversity and prolonged selection of crops in monoculture may compromise this potential for selection

106 In contrast to declining PHH monocultures, micropatterned co-cultures (MPCCs) of PHHs

107 o biomaterials are often studied in in vitro monoculture models, few studies have investigated how bi

108 ere greater than between species selected in monocultures (monoculture types).

109 In monoculture, mycorrhizal dependency of legumes was highe

110 extinguished repeatedly during the extended monoculture of domestication.

111 ibility: (a) a relatively high digestibility monoculture of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne), (b)

112 ive to a soilborne pathogen during prolonged monoculture of the susceptible host.

113 urs in response to the disease and continued monoculture of wheat.

114 (12-23% of daytime water losses) in row-crop monocultures of bean (annual herb) and cotton (woody shr

115 ss years (CV) was 50% lower in mixtures than monocultures of both native and exotic species.

116 ctional response observed in heifers grazing monocultures of Cynodon sp.

117 Monocultures of different plant functional types had dis

118 To address this, we sampled replicated monocultures of four tree species and secondary forest c

119 ve capacity, and limitations of conventional monocultures of human hepatocytes, with high attrition r

120 Whereas monocultures of LNCaP(bcl-2/neo-r) or LNCaP(hygr-r) trea

121 In the laboratory, monocultures of M. xanthus at a very high density will r

122 Monocultures of O. vulgatum were enriched in (13) C and

123 While monocultures of PS01 and PS02 had few motile cells (0.6

124 ent on these habitats are being displaced by monocultures of weedy species.

125 est gains (via mixed forest) and losses (via monocultures) of bird diversity, along with major losses

126 l cancer (CRC) cells (HCT116, HT29) grown in monoculture or coculture.

127 plant density and species composition (wheat monoculture or wheat and faba bean polyculture) on the e

128 and stromal cells were isolated and grown in monocultures or co-cultures, and incubated with 0.1 to 1

129 cross China, GFGP forests are overwhelmingly monocultures or compositionally simple mixed forests.

130 ng cells within the hydrogels, and either as monocultures or indirect (non-contact) cocultures with p

131 wing with pine and birch compared with their monocultures or mixtures without pine and birch.

132 Hepatocytes were either cultured alone (monoculture) or co-cultured with PBMCs.

133 c microvascular endothelial cells (CMECs) in monoculture, or together in coculture.

134 s been performed at the species level and in monoculture, our ability to predict responses across spe

135 re performances represented the sum of their monoculture parts.

136 erbivore attack in polyculture compared with monoculture plantings.

137 ost species unable to sustain the plasmid in monoculture, promoting community-wide access to the plas

138 In such monoculture, prostate cancer cells have a high (i.e., >9

139 Monoculture results indicate that approximately 5% of al

140 ified landscapes composed of large swaths of monocultures separated by small fragments of natural lan

141 solation and characterization of bacteria in monoculture, separating the organisms from the surroundi

142 Oilseed rape (OSR) grown in monoculture shows a decline in yield relative to virgin

143 In monoculture, streptococcal arginine biosynthesis was ine

144 vious bottom-up estimate based on laboratory monoculture studies but 2 orders of magnitude lower than

145 ulture model compared to either cell type in monoculture, suggesting an interaction and feedback mech

146 Monoculture suspensions of 6 bacterial species were trea

147 determinants could be obtained from cells in monoculture than from whole animal studies where differe

148 In monoculture, the mean effect of CO(2) enrichment on abov

149 In monocultures, these strains grew comparably; however, th

150 ture system is a better in vitro screen than monoculture to identify proliferation-independent agents

151 esents a tree species richness gradient from monocultures to 2-, 3- and 5-species mixtures composed o

152 an between species selected in monocultures (monoculture types).

153 ixtures of mixture types than in mixtures of monoculture types.

154 fermented by Lactobacillus plantarum 299v in monoculture under different time and temperature conditi

155 idespread decline of take-all in response to monoculture wheat (or barley-wheat sequences).

156 roduced the amount of biomass predicted from monoculture when sown with close relatives.

157 duced more biomass than predicted from their monocultures when they were in plots with distantly rela

158 N mineralization was found in A. crassicarpa monoculture, which was over twice than that in Castanops

159 intestinalis and Bacteroides ovatus grown in monoculture with the abundant dietary polysaccharide xyl

160 n (e.g. industrial management of large-scale monocultures with high chemical inputs) homogenises land

161 many agricultural landscapes into expansive monocultures with little natural habitat.

162 72h in co-culture with PBMCs as compared to monoculture, with MHC II-expressing HCC hepatocytes show

163 e cancer cells to chemotherapeutic agents in monoculture without the presence of osteoblasts.

164 ntal conditions, whereas correlations in the monoculture yield affected productivity throughout expos

165 d for two traits (per capita growth rate and monoculture yield) under constant and temporary exposure

166 bioenergy yields that were 238% greater than monoculture yields after a decade.