ライフサイエンスコーパス: monogamous

1 rmined that the mating system is effectively monogamous.

2 e methods are hampered by the immigration of monogamous, already-mated females.

3 ibution of V1aR dramatically differs between monogamous and nonmonogamous species.

4 gs from two species of vole, one of which is monogamous and pair bonds whereas the other species is p

5 s, including inbred and outbred populations, monogamous and polygamous mating patterns, as well as sy

6 vioral studies of various species, including monogamous and promiscuous voles.

7 on of progestin receptors (PR) in a socially monogamous and spontaneously parental male rodent has ne

8 in socioreproductive behaviors in a socially monogamous and spontaneously paternal male rodent.

9 In the current study, two monogamous and two nonmonogamous vole species were compa

10 Prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) are monogamous and, like humans, are biparental.

11 l advantages of idiosyncratic mate choice in monogamous animal species.

12 One of the most important decisions in a monogamous animal's life is the choice of a partner (par

13 h the usual effects of cuckoldry in socially monogamous animals.

14 ssin immunoreactivity were as evident in the monogamous as in the nonmonogamous species.

15 wbirds and smaller for the monochromatic and monogamous bay-winged and screaming cowbirds, suggesting

16 ave been implicated previously in regulating monogamous behaviors, suggesting that the lack of variat

17 ble univalent binding and (2) a tendency for monogamous binding of both MoAb Fab to two Fab epitopes

18 e amount of extra-pair paternity in socially monogamous bird species varies from 0% to 76% extra-pair

19 y increases with male-biased ASR in socially monogamous birds, suggesting that male coercion and/or f

20 hether OXT contributes to the maintenance of monogamous bonds after they have been formed is unclear.

21 d dispersal in mammals may be more likely on monogamous branches of the phylogeny, and that females m

22 cial nature of bumble bees and their largely monogamous breeding system, which renders their effectiv

23 uctive success across 11 cohorts of socially monogamous but genetically polygynandrous song sparrows

24 ception; the probability of remaining in the monogamous class was 0.51 between visits 1 and 2.

25 174 monogamous couples, in which one partner was HIV-1 posit

26 SW) and frequently occurs in both members of monogamous couples.

27 followed 1484 immunocompetent, heterosexual, monogamous couples: one with clinically symptomatic geni

28 ch partner were concordant in 55 (95%) of 58 monogamous couples; BV was present in both partners in 1

29 ohorts of two long-lived species of socially monogamous Darwin's finch species, Geospiza fortis and G

30 rate of growth was slower in polygynous than monogamous families.

31 rrhoeae from an infected male and two of his monogamous female sex partners.

32 al sets of Drosophila pseudoobscura females: monogamous females allowed to copulate one time (MOC); m

33 females allowed to copulate one time (MOC); monogamous females held with a male over her entire life

34 Of 31 couples monogamous for >3 months, rep-PCR fingerprints were iden

35 Over 90% of the couples were monogamous for the year prior to entry into the study; <

36 29 monogamous heterosexual couples having unprotected sex;

37 le risk information for counseling long-term monogamous heterosexual couples in which one partner has

38 to estimate the risk for HCV infection among monogamous heterosexual couples.

39 In seroprevalence studies in monogamous, heterosexual partners of HCV-infected, HIV-n

40 We retrospectively identified 235 monogamous, HIV-discordant couples in a Ugandan populati

41 way, OXT may help to promote fidelity within monogamous human relationships.

42 ments between this promiscuous lineage and a monogamous laboratory lineage revealed male-specific eff

43 onding between mates in species that display monogamous life strategies.

44 ine males inherit higher MUP expression than monogamous-line males through transgenerational inherita

45 In socially monogamous male prairie voles, AVP acts centrally via va

46 pair-bonding or drug experience in socially monogamous male prairie voles.

47 Monogamous males and females show this pattern of femini

48 ie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) are socially monogamous, males vary in both sexual and spatial fideli

49 ces in parental care between promiscuous and monogamous mammal species?

50 may disperse farther than males in socially monogamous mammalian species.

51 cularly important role in social behavior in monogamous mammals, such as prairie voles (Microtus ochr

52 he regulation of pair bond formation between monogamous mates and suggest potential brain regions inv

53 Monogamous mating constrains the reproductive success of

54 ttention to the role of sexual conflict in a monogamous mating context.

55 By enforcing a monogamous mating system in populations of Drosophila me

56 exual selection was removed through enforced monogamous mating with random mate assignment or retaine

57 tion in the prairie vole, but not in the non-monogamous meadow vole.

58 e attributed to OXT altering the attitude of monogamous men toward attractive women or their judgment

59 ve effects of condom use were observed among monogamous men.

60 Monogamous MSM were one exception; the probability of re

61 ensive aggression of wild caught territorial monogamous multiband butterflyfish, Chaetodon multicinct

62 ct classes of sexual risk, which we labeled "monogamous" (n = 1,224), "risk minimizer" (n = 1,443), "

63 s aged 18-45 years who were sexually active, monogamous, not pregnant, and not sex workers, were elig

64 monkeys, as it does in more egalitarian and monogamous ones, like prairie voles and humans, when the

65 ual selection, as measured by mating system (monogamous or polygynous) and by the degree of SSD.

66 em is responsible for the enduring nature of monogamous pair bonding.

67 cial bonding in general and the stability of monogamous pair bonds and offspring care in particular.

68 The formation of monogamous pair bonds, by prairie voles, is facilitated

69 Prairie vole breeder pairs form monogamous pair bonds, which are maintained through the

70 he formation, expression, and maintenance of monogamous pair bonds.

71 attraction and the subsequent development of monogamous pair-bonds is substantially predicted by infl

72 example, seeds, eggs or young from a pair of monogamous parents) and their father, mother or both are

73 Persons in long-term monogamous partnerships are at lower risk of HCV acquisi

74 with chronic HCV infection who are in steady monogamous partnerships versus those with multiple partn

75 ugh half of the gaps were positive (serially monogamous partnerships), many were of short duration; t

76 ric recombinases, to identify the unique and monogamous patterns of Int bridges for integrative and e

77 and meadow (M. pennsylvanicus) voles and the monogamous pine vole (M. pinetorum), and two species of

78 We model a territorial, monogamous population inhabiting a completely homogeneou

79 e at first intercourse in this predominantly monogamous population, which may be explained by more vi

80 The monogamous populations also evolved a greater net reprod

81 IV status awareness reduces HIV incidence in monogamous populations by 0.27 percent for women and 0.6

82 In the monogamous populations, males evolved to be less harmful

83 We have recently established the socially monogamous prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster) as an ani

84 that a rodent species, the highly social and monogamous prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster), greatly

85 In the socially monogamous prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster), mating i

86 behavior, including differences between the monogamous prairie vole and its promiscuous congeners.

87 affiliative behaviour in the highly social, monogamous prairie vole, but not in the relatively asoci

88 m the male segment of a 25-year study of the monogamous prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster, in Illino

89 roles in the formation of pair bonds in the monogamous prairie vole.

90 vior and pair bond formation in the socially monogamous prairie vole.

91 l CRF receptors modulate pair bonding in the monogamous prairie vole.

92 ssessed in a series of experiments using the monogamous prairie vole.

93 Monogamous prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) and prom

94 Monogamous prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) show mat

95 boratory proxy for pair bonding) in socially monogamous prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster).

96 ain distribution of CART mRNA and peptide in monogamous prairie voles compared to congener promiscuou

97 Among monogamous prairie voles, levels of vasopressin receptor

98 In monogamous prairie voles, Microtus ochrogaster, males ar

99 In monogamous prairie voles, OT and dopamine interact to pr

100 We investigated Oxtr expression in monogamous prairie voles, which have a well-characterize

101 nisms are involved in pair bond formation in monogamous prairie voles.

102 ment of NAcc DA in social attachment of the "monogamous" prairie vole (Microtus orchrogaster).

103 gate central glucose uptake in 17 males of a monogamous primate species, the titi monkey (Callicebus

104 he Eurasian sparrowhawk (Accipiter nisus), a monogamous raptor with reversed sexual size dimorphism.

105 observed in mice lacking SDF-1, suggesting a monogamous relationship between CXCR4 and SDF-1.

106 The apparent monogamous relationship between I-309 and CCR8 is unusua

107 9 years), and 75% reported being in the same monogamous relationship for the past 6 months.

108 owed again that OXT only stimulated men in a monogamous relationship to approach pictures of attracti

109 al administration of OXT stimulates men in a monogamous relationship, but not single ones, to keep a

110 hat where OXT release is stimulated during a monogamous relationship, it may additionally promote its

111 Crosses between the monogamous rodent species Peromyscus polionotus and the

112 ie vole (Microtus ochrogaster) is a socially monogamous rodent species that forms pair bonds after ma

113 airie vole (Microtus ochrogaster)-a socially monogamous rodent that forms enduring pair bonds between

114 The prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster), a monogamous rodent that forms long-lasting pair bonds, ha

115 irie vole (Microtus ochrogaster)--a socially monogamous rodent that forms long-term pair bonds after

116 The prairie vole is a socially monogamous rodent that is an excellent animal model for

117 irie vole (Microtus ochrogaster), a socially monogamous rodent, often used as an animal model to scre

118 Research on a monogamous rodent, the prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaste

119 Studies in monogamous rodents have begun to elucidate the neural ci

120 Prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) are monogamous rodents that display high levels of affiliati

121 Prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) are monogamous rodents that form pair bonds characterized by

122 reference formation and paternal behavior in monogamous rodents.

123 r-bond formation has emerged from studies in monogamous rodents.

124 sex was associated with white race and a non-monogamous sex partner in men and women.

125 ng oral sex was associated with having a non-monogamous sex partner in men.

126 ce, age of 20-44 years, and having had a non-monogamous sex partner.

127 airie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) exhibit a monogamous social structure in nature, whereas closely r

128 o be associated with a monogamous versus non-monogamous social structure.

129 s (r = -0.08), and with wife quality only in monogamous societies (r = 0.15).

130 e (Microtus ochrogaster) is a highly social, monogamous species and displays pair bonding that can be

131 ventral pallidal region of several unrelated monogamous species compared with nonmonogamous species.

132 The prairie vole is a socially monogamous species in which breeder pairs typically show

133 In a monogamous species lacking sperm competition, Peromyscus

134 produces sperm with longer midpiece than the monogamous species, and midpiece size correlates positiv

135 vior and physiology are typically reduced in monogamous species, we initially predicted that male and

136 regions mediate pair bond formation in this monogamous species.

137 e should be no selection for imprinting in a monogamous species.

138 be explained if imprinting was absent in the monogamous species.

139 pressin influence pair-bond formation in the monogamous species.

140 as enhanced male social affiliation in a non-monogamous species.

141 a key component of male fitness in socially monogamous systems and could cause selection on female e

142 irs of oncogenic HPV, and cervical cancer in monogamous Thai women develops in part as a result of tr

143 at higher levels in the ventral forebrain of monogamous than in promiscuous vole species, whereas dop

144 f these methods assume either both sexes are monogamous to infer full sibships only or only one sex i

145 he brain that appear to be associated with a monogamous versus non-monogamous social structure.

146 ped CRFR(1) and CRFR(2) in the brains of two monogamous vole species, the prairie vole and pine vole,

147 and paternal care, found selectively in the monogamous vole.

148 In earlier studies, monogamous voles have been reported to differ from close

149 Social, monogamous voles have more OT receptors in the extended

150 The risks of cervical carcinoma in monogamous women and of oncogenic HPV in their husbands

151 visual acuity than that of the pair-bonding, monogamous X. flavipinnis.