ライフサイエンスコーパス: monovalent

1 inactivated subunit vaccine (ISV) targeting monovalent 2009 pandemic influenza A(H1N1) virus or live

2 However, monovalent 2D6 Fab fragments also inhibited V. cholerae

3 er AS03(B)-adjuvanted subunit or whole virus monovalent A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccine and describe the antibod

4 and biopanning, we identified two functional monovalent Abs (nanobodies) targeting ChemR23.

5 A maternal monovalent acellular pertussis (aP) vaccine, in developm

6 ive K(+) channels, do not discriminate among monovalent alkali cations and are permeable also to seve

7 he divalent GLP-1 analogues were superior to monovalent analogues with respect to control of glucose

8 as implemented and validated for both simple monovalent and biomimetic divalent ligands, which have r

9 Specifically, a series of monovalent and bivalent bispecific IgGs composed of the

10 aratopic nanobodies were superior over their monovalent and bivalent counterparts in terms of potency

11 this paper, we study cholesteric shells with monovalent and bivalent defect configurations.

12 o estimate the effect of the introduction of monovalent and bivalent OPV on vaccine-induced serotype-

13 electivity and permeation properties to both monovalent and divalent cations under perfused two-elect

14 on of -0.96 +/- 0.03 and -0.52 +/- 0.01 with monovalent and divalent cations, respectively, and these

15 Changes in monovalent and divalent ion concentrations drive an abru

16 We next synthesized divalent M2pep with monovalent and divalent KLA ([M2pep]2-[KLA] and [M2pep]2

17 ge had a relatively low rejection (6-46%) of monovalent and divalent salts, it exhibited a moderate r

18 5 A as well as modest (30-40%) retention of monovalent and divalent salts.

19 The SNAP-tag is an intrinsically monovalent and highly specific genetic tag for attaching

20 monovalent (single binding site) Pproxy and monovalent and multivalent (multiple equivalent and inde

21 methods are currently available to study how monovalent and multivalent GAG.protein bonds respond to

22 the one-step fluorescence detection of both monovalent and multivalent proteins has been developed.

23 l model of B cell affinity maturation during monovalent and polyvalent vaccinations that predicts the

24 ersus intramuscular injection in rats, using monovalent and trivalent formulations of IPV.

25 Since glutamate is the major monovalent anion in E. coli, these results suggest that

26 manner for POPA and PIP2 lipids; and 6) the monovalent anion type has little influence on the lipid

27 entameric membrane channels that translocate monovalent anions across biological membranes.

28 CCs) regulate the flow of chloride and other monovalent anions across cellular membranes in response

29 d under acidic conditions in the presence of monovalent anions.

30 dated using a clinically available blocking, monovalent anti-CD28 antibody (FR104) whose effects in a

31 2009 and 1 October 2011 to mothers receiving monovalent AS03-adjuvanted H1N1 influenza vaccine (Pande

32 requirement for stable immobilization, while monovalent attachment is reversible and, in the case of

33 have predicted and measured varied from the monovalent binding interaction by several orders of magn

34 ce plasmon resonance measurements revealed a monovalent binding mode for the interaction of Pex5p and

35 Due to monovalent binding of XGFR to IGF-1R, IGF-1R internaliza

36 Monovalent binding reduces avidity and potency, thus exp

37 Here, we describe a new strategy for making monovalent bispecific heterodimeric IgG antibodies in ma

38 ytotoxicity enhancement could be embedded in monovalent bispecific heterodimeric IgG to make best-in-

39 Affinity-reduced monovalent bispecific variants, but not their bivalent b

40 This results in functionally monovalent, bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) with unknown s

41 Coadministration of monovalent, bivalent, or trivalent OPV seems to lower RV

42 Thus, monovalent blocking of FcgammaR function demonstrates a

43 Monovalent blocking of FcgammaR function dramatically in

44 An electron-rich monovalent boron compound is used as a Lewis base to pre

45 icable, leading to a number of unprecedented monovalent boron species with different Lewis basic grou

46 ab-arm exchange, leading to the formation of monovalent but bispecific antibodies, and it interacts p

47 times lower than those required for similar monovalent catalysts and displays unique kinetic paramet

48 d Mg(2+)) were more than 31-fold of that for monovalent cation (Na(+) and K(+)).

49 that PFL-AE binds a catalytically essential monovalent cation at its active site, yet another parall

50 centrations within the reported intranuclear monovalent cation concentration range, and are partly co

51 t that shear stress indirectly activates the monovalent cation current carried by transient receptor

52 e, consistent with activation of a vesicular monovalent cation Na(+)(K(+))/H(+) exchanger.

53 This monovalent cation site controls enzyme activity: (i) PFL

54 se at a range of temperatures, buffer pH and monovalent cation strength.

55 is selective toward the ionic radius of the monovalent cation, accepting those larger than Na(+).

56 (14C)-citrate anion, as well as the organic monovalent cation, ethidium, but not its divalent analog

57 otypic profile of the null mutant of Nhel, a monovalent cation/H(+)exchanger.

58 d perovskite solar-cell absorbers APbX3 (A = monovalent cation; X = Br or I).

59 first time, to our knowledge, that a nuclear monovalent cationic channel (NMCC) is prominently expres

60 is known regarding the properties of nuclear monovalent cationic channels.

61 MdfA exchanges a single proton with a single monovalent cationic drug molecule.

62 e of divalent cations (Ca(2+) and Ba(2+)) as monovalent cations (K(+)), but a viroporin defective mut

63 or Ca(2+) over Na(+), but nonselective among monovalent cations (Li(+), Na(+), and K(+)).

64 strongly depend on the cation employed, with monovalent cations (Na(+) and K(+)) leading to the highe

65 nducts Zn(2+), Mg(2+), and Ca(2+) as well as monovalent cations and contains a functional serine/thre

66 Kd approximately 1.6 mM) compared with other monovalent cations and relevant, considering lithium dos

67 lex structures made of stacked guanines with monovalent cations bound at a central cavity.

68 conducted primarily ( approximately 80%) by monovalent cations but not Ca(2+) .

69 ter membrane, whereas LPS in the presence of monovalent cations forms highly mobile negatively-charge

70 ity: (i) PFL-AE in the absence of any simple monovalent cations has little-no activity; and (ii) amon

71 proximal promoter (kit2) in the presence of monovalent cations K+ and Na+.

72 t metals such as Ca(2+), Mg(2+), and Zn(2+), monovalent cations often function as efficient and selec

73 ike many other TRP channels, is permeable to monovalent cations only.

74 channels in TAL: a cldn10b-based channel for monovalent cations such as Na(+) and a spatially distinc

75 ical standpoint is possible, particularly by monovalent cations such as NH4(+), or K(+).

76 By contrast, monovalent cations such as sodium and potassium mainly r

77 ference interaction site (3D-RISM) model for monovalent cations surrounding DNA and RNA helices, and

78 Selectivity against monovalent cations takes place via Mg(2+) binding at a h

79 The presence of a regulatory site for monovalent cations that affects the conformation of the

80 irst, we employed subsequent replacements of monovalent cations transiently captured within Syt1 Ca(2

81 h selectivity ratios of over 100 and conduct monovalent cations up to 5 times more rapidly than dival

82 ivalent cations are preferentially lost over monovalent cations upon A.C protonation, providing exper

83 been used to characterize the interaction of monovalent cations with 26-basepair DNA oligomers contai

84 markedly alters preferential interactions of monovalent cations with the B( *) conformation.

85 cy Mg(2+)-selective channel, fully excluding monovalent cations, and Ca(2+), whereas in absence of Mg

86 of cooperative association dependent on GTP, monovalent cations, and Mg(2+).

87 may or may not interact preferentially with monovalent cations, depending on the relative number of

88 crystallized in the presence of a variety of monovalent cations, including Na(+), Cs(+), and dimethyl

89 p to approximately 4-5 times compared to the monovalent cations.

90 ionally wide filter but is only permeable to monovalent cations; filter residue Gln973 is essential i

91 nd to HIV-infected target cells coupled to a monovalent CD3 binding arm designed to engage cytolytic

92 to a second distinct site on LRP1 to form a monovalent complex.

93 on, with affinities greatly exceeding either monovalent component.

94 ypes that were specific to each of the three monovalent components of the trivalent influenza vaccine

95 rimerization that depends on the presence of monovalent copper ions and the sulfhydryl group of Cys46

96 and characterized a series of water-soluble monovalent copper ligands, MCL-1, MCL-2, and MCL-3, that

97 o the vacuolar membrane and are activated by monovalent copper or silver ions and cysteine, showing d

98 functional profile that was unique from its monovalent counterpart providing evidence of the discret

99 Relative to their monovalent counterparts, where the sigma-hole is located

100 ng potency by 3- to 5-fold compared to their monovalent counterparts.

101 Moreover, monovalent CTxB does not stabilize membrane domains, unl

102 s of sera from recipients of live-attenuated monovalent DENV vaccine candidates revealed a strong cor

103 sed to primary DENV4 natural infections or a monovalent DENV4 vaccine were analyzed.

104 monovalent, divalent) and pH.

105 tions revealed significant differences among monovalent, divalent, and trivalent cation distributions

106 A systematic comparison of transport of monovalent electrolytes [potassium chloride (KCl), sodiu

107 For parameters that correspond to monovalent electrolytes in biologically and technologica

108 Monovalent engagement of the BCR with an epitope-bearing

109 was to determine the comparative activity of monovalent, engineered anti-Her2/neu immunotoxins fused

110 ese comparative studies demonstrate that the monovalent, engineered rGel/4D5 construct displayed comp

111 alf-life and absorption time compared to its monovalent equivalent.

112 ), Mg(2+)) being more influential than their monovalent equivalents (e.g., Na(+), K(+)).

113 se 3 clinical trials showed that inactivated monovalent EV-A71 vaccines manufactured in China were hi

114 amorphization of natrolites (PIA) containing monovalent extra-framework cations (EFC) Li(+), Na(+), K

115 e single-domain version of FC5; bivalent and monovalent FC5 fusions with Fc exhibited similar systemi

116 Serial passage of the monovalent FluMist 2009 H1N1 pandemic vaccine at increas

117 Animals immunized with a high-payload monovalent FMD vaccine developed high titers of neutrali

118 Here, we introduce a monovalent form of Strep-Tactin that harbours a unique b

119 Early studies showed that a monovalent formalin-inactivated HRV vaccine can be prote

120 n endothelial monolayer by 25% compared with monovalent fusion.

121 value as compared to the value obtained with monovalent Fynomer 2C1.

122 Botswana introduced monovalent G1P rotavirus vaccine (RV1) in July 2012, pro

123 that heterologous protection by the current monovalent G1P[8] HRV vaccine against emerging G9 strain

124 med active diarrhea surveillance to evaluate monovalent G1P[8] rotavirus vaccine (RV1) efficacy and u

125 We found that glycoprotein substrates and monovalent glycans containing Neu5Acalpha2-3Galbeta1-4Gl

126 nited States, we analyzed the association of monovalent H1N1 influenza vaccine (MIV) during pregnancy

127 We show that both monovalent hapten and recombinant SPE-7 IgE Fab inhibit

128 avidity for the target IgE compared with the monovalent hapten.

129 e of difficulty obtaining and delivering the monovalent HBV vaccine and the HBV immunoglobulin.

130 sed the immunogenicity and safety of a novel monovalent high-dose inactivated poliovirus type 2 vacci

131 We designed DARTs with a monovalent HIV-1 envelope-binding (Env-binding) arm that

132 , we generated a fusion protein comprising a monovalent human FcgammaRIIIA-specific antibody linked i

133 Monovalent human rotavirus vaccine (RV1) was added into

134 A monovalent human rotavirus vaccine (RV1) was introduced

135 We assessed the vaccine effectiveness of monovalent human rotavirus vaccine in preventing admissi

136 Monovalent human-bovine (116E) rotavirus vaccine is effe

137 to assess the efficacy and tolerability of a monovalent human-bovine rotavirus vaccine for severe rot

138 ole human Fc receptor with high affinity for monovalent IgG.

139 lpha-coated nanoparticles in comparison with monovalent IL-15:IL-15Ralpha.

140 tive antibody response in 75 recipients of a monovalent inactivated A/Shanghai/02/2013 H7N9 vaccine.

141 Vaccination in pregnancy with a monovalent inactivated AS03-adjuvanted split virion infl

142 ified the receipt of A(H1N1)pdm09-containing monovalent inactivated influenza vaccine (MIIV) and 2010

143 rain A/Indonesia/5/2005) followed by an H5N1 monovalent inactivated vaccine boost at 4, 8, 12, 16, or

144 , 16, or 24 weeks to that of 2 doses of H5N1 monovalent inactivated vaccine in adults.

145 double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of a monovalent influenza A H1N1 vaccine to establish the saf

146 0.22-6.63) per million doses for inactivated monovalent influenza vaccine (2 cases, 1,090,279 doses g

147 following receipt of seasonal and 2009 H1N1 monovalent influenza vaccines.

148 c (acetic, oxalic, succinic, or citric) acid/monovalent inorganic salt mixtures was assessed by measu

149 that stabilize the initial weak (micromolar) monovalent interaction.

150 On the other hand, monovalent interactions and antiviral activity are prese

151 are determined by several factors including monovalent ion composition and the precise sequence and

152 he substrate secondary structure or solution monovalent ion composition.

153 -nanomolar detection limit is expected for a monovalent ion.

154 Monovalent ions (chloride, bromide, and nitrate) are use

155 s reaction, although the rate is slower with monovalent ions alone.

156 imescales are remarkably slow for individual monovalent ions and could have important implications fo

157 residence times are described, both for the monovalent ions and for the hexahydrated Mg[(H2O)6](2+)

158 and seawater, both of which contain not only monovalent ions but also divalent ions.

159 including Ca(2+), inhibit the permeation of monovalent ions by directly blocking the TRPP2 channel p

160 Both divalent and monovalent ions can catalyze this reaction, although the

161 Our analysis shows that solvated monovalent ions permeate through the selectivity filter

162 ct closely and strongly with the RNA, unlike monovalent ions such as K(+), suggesting that an explici

163 the slower rate observed experimentally with monovalent ions, we hypothesize that the activation of t

164 permeability of the erythrocyte membrane to monovalent ions.

165 torage capacities compared to those that use monovalent ions.

166 e presence of divalent ions rather than only monovalent ions.

167 d (N-N: 1.111(6) A) that bridges between two monovalent (iPr2) TpCu fragments.

168 critical to gain access to this 14-electron, monovalent Ir intermediate.

169 es, mica, but not on silica surfaces nor for monovalent K(+) and Na(+) cations is driven by charge re

170 Monovalent ligand exhibited a binding affinity higher th

171 increased by up to 1500-fold compared to the monovalent ligand, while maintaining the selectivity for

172 As neither a mixture of monovalent ligands 9 + 10 nor bivalents 2-5 produced tol

173 ser' family, is notably more potent than the monovalent ligands and we show here that this apparently

174 a mixture of mu agonist and CCR5 antagonist monovalent ligands.

175 magnitude more potent than the corresponding monovalent ligands.

176 alphaIIbbeta3 binding to multivalent but not monovalent ligands.

177 hat define DNA-nanoparticles and compared to monovalent linker systems.

178 In contrast to monovalent lithium or sodium ions, the reversible insert

179 In contrast, monovalent LSTc does not bind influenza virus or inhibit

180 0-fold lower concentration than required for monovalent M2pep activity.

181 acrophage-selective toxicity not observed in monovalent M2pep treatment.

182 A monovalent MenA polysaccharide-tetanus toxoid conjugate

183 The monovalent meningococcal A conjugate vaccine (PsA-TT, Me

184 The phase II study GO27819 investigated the monovalent MET inhibitor onartuzumab plus bevacizumab (O

185 , the development of fluorescent sensors for monovalent metal ions, such as sodium (Na(+)), has remai

186 ecular dynamics simulations of macroions and monovalent microions that interact via Coulombic potenti

187 ii) conjugation with DNA and purification of monovalent MPNs, (iii) modular targeting of MPNs to cell

188 with multiple reactive bonds is to insert a monovalent N fragment (nitrene or nitrenoid) into a C-H

189 y evaluating the free energies for replacing monovalent Na(+) with H3O(+) in various model selectivit

190 ding aggregation kinetics in the presence of monovalent (Na(+)) and divalent cations (Ca(2+)) show th

191 -exchange metadynamics) to study and compare monovalent (Na(+), K(+)) ion permeation in the open-acti

192 The N-terminal-binding or class 1 monovalent nanobodies possessed potencies in the single-

193 Two classes of selective monovalent nanobodies were identified, and detailed epit

194 t, the extracellular loop-binding or class 2 monovalent nanobodies were of lower potency but were mor

195 avid binding by fusing multiple (different) monovalent Nanobody building blocks via linker sequences

196 ultivalent ureidopyrimidinone monomers and a monovalent naphthyridine molecule which acts as an end-c

197 s revealed that CB[7]6 is among the tightest monovalent non-covalent complexes ever reported in water

198 ty of the bivalent configuration against the monovalent one is controlled by c = h/p, where h is the

199 Against serotype 1, both monovalent OPV (median 32.1%, 95% CI 26.1-38.1) and biva

200 lso model the trade-offs of use vs nonuse of monovalent OPV (mOPV) for outbreak response considering

201 The interference caused by bivalent and monovalent OPV formulations, which will be increasingly

202 adesh, were randomized to receive 3 doses of monovalent OPV type 1 or bivalent OPV types 1 and 3 at e

203 -specific IgA were measured in stool after a monovalent OPV type 2 challenge at 18 weeks of age.

204 pe 2 and faecal shedding for 4 weeks after a monovalent OPV type 2 challenge at age 28 weeks.

205 ulovirus and administered intramuscularly as monovalent or bivalent vaccines with CpG and alum.

206 ivalent metal ions and the presence of other monovalent or divalent metal ions do not affect its dete

207 ations from study participants receiving the monovalent or tetravalent live attenuated DENV vaccine (

208 niomethyltrifluoroborate (AmBF3) to generate monovalent or trivalent enzyme inhibitors.

209 ontrolled study, adults were challenged with monovalent oral poliovirus type 1 vaccine (mOPV1) and su

210 Despite intensified use of monovalent oral poliovirus type 1 vaccine and improved c

211 hromycin on the immunogenicity of serotype-3 monovalent oral poliovirus vaccine given to healthy infa

212 nce daily for 3 days, followed by serotype-3 monovalent oral poliovirus vaccine on day 14.

213 e performed a randomized controlled trial of monovalent oral rotavirus vaccine (RV1).

214 esponses to trivalent seasonal influenza and monovalent pandemic H1N1 vaccination, we sequenced gene

215 FR104 is a monovalent pegylated Fab' Ab, antagonist of CD28, under

216 FR104 is a monovalent, PEGylated-humanized Fab' Ab fragment against

217 for Disease Control and Prevention-provided monovalent polyclonal botulinum antitoxins raised agains

218 kine platelet-derived growth factor) and two monovalent proteins (a Fab fragment and the transcriptio

219 orrelation forces play a central role in the monovalent Rb(+) distribution and a combination of ion-c

220 ceptin/rGel conjugate, and the corresponding monovalent recombinant immunotoxins in two orientations,

221 Monovalent recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus (rVSV)

222 assess the safety and immunogenicity of the monovalent, recombinant, chimpanzee adenovirus type-3 ve

223 and transcription factor-binding sites than monovalent regions.

224 sits for intussusception within 7 days after monovalent rotavirus vaccination from April 2008 through

225 We further compared the risk after monovalent rotavirus vaccination with the risk in a conc

226 onfirmed intussusception within 7 days after monovalent rotavirus vaccination, as compared with the r

227 ll increase in risk of intussusception after monovalent rotavirus vaccination.

228 During the study period, 207,955 doses of monovalent rotavirus vaccine (including 115,908 first do

229 rus vaccine (OPV) is known to interfere with monovalent rotavirus vaccine (RV1) immunogenicity.

230 and later schedule on the immunogenicity of monovalent rotavirus vaccine (RV1) in a developing count

231 among the first African nations to introduce monovalent rotavirus vaccine (RV1) into its childhood im

232 We sought to determine monovalent rotavirus vaccine cost-effectiveness in Malaw

233 A monovalent rotavirus vaccine remains effective against a

234 Togo introduced monovalent rotavirus vaccine starting 19 June 2014.

235 ion after the administration of two doses of monovalent rotavirus vaccine was estimated to be 5.3 per

236 In Bolivia, monovalent rotavirus vaccine was introduced in 2008 and

237 The monovalent rotavirus vaccine was introduced in Tanzania

238 Monovalent rotavirus vaccine was introduced in the routi

239 of intussusception among children receiving monovalent rotavirus vaccine with historical background

240 icensure study of more than 200,000 doses of monovalent rotavirus vaccine, we observed a significant

241 ntirotavirus antibodies on immunogenicity of monovalent RV vaccine (RV1).

242 Concerns exist about whether monovalent (RV1) and pentavalent (RV5) rotavirus vaccine

243 ainst rotavirus in Guatemala, where both the monovalent (RV1; 2-dose series) and pentavalent (RV5; 3-

244 e seek to determine the crystal structure of monovalent SA at 1.7-A resolution.

245 The structural information of monovalent SA will be valuable for its applications acro

246 A SA variant, monovalent SA, was developed with a single and high affi

247 For low-to-moderate concentrations of monovalent salt (up to approximately 150 mM), our result

248 High concentrations of monovalent salt can induce the solubilization or crystal

249 otonic dependence of the binding affinity on monovalent salt concentration in the presence of force.

250 unfolding is a nonmonotonic function of the monovalent salt concentration of the solution, contrary

251 e-stranded DNA as a function of sequence and monovalent salt concentration to examine the effects of

252 K over a range of mechanical forces (fs) and monovalent salt concentrations (Cs).

253 ations in the electrolyte, NPs pairs at high monovalent salt concentrations interact via remarkably s

254 d or unoriented long-fragment DNA bundles in monovalent salt solutions as first order, with a small b

255 ow the two melting processes at 5 mM and 1 M monovalent salt.

256 The phase transition occurs as monovalent salts are used to modify the ionic strength f

257 effect of trehalose to alter the activity of monovalent salts in aqueous solution.

258 lates the phase diagram of DNA solutions for monovalent salts to that for polyvalent salts and sheds

259 Using a series of monovalent salts, we find, surprisingly, that the extent

260 own to bind selectively to the dockerin of a monovalent scaffoldin (ScaG), thus enabling formation of

261 nzymes either directly or through additional monovalent scaffoldins (ScaC and ScaD).

262 Most viroporins are monovalent selective cation channels, with few showing t

263 fouling strategies, together with the use of monovalent selective membranes, is recommended to mainta

264 Monovalent-selective Neosepta CMS is known to block diva

265 lter residue Gln973 is essential in defining monovalent selectivity.

266 ty filter may be an important determinant of monovalent selectivity.

267 Monovalent shells have a single radial defect, which is

268 implementation of the method in the case of monovalent (single binding site) Pproxy and monovalent a

269 Surprisingly, monovalent sodium or ammonium ions, positioned in the pr

270 on on MWCNTs through bridging effects, while monovalent sodium reduced SRHA adsorption.

271 The additional cation used was either monovalent (sodium) or divalent (M(2+)).

272 and green fluorescent protein, we show that monovalent Strep-Tactin is generally applicable to prote

273 We expect monovalent Strep-Tactin to be a reliable anchoring tool

274 of the interaction between Strep-tag II and monovalent Strep-Tactin were characterized.

275 te tag proved a more powerful way to isolate monovalent streptavidin, for ultra-stable labeling witho

276 play equal enzymatic activities on a soluble monovalent substrate and similar substrate specificities

277 responses of human subjects vaccinated with monovalent subunit A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccine.

278 g hemagglutination inhibition (HI) data with monovalent swine antisera and antigenic cartography to e

279 Glycoconjugates containing stable, monovalent synthetic oligosaccharide analogs of ST-5 CPS

280 ith the binding of one (multivalent) or two (monovalent) target molecules to these elements opens the

281 se events and have reasoned that designing a monovalent targeting strategy could circumvent the infla

282 Tumor uptake was 2-fold higher for monovalent tracers ( approximately 0.60 percentage injec

283 This is the first monovalent transition metal dependent RNA-cleaving DNAzy

284 had received a median of 3 bOPV doses and 2 monovalent type 1 OPV (mOPV1) doses through campaigns an

285 The provision of several doses of monovalent type 1 oral poliovirus vaccine (mOPV1) and bi

286 roprojection array, the Nanopatch, delivered monovalent type 2 IPV (IPV2) vaccine to the skin.

287 all infants were challenged with one dose of monovalent type 2 OPV (mOPV2).

288 After April 2016, monovalent type 2 OPV will be available for type 2 outbr

289 valent OPV (bOPV) and IPV and challenge with monovalent type 2 OPV, and stools samples were collected

290 on after a polio vaccination campaign with a monovalent type 2 oral polio vaccine (mOPV2).

291 Infants in all groups were challenged with monovalent type 2 vaccine (mOPV2) at 18 weeks (groups 1,

292 We assessed the immunogenicity of monovalent type-1 oral poliovirus vaccine (mOPV1) given

293 structural (NS) proteins were observed after monovalent vaccination, T cell responses following tetra

294 Monovalent vaccine administered between October 2009 and

295 for H1N1; VE was 73% (61-81; I(2)=31.4) for monovalent vaccine against H1N1pdm09.

296 , a pentavalent vaccine) and Rotarix (RV1, a monovalent vaccine).

297 mmunization with DENV1-4 VLPs as individual, monovalent vaccines elicited strong neutralization activ

298 rum antibodies recognized both the H1 and H3 monovalent vaccines.

299 MRV (MMRV group), or (2) MMR at dose one and monovalent varicella vaccine at dose two (MMR+V group),

300 Immunisation is possible with monovalent varicella vaccine or a combined measles-mumps