戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 r originally was self-interest, not anything moral.
2 ersiveness (Which feels worse?), and overall moral acceptability.
3 esults support a disparity between simulated moral action and moral judgment.
4 on provides a better assessment of simulated moral action, and illustrates the embodied nature of mor
5 ologies allow the investigation of simulated moral actions in visually immersive environments.
6 perceivers derive character information from moral acts.
7  such as ACP, also function intentionally as moral agents through well-designed efforts to advocate f
8                                Evidence from moral and developmental psychology indicates that decisi
9 complex, multiscalar phenomenon with immense moral and economic costs.
10 eviously associated with these areas include moral and emotional conflict regulation, decision making
11  recipient and donor candidates; address the moral and ethical issues surrounding the procedure; outl
12 er in the likelihood or quality of committed moral and immoral acts.
13 igating circumstances play a central role in moral and legal assessments in large-scale industrialize
14 us to achieve and sustain the United Nations moral and legal mandate for child health and full develo
15 on of moral emotion is key for the spread of moral and political ideas in online social networks, a p
16 ffer insights into how people are exposed to moral and political ideas through social networks, thus
17 ieved to play a crucial role in adherence to moral and social norms, but the mechanisms by which guil
18 iry have been shown to be concerned with the moral and social ramifications of their scientific endea
19 nce that is being debated and the political, moral, and legal implications that come with its societa
20 ically assess this phenomenon, from a legal, moral, and practical perspective, and to offer some reco
21                   Although these features of moral assessment are widely assumed to be universal, to
22  the cost-to-benefit ratio of cooperation or moral assessment rules (social norms).
23 n between disgust and specific political and moral attitudes; the second concerns the observation tha
24 emselves, we probed the relationship between moral behavior and neural representations of profit and
25 oles of serotonin and dopamine in modulating moral behavior have implications for potential treatment
26                         The findings suggest moral behavior in our task is linked to a neural devalua
27                                Why does past moral behavior sometimes lead people to do more of the s
28 ature in four domains - attitudes, emotions, moral behavior, and self-regulation - showing that group
29 vents occur to punish or reward individuals' moral behavior.
30 explanation of the rationale behind people's moral behavior.
31 odels of how they compete for the control of moral behavior.
32  know little about how such principles guide moral behavior.
33 rsonality disorder characterised by atypical moral behaviour likely rooted in atypical affective/moti
34  theory to expand the understanding of early moral behaviours.
35                            What makes humans moral beings?
36                        When do humans become moral beings?
37 ined by changes in material self-interest or moral beliefs and was dissociated from participants' imp
38 ons (accommodation states where religious or moral beliefs must be taken into consideration when decl
39 social science theory saw the enforcement of moral boundaries as a critical way by which group member
40 rcement, highlighting how the enforcement of moral boundaries offers an efficient solution to coopera
41   For individuals, integrity is an aspect of moral character and experience.
42  in behavior, and often exhibit questionable moral character.
43 ison act, yet as a clearer indicator of poor moral character.
44                                              Moral choice appears to be the product of a contract bec
45              Anecdotally, digressions from a moral code are often described as a series of small brea
46                                              Moral cognition engages brain networks supporting mental
47               We conclude that even abstract moral cognition is partly constituted by interactions wi
48                        A decisive element of moral cognition is the detection of harm and its assessm
49 then argued that this salient feature of our moral cognition represents a profound puzzle for evoluti
50 ion casts light on the fundamental nature of moral cognition, including its underpinnings in general
51  advertise our externalization of particular moral commitments generates features of our social inter
52 uralism gives us additional insight into how moral communities become cohesive and why this can be pr
53 quired for the acquisition and maturation of moral competency are not well understood.
54 strate for the acquisition and maturation of moral competency that goes beyond self-interest to consi
55 ing less risk while broadening the circle of moral concern), (ii) the intensifying and market-orienta
56 esearch and its importance and by addressing moral concerns and objections.
57 emand by regulatory agencies, and ethical or moral concerns.
58 which make one a desirable partner may drive moral conduct.
59 to show that MSM's actions were motivated by moral considerations, even when those choices posed HIV
60  We organize the literature on moderators of moral consistency versus licensing effects using five co
61 of daily dynamics revealed evidence for both moral contagion and moral licensing.
62                   Furthermore, we found that moral contagion was bounded by group membership; moral-e
63 n online social networks, a process we call "moral contagion." Using a large sample of social media c
64 vide insights into the processes involved in moral decision making and highlight the complementary ro
65  new insights into the processes involved in moral decision making and highlight the complementary ro
66 ion has implications for understanding human moral decision making and its disturbance in antisocial
67                                      Complex moral decision making is associated with the ventromedia
68 amage have a strikingly opposite approach to moral decision making than vmPFC-lesioned patients.
69 tic and hyperaltruistic tendencies influence moral decision making, we investigated trade-off decisio
70  and have decreased emotional arousal during moral decision making.
71 rn for the suffering of others is central to moral decision making.
72 h an engagement of deliberative processes in moral decision making.
73 ed with attribution of intentionality during moral decision-making in DG (especially regarding intent
74 ntional inference task, which assesses rapid moral decision-making regarding intentional or unintenti
75                                              Moral decisions also modulated functional connectivity b
76       By contrast, control participants made moral decisions based on the integration of an adverse e
77 the algorithms that will help AVs make these moral decisions is a formidable challenge.
78 ve bilateral hippocampal damage would derive moral decisions on a classic moral dilemmas paradigm.
79 -damaged patients and they stated that their moral decisions were based on emotional instinct.
80 eir eyes the experimenter can change complex moral decisions.
81 thesis, showing why the status we ascribe to moral demands and considerations exhibits the otherwise
82 inctive tendency to objectify or externalize moral demands, and it is then argued that this salient f
83      These results shed light on theories of moral development by documenting the respective contribu
84 mportance of the social environment in early moral development, supporting a prefrontal maturation mo
85 ond self-interest is a fundamental aspect of moral development.
86 ctive neural system early in life interrupts moral development.
87 surrogate, and (4) institutions promote open moral dialogue and foster a culture that respects divers
88 ow the human brain is engaged when viewing a moral dilemma between genetic vs. non-genetic sisters.
89  Disgust Scale and the most commonly used 12 moral dilemmas measuring utilitarian/deontological prefe
90 ge would derive moral decisions on a classic moral dilemmas paradigm.
91 healthy subjects deliberate about 'personal' moral dilemmas, patients with Alzheimer's disease give n
92    Participants undergoing fMRI responded to moral dilemmas, separately evaluating options for their
93  conservatives emphasized somewhat different moral dimensions.
94 is a valid and reliable instrument to assess moral distress among critical care clinicians and develo
95 the effects of five independent variables on moral distress and moral voice: (a) frequency of ethical
96 ers, cultural sensitivity and communication, moral distress and self-limitations, self-reflection and
97 are, and critical care nurses can experience moral distress as they struggle to think about patients
98 ly, and nearly half reported they experience moral distress at least several times a month.
99 atients and families, however, they suffered moral distress because of self-limitation, lack of knowl
100 al units might be susceptible to unmitigated moral distress because they report less engagement in co
101                    Although the existence of moral distress has been observed by scholars for decades
102                       Most of the studies on moral distress have used the Moral Distress Scale or its
103 ectives were to determine the key sources of moral distress in diverse critical care professionals an
104                                              Moral distress is a common experience among critical car
105 ication gaps are likely to occur at critical moral distress junctures.
106      This study identified the ways in which moral distress manifests across critical care discipline
107 s support moderated the moral efficacy-voice-moral distress relationship such that when organizationa
108  the studies on moral distress have used the Moral Distress Scale or its revised version (Moral Distr
109 ms to explore the factorial structure of the Moral Distress Scale-Revised and develop a valid and rel
110                                  The Italian Moral Distress Scale-Revised evinces good reliability (a
111 factor analysis was conducted to explore the Moral Distress Scale-Revised factorial structure.
112                                  The Italian Moral Distress Scale-Revised is a valid and reliable ins
113                                  The Italian Moral Distress Scale-Revised is composed of 14 items ref
114                                          The Moral Distress Scale-Revised was translated into Italian
115 Moral Distress Scale or its revised version (Moral Distress Scale-Revised).
116 No significant differences were found in the moral distress total score between physicians and nurses
117 ow, moral efficacy was negatively related to moral distress via voice.
118                                              Moral distress was higher for those clinicians consideri
119  the relationship between moral efficacy and moral distress, and partially mediated the relationship
120 's health care organizations and may lead to moral distress, which is often associated with physical
121 ed care"), providers ("increased workload," "moral distress," and "burnout"), and the health system (
122 h appears to give rise to voice, and reduced moral distress.
123  issues and organizational ethics support on moral distress.
124 d intrapersonal variables that may influence moral distress.
125 embers of the ICU team reported experiencing moral distress.
126 tuations where intrateam discordance creates moral distress: 1) situations involving initiation or ma
127 ely adequate account of the structure of the moral domain as a precondition for understanding the evo
128 oice fully mediated the relationship between moral efficacy and moral distress, and partially mediate
129 ch that when organizational support was low, moral efficacy was negatively related to moral distress
130 ganizations may wish to help improve nurses' moral efficacy, which appears to give rise to voice, and
131  organizational ethics support moderated the moral efficacy-voice-moral distress relationship such th
132 uency of ethical dilemmas and conflicts; (b) moral efficacy; (c) ethics communication; (d) ethical en
133                                   Guilt is a moral emotion believed to play a crucial role in adheren
134         Here, we show that the expression of moral emotion is key for the spread of moral and politic
135 mpt is typically studied as a uniquely human moral emotion.
136 l contagion was bounded by group membership; moral-emotional language increased diffusion more strong
137 = 563,312), we observed that the presence of moral-emotional words in messages increased their diffus
138 ltruism, cooperation, trust, and the related moral emotions--has matured enough to produce general sc
139 with the protocol and in compliance with the moral, ethical, and scientific principles governing clin
140 s accumulating evidence for early social and moral evaluation as shown by research with infants and c
141 time, the temporal neurodynamics of implicit moral evaluation in 3- to 5-year-old children.
142 ence--critical components of mentalizing and moral evaluation.
143 ondition, suggesting that these two types of moral evaluations are neurobiologically dissociable.
144 xtends to norms that are commonly considered moral even though they are distinct from fairness.
145 ents, dynamics, and consequences of everyday moral experience.
146                                              Moral experiences were surprisingly frequent and manifol
147  measure DLPFC/TPJ activity recruited during moral flexibility, and examined its effect on other doma
148 ere in which this happened, and the possible morals for modern times.
149 Model Of Recurrence After Liver transplant" (MORAL) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
150                       It did not explain the moral force of the taboo.
151 sequences for ourselves and others forms the moral foundation of our society.
152 ontrast this with the framework of Universal Moral Grammar, which has sought a descriptively adequate
153         The highest risk patients in the Pre-MORAL had a 5-year RFS of 17.9% compared with 98.6% for
154  monopoly, monopsony, adverse selection, and moral hazard, to central features of U.S. health care.
155           The ethical concerns relate to the moral hazards involved in the modification of human soci
156 ot reflect the complexity of domain-specific moral heuristics.
157 nce of emotion in the social transmission of moral ideas and also demonstrate the utility of social n
158 works to investigate processes by which some moral ideas spread more rapidly or broadly than others.
159 luded the unequal worth of human beings, the moral imperative of preserving a pure Aryan people, the
160                                          The moral imperative to honor their collective sacrifice is
161                               I focus on the moral implications of this discrimination and on the pos
162 ccess to medical services and protecting the moral integrity of clinicians.
163 a "shield" to protect individual clinicians' moral integrity rather than as a "sword" to impose clini
164  by groups with homogeneous backgrounds, and moral issues about fairness.
165 l of post-conventional moral reasoning judge moral issues based on deeper principles and shared ideal
166 en when they are reasoning about high-level, moral issues.
167 esult in an abnormally egocentric pattern of moral judgement.
168                             Learning to make moral judgements based on considerations beyond self-int
169                                              Moral judgements regarding the function of the aggressio
170  associated with the ability to make complex moral judgements.
171 ttern to those with vmPFC damage when making moral judgements.
172  Contrary to Greene's dual-process theory of moral judgment (Greene 2013), this commentary suggests t
173 emotional disgust and disgust sensitivity in moral judgment and decision-making has been debated inte
174  support psychological processes involved in moral judgment and mental-state reasoning.
175                            After making this moral judgment correctly, they were asked to play with t
176                      In addition, members of moral judgment groups subsequently showed more interpers
177   We note that though the role of disgust in moral judgment has been questioned recently, few studies
178                      This study investigated moral judgment in children with high-functioning autism
179 y the perceived suffering of a victim colors moral judgment of an accidental harmdoer.
180  Significance statement: Popular accounts of moral judgment often describe it as a battle for control
181                                              Moral judgment often requires making difficult tradeoffs
182 s of high-level judgments: causal reasoning, moral judgment, language comprehension, and more.
183 patible with the person-centered approach to moral judgment, which emphasizes the adaptive manner in
184 tween automatic and controlled influences on moral judgment, which is subserved by distinct neural st
185 norms rather than inherent features of human moral judgment.
186 , or how they are integrated into an overall moral judgment.
187 nd ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) to moral judgment.
188  contributions of intentions and outcomes in moral judgment.
189 or prosocial and antisocial behavior and for moral judgment.
190 rating intention and outcome information for moral judgment.
191 disparity between simulated moral action and moral judgment.
192  experiment, groups whose members could make moral judgments achieved greater cooperation than groups
193 lly accepted that religion contours people's moral judgments and prosocial behavior, the relation bet
194  the brain's frontostriatal reward system in moral judgments and prosocial behaviors.
195 t potential actions, and then make difficult moral judgments constructed from combinations of these a
196 personal expression of positive and negative moral judgments encourages cooperation in groups and pro
197 other's self-interest and build cooperation, moral judgments have most often been studied as processe
198                       This work compared the moral judgments of these patient groups using a task des
199                                       Mature moral judgments rely both on a perpetrator's intent to c
200                                       Mature moral judgments rely on the consideration of a perpetrat
201                                     Instead, moral judgments resembled the architecture of simple eco
202  such as regret and relief, and they support moral judgments such as blame.
203 rmfulness information for different types of moral judgments, and individual differences in the exten
204 d that both HFA and TD children made correct moral judgments, and that HFA children might even have m
205 tent information is neurally represented for moral judgments, but few studies have investigated wheth
206                      During such integrative moral judgments, the vmPFC is preferentially engaged rel
207  to traditional questionnaire assessments of moral judgments.
208 ntent and mitigating circumstances influence moral judgments.
209 natomical basis of individual differences in moral judgments.
210            Here, we examine such integrative moral judgments.
211 ed outcomes to yield "all things considered" moral judgments.
212 pattern predict differences in participants' moral judgments.
213 rmfulness information determined severity of moral judgments.
214 n neuroanatomy can also explain variation in moral judgments.
215               Do free will beliefs influence moral judgments?
216 e discuss the current result in terms of the moral, laws, rules and regulations in a society, e.g., c
217 vealed evidence for both moral contagion and moral licensing.
218 ch emotions should play the main role in our moral lives: morality should be more closely linked to "
219 ments to the target article: (1) The leftist moral narrative may be based on zero-sum competition amo
220 ich an agent is herself motivated by a given moral norm and the extent to which she uses conformity t
221  leads individuals to endorse more stringent moral norms and exhibit more morally normative behavior.
222 nsiders the enforcement and establishment of moral norms, the interpersonal comparison of welfare, an
223       This commentary asserts that we have a moral obligation to translate our success in reducing lu
224 dy everyday morality, we repeatedly assessed moral or immoral acts and experiences in a large (N = 12
225                          Being the target of moral or immoral deeds had the strongest impact on happi
226 gest impact on happiness, whereas committing moral or immoral deeds had the strongest impact on sense
227 , and realistic human sculptures, to enhance moral paradigms that are often contextually impoverished
228 licy is perhaps one of the most rational and moral paths for a sustainable future of the human race a
229 ch to perception and use our own research on moral perception as a "case study of case studies" to ex
230                                       From a moral perspective, we evaluate the various arguments use
231 tructure proposed by John Rawls, the leading moral philosopher of the last century.
232   The Foundation will include a committee on moral philosophy that will accompany and supervise biome
233                                              Moral philosophy, however, can handle contemporary biome
234 s diseases, while respecting the precepts of moral philosophy.
235  media communications about three polarizing moral/political issues (n = 563,312), we observed that t
236  of the patient; (D) imagining and acting on moral possibilities for end of life care; and (E) facili
237                                              Moral preferences correlated with neural responses to pr
238  to profit, where participants with stronger moral preferences had lower dorsal striatal responses to
239                  Most participants displayed moral preferences, placing a higher cost on harming othe
240 isgust is associated with more deontological moral preferences.
241  especially evident in popular attachment to moral presumptions of individual responsibility and voli
242                                          The moral principle guiding intersubject trade-off decision
243                The reason is partly that the moral principles that actually govern our day-to-day beh
244 edical care in both its aims and its guiding moral principles.
245                                              Moral, professional, sociocultural and societal vulnerab
246                                     However, moral psychology has yet to incorporate the study of soc
247                                     Existing moral psychology research commonly explains certain phen
248  puzzle for evolutionary approaches to human moral psychology that existing proposals do not help to
249 ng a two-alternative forced-choice task with moral questions.
250 mplex nature of both the is-ought tension in moral reasoning and moral reasoning per se, and (b) does
251 ize network interactions underlying abnormal moral reasoning in frontotemporal dementia, which may se
252 gs suggest that high-level post-conventional moral reasoning is associated with increased activity in
253                                              Moral reasoning is impaired in both conditions but there
254 reach the highest level of post-conventional moral reasoning judge moral issues based on deeper princ
255          However, it remains unknown whether moral reasoning level is associated with differences in
256 een activation- and patient-based studies of moral reasoning might reflect a modulatory role for the
257  the is-ought tension in moral reasoning and moral reasoning per se, and (b) does not reflect the com
258 at donors often make their decision based on moral reasoning rather than balancing risks and benefits
259 ication, nominal realism, is-ought errors in moral reasoning).
260 y different implications for dehumanization, moral reasoning, and other important social phenomena.
261 e pre-conventional and conventional level of moral reasoning, post-conventional individuals showed in
262                  People vary considerably in moral reasoning.
263 e network to the default mode network during moral reasoning.
264 reviously proposed 'dual-process' account of moral reasoning.
265 le of 64 participants at different levels of moral reasoning.
266 ationist narrative and to a careless form of moral relativism to which many scholars adhere.
267                    They name specialization, moral responsibility, and efficiency as vital components
268  improve performance through specialization, moral responsibility, and efficiency.
269 e implications of the Selfish Goal model for moral responsibility, arguing it suggests a form of skep
270 lf-interested actions that involved breaking moral rules or physically harming others in order to ben
271           In response to simple hypothetical moral scenarios, the patients were more likely than comp
272                                          The MORAL score provides a simple, highly accurate tool for
273                                      The Pre-MORAL score was constructed from the hazard ratios and a
274      Hypotheses include inequity aversion, a moral sense that inequality is intrinsically unfair, and
275 e argue that infants and toddlers possess a "moral sense" based on core knowledge of the social world
276 dy examined neural responses associated with moral sensitivity in adolescents with a background of ea
277 he neural underpinnings of and precursors to moral sensitivity in infants and toddlers (n = 73, ages
278                         When facing opposing moral sentiments-to be honest vs. to join forces in coll
279 orate realistic haptic feedback into virtual moral simulations.
280  may help prevent future confusion about the moral status of complex models of human development.
281 arch raise thorny ethical concerns about the moral status of such chimeric animals.
282 r than merely condemning them with an air of moral superiority.
283 t be an apt account of some societies, other moral systems might be needed among certain groups and c
284                                              Moral systems universally prohibit harming others for pe
285 he anticipation of guilt regarding potential moral transgressions and advance our understanding of th
286 of guilt about committing potential everyday moral transgressions, and tested the extent to which the
287 e combination of consequential legitimacy (a moral understanding of outcomes) and comprehensibility l
288 ex where they are integrated into an overall moral value judgment.
289                                      Overall moral value judgments were represented in an anterior po
290 ontal cortex for integration into an overall moral value signal.
291  process that constructs belief in objective moral value.
292 We discuss how relational values differ from moral values and raise the issue of their ontogeny from
293 e Nazi Party and imparted Nazi political and moral values in their teaching.
294 tutes an argument for a science of objective moral values.
295 trast, dehumanization does not contribute to moral violence because morally motivated perpetrators wi
296 letely human-increases instrumental, but not moral, violence.
297  independent variables on moral distress and moral voice: (a) frequency of ethical dilemmas and confl
298                                     The post-MORAL was constructed similarly using the 4 postoperativ
299                            The pre- and post-MORAL were superior to Milan at predicting recurrence wi
300  then combined the scores to produce a combo-MORAL, with a c-statistic of 0.91 for predicting recurre

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top